Extended Duration of Active Surveillance of Small Renal Masses: A Prospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: We report the natural history of small renal masses in patients undergoing active surveillance with extended followup. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study in patients undergoing active surveillance of small renal masses diagnosed between 2001 and 2011 at a single institution. All patients underwent active surveillance of small renal masses presumed to be renal cell carcinoma based on diagnostic imaging. Reported patient outcomes included progression to treatment, metastatic disease and/or death. Linear and volumetric tumor growth rates were evaluated. RESULTS: Included in study were 103 patients with a total of 107 small renal masses. Median followup was 55.5 months in patients who continued on active surveillance. Median maximum diameter and volume at diagnosis were 2.1 cm (IQR 1.5-2.7) and 4.8 cm3 (IQR 1.7-11.9), respectively. At last followup 53 patients (51.5%) were alive without metastatic disease, 48 (45.6%) had died of another cause and metastatic disease had developed in 2 (1.9%), including 1 (1.0%) who ultimately died of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The mean ± SEM linear and volumetric growth rates of all small renal masses were 0.21 ± 0.03 cm per year and 6.15 ± 2.15 cm3, respectively. Study limitations include nonstandardized followup and a lack of biopsy data on most patients. CONCLUSIONS: During extended followup the majority of small renal masses in patients on active surveillance display indolent behavior. The risk of progression to metastatic disease remains low.

Accuracy of kidney cancer diagnosis and histological subtype within Canadian cancer registry data.

INTRODUCTION: Provincial/territorial cancer registries (PTCRs) are the mainstay for Canadian population-based cancer statistics. Each jurisdiction captures this data in a population-based registry, including the Nova Scotia Cancer Registry (NSCR). The goal of this study was to describe data from the NSCR regarding renal cell carcinoma (RCC) pathology subtype and method of diagnosis and compare it to the actual pathology reports to determine the accuracy of diagnosis and histological subtype assignment. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients diagnosed with RCC in the NSCR from 2006-2010 with an ICD-O-3 code C64.9 seen or treated in the largest NS health district. From the NSCR, method of diagnosis and pathological diagnosis was recorded. All diagnoses of non-clear-cell RCC (nonccRCC) from NSCR were compared to the actual pathology report for descriptive comparison and reasons for discordance. RESULTS: 723 patients make up the study cohort. 81.3% of patients were diagnosed by nephrectomy, 11.1% radiography, 6.9 % biopsy, and 0.7% autopsy. By NSCR data, 52.8% had clear-cell (ccRCC), 20.5% RCC not otherwise specified (NOS), 12.7% papillary, 4% chromophobe, and the rest had other nonccRCC subtypes. By pathology reports, 69.5% had clear-cell, 15% papillary, 5% chromophobe, only 2.7% RCC NOS. There was a discordance rate of 15.4% between NSCR data and diagnosis from pathology report. Reasons for discordance were not enough information by the pathologist in 45.5%, misinterpretation of report by data coder in 22.2%, and true coding error in 32.3%. CONCLUSIONS: When using PTCR for RCC incidence data, it is important to understand how the diagnosis is made, as not all are based on pathological confirmation; in this cohort 11% were based on radiology. One must also be aware that clear-cell and non-clear-cell subtypes may differ between the PTCR data and pathology reports. In this study, ccRCC made up 52.8% of the registry diagnoses, but increased to 69.6% on pathology report review. Use of synoptic reporting and ongoing education may improve accuracy of registry data.

Overactive Bladder and Storage Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Following Radical Prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the rate of overactive bladder (OAB) and storage lower urinary tract symptoms following radical prostatectomy (RP) and determine if subsequent radiation increases the risk of OAB. METHODS: We reviewed all patients who underwent open RP at our tertiary care institution from January 2006 to June 2011. Primary outcomes were the proportion of patients with new OAB and time to development of OAB in those treated with RP alone vs RP plus radiation. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients treated for OAB. A Cox survival analysis was used to assess the impact of radiation on development of OAB. RESULTS: Of the 875 patients who met study criteria, 19% of patients developed de novo OAB defined as urgency with or without frequency and nocturia. A total of 256 patients (29%) developed 1 or more urinary symptoms including nocturia (22%), frequency (21%), urgency (19%), and urge incontinence (6%) following RP. After adjusting for age, body mass index, smoking status, cancer stage, and nerve-sparing status, radiation therapy was associated with an increased relative hazard of OAB (5.59; 95% CI 3.63-8.61, P < .001). Among men classified with de novo OAB, only 41% received treatment. CONCLUSION: OAB and storage lower urinary tract symptoms are prevalent in men post-RP. Adjuvant or salvage radiation therapy increases the risk of developing OAB after RP. OAB may be undertreated in men following prostate cancer treatment.