Exploring Urological Malignancies on Pinterest: Content Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pinterest is a visually oriented social media platform with over 250 million monthly users. Previous studies have found misinformative content on genitourinary malignancies to be broadly disseminated on YouTube; however, no study has assessed the quality of this content on Pinterest. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the quality, understandability, and actionability of genitourinary malignancy content on Pinterest. METHODS: We examined 540 Pinterest posts or pins, using the following search terms: "bladder cancer," "kidney cancer," "prostate cancer," and "testicular cancer." The pins were limited to English language and topic-specific content, resulting in the following exclusions: bladder (n=88), kidney (n=4), prostate (n=79), and testicular cancer (n=10), leaving 359 pins as the final analytic sample. Pinterest pins were classified based on publisher and perceived race or ethnicity. Content was assessed using 2 validated grading systems: DISCERN quality criteria and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool. The presence of misinformation was evaluated using a published Likert scale ranging from 1=none to 5=high. RESULTS: Overall, 359 pins with a total of 8507 repins were evaluated. The primary publisher of genitourinary malignancy pins were health and wellness groups (n=162, 45%). Across all genitourinary malignancy pins with people, only 3% (n=7) were perceived as Black. Additionally, Asian (n=2, 1%) and Latinx (n=1, 0.5%) individuals were underrepresented in all pins. Nearly 75% (n=298) of the pins had moderate- to poor-quality information. Misinformative content was apparent in 4%-26% of all genitourinary cancer pins. Understandability and actionability were poor in 55% (n=198) and 100% (n=359) of the pins, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: On Pinterest, the majority of the urological oncology patient-centric content is of low quality and lacks diversity. This widely used, yet unregulated platform has the ability to influence consumers' health knowledge and decision-making. Ultimately, this can lead to consumers making suboptimal medical decisions. Moreover, our findings demonstrate underrepresentation across many racial and ethnic groups. Efforts should be made to ensure the dissemination of diverse, high-quality, and accurate health care information to the millions of users on Pinterest and other social media platforms.

Characteristics of pelvic organ prolapse content available on social media.

AIMS: To analyze the quality, understandability, and actionability of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) content and to characterize creators of content and treatment options discussed on social media platforms YouTube, Instagram, and Pinterest. METHODS: A cross-sectional, qualitative study was conducted for each platform. A search for "pelvic organ prolapse" was conducted and the first 100 relevant results analyzed. Data collected include source characteristics, treatments discussed, and scores for each criterion of validated Patient Education Materials and Assessment Tool and DISCERN metrics to evaluate quality, actionability, and understandability. The χ 2 analysis, univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were done to assess correlations and the impact of variables on outcomes of interest across platforms. RESULTS: Low to moderate quality was present in 74.1% of posts. Poor understandability was seen in 37.1% of posts, and 56.1% had poor actionability. The most common publisher of content overall was health and wellness or physical therapy groups (44.6%). The most common YouTube publisher was doctors, hospitals, or clinics (49%). Pelvic floor muscle training was the most discussed treatment overall (57.4%). On YouTube surgery was discussed more frequently than Instagram or Pinterest (58% vs. 11% vs. 43%, p < 0.001. Pinterest posts had better understandability ratings than YouTube videos (odds ratio = 0.19; 95% confidence interval: [0.10-0.36]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Information on popular platforms regarding POP demonstrates inconsistent quality and poor understandability and actionability. There is an opportunity for health care providers to direct patients to curated lists of high-quality educational content on these platforms. Awareness of information available on social media is an increasingly important aspect of patient care.

Analysis of Pelvic Organ Prolapse-related Content on Pinterest.

OBJECTIVES: Our study is a cross-sectional, qualitative study analyzing pelvic organ prolapse-related content on Pinterest, a social media platform that also functions as a visual search engine. Primary outcomes assessed include quality, understandability, and actionability of content. Secondary outcomes include levels of misinformation and commercial bias. Our study further characterizes sources of prolapse content and treatment modalities discussed. METHODS: A Pinterest search was conducted using the term "pelvic organ prolapse," analyzing the first 100 relevant results. We examined the publisher of each pin and the writer of linked content. Using validated tools including the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool and DISCERN criteria, we assessed understandability and actionability of content. We further compared content to professional guidelines for discussing and treating prolapse, evaluating for misinformation. We also evaluated for commercial bias and subjectively rated pin quality. RESULTS: Of pins evaluated, low understandability was found in 16, low actionability in 30, and low-to-moderate quality in 69. The most common publisher of pins was health and wellness groups, and the most common writer of content was physical therapists. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is the treatment modality discussed most frequently on Pinterest. CONCLUSIONS: Pinterest content discussing pelvic organ prolapse shows good levels of understandability for patients at all levels of health literacy. However, the number of pins showing poor actionability raises concern that content may not encourage readers to take direct steps toward prolapse assessment and management. In all, a majority of prolapse-related content on Pinterest was of low-to-moderate quality.

Litigation Patterns in Oncologic Nephrectomies: A 30-Year Review.

Introduction: The litigious environment encompassing the medical-legal domain is an increasing concern for surgical fields, with urology being no exception. The objective of our study was to systematically review, evaluate, and summarize the factors associated with oncologic nephrectomy litigation to determine possible factors contributing to verdicts or settlements. Materials and Methods: Publicly available verdict reports were retrieved using the Westlaw® legal database (Reuters). Cases were identified using the search term "nephrectomy" with dates ranging from January 1, 1990 to July 1, 2019. Each case was evaluated by two independent reviewers for defendant specialty, alleged breach in treatment, resulting complications, verdict outcomes, and indemnity payment. Complications were determined to be preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative. Data were analyzed using SPSS software to produce the descriptive statistics. Results: After accounting for duplicates and irrelevant cases, a total of 103 cases were analyzed with more than three-fourths being radical nephrectomies (78%). The most common claim was preoperative negligence (48%); however, negligence in perioperative care received the highest average monetary payment of $5,493,151. Forty-one percent of cases were perioperative with the majority being attributed to vascular injury (46%). The type of perioperative negligence claims and its average payment were found to be statistically significant (p = 0.042). Overall, 57% of cases denied the plaintiff's claims, whereas 28% were awarded. Conclusions: Our data show that although the highest number of cases were caused by preoperative negligence, perioperative negligence accounts for the highest settlement awards. This review provides insights into stages of management in the surgical management of renal cell cancer patients that may be subject to litigation.

A systematic review of best practices for the perioperative management of abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

PURPOSE: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been shown to reduce surgical morbidity and length of stay across various procedures. Our objective was to systematically evaluate the literature for best practices of ERAS elements in abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC), to determine if there is sufficient evidence to create best practice guidelines for this procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement, we performed a review using Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Eligible articles contained ERAS components and postoperative outcomes of ASC published in English since 1997. Thirty-five full-text articles were selected for final qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Poor functional status before ASC was associated with a longer length of hospital stay. Laparoscopic ASC was associated with a shorter postoperative hospital stay, with no difference between laparoscopic and robotic approaches. Epidural analgesia in addition to spinal anesthesia lowered levels of pain throughout the postoperative stay in laparoscopic ASC. A multimodal bowel regimen shortened time to first bowel movement compared to a single agent regimen. Removing a Foley catheter may lead to sooner first spontaneous void but may result in higher rates of urinary retention and urinary tract infection. Studies investigating preoperative bowel preparation, preanesthesia medication, and multidose antimicrobial prophylaxis did not show significant benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Best practices for ASC can be developed based on current findings from the literature and extrapolation of evidence from other surgeries where ASC-specific elements are missing, with the ability to modify the pathways as new data become available.