Development and Validation of Discriminatory In-vitro Release Method for Intramammary Drug Product.

PURPOSE: Intramammary (IMM) formulations are locally acting and delivered intracisternally into the udder. No pharmacopeial in-vitro release method is available to differentiate between the IMM formulations. Our research aim is to develop in-vitro release methods that discriminate different IMM formulations (SPECTRAMAST® LC and in-house formulations). METHODOLOGY: Different in-house formulations were developed to simulate SPECTRAMAST® LC generics. SPECTRAMAST® LC and the in-house formulations were characterized for physicochemical attributes, such as particle size, rheology, drug content, sedimentation rate, and flocculation rate. The in-vitro release method was optimized by evaluating drug release using USP apparatuses 1, 2 (with and without enhancer/customized cells), and 4. Various test parameters, including medium effect (whole homogenized bovine milk versus aqueous buffer), medium volume (200-900 mL), and rotational speed (50-200 rpm) were investigated. RESULTS: Two potential in-vitro systems can be used as discriminatory methods for IMM formulations: USP apparatus 2 with the IMM formulation loaded into two containers a) customized formulation container (83.1 cm in height and 56.4 cm in width) or b) enhancer cells with their top adapted with mesh #40 (rotation speed:125 rpm and 900 mL of whole homogenized bovine milk). The release profile of SPECTRAMAST® LC at 1 h (99.8%) was not significantly different from formulations with similar physicochemical characteristics F-01 (99.1%) and F-02 (100.5%). Formulation with different physicochemical characteristics F-03 (44.3%) and F-04 (57.2%) showed slower release (1 h) than SPECTRAMAST® LC (98.8%). CONCLUSION: The developed in-vitro release methods can be used as a potential tool for in-vitro comparability evaluations for IMM formulations.

Bioconjugation in Drug Delivery: Practical Perspectives and Future Perceptions.

For the past three decades, pharmaceutical research has been mainly converging to novel carrier systems and nanoparticulate colloidal technologies for drug delivery, such as nanoparticles, nanospheres, vesicular systems, liposomes, or nanocapsules to impart novel functions and targeting abilities. Such technologies opened the gate towards more sophisticated and effective multi-acting platform(s) which can offer site-targeting, imaging, and treatment using a single multifunctional system. Unfortunately, such technologies faced major intrinsic hurdles including high cost, low stability profile, short shelf-life, and poor reproducibility across and within production batches leading to harsh bench-to-bedside transformation.Currently, pharmaceutical industry along with academic research is investing heavily in bioconjugate structures as an appealing and advantageous alternative to nanoparticulate delivery systems with all its flexible benefits when it comes to custom design and tailor grafting along with avoiding most of its shortcomings. Bioconjugation is a ubiquitous technique that finds a multitude of applications in different branches of life sciences, including drug and gene delivery applications, biological assays, imaging, and biosensing.Bioconjugation is simple, easy, and generally a one-step drug (active pharmaceutical ingredient) conjugation, using various smart biocompatible, bioreducible, or biodegradable linkers, to targeting agents, PEG layer, or another drug. In this chapter, the different types of bioconjugates, the techniques used throughout the course of their synthesis and characterization, as well as the well-established synthetic approaches used for their formulation are presented. In addition, some exemplary representatives are outlined with greater emphasis on the practical tips and tricks of the most prominent techniques such as click chemistry, carbodiimide coupling, and avidin-biotin system.