Implementation of cytogenomic microarray with plasma cell enrichment enables better abnormality detection and risk stratification in patients with plasma cell neoplasia than conventional cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

The detection of chromosomal abnormalities is important in the diagnosis, prognosis and disease monitoring in plasma cell neoplasia (PCN). However, the gold standard diagnostic techniques of conventional cytogenetics (CC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are hampered by culture difficulties and probe availability. Cytogenomic microarray (CMA), however, is able to surmount such limitations and generate a comprehensive genomic profile with the implementation of plasma cell (PC) enrichment. In this study, we examined 89 bone marrow specimens with CC and FISH without PC enrichment, 35 of which were examined with CMA after PC enrichment. Results revealed that after PC enrichment, CMA was able to detect chromosomal abnormalities in 34 of 35 specimens tested (97.1%), compared to 21 and 32 specimens (60% and 91.4%, respectively) achieved by CC and FISH, respectively, which were similar to the abnormality detection rates among all 89 specimens (59.5% by CC and 92.1% by FISH). In addition, as the only technique capable of detecting copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (CN-LOH) and chromothripsis, CMA appears to be the most powerful tool in risk stratification as it successfully re-stratified 9 (25.7%) and 12 (34.3%) specimens from standard risk (determined by CC and FISH, respectively) to high risk. Based on the encouraging data presented by our study and others, we conclude that implementation of CMA with PC enrichment is of great value in routine clinical workup in achieving a more complete genetic profile of patients with PCN.

Chromosomal microarray analysis is superior in identifying cryptic aberrations in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia at diagnosis/relapse as a single assay.

INTRODUCTION: Conventional cytogenetics (CC) is important in diagnosis, therapy, monitoring of post-transplant bone marrow, and prognosis assessment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, due to the nature of ALL, CC often encounters difficulties of complex karyotype, poor chromosome morphology, low mitotic index, or normal cells dividing only. In contrast, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) showed a specificity >99% and a sensitivity of 100% in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. Here, we report our experience with CMA on adult ALL patients. METHODS: Thirty-three bone marrow/blood samples from ALL patients (aged 18-79 years, median 44) at diagnosis/relapse, analyzed by CC and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), were recruited. Chromosomal microarray analysis results were compared with CC. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis, if available, was applied when there was a discrepancy. RESULTS: Copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity (CN-LOH) was found in 8 cases (24.2%). Only CN-LOH at 9p was recurrent (3 cases, 9.1%). Copy number alterations (CNAs) were detected in 6 of 9 cases (66.7%) with normal karyotypes, in 3 of 5 cases (60.0%) with sole "balanced" translocations, and in 18 of 19 cases (94.7%) with complex karyotypes. Common CNAs involved CDKN2A/2B (30.3%), IKZF1 (27.3%), PAX5 (9.1%), RB1 (9.1%), BTG1 (6.7%), and ETV6 (6.7%), which regulate cell cycle, B lymphopoiesis, or act as tumor suppressors in ALL. Copy number alteration detection rate by CMA was 81.8% (27 of 33 cases) as compared to 57.6% (19 of 33 cases) by CC. CONCLUSION: Incorporation of CMA as a routine clinical test at the time of diagnosis/relapse, in conjunction with CC and/or FISH, is highly recommended.