Efficacy of double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic balloon dilatation combined with stent deployment for hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic stricture.

BACKGROUND: Hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic stricture (HJAS) is a significant complication of biliary reconstruction surgery. Endoscopic management of HJAS using double-balloon enteroscopy has expanded; however, retrospective reports in this setting are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic balloon dilatation combined with stent deployment for HJAS. METHODS: This was a single-arm prospective clinical trial involving 40 patients with treatment-naïve HJAS enrolled between March 2016 and August 2019 at four endoscopy units in Japan. For HJAS, plastic stents combined with balloon dilatation were placed for 6 months after initial stenting. The primary outcome was HJ anastomosis patency 12 months after stent removal. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 97.5% (39/40). The failed case required percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage using the rendezvous technique. All cases achieved successful endoscopic treatment. During the treatment period, four of 40 patients (10%) ended the study protocol due to unrelated causes and were excluded from the primary analysis. Among the 36 patients, clinical success was achieved in 34 (94.4%) patients. The remaining two patients achieved HJAS resolution after an additional 3 months. All 36 patients achieved HJAS resolution. Adverse events were observed in two patients (5.0%) who developed moderate cholangitis. During a median follow-up of 21.3 months, HJAS recurrence was observed in 8.3% (3/36) with a median time to recurrence of 4.3 months and HJ anastomosis patency at 12 months was 94.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic balloon dilatation combined with plastic stent deployment for 6 months was a safe and effective strategy for HJAS. (Clinical Trial Registry no. UMIN000020613).

Endoscopic placement of covered versus uncovered self-expandable metal stents for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: Stenting is an established endoscopic therapy for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (mGOO). The choice of stent (covered vs uncovered) has been examined in prior randomised studies without clear results. DESIGN: In a multicentre randomised prospective study, we compared covered (CSEMS) with uncovered self-expandable metal stents (UCSEMS) in patients with mGOO; main outcomes were stent dysfunction and patient survival, with subgroup analyses of patients with extrinsic and intrinsic tumours. RESULTS: Overall survival was poor with no difference between groups (probability at 3 months 49.7% for covered vs 48.4% for uncovered stents; log-rank for overall survival p=0.26). Within that setting of short survival, the proportion of stent dysfunction was significantly higher for uncovered stents (35.2% vs 23.4%, p=0.01) with significantly shorter time to stent dysfunction. This was mainly relevant for patients with extrinsic tumours (stent dysfunction rates for uncovered stents 35.6% vs 17.5%, p<0.01). Subgrouping was also relevant with respect to tumour ingrowth (lower with covered stents for intrinsic tumours; 1.6% vs 27.7%, p<0.01) and stent migration (higher with covered stents for extrinsic tumours: 15.3% vs 2.5%, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Due to poor patient survival, minor differences between covered and uncovered stents may be less relevant even if statistically significant; however, subgroup analysis would suggest to use covered stents for intrinsic and uncovered stents for extrinsic malignancies.

Comparison Between Endoscopic Biliary Stenting Combined with Balloon Dilation and Balloon Dilation Alone for the Treatment of Benign Hepaticojejunostomy Anastomotic Stricture.

BACKGROUND: Hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic stricture (HJAS) is an important complication of biliary reconstructive surgery but has no standard treatment. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of endoscopic treatment for benign HJAS and identify the risk factors for its recurrence. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 176 patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for HJAS between April 2008 and March 2016. The outcome of endoscopic biliary stenting combined with balloon dilation (EBS group) and balloon dilation alone (balloon group) was evaluated. RESULTS: The scope was successfully inserted into the HJ site in 93.8% patients (165/176), and 139 patients underwent endoscopic treatment after HJAS was confirmed. Successful biliary drainage was achieved in 137 patients by using ERCP and rendezvous procedures. Among these, 103 patients were included in balloon group and 34 patients were in EBS group. HJAS was resolved in 132 patients; five died from recurrence of primary disease. The 1 (3)-year bile duct patency rates in the balloon and EBS groups were 62.5% (46.6%) and 89.4% (84.7%), respectively (p = 0.015). Univariate analysis showed that balloon dilation (p = 0.009) and early HJAS formation (time from surgery to ERCP < 1 year) (p = 0.02) were risk factors for HJAS recurrence. In the multivariate analysis, balloon dilatation was identified as independent risk factors for HJAS recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon dilation without stent deployment and early HJAS formation are risk factors for HJAS recurrence after endoscopic treatment. Stent deployment might be recommended for definite resolution of HJAS.

Dexmedetomidine for conscious sedation with colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: Conscious sedation for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has not been standardized, and there are no studies of sedation for colorectal ESD. METHODS: We conducted a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial to clarify the usefulness of DEX during colorectal ESD. In total 80 patients with colorectal ESD from April 2016 to May 2017 were assigned to the placebo group or the DEX group (40 cases each). The primary outcome was patient satisfaction (visual analogue scale: VAS). Secondary outcomes were evaluated for 13 factors, including patient pain level (VAS), endoscopist satisfaction (VAS), objective patient pain level viewed from the endoscopist's perspective (VAS), rate of patient response, rate of side effects, etc., from the patient's and endoscopist's perspectives. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction was 8.4 and 9.1 (P = 0.018) in the placebo group and the DEX group, respectively. Secondary outcomes of patient pain level, endoscopist satisfaction, objective patient pain level from the endoscopist's perspective for the placebo and DEX groups were 1.2 and 0.4 (P = 0.045), 8.2 and 9.3 (P < 0.001), and 1.2 and 0.5 (P = 0.002), respectively. All of these were significantly positive results (more comfortable and less pain) in the DEX group. The rate of a patient response was 100% in all cases. The side effects (hypoxia/bradycardia/hypotension) were 0%/0%/0% and 7.5%/7.5%/5% (P = 0.030). However, these rates were less than the reported side effect occurrence rate, and no additional medication was needed. CONCLUSION: DEX enables conscious sedation, and is useful not only for patient and endoscopist satisfaction but also for pain relief. DEX is an effective sedation method for colorectal ESD.

