Complications and Practice Variation in the Use of Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in People With Cystic Fibrosis: The Prospective Study of Peripherally Inserted Venous Catheters in People With Cystic Fibrosis Study.

BACKGROUND: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are used commonly to administer antibiotics to people with cystic fibrosis (CF), but their use can be complicated by venous thrombosis and catheter occlusion. RESEARCH QUESTION: Which participant-, catheter-, and catheter management-level attributes are associated with increased risk of complications of PICCs among people with CF? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of adults and children with CF who received PICCs at 10 CF care centers in the United States. The primary end point was defined as occlusion of the catheter resulting in unplanned removal, symptomatic venous thrombosis in the extremity containing the catheter, or both. Three categories of composite secondary outcomes were identified: difficult line placement, local soft tissue or skin reactions, and catheter malfunction. Data specific to the participant, catheter placement, and catheter management were collected in a centralized database. Risk factors for primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Between June 2018 and July 2021, 157 adults and 103 children older than 6 years with CF had 375 PICCs placed. Patients underwent 4,828 catheter-days of observation. Of the 375 PICCs, 334 (89%) were ≤ 4.5 F, 342 (91%) were single lumen, and 366 (98%) were placed using ultrasound guidance. The primary outcome occurred in 15 PICCs for an event rate of 3.11 per 1,000 catheter-days. No cases of catheter-related bloodstream infection occurred. Other secondary outcomes developed in 147 of 375 catheters (39%). Despite evidence of practice variation, no risk factors for the primary outcome and few risk factors for secondary outcomes were identified. INTERPRETATION: This study affirmed the safety of contemporary approaches to inserting and using PICCs in people with CF. Given the low rate of complications in this study, observations may reflect a widespread shift to selecting smaller-diameter PICCs and using ultrasound to guide their placement.

Gaps in Cystic Fibrosis Care Are Associated with Reduced Lung Function in the U.S. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry.

Rationale: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease leading to progressive lung function loss and early mortality. Many clinical and demographic variables are associated with lung function decline, but little is known about the effects of prolonged periods of missed care. Objectives: To determine if missed care in the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR) is associated with decreased lung function at follow-up visits. Methods: Deidentified CFFPR data for 2004-2016 were analyzed, with the exposure of interest being ⩾12-month gap in CFFPR data. We modeled percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second using longitudinal semiparametric modeling with natural cubic splines for age (knots at quantiles) and with subject-specific random effects, adjusted for sex and CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) genotype, race, and ethnicity and included time-varying covariates for gaps in care, insurance type, underweight body mass index, CF-related diabetes status, and chronic infections. Results: A total of 24,328 individuals with 1,082,899 encounters in the CFFPR met inclusion criteria. In the cohort, 8,413 (35%) individuals had at least a single ⩾12-month episode of discontinuity, whereas 15,915 (65%) had continuous care. Of the encounters preceded by a 12-month gap, 75.8% occurred in patients 18 years and older. Compared with those with continuous care, those with a discontinuous care episode had a lower follow-up percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second at the index visit (-0.81%; 95% confidence interval, -1.00, -0.61) after adjustment for other variables. The magnitude of this difference was much greater (-2.1%; 95% confidence interval, -1.5, -2.7) in young adult F508del homozygotes. Conclusions: There was a high rate of ⩾12-month gap in care, especially in adults, documented in the CFFPR. Discontinuous care identified in the CFFPR was strongly associated with decreased lung function, especially in adolescents and young adults homozygous for the F508del CFTR mutation. This may have implications for identifying and treating people with lengthy gaps in care and may have implications for CFF care recommendations.

Community oncologists' perceptions and utilization of large-panel genomic tumor testing.

PURPOSE: Large-panel genomic tumor testing (GTT) is an emerging technology with great promise but uncertain clinical value. Previous research has documented variability in academic oncologists' perceptions and use of GTT, but little is known about community oncologists' perceptions of GTT and how perceptions relate to clinicians' intentions to use GTT. METHODS: Community oncology physicians (N = 58) participating in a statewide initiative aimed at improving access to large-panel GTT completed surveys assessing their confidence in using GTT, attitudes regarding the value of GTT, perceptions of barriers to GTT implementation, and future intentions to use GTTs. Descriptive and multivariable regression analyses were conducted to characterize these perceptions and to explore the relationships between them. RESULTS: There was substantial variability in clinicians' perceptions of GTT. Clinicians generally had moderate confidence in their ability to use GTT, but lower confidence in patients' ability to understand test results and access targeted treatment. Clinicians had positive attitudes regarding the value of GTT. Clinicians' future intentions to use GTT were associated with greater confidence in using GTT and greater perceived barriers to implementing GTT, but not with attitudes about the value of GTT. CONCLUSIONS: Community oncologists' perceptions of large-panel genomic tumor testing are variable, and their future intentions to use GTT are associated with both their confidence in and perceived barriers to its use, but not with their attitudes towards GTT. More research is needed to understand other factors that determine how oncologists perceive and use GTT in clinical practice.