Cost-Utility Analysis of the Caresyntax Platform to Identify Patients at Risk of Surgical Site Infection Undergoing Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) account for up to 18% of all healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). The Caresyntax data-driven surgery platform incorporates the most common risk factors for SSI, to identify high-risk surgical patients before they leave the operating theatre and treat them prophylactically with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). An economic analysis was performed to assess the costs and health outcomes associated with introduction of the technology in the English healthcare setting. METHODS: A hybrid decision tree/Markov model was developed to reflect the treatment pathways that patients undergoing colorectal surgery would typically follow, both over the short term (30-day hospital setting) and long term (lifetime). The analysis considered implementation of Caresyntax's platform-based SSI predictive algorithm in the hospital setting, compared with standard of care, from an English National Health Service (NHS) perspective. The base-case analysis presents results in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, as well as operational impact. RESULTS: The base-case analysis indicates that the intervention leads to a cost saving of £55.52m across the total NHS colorectal surgery patient population in 1 year. In addition, the intervention has a 98.36% probability of being cost effective over a lifetime horizon. The intervention results in the avoidance of 19,744 SSI events, as well 191,911 excess hospital bed days saved. CONCLUSION: Caresyntax's platform-based SSI predictive algorithm has the potential to result in cost savings and improved patient quality of life. Additionally, operational gains for the healthcare provider, including reduced infection rates and hospital bed days saved, have been shown through the economic modeling.

Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening strategies: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of death worldwide and the use of CRC screening tests can reduce the incidence and mortality of the disease by early detection. This study aims to review cost-effectiveness strategies in different ages and countries, systematically. METHODS: We searched ProQuest, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, PubMed and Embase for related studies between 2010 and 2020. Articles that reported costs per Quality-Adjusted Life Year or Life Year Gain and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios to compare the cost-effectiveness of CRC screening strategies in the average-risk population were included in our study. RESULTS: The search strategies identified 426 records and finally 48 articles were included in the systematic review based on included and excluded criteria. We identified seven strategies for CRC screening. Most of the strategies were performed in aged 50-75. These studies were reported by cost per Quality-Adjusted life year (QALY)/Life Year Gain (LYG) based on methods and perspectives and the ICER of comparison of two-by-two strategies. CONCLUSION: Most of the CRC screening strategies were cost-effective, but there was big heterogeneity between the cost-effectiveness analysis of CRC screening strategies because of different screening methods, perspectives and screening populations. So, it is important to consider this heterogeneity to compare the economic evaluation studies in this field.

Economic evaluation of a national vitamin D supplementation program among Iranian adolescents for the prevention of adulthood type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation in preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among Iranian adolescents. METHODS: This analytical observational study was conducted, using the decision tree model constructed in TreeAge Pro to assess the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of monthly intake vitamin D supplements to prevent T2DM compared to no intervention from the viewpoint of Iran's Ministry of Health and through an one-year horizon. In the national program of vitamin D supplementation, 1,185,211 Iranian high-school students received 50,000 IU vitamin D supplements monthly for nine months. The costs-related data were modified to 2018. The average cost and effectiveness were compared based on the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). RESULTS: Our analytical analysis estimated the 4071.25 (USD / QALY) cost per AQALY gained of the monthly intake of 50,000 IU vitamin D for nine months among adolescents over a one-year horizon. Based on the ICER threshold of 1032-2666, vitamin D supplementation was cost-effective for adolescents to prevent adulthood T2DM. It means that vitamin D supplementation costs were substantially less than the costs of T2DM treatments than the no intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings, the national vitamin D supplementation program for Iranian adolescents could be a cost-effective strategy to reduce the risk of diabetes in adulthood. From an economic perspective, vitamin D supplementation, especially in adolescents with vitamin D deficiency, would be administrated.

Sarcopenia screening strategies in older people: a cost effectiveness analysis in Iran.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Sarcopenia is an important age-related disease which can lead to an increased risk of mortality, falls, fractures, and poor quality of life. So, timely detection can be effective in reducing the burden of disease. The aim of this study was to identify the most cost-effective strategy for sarcopenia screening in Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We constructed a Markov transition model over a life-time horizon based on natural history. Compared strategies included Sarcopenia scoring assessment models (SarSA-Mod), European working group on sarcopenia in older people (EWGSOP), Mini sarcopenia risk assessment (MSRA) and SARC-F. Parameters values were extracted from primary data and the literature, and the costs and Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated for each strategy. Sensitivity analysis of uncertain parameters was also performed to determine the robustness of the model. Analysis was performed using 2020 version of TreeAge Pro software. RESULTS: All four screening strategies increased life time QALYs. After removing dominated strategy, the incremental cost per QALY gained for sarcopenia screening varied from $1875.67 for EWGSOP to $1898.33 for MSRA. Our base-case analysis showed that the most cost-effective strategy was EWGSOP and 2nd best was SarSA-Mod with $43,414.3 and $42,663.3 net monetary benefits given one GDP per capita ($5520.311) as willingness to pay, respectively. Sensitivity analysis of model parameters also showed robustness of results. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study, as the first economic evaluation of sarcopenia screening, showed that the EWGSOP strategy is more cost-effective than other strategies.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for monitoring TNF-alpha inhibitors and antibody levels in people with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic autoimmune disease that primarily causes inflammation, pain and stiffness in the joints. People with severe disease may be treated with biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, including tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors, but the efficacy of these drugs is hampered by the presence of anti-drug antibodies. Monitoring the response to these treatments typically involves clinical assessment using response criteria, such as Disease Activity Score in 28 joints or European League Against Rheumatism. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays can also be used to measure drug and antibody levels in the blood. These tests may inform whether or not adjustments to treatment are required or help clinicians to understand the reasons for treatment non-response or a loss of response. METHODS: Systematic reviews were conducted to identify studies reporting on the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to measure drug and anti-drug antibody levels to monitor the response to tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors [adalimumab (Humira®; AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA), etanercept (Enbrel®; Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA), infliximab (Remicade®, Merck Sharp & Dohme Limited, Hoddesdon, UK), certolizumab pegol (Cimzia®; UCB Pharma Limited, Slough, UK) and golimumab (Simponi®; Merck Sharp & Dohme Limited)] in people with rheumatoid arthritis who had either achieved treatment target (remission or low disease activity) or shown primary or secondary non-response to treatment. A range of bibliographic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), were searched from inception to November 2018. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-1 (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) tool for non-randomised studies, with adaptations as appropriate. Threshold and cost-utility analyses that were based on a decision tree model were conducted to estimate the economic outcomes of adding therapeutic drug monitoring to standard care. The costs and resource use were considered from the perspective of the NHS and Personal Social Services. No discounting was applied to the costs and effects owing to the short-term time horizon of 18 months that was adopted in the economic analysis. The impact on the results of variations in testing and treatment strategies was explored in numerous clinically plausible sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Two studies were identified: (1) a non-randomised controlled trial, INGEBIO, that compared standard care with therapeutic drug monitoring using Promonitor® assays [Progenika Biopharma SA (a Grifols-Progenika company), Derio, Spain] in Spanish patients receiving adalimumab who had achieved remission or low disease activity; and (2) a historical control study. The economic analyses were informed by INGEBIO. Different outcomes from INGEBIO produced inconsistent results in both threshold and cost-utility analyses. The cost-effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring varied, from the intervention being dominant to the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £164,009 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. However, when the frequency of testing was assumed to be once per year and the cost of phlebotomy appointments was excluded, therapeutic drug monitoring dominated standard care. LIMITATIONS: There is limited relevant research evidence and much uncertainty about the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based testing for therapeutic drug monitoring in rheumatoid arthritis patients. INGEBIO had serious limitations in relation to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence scope: only one-third of participants had rheumatoid arthritis, the analyses were mostly not by intention to treat and the follow-up was 18 months only. Moreover, the outcomes might not be generalisable to the NHS. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, no firm conclusions could be made about the cost-effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring in England and Wales. FUTURE WORK: Further controlled trials are required to assess the impact of using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for monitoring the anti-tumour necrosis factors in people with rheumatoid arthritis. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018105195. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 8. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Rheumatoid arthritis is a long-term condition that causes pain, swelling and stiffness in the joints. People with severe disease may be treated with drugs called tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors [adalimumab (Humira^®; AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA), etanercept (Enbrel^®; Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA), infliximab (Remicade^®; Merck Sharp & Dohme Limited, Hoddesdon, UK), certolizumab pegol (Cimzia^®; UCB Pharma Limited, Slough, UK) and golimumab (Simponi^®; Merck Sharp & Dohme Limited)]. Some people taking these drugs find that their disease improves, whereas others do not respond to the treatment or improve initially and then experience loss of response. One cause of lost response is that individuals develop antibodies (i.e. protective proteins) against the drug, which hamper the effect of treatment. Various tests have been developed to measure the level of drugs and antibodies against these drugs in patient's blood samples. This kind of monitoring would allow treatment to be adjusted in response to the test outcomes to optimise benefit for the patient, and help clinicians to better understand the reasons for an absence or a loss of response to treatment. The aim of this study was to find out whether or not it would be clinically effective (i.e. good for patients) and cost-effective (i.e. a good use of NHS resources) to use these tests for monitoring drug and antibody levels, as a means of assessing treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis patients who are controlled, have not responded or have lost response. Results from a systematic review showed that, because of the limited and poor-quality evidence, there was much uncertainty in the clinical effectiveness of testing. A simple mathematical model drew on evidence from one poorly reported study, which was heavily supplemented by data from other studies and expert advice. Results from the model were inconclusive and suggest that there is considerable uncertainty in the cost-effectiveness of testing. Therefore, the results presented here should be considered with caution. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of tumour necrosis factor testing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

A Corticosteroid-Eluting Sinus Implant Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A UK-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is one of the commonest chronic health problems among adults in the UK. Around 15% of CRS patients undergo functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) annually after failing medical treatment. However, as incomplete resolution of symptoms or complications post-operatively is common, the post-operative management is considered to be as important as the surgery itself. A bioabsorbable corticosteroid-eluting sinus implant (CESI) (Propel®, mometasone furoate 370 µg) has been used as an alternative post-FESS treatment. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of the corticosteroid-eluting implant versus non-corticosteroid-eluting spacer following FESS for treatment of patients with CRS. METHODS: A decision tree model was developed to estimate the cost and effectiveness in each strategy. Costs and effects were estimated from a UK National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services perspective over a 6-month time horizon. Model pathways and parameters were informed by existing clinical guidelines and literature and sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore uncertainties in base-case assumptions. RESULTS: Over a 6-month time horizon, inserting CESI at the end of FESS is less costly (£4646 vs. £4655 per patient) and is the more effective intervention [total quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over 6 months 0.443 vs. 0.444] than non-corticosteroid-eluting spacers; hence, it is a dominant strategy. The probabilistic analysis results indicate that CESI following FESS has a 62% probability of being cost effective at the £20,000/per QALY willingness-to-pay threshold and 56% probability of being a cost-saving intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CESI after FESS results in fewer post-operative complications than non-corticosteroid-eluting implants and may be a cost-saving technology over a 6-month time horizon. Although the cost of initial treatment with the CESI is greater, cost savings are made due to a reduction in the number of complications experienced.

Combined cataract extraction and trabeculotomy by the internal approach for coexisting cataract and open-angle glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To provide efficacy and safety of surgery with Trabectome combined with phacoemulsification in primary open-angle glaucoma. METHODS: In this interventional case series, 30 consecutive eyes that have had combined phacoemulsification with Trabectome were included. The main outcome measures were change in intraocular pressure (IOP), glaucoma medication use, and the rate of complications. RESULTS: Mean IOP was 18.25 ± 3.28 mmHg preoperatively which decreased to 13.50 ± 2.53 mmHg at 1 year. (P < 0.05). There was a corresponding drop in glaucoma medications from 2.52 ± 0.60 at baseline to 1.40 ± 0.53 at 12 months (P < 0.01). The preoperative BCVA (Log Mar) was improved from 0.68 ± 0.26 pre-operatively to 0.26 ± 0.19, 0.18 ± 0.13, 0.17 ± 0.13, 0.11 ± 0.12, at 5 days and 2, 6, and 12 months, respectively (P < 0.01). The only frequent complication was transient blood reflux resolving spontaneously within a few days. No vision-threatening complication occurred. CONCLUSION: Combined phacoemulsification and Trabectome significantly lowered IOP and medication use, with early visual rehabilitation in the majority of patients.