Comparison of two fluoroscopic images to ensure efficient scope insertion for biliary intervention in patients with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy.

Background and study aims No standard procedure for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is available for patients with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (RYHJ) with side-to-end hepaticojejunostomy. We therefore explored methods of efficient scope insertion at a hepaticojejunostomy site. Patients and methods Patients with suspected biliary disease were prospectively enrolled. Based on two fluoroscopic images obtained on scope insertion into each lumen of a two-pronged Roux-en-Y anastomosis, we selected the lumen in which the distal end of the scope progressed toward the patient's liver or head. The accuracy of this method for selecting the correct lumen leading to the hepaticojejunostomy site was investigated. Results Of the 33 included patients, successful insertion to the hepaticojejunostomy site was achieved in 32 (97 %), 26 (81 %) of whom had undergone the imaging method. The accuracy of the method was 88 % (23/26). The time required for insertion between the anastomotic site and the hepaticojejunostomy site was shorter when the lumen selection had been correct (13 minutes [7 - 30] (n = 23) vs. 18 minutes [8 - 28] (n = 9); P = 0.95). Conclusion This method based on two fluoroscopic images was useful for achieving efficient scope insertion in patients with RYHJ.Trial registered at University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000014183).

The efficacy and safety of single-session endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for evaluation of pancreatic masses.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There have been limited studies evaluating single-session EUS-FNA and ERCP for evaluation of pancreatic masses. The aim of this study was to determine the safety of single-session EUS-FNA and ERCP, and to compare the diagnostic accuracies of cytodiagnosis by EUS-FNA, ERCP, and their combination. METHODOLOGY: A total of 100 patients with pancreatic masses were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent single-session EUS-FNA and ERCP. The main outcome measurement was frequency of post-procedural complications. Another measurement was diagnostic accuracy of cytodiagnosis by EUS-FNA, ERCP, and their combination. RESULTS: Procedure-related pancreatitis occurred in 10 patients, but all patients were conservatively managed. Cytodiagnosis by EUS-FNA was significantly superior to ERCP in accuracy. In patients with a pancreatic head mass, 3 cases of false negative EUS-FNA were positive on ERCP. The combination procedures improved accuracy compared with EUS-FNA alone. By contrast, in the subgroup of the pancreatic body or tail mass, the combination of EUS-FNA and ERCP did not improve cytodiagnosis compared to that with EUS-FNA alone. CONCLUSIONS: Single-session EUS-FNA and ERCP appears to be as safe as performing each procedure separately. EUS-FNA should be considered the principal procedure for cytodiagnosis. ERCP has only a complementary role in patients with pancreatic head mass.

[A case of diversion colitis successfully treated with 5-aminosalicylic acid].

An 84-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of blood in the stool. He had previously undergone a subtotal colectomy and ileostomy with a mucous fistula of the sigmoid colon because of a large bowel hemorrhage of unknown origin. Five years later, a minor hemorrhage developed in the remnant rectum. The clinical history, colonoscopic findings, and the histology of the diverted colon specimens were suggestive of diversion colitis. Treatment was initiated with short-chain fatty acid enema, but slight blood loss through the stool continued;thus, the patient was administered 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) enema. Subsequently, his symptoms and endoscopic findings improved. 5-ASA enema appears to be both safe and effective in the treatment of diversion colitis following intestinal tract surgery.

Management of occluded metallic stents in malignant hilar biliary stricture.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Little is known about the management of occluded multiple metallic stent (MS) deployed in malignant hilar biliary strictures (HBS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the endoscopic management of occluded multiple MSs deployed in HBS. METHODOLOGY: Fifty-five patients with unresectable biliary tract carcinoma had multiple MSs inserted due to HBS. The endoscopic intervention through the duodenal papilla was performed on 30 cases that had MS occlusion. The procedure success rate, the survival time after the procedure and the number of endoscopic interventions before death were analyzed, retrospectively. RESULTS: The causes of MS obstruction were tissue ingrowth (n=20), sludge (n=7), tumor overgrowth (n=2), and hemobilia (n=1). Endoscopic cleaning or deployment of plastic stents or metallic stents was performed on these patients and was successfully accomplished only via the transpapillary approach. The survival time after MS obstruction was 219 days. The median number of endoscopic interventions before death was 3. The median interval of endoscopic intervention after the first plastic stent occlusion was 84 days. CONCLUSIONS: Our long-term data regarding the endoscopic management of occluded MSs deployed in malignant hilar biliary strictures are acceptable although the patency time of plastic stents deployed after MS occlusion was relatively short.

Monitoring of CA19-9 and SPan-1 can facilitate the earlier confirmation of progressing pancreatic cancer during chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of objective response to chemotherapy using imaging modalities is sometimes difficult in pancreatic cancer (PC). We aimed to verify whether monitoring of serum tumor markers (TMs), namely carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9, DUPAN-2, SPan-1, can facilitate earlier confirmation of treatment failure. METHODS: Monitoring of serum TMs and computed tomography were performed every 4 weeks until progression of disease in 90 patients with PC undergoing gemcitabine therapy. In Group A (January 2006-October 2007), we analyzed the fluctuation rates of TMs with high pretreatment positive rates, and defined the criteria of progressive disease under TM monitoring (TM-PD). In