Colorectal Cancer Screening by Fecal Immunochemical Tests (FIT): Considerations on Sampling and Markers (Hb and Hb/Hp Complex) of Fecal Occult Blood (FOB).

BACKGROUND/AIM: Formal demonstration of the efficacy of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) in reducing CRC incidence and mortality is still missing. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of sampling and FIT marker in the recently implemented CRC screening program in Finland. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Because only the index test [FIT hemoglobin (Hb)]-positive subjects are verified by the reference test (colonoscopy), the new screening program is subject to verification bias that precludes estimating the diagnostic accuracy (DA) indicators. A previously published study (5) with 100% biopsy verification of colonoscopy referral subjects (called validation cohort, n=300) was used to derive these missing DA estimates. Two points of concern were addressed: i) only one-day sample tested, and ii) only the Hb component (but not Hb/Hp complex) was analyzed by FIT. RESULTS: The estimated DA of one-sample testing for Hb in the screening setting had a very low sensitivity (SE) (12.5%; 95%CI=12.3-12.7) for adenomas, with AUC=0.560 (for CRC, AUC=0.950). Testing three samples for Hb improved SE to 19.4% (95%CI=19.1-19.7%) but had little effect on overall DA (AUC=0.590). For adenomas, one-sample testing for Hb and Hb/Hp complex provided higher SE than three-sample testing for Hb (SE 20.6%; 95%CI=20.3-21.0), and the best SE was reached when two samples were tested for Hb and Hb/Hp complex (SE 47.5%; 95%CI=46.9-48.1%) (AUC=0.730). CONCLUSION: The strategy of the current CRC screening could be significantly improved by testing two consecutive samples by Hb and Hb/Hp complex, instead of stand-alone Hb testing of one sample.

Awareness and Acceptance of Nicotine-free Smoking Intervention Methods (Acetium® Lozenge) Increased Among Health Care Professionals by Targeted E-training as Confirmed by Post-training Surveys.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To increase the awareness and acceptance of the new nicotine-free smoking intervention method (Acetium® lozenge; Biohit Oyj, Finland), targeted E-Training with accompanying surveys were conducted in 2018, 2020 and 2023. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The target groups were derived from the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)-compliant registers of Finnish physicians, pharmacy staff and nurses owned by Success Clinic Oy. The post-training surveys recorded 1) awareness of the responders on Acetium® lozenge, 2) their attitude to nicotine-free smoking intervention methods in general as well as 3) their readiness for recommending this new tool to their patients. RESULTS: The three surveys accumulated a total of 1.892 responders. There was a constantly increasing awareness on Acetium® lozenge, increased interest in nicotine-free smoking intervention methods in general and a substantially increased readiness to recommend Acetium® acceptance to the smoking patients. The impact of E-Training, as measured by the increased interest in nicotine-free methods (56%) and readiness to endorse Acetium® acceptance (58%), was most marked among nurses who had the least awareness on Acetium® lozenge beforehand, exceeding the respective increase among medical doctors by 20% and 10% and among pharmacy staff by 30% and 20%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This E-Training had a favorable effect 1) on the responders' interest in nicotine-free smoking intervention method in general, 2) on increasing the awareness of Acetium® lozenge as a novel innovative method to quit smoking, as well as 3) on increasing the responders' readiness to introduce the new device to their smoking patients who are motivated to stop smoking nicotine-free.

Helicobacter pylori (Hp) IgG ELISA of the New-Generation GastroPanel® Is Highly Accurate in Diagnosis of Hp-Infection in Gastroscopy Referral Patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection affects a substantial proportion of the world population and is a major risk factor of gastric cancer (GC). The caveats of common Hp-tests can be evaded by a serological biomarker test (GastroPanel®, Biohit Oyj, Helsinki), the most comprehensive Hp-test on the market. The clinical validation of Helicobacter pylori IgG ELISA of the new-generation GastroPanel® test is reported. The aim of the study is to validate the clinical performance of the Helicobacter pylori IgG ELISA test in diagnosis of biopsy-confirmed Hp-infection in gastroscopy referral patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 101 patients (mean age=50.1 years) referred for gastroscopy at the outpatient Department of Gastroenterology (SM Clinic, St. Petersburg) were examined by two test versions to validate the new-generation GastroPanel®. All patients were examined by gastroscopy and biopsies, which were stained with Giemsa for specific identification of Hp in the antrum (A) and corpus (C). RESULTS: Biopsy-confirmed Hp-infection was found in 64% of patients, most often confined to antrum. The overall agreement between Hp IgG ELISA and gastric biopsies in Hp-detection was 91% (95%CI=84.1-95.8%). Hp IgG ELISA diagnosed biopsy-confirmed Hp (A&C) with sensitivity (SE) of 92.3%, specificity (SP) of 88.6%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 93.8% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 86.1%, with AUC=0.904 (95%CI=0.842-0.967). In ROC analysis for Hp detection (A&C), Hp IgG ELISA shows AUC=0.978 (95%CI=0.956-1.000). CONCLUSION: The Hp IgG ELISA test successfully concludes the clinical validation process of the new-generation GastroPanel® test, which retains the unrivalled diagnostic performance of all its four biomarkers, extensively documented for the first-generation test in different clinical settings.

Slow-release L-Cysteine (Acetium®) Lozenge Is an Effective New Method in Smoking Cessation. A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Intervention.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Because of the major health problems and annual economic burden caused by cigarette smoking, effective new tools for smoking intervention are urgently needed. Our previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) provided promising results on the efficacy of slow-release L-cysteine lozenge in smoking intervention, but the study was not adequately powered. To confirm in an adequately-powered study the results of the previous RCT implicating that effective elimination of acetaldehyde in saliva by slow-release L-cysteine (Acetium® lozenge, Biohit Oyj, Helsinki), would assist in smoking cessation by reducing acetaldehyde-enhanced nicotine addiction. On this matter, we undertook a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing Acetium® lozenge and placebo in smoking intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 1,998 cigarette smokers were randomly allocated to intervention (n=996) and placebo arms (n=1,002). At baseline, smoking history was recorded by a questionnaire, with nicotine dependence testing according to the Fagerström scale (FTND). The subjects used smoking diary recording the daily numbers of cigarettes, lozenges and subjective sensations of smoking. The data were analysed separately for point prevalence of abstinence (PPA) and prolonged abstinence (PA) endpoints. RESULTS: Altogether, 753 study subjects completed the trial per protocol (PP), 944 with violations (mITT), and the rest (n=301) were lost to follow-up (LTF). During the 6-month intervention, 331 subjects stopped smoking; 181 (18.2%) in the intervention arm and 150 (15.0%) in the placebo arm (OR=1.43; 95%CI=1.09-1.88); p=0.010). In the PP group, 170 (45.3%) quitted smoking in the intervention arm compared to 134 (35.4%) in the placebo arm (OR=1.51, 95%CI=1.12-2.02; p=0.006). In multivariate (Poisson regression) model, decreased level of smoking pleasure (p=0.010) and "smoking sensations changed" were powerful independent predictors of quit events (IRR=12.01; 95%CI=1.5-95.6). CONCLUSION: Acetium® lozenge, herein confirmed in an adequately powered study to be an effective means to aid smoking quit, represents a major breakthrough in the development of smoking intervention methods, because slow-release L-cysteine is non-toxic, with no side-effects or limitations of use.

Slow-release L-cysteine capsule prevents gastric mucosa exposure to carcinogenic acetaldehyde: results of a randomised single-blinded, cross-over study of Helicobacter-associated atrophic gastritis.

INTRODUCTION: Helicobacter-induced atrophic gastritis with a hypochlorhydric milieu is a risk factor for gastric cancer. Microbes colonising acid-free stomach oxidise ethanol to acetaldehyde, a recognised group 1 carcinogen. OBJECTIVE: To assess gastric production of acetaldehyde and its inert condensation product, non-toxic 2-methyl-1,3-thiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid (MTCA), after alcohol intake under treatment with slow-release L-cysteine or placebo. METHODS: Seven patients with biopsy-confirmed atrophic gastritis, low serum pepsinogen and high gastrin-17 were studied in a cross-over single-blinded design. On separate days, patients randomly received 200 mg slow-release L-cysteine or placebo with intragastric instillation of 15% (0.3 g/kg) ethanol. After intake, gastric concentrations of ethanol, acetaldehyde, L-cysteine and MTCA were analysed. RESULTS: Administration of L-cysteine increased MTCA (p < .0004) and decreased gastric acetaldehyde concentrations by 68% (p < .0001). The peak L-cysteine level was 7552 ± 2687 µmol/L at 40 min and peak MTCA level 196 ± 98 µmol/L at 80 min after intake. Gastric L-cysteine and MTCA concentrations were maintained for 3 h. The AUC for MTCA was 11-fold higher than acetaldehyde, indicating gastric first-pass metabolism of ethanol. With placebo, acetaldehyde remained elevated also at low ethanol concentrations representing 'non-alcoholic' beverages and food items. CONCLUSIONS: After gastric ethanol instillation, slow-release L-cysteine eliminates acetaldehyde to form inactive MTCA, which remains in gastric juice for up to 3 h. High acetaldehyde levels indicate a marked gastric first-pass metabolism of ethanol resulting in gastric accumulation of carcinogenic acetaldehyde. Local exposure of the gastric mucosa to acetaldehyde can be mitigated by slow-release L-cysteine capsules.

Prevalence of H. pylori Infection and Atrophic Gastritis in a Population-based Screening with Serum Biomarker Panel (GastroPanel®) in St. Petersburg.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Russian Federation is among the high-incidence countries for gastric cancer (GC), with the incidence being projected to continue increasing. Using a non-invasive blood test with four stomach-specific biomarkers (pepsinogen-I (PG-I) and -II (PG-II), amidated gastrin-17 (G-17) and Helicobacter pylori (HP) IgG antibodies) in a hospital-based screening setting, we aimed to determine the prevalence of GC risk conditions: HP-infection and atrophic gastritis (AG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A population-derived cohort of 918 asymptomatic subjects (646 women and 272 men) with a mean age of 51.8 years (range=26-83) was examined with the GastroPanel® (GP) test. GP results were verified by gastroscopy and biopsies (the Updated Sydney System (USS) classification for all test-positive AG cases and for random 5% test-negatives (n=263) to correct for the verification bias. RESULTS: Of the 918 subjects, only 199 (21.7%) tested completely normal, while 76.7% (704/918) had HP-infection. Altogether, in 99 subjects (10.8%), GP suggested AG: atrophic gastritis in the antrum (AGA) (n=21), atrophic gastritis in the corpus (AGC) (n=69) or atrophic pangastritis (AGpan) (n=9). The overall concordance between GP and USS classification was 82.5% (217/263) with weighted kappa intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.875 (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.840-0.901). The sensitivity/specificity balance in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for PG-I as a marker of moderate/severe AGC (AGC2+) had area under the curve (AUC)=0.895 (95%CI=0.837-0.953). Using the AGC2+ end-point, verification bias-corrected specificity of PGI reached 96.4% (95%CI=94.7-97.9) and that of PGI/PGII ratio 94.6% (95%CI=92.6-96.3), with inevitable erosion in sensitivities. CONCLUSION: While capable of detecting the subjects at risk for GC (HP and/or AG), GP should be the cost-effective means to break the current ominous trend in GC incidence in Russian Federation.

Elimination of Cigarette Smoke-derived Acetaldehyde in Saliva by Slow-release L-Cysteine Lozenge Is a Potential New Method to Assist Smoking Cessation. A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Intervention.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Harmans are condensation products of acetaldehyde and biogenic amines in saliva. Like other monoamine oxidase inhibitors, harmans help maintain behavioral sensitization to nicotine and mediate the addictive potential of cigarette smoke-derived acetaldehyde. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that effective elimination of acetaldehyde in saliva by slow-release L-cysteine (Acetium™ lozenge; Biohit Oyj, Helsinki, Finland) blocks the formation of harmans and eliminates acetaldehyde-enhanced nicotine addiction in smokers. STUDY DESIGN: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing Acetium lozenges and placebo in smoking intervention was undertaken. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 423 cigarette smokers were randomly allocated to intervention (n=212) and placebo arms (n=211). Smoking-related data were recorded by questionnaires, together with nicotine dependence testing by Fagerström scale. The participants used a smoking diary to record the daily number of cigarettes, test lozenges and sensations of smoking. The data were analyzed separately for point prevalence of abstinence and prolonged abstinence endpoints. RESULTS: Altogether, 110 study participants completed the trial per protocol, 234 had minor violations, and the rest (n=79) were lost to follow-up. During the 6-month trial, 65 participants quit smoking; 38 (17.9%) in the intervention arm and 27 (12.8%) in the placebo arm [odds ratio (OR)=1.48; 95% confidence intervals (CI)=0.87-2.54; p=0.143]. Success in the per protocol group was better (42.9% vs. 31.1%, respectively; OR=1.65, 95% CI=0.75-3.62; p=0.205) than in the modified intention-to-treat group: 13.5% vs. 7.4% (p=0.128). CONCLUSION: If the efficacy of Acetium lozenge can be confirmed in an adequately powered study, this new approach would represent a major breakthrough in smoking quit intervention because slow-release L-cysteine is non-toxic with no side-effects or limitations of use.

A New-Generation Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Is Superior to Quaiac-based Test in Detecting Colorectal Neoplasia Among Colonoscopy Referral Patients.

AIM: To compare a new-generation fecal immunochemical test (FIT) with the leading guaiac-based test in detection of fecal occult blood (FOB) in colonoscopy-referral patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 300 patients referred for colonoscopy was examined by two different tests for FOB: ColonView quick test (CV) (FIT test for haemoglobin (Hb) and haemoglobin/haptoglobin (Hb/Hp) complex) and HemoccultSENSA (HS) (quaiac test for Hb). Three fecal samples were tested and all subjects were examined by diagnostic colonoscopy with biopsy verification. The test was interpreted positive if any of the three samples tested positive for Hb (HS test) and either Hb or Hb/Hp complex (CV test). The performance indicators (sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under the curve (AUC)) were calculated for both tests using three endpoints (adenoma (A), adenoma/carcinoma (A/AC) and carcinoma (AC)), collectively and were stratified according to tumor site. The two tests were compared regarding their sensitivity/specificity balance (AUC), using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) comparison test. RESULTS: Colonoscopy (and biopsies) disclosed normal results in 85 (27.2%) subjects, A in 91 cases (30.3%) and AC in 95 (31.7%) patients. For the combined A+AC endpoint, the HS test had SE of 58.3% and SP of 96.5% (AUC=0.774), while the CV test had 97.2% SE and 85.8% SP (AUC=0.916) (p=0.0001). For the A endpoint, the difference between HS and CV was even more significant, AUC=0.637 and AUC=0.898, respectively (p=0.0001). In CV test, the Hb/Hp complex was 15% (93% vs. 78%) and 8% (96% vs. 88%) more sensitive than Hb alone, for the A and A+AC endpoints, respectively. Being more stable than Hb in the feces, the Hb/Hp complex detected 100% of the tumors in the proximal colon, as contrasted to only 41.2% and 52.9% by the Hb of HS and CV test, respectively (p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: With its 100% SE and 95.3% SP for proximal colon neoplasia, as well as 98.2% SE and 95.3% SP for the distal neoplasia, ColonView is superior to current FIT tests on the market, recently shown to exhibit pooled SE of 79% and pooled SP of 94% for colorectal cancer (CRC) in a comprehensive meta-analysis. With these exceptional performance indicators, ColonView quick test should be the test-of-choice for CRC screening.