Topical tranexamic acid (TXA) is non-inferior to intravenous TXA in adult spine surgery: a meta-analysis.

Tranexamic acid (TXA) has long been utilized in spine surgery and can be administered through intravenous (IV) and topical routes. Although, topical and IV administration of TXA are both effective in decreasing blood loss during spine surgery, complications like deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism have been reported with the use of intravenous TXA (ivTXA). These potential complications may be mitigated through the use of topical TXA (tTXA). To assess optimal dosing protocols and efficacy of topical TXA in spine surgery, Embase, Ovid-MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov were queried for original research on the use of tTXA in adult patients undergoing spine surgery. Data parameters analyzed included blood loss, transfusion rate, thromboembolic, and other complications. Data was synthesized and confidence evaluated according to the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Nineteen studies were included in the final analysis with 2197 patients. Of the 18 published studies, 9 (50%) displayed high levels of evidence. Topical TXA showed a trend towards a lower risk of transfusion and complications. Protocols that used 1g tTXA showed a significantly reduced risk for transfusion when compared to controls (risk ratio -1.05, 95% CI (-1.62, -0.48); P = 0.94, I2 = 0%). Complications associated with tTXA included DVTs and wound infections. Topical TXA was non-inferior to intravenous TXA with similar efficacy and complication profiles for bleeding control in spine surgery; however, more studies are needed to discern benefits and risks.

CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder masquerading as an atypical melanocytic proliferation.

Heuristics are cognitive strategies used to facilitate decision-making. They can be helpful tools for expediting pathologic diagnoses, however, they can also affect judgment and lead to biases that guide the pathologist astray. We report the case of a 52-year-old female who presented with two unusual pigmented lesions on the wrist and thigh that clinically and histopathologically resembled an atypical melanocytic proliferation. A biopsy of the thigh revealed a broad proliferation of large, atypical cells forming nests within a heavily pigmented epidermis. The lesion was initially misdiagnosed as melanoma in situ, despite equivocal staining for melanocytic markers, likely due to anchoring and adjustment as well as availability biases, which restricted the differential diagnosis and limited the selection of immunohistochemical stains. It was later discovered through chart review that the patient had a prior history of a cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder, which eventually led to the appropriate diagnosis in this case. Herein, we highlight a rare and unusual presentation of a pigmented epidermotropic CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder, along with the biases leading to its misdiagnosis and the steps leading to the revelation of the actual diagnosis.