Impact of surgical volume and resident involvement on patency rates after vasectomy reversal-A 14-year experience in an open access system.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the influence of fellowship training, resident participation, reconstruction type, and patient factors on outcomes after vasectomy reversals in a high volume, open access system. METHODS: Retrospective review of all vasectomy reversals performed at a single institution from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2016 was conducted. Patient and spouse demographics, patient tobacco use and comorbidities, surgeon training and case volume, resident participation, reconstruction type, and postoperative patency were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Five hundred and twenty-six vasectomy reversals were performed during the study period. Follow-up was available in 80.6% of the cohort and overall patency, regardless of reconstruction type was 88.7%. The mean time to reversal was 7.87 years (range of 0-34 years). The majority of cases included resident participation. Case volume was high with faculty and residents logging a mean of 37.0 and 38.7 (median 18 and 37) cases respectively. Bilateral vasovasostomy was the most common reconstruction type (83%) and demonstrated a significantly better patency rate (89%) than all other reconstructions (p=0.0008). Overall patency and patency by reconstruction type were not statistically different among faculty surgeons and were not impacted by fertility fellowship training, resident participation or post-graduate year. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that increased time to reversal and repeat reconstructions had a negative impact on patency (p=0.0023 and p=0.043, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons with a high volume of vasectomy reversals have outcomes consistent with contemporary series regardless of fellowship training in fertility. Patency was better for bilateral vasovasostomies. Patency was not negatively impacted by tobacco use, comorbidities, resident participation, or post-graduate year.

Malignant Solitary Fibrous Tumor of the Renal Vein Presenting as a Giant Renal Artery Aneurysm: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

OBJECTIVES: To discuss an unusual presentation of solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) as well as the first description of SFT originating from the renal vein. CASE REPORT: In this article, we report the case of a 56-year-old man who presented with nonspecific epigastric pain and was found on computed tomography to have a large 10-cm renal artery aneurysm with evidence of contained rupture, segmental ischemia of the kidney, and suggestion of renal vein thrombosis. This was treated by a multidisciplinary team of urologists, vascular surgeons, and interventional radiologists with both renal artery coil embolization and radical nephrectomy. The thrombosis was found on pathologic review to be a malignant SFT originating from the renal vein with likely erosion into the renal artery. CONCLUSION: This report describes the first case of SFT originating from the renal vein and demonstrates the potential for mimicry as a giant renal artery aneurysm.

Head-to-Head Comparison of Three Virtual-Reality Robotic Surgery Simulators.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are several different commercially available virtual-reality robotic simulators, but very little comparative data. We compared the face and content validity of 3 robotic surgery simulators and their pricing and availability. METHODS: Fifteen participants completed one task on each of the following: dV-Trainer (dVT; Mimic Technologies, Inc., Seattle, Washington, USA), da Vinci Skills Simulator (dVSS; Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, California, USA), and RobotiX Mentor (RM; 3D Systems, Rock Hill, South Carolina, USA). Participants completed previously validated face and content validity questionnaires and a demographics questionnaire. Statistical analysis was then performed on the scores. RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 29.6 (range, 25-41) years. Most were surgical trainees, having performed a mean of 8.6 robotic primary surgeries. For face validity, ANOVA showed a significant difference favoring the dVSS over the dVT (P = .001), and no significant difference between the RM, dVSS, and dVT. Content validity revealed similar results, with a significant difference between the dVSS and dVT (P = .021), a trend toward a difference between the RM and dVT (P = .092), and no difference between the dVSS and RM (P = .99). CONCLUSION: All simulators demonstrated evidence of face and content validity, with significantly higher scores for the dVSS; it is also the least costly ($80,000 for the simulator), although it is frequently unavailable because of intra-operative use. The dVT and RM have similar face and content validity, are slightly more expensive, and are readily available.

Clinical and Pathologic Features of Hispanic Endometrial Cancer Patients With Loss of Mismatch Repair Expression.

OBJECTIVES: Approximately 3% to 5% of endometrial cancers (EC) are associated with Lynch syndrome (LS). The clinical characteristics and prevalence of LS have not been well studied in the US Hispanic population. Hispanics are the largest and fastest growing ethnic minority group in the United States. We sought to characterize the demographics, tumor characteristics, and prevalence of loss of mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression in a large Hispanic population with EC. METHODS: From January 1, 2005, to August 1, 2012, 83 women of Hispanic ethnicity diagnosed with EC 50 years and younger were identified. Clinical and pathologic data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Tumor studies included immunohistochemistry of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 and methylation of the MLH1 promoter. RESULTS: Ninety-five percent of patients were overweight or obese. The mean body mass index was 40.1 kg/m, 75% had irregular menses, 36% had diabetes, 46% were nulliparous, and 95% had endometrioid histology. Thirteen patients (15.7%) had tumor MMR deficiency due to a presumed germline mutation (9 MSH6, 3 MSH2, and 1 MLH1). The pattern of MMR protein loss was consistent with the expected binding properties of the MMR heterodimer complexes. No significant difference was found in clinical or pathological variables between patients with and without MMR deficient tumors. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of molecular findings consistent with LS was at least as high as other populations of varied geography, race, and ethnicity. We found no reliable factors to include body mass index, family history, synchronous tumors, or pathologic tumor features to serve as triage markers for which ECs should be screened for MMR protein loss. Our findings support a recommendation for universal screening of ECs utilizing 2-antibody testing with MLH1 promoter methylation testing as indicated up to 60 years or older. Our recommendations should be generalizable to other Hispanic populations in the Southern United States.