Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
RMD Open ; 10(1)2024 Jan 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38296307

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, possibly due to a chronic inflammatory state. OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study was to investigate the difference in vascular inflammation, measured with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT), in PsA patients and controls. We conducted a secondary analysis to assess the association between clinical parameters of disease activity with vascular inflammation in PsA. METHODS: We included a total of 75 PsA patients with active peripheral arthritis (defined as ≥2 tender and swollen joints) from an ongoing clinical trial (EudraCT 2017-003900-28) and a retrospective group of 40 controls diagnosed with melanoma, without distant metastases and not receiving immunotherapy. The main outcome measure was aortic vascular inflammation which was measured on PET/CT scans using target-to-background ratios. Clinical disease activity in PsA was assessed with joint counts, body surface area and the Disease Activity index for PsA. Laboratory assessments included C reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. RESULTS: Vascular inflammation was increased in patients with PsA in comparison with controls (mean target-to-background ratio for entire aorta, respectively, 1.63±0.17 vs 1.49±0.16; p=<0.001). This association remained significant after correction for gender, age, body mass index, mean arterial pressure and aortic calcification (p=0.002). Vascular inflammation was not associated with disease-related parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic vascular inflammation was significantly increased in patients with active PsA compared with controls. This evidence supports the theory that inflammation in PsA is not limited to the skin and joints but also involves the vascular system.


Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica , Humanos , Artrite Psoriásica/complicações , Artrite Psoriásica/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inflamação , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons
2.
BMJ Open ; 12(10): e064338, 2022 10 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36216430

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic, inflammatory, musculoskeletal disease that affects up to 30% of patients with psoriasis. Current challenges in clinical care and research include personalised treatment, understanding the divergence of therapy response and unravelling the multifactorial pathophysiology of this complex disease. Moreover, there is an urgent clinical need to predict, assess and understand the cellular and molecular pathways underlying the response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The TOFA-PREDICT clinical trial addresses this need. Our primary objective is to determine key immunological factors predicting tofacitinib efficacy and drug-free remission in PsA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this investigator-initiated, phase III, multicentre, open-label, four-arm randomised controlled trial, we plan to integrate clinical, molecular and imaging parameters of 160 patients with PsA. DMARD-naïve patients are randomised to methotrexate or tofacitinib. Additionally, patients who are non-responsive to conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs continue their current csDMARD and are randomised to etanercept or tofacitinib. This results in four arms each with 40 patients. Patients are followed for 1 year. Treatment response is defined as minimal disease activity at week 16. Clinical data, biosamples and images are collected at baseline, 4 weeks and 16 weeks; at treatment failure (treatment switch) and 52 weeks. For the first 80 patients, we will use a systems medicine approach to assess multiomics biomarkers and develop a prediction model for treatment response. Subsequently, data from the second 80 patients will be used for validation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee in Utrecht, Netherlands, is registered in the European Clinical Trials Database and is carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study's progress is monitored by Julius Clinical, a science-driven contract research organisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT: 2017-003900-28.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Artrite Psoriásica , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Biomarcadores , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Etanercepte/uso terapêutico , Furanos , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Piperidinas/uso terapêutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Trials ; 23(1): 494, 2022 Jun 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35710576

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but are expensive and increase the risk of infection. Therefore, in patients with a stable low level of disease activity or remission, tapering bDMARDs should be considered. Although tapering does not seem to affect long-term disease control, (short-lived) flares are frequent during the tapering process. We have previously developed and externally validated a dynamic flare prediction model for use as a decision aid during stepwise tapering of bDMARDs to reduce the risk of a flare during this process. METHODS: In this investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized (1:1) controlled trial, we will assess the effect of incorporating flare risk predictions into a bDMARD tapering strategy. One hundred sixty RA patients treated with a bDMARD with stable low disease activity will be recruited. In the control group, the bDMARD will be tapered according to "disease activity guided dose optimization" (DGDO). In the intervention group, the bDMARD will be tapered according to a strategy that combines DGDO with the dynamic flare prediction model, where the next bDMARD tapering step is not taken in case of a high risk of flare. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to the control or intervention group. The primary outcome is the number of flares per patient (DAS28-CRP increase > 1.2, or DAS28-CRP increase > 0.6 with a current DAS28-CRP ≥ 2.9) during the 18-month follow-up period. Secondary outcomes include the number of patients with a major flare (flare duration ≥ 12 weeks), bDMARD dose reduction, adverse events, disease activity (DAS28-CRP) and patient-reported outcomes such as quality of life and functional disability. Health Care Utilization and Work Productivity will also be assessed. DISCUSSION: This will be the first clinical trial to evaluate the benefit of applying a dynamic flare prediction model as a decision aid during bDMARD tapering. Reducing the risk of flaring during tapering may enhance the safety and (cost)effectiveness of bDMARD treatment. Furthermore, this study pioneers the field of implementing predictive algorithms in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register number NL9798, registered 18 October 2021, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/9798 . The study has received ethical review board approval (number NL74537.041.20).


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Artrite Reumatoide , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa
5.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 149(1): 432-439.e4, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34048852

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A novel autoinflammatory syndrome was recently described in male patients who harbored somatic mutations in the X-chromosomal UBA1 gene. These patients were characterized by adult-onset, treatment-refractory inflammation with fever, cytopenia, dysplastic bone marrow, vacuoles in myeloid and erythroid progenitor cells, cutaneous and pulmonary inflammation, chondritis, and vasculitis, which is abbreviated as VEXAS. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (retrospectively) diagnose VEXAS in patients who had previously been registered as having unclassified autoinflammation. We furthermore aimed to describe clinical experiences with this multifaceted, complex disease. METHODS: A systematic reanalysis of whole-exome sequencing data from a cohort of undiagnosed patients with autoinflammation from academic hospitals in The Netherlands was performed. When no sequencing data were available, targeted Sanger sequencing was applied in cases with high clinical suspicion of VEXAS. RESULTS: A total of 12 male patients who carried mutations in UBA1 were identified. These patients presented with adult-onset (mean age 67 years, range 47-79 years) autoinflammation with systemic symptoms, elevated inflammatory parameters, and multiorgan involvement, most typically involving the skin and bone marrow. Novel features of VEXAS included interstitial nephritis, cardiac involvement, stroke, and intestinal perforation related to treatment with tocilizumab. Although many types of treatment were initiated, most patients became treatment-refractory, with a high mortality rate of 50%. CONCLUSION: VEXAS should be considered in the differential diagnosis of males with adult-onset autoinflammation characterized by systemic symptoms and multiorgan involvement. Early diagnosis can prevent unnecessary diagnostic procedures and provide better prognostic information and more suitable treatment options, including stem cell transplantation.


Assuntos
Doenças Hereditárias Autoinflamatórias/genética , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/genética , Dermatopatias Genéticas/genética , Enzimas Ativadoras de Ubiquitina/genética , Adulto , Idade de Início , Idoso , Doenças Hereditárias Autoinflamatórias/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mutação , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/diagnóstico , Países Baixos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dermatopatias Genéticas/diagnóstico
6.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 79(1): 39-52, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31413005

RESUMO

To update the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for vaccination in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) published in 2011. Four systematic literature reviews were performed regarding the incidence/prevalence of vaccine-preventable infections among patients with AIIRD; efficacy, immunogenicity and safety of vaccines; effect of anti-rheumatic drugs on the response to vaccines; effect of vaccination of household of AIIRDs patients. Subsequently, recommendations were formulated based on the evidence and expert opinion. The updated recommendations comprise six overarching principles and nine recommendations. The former address the need for an annual vaccination status assessment, shared decision-making and timing of vaccination, favouring vaccination during quiescent disease, preferably prior to the initiation of immunosuppression. Non-live vaccines can be safely provided to AIIRD patients regardless of underlying therapy, whereas live-attenuated vaccines may be considered with caution. Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination should be strongly considered for the majority of patients with AIIRD. Tetanus toxoid and human papilloma virus vaccination should be provided to AIIRD patients as recommended for the general population. Hepatitis A, hepatitis B and herpes zoster vaccination should be administered to AIIRD patients at risk. Immunocompetent household members of patients with AIIRD should receive vaccines according to national guidelines, except for the oral poliomyelitis vaccine. Live-attenuated vaccines should be avoided during the first 6 months of life in newborns of mothers treated with biologics during the second half of pregnancy. These 2019 EULAR recommendations provide an up-to-date guidance on the management of vaccinations in patients with AIIRD.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Doenças Autoimunes/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Doenças Reumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Vacinas/uso terapêutico , Viroses/prevenção & controle , Características da Família , Hepatite A/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Hepatite A/uso terapêutico , Hepatite B/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/uso terapêutico , Herpes Zoster/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/uso terapêutico , Tétano/prevenção & controle , Toxoide Tetânico/uso terapêutico , Vacinas Atenuadas/uso terapêutico
7.
RMD Open ; 5(2): e001041, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31673420

RESUMO

Objectives: The aims of this study were to update the evidence on the incidence and prevalence rates of vaccine preventable infections (VPI) in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) and compare the data to the general population when available. Methods: A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase and Cochrane library (October 2009 to August 2018). The primary outcome was the incidence or prevalence of VPI in the adult AIIRD population. Meta-analysis was performed when appropriate. Results: Sixty-three publications out of 3876 identified records met the inclusion criteria: influenza (n=4), pneumococcal disease (n=7), hepatitis B (n=10), herpes zoster (HZ) (n=29), human papillomavirus (HPV) infection (n=13). An increased incidence of influenza and pneumococcal disease was reported in patients with AIIRD. HZ infection-pooled incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 2.9 (95% CI 2.4 to 3.3) in patients with AIIRD versus general population. Among AIIRD, inflammatory myositis conferred the highest incidence rate (IR) of HZ (pooled IRR 5.1, 95% CI 4.3 to 5.9), followed by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (pooled IRR 4.0, 95% CI 2.3 to 5.7) and rheumatoid arthritis (pooled IRR 2.3, 95% CI 2.1 to 2.6). HPV infection-pooled prevalence ratio was 1.6, 95% CI 0.7 to 3.4 versus general population, based on studies mainly conducted in the SLE population in Latin America and Asia. Pooled prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B core antibody in patients with AIIRD was similar to the general population, 3%, 95% CI 1% to 5% and 15%, 95% CI 7% to 26%, respectively. Conclusion: Current evidence shows an increased risk of VPI in patients with AIIRD, emphasising that prevention of infections is essential in these patients.


Assuntos
Doenças Autoimunes/complicações , Doenças Autoimunes/epidemiologia , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , Doenças Transmissíveis/epidemiologia , Doenças Transmissíveis/etiologia , Doenças Reumáticas/complicações , Doenças Reumáticas/epidemiologia , Vacinas/imunologia , Doenças Autoimunes/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Razão de Chances , Prevalência , Doenças Reumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Vacinação
9.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 73(8): 1500-7, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23723319

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare the immunogenicity and safety of the bivalent human papillomavirus (HPV)16/18 vaccine between female patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and healthy female adolescents. METHODS: 68 patients and 55 healthy girls aged 12-18 years were included in a prospective controlled observational cohort and were vaccinated at 0, 1 and 6 months. Primary outcomes were immunogenicity expressed as seropositivity rate after three vaccine doses at 7 and 12 months and HPV-specific geometric mean antibody concentrations. Secondary outcomes were HPV16/18-specific memory B cell responses in a subset of participants and safety, defined as adverse events and the effect of vaccination on JIA disease activity. RESULTS: All participants were seropositive for HPV16 and HPV18 at 7 months. One patient turned seronegative at 12 months for HPV16/18. No significant differences were found between patients and controls in HPV-specific antibody concentrations; however, antibody concentrations were consistently lower in patients. No effect of methotrexate on HPV16 antibodies (p=0.79) or HPV18 antibodies (p=0.37) was detected. All patients on anti-TNFα treatment were seropositive after vaccination. The kinetics of HPV16/18 memory B cell responses was comparable between patients and controls, but the magnitude of B cell responses at 7 and 12 months appeared lower in patients. No relevant differences in adverse events were found. HPV vaccination did not aggravate JIA disease. CONCLUSIONS: The bivalent HPV16/18 vaccine is immunogenic and well tolerated in JIA patients. However, HPV-specific antibodies and B cell responses tended to be lower in patients compared with healthy controls. CLINICAL TRIAL LISTING: NCT00815282.


Assuntos
Artrite Juvenil/imunologia , Papillomavirus Humano 16/imunologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Criança , Feminino , Seguimentos , Papillomavirus Humano 18/imunologia , Humanos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/imunologia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/imunologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/imunologia
11.
J Rheumatol ; 39(10): 2032-40, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22859359

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Although methotrexate (MTX) is the most widely prescribed drug in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), 30% of patients fail to respond to it. To individualize treatment strategies, the genetic determinants of response to MTX should be identified. METHODS: A cohort of 287 patients with JIA treated with MTX was studied longitudinally over the first year of treatment. MTX response was defined as the American College of Rheumatology pediatric 70 criteria (ACRped70). We genotyped 21 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in 13 genes related to MTX polyglutamylation and to cellular MTX uptake and efflux. Potential associations between ACRped70 and genotypes were analyzed in a multivariate model and corrected for these 3 covariates: disease duration prior to MTX treatment, physician's global assessment of disease activity at baseline, and MTX dose at all study visits. RESULTS: MTX response was more often achieved by patients variant for the adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette transporter B1 (ABCB1) gene polymorphism rs1045642 (OR 3.80, 95% CI 1.70-8.47, p = 0.001) and patients variant for the ABCC3 gene polymorphism rs4793665 (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.49-6.41, p = 0.002) than by patients with other genotypes. Patients variant for the solute carrier 19A1 (SLC19A1) gene polymorphism rs1051266 were less likely to respond to MTX (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.72, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: ABCB1 rs1045642, ABCC3 rs4793665, and SLC19A1 rs1051266 polymorphisms were associated with response to MTX in 287 patients with JIA studied longitudinally. Upon validation of our results in other JIA cohorts, these genetic determinants may help to individualize treatment strategies by predicting clinical response to MTX.


Assuntos
Membro 1 da Subfamília B de Cassetes de Ligação de ATP/genética , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Juvenil/genética , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Associadas à Resistência a Múltiplos Medicamentos/genética , Subfamília B de Transportador de Cassetes de Ligação de ATP , Adolescente , Artrite Juvenil/tratamento farmacológico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Frequência do Gene , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Polimorfismo Genético , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA