Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 39(10): 2249-2254, 2022 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36114906

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate the possible effect of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on sperm quality by evaluating semen analyses of men prior to vaccination and 6-14 months after vaccination. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study, conducted in a university-affiliated in vitro fertilization center between October 2021 and March 2022, including men not previously infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus who received at least 2 doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Semen analyses of samples given pre-vaccination and 6-14 months post-vaccination were analyzed for the parameters of volume, concentration, motility, morphology, and total motile count (TMC) and compared. These parameters were also compared separately for men who received a third (booster) dose and for men with pre-vaccination normal and abnormal sperm. Correlations between time from vaccination and post-vaccination sperm parameters were also assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-eight men were included in the final analysis. Semen volume (2.9 ± 1.4 vs. 2.9 ± 1.6 ml), sperm concentration (42.9 ± 37.9 vs. 51.5 ± 46.2 million/ml), motility (42.5 ± 23.1 vs. 44.3 ± 23.4 percent), morphology (8.8 ± .16.6 vs. 6.6 ± 8.8 percent), and TMC (55.7 ± 57.9 vs. 71.1 ± 77.1 million) were comparable between the pre- and post-vaccination samples. This was true for the entire study cohort, for the subgroup of men who received a third dose and for the subgroups of men with a pre-vaccination normal and abnormal semen samples. No correlation was found between time from vaccination and post-vaccination sperm parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) SARS-CoV-2 vaccine does not impair any of the sperm parameters over a relatively long-time interval of 6 to 14 months from vaccination.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Masculino , Humanos , Vacina BNT162 , Sêmen , RNA Mensageiro , Estudos Retrospectivos , Seguimentos , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Espermatozoides
2.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 28(8): 1497-1502.e1, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33310167

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of a third ectopic pregnancy according to the modality of treatment of the second ectopic pregnancy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University-affiliated tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: One hundred eleven women who had 2 ectopic pregnancies and a third consecutive pregnancy between 2003 and 2018. INTERVENTIONS: Surgery or medical treatment as required. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: With regard to the modality of treatment of the second ectopic pregnancy, the patients were divided into 3 groups: expectant management, medical treatment with methotrexate, and laparoscopic salpingectomy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the association of various parameters of the second ectopic pregnancy with the occurrence of a third ectopic pregnancy in the consecutive pregnancy. Twenty women (18.0%) were managed expectantly, 55 (49.6%) were treated with methotrexate, and 36 (32.4%) underwent surgery. Expectant management resulted in significantly higher rates of a third ectopic pregnancy compared with treatment with methotrexate or surgical intervention (50.0% vs 18.2% and 13.8%, respectively; p = .005). In the cases of 2 ipsilateral ectopic pregnancies, the interventional approach (medical or surgical treatment) resulted in lower recurrence rates compared with expectant management (25.7% vs 60.0%, respectively; p = .043). CONCLUSION: The risk of a third episode of an ectopic pregnancy after expectant management of a second ectopic pregnancy is extremely high. An interventional approach by treatment with methotrexate or salpingectomy is therefore preferred for recurrent ectopic pregnancy management, especially in ipsilateral recurrences.


Assuntos
Gravidez Ectópica , Gravidez Tubária , Feminino , Humanos , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Gravidez , Gravidez Ectópica/diagnóstico por imagem , Gravidez Ectópica/cirurgia , Gravidez Tubária/diagnóstico por imagem , Gravidez Tubária/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Salpingectomia
3.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 238: 20-24, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31082739

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Tubo-ovarian abscess (TOA) is a well-established sequel of acute pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). While as up to 25% of women will experience conservative treatment failure, the factors associated with treatment failure are not clearly-established, and the role of Cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) is under-studied. We aim to evaluate the role of CA-125 in the conservative management of TOA. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study conducted at tertiary university-affiliated hospital during 2007-2018. Ninety one patients were diagnosed with a TOA and underwent a trial of conservative management with intravenous antibiotics. Patients who eventually underwent surgical intervention were compared with patients managed conservatively. RESULTS: Overall, 39/91 (42.8%) underwent an invasive intervention subsequent to failed antibiotic treatment. Patients who experienced conservative treatment failure had higher medians of inflammatory markers as CRP (15.7 vs. 10.8 mg/L, p = 0.02), WBC count (14.2 vs. 12.4 1,000/mm3, p = 0.04) and platelet count (374 vs. 295 109/L, p = 0.04) at admission. Higher levels of CA-125 at admission were found in those who required an invasive intervention (57 vs. 30 U\ml, p = 0.02) as well. The largest diameter of TOA at admission was higher in those who required an invasive intervention as compared to those who were successfully treated conservatively (75 mm vs. 57 mm, p = 0.01). CA-125 level was found to be the only independent factor associated with conservative treatment failure (OR; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27, 1.08-1.48, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Elevated CA-125 serum levels were found to be associated with failure of conservative parenteral antibiotic therapy for TOA. This finding should be better evaluated in a prospective manner.


Assuntos
Abscesso/sangue , Abscesso/etiologia , Antígeno Ca-125/sangue , Doença Inflamatória Pélvica/complicações , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Inflamatória Pélvica/sangue , Doença Inflamatória Pélvica/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg ; 24(5): 352-355, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28658003

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine anatomical and clinical cure, as well as patient satisfaction in uterine-preserving laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) in women with anterior and apical prolapse. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including all women who underwent LUSLS for anterior and apical prolapse between January 2012 and December 2015 at a tertiary-care university hospital. All women had LUSLS hysteropexy and anterior colporrhaphy. Pre- and postoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) measurements were taken. Prolapse symptoms were queried via standardized history. Patient satisfaction was measured by the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I). RESULTS: Fifty-three women underwent the procedure during the study period. Follow-up data were available for 48 women. The mean preoperative POP-Q Ba point was 2.7 ± 1.6 and C point was -0.8 ± 2.8. At a mean follow-up of 17.5 ± 16.0 months with a median of 12 months (range, 1-54 months), there was a significant improvement of POP-Q points Ba, C, and Bp (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Anatomical cure, defined as no prolapse of any POP-Q point at or below 1 cm above the hymen (-1), was 85.4%. Clinical cure, defined as a composite outcome of no prolapse outside the hymen, C point above total vaginal length/2, no prolapse symptoms, and no need for further treatment, was 95.8%. At a mean of 22.2 ± 12.4 months postoperatively, patient satisfaction was high, with 95.5% stating their condition was very much better (PGI-I-A) or much better (PGI-I-B). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension is a valid uterine-preserving option for women with anterior and apical prolapse, with high anatomical and clinical cure rates and patient satisfaction.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/psicologia , Ligamentos/cirurgia , Satisfação do Paciente , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Idoso , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/classificação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários
6.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 24(6): 1007-1013, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28642091

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and reproductive outcomes of an ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) procedure with the widely accepted operative hysteroscopic (OH) procedure in the removal of retained products of conception (RPOCs) after normal vaginal delivery. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: A university-affiliated tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Eighty-six patients after normal vaginal delivery diagnosed with RPOCs from 2005 through 2015. This study was approved by the local institutional review board. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with either MVA or OH for patients diagnosed with RPOCs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 86 patients, 23 underwent remnant removal by ultrasound-guided MVA using a 6- to 7-mm catheter in a "see and treat" office procedure. Sixty-three patients underwent remnant removal using the OH procedure. Follow-up included sonographic examination 3 to 5 weeks after the procedure and long-term follow-up on complications and reproductive outcomes. Successful remnant evacuation and the overall complications rates were similar when comparing the MVA group and the OH group (95.7% vs 96.8% and 4.3% vs 4.7%, respectively). Conception rates and miscarriage rates were comparable in the MVA and OH groups (78.6% vs 72.2% and 9.1% vs 14.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Preliminary results from 23 patients suggest that MVA is an efficient procedure with low complication rates and satisfactory reproductive outcomes. It does not require anesthesia or operating room facilities, allowing an immediate and inexpensive "see and treat" option for RPOCs. Further larger controlled trials are required.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios , Parto Obstétrico/efeitos adversos , Exame Ginecológico , Placenta Retida/cirurgia , Curetagem a Vácuo/métodos , Adulto , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/métodos , Feminino , Exame Ginecológico/métodos , Humanos , Histeroscopia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Placenta Retida/diagnóstico , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Aderências Teciduais/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA