Efficacy of Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Compared to Azacitidine Monotherapy: Real-World Experience.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The combination of venetoclax (VEN) and azacitidine (AZA) (VEN+AZA) leads to higher complete remission rates and longer overall survival (OS) in patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive combination chemotherapy. In practice, the doses of VEN and AZA are reduced at the attending physician's discretion to avoid adverse events; however, the impact of dose and duration reductions has not been fully clarified. We analyzed whether the efficacy was maintained with reduced VEN+AZA compared to AZA monotherapy in the real world. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 33 patients were included; 17 (10 newly diagnosed, 7 primary refractory or relapsed) received VEN+AZA, and 16 (7 newly diagnosed, 9 primary refractory or relapsed) received AZA. We analyzed complete remission (CR) and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rates, OS, and the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: CR/CRi were achieved in 7/17 (41.2%) and 11/17 (64.7%) patients in the VEN+AZA group and 0/15 (0%) and 2/15 (6.7%) patients in the AZA group, respectively. The CR/CRi rate was higher in the VEN+AZA group than in the AZA group (p=0.001). OS was longer in the VEN+AZA group than in the AZA group (p=0.03), with a median of 506 days [95% confidence interval (CI)=234-585 days] and 208 days (95% CI=52-343 days), respectively. CONCLUSION: The doses of the VEN+AZA combination were reduced at the attending physician's discretion, resulting in a higher CR/CRi rate and longer OS than AZA monotherapy and is considered useful for AML in the real world.

Thyroid dysfunction with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab after lenvatinib in hepatocellular carcinoma: A case series.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is the recommended first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, based on guidelines from the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer prognosis and treatment strategy. However, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab may be used after administration of lenvatinib. Here, we present four patients who developed thyroid dysfunction after second-line treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, but not after lenvatinib alone. The patients were treated with lenvatinib and/or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma at Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital. Of patients treated with only lenvatinib or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, 2/18 (11%) and 4/15 (27%) developed thyroid dysfunction, respectively. All four patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab after lenvatinib developed hypothyroidism after 2-14 doses of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Three patients developed Grade 2 symptoms and were treated with levothyroxine sodium. In patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, the incidence of thyroid dysfunction may be higher among patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab after lenvatinib than those treated with lenvatinib or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab alone.