Challenges in Treating Pediatric Cancer Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Balancing Risks and Care.

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in millions of fatalities worldwide. The case of pediatric cancer patients stands out since, despite being considered a population at risk, few studies have been carried out concerning symptom detection or the description of the mechanisms capable of modifying the course of the COVID-19 disease, such as the interaction and response between the virus and the treatment given to cancer patients. By synthesizing existing studies, this paper aims to expose the treatment challenges for pediatric patients with COVID-19 in an oncology context. Additionally, this updated review includes studies that utilized the antiviral agents Remdesivir and PaxlovidTM in pediatric cancer patients. There is no specific treatment designed exclusively for pediatric cancer patients dealing with COVID-19, and it is advisable to avoid self-medication to prevent potential side effects. Managing COVID-19 in pediatric cancer patients is indeed a substantial challenge. New strategies, such as chemotherapy application rooms, have been implemented for children with cancer who were positive for COVID-19 but asymptomatic since the risk of disease progression is greater than the risk of complications from SARS-CoV-2.

Genetic Markers as Predictors for Response to Treatment and Possible Therapeutic Targets in Medulloblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Medulloblastomas (MB) are the most common malignant brain tumors in the pediatric age. In 2021, WHO categorized medulloblastomas into two groups: molecularly defined and histologically defined medulloblastomas. Molecularly defined medulloblastomas are divided into WNTactivated medulloblastoma, SHH-activated and TP53-wildtype medulloblastoma, SHH-activated, and TP53-mutant and non-WNT/non-SHH medulloblastoma, which include Group 3 (MYC) and Group 4 (CDK6 and MYCN). In this paper, we will focus on molecularly defined medulloblastomas. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to review the literature in order to describe the molecular structure of the medulloblastoma groups and to emphasize the importance of genetic predictors in medulloblastoma that can be used in clinical practice, either as a prognostic tool or as a therapeutic target in the future. RESULTS: Each molecular subtype of medulloblastoma presents a different prognosis, and the molecular subtype with the best prognosis is medulloblastoma-activated WNT. It has even been observed that a reduction in the intensity of the combined treatment does not modify the prognosis of the patients, resulting in even fewer adverse effects due to the treatment. On the other hand, it was observed that the subtypes with the worst prognosis are medulloblastomas with activated MYC and medulloblastomas with activated SHH and mutated TP53, due to their high capacity to metastasize or to their radio-resistance. However, a new target therapy has emerged that could help improve the prognosis in these patients. CONCLUSION: The deeper knowledge of the molecular pathways involved in the appearance and progression of medulloblastomas will allow us to offer a prognosis at the time of diagnosis and more specific treatments through the development of the targeted therapy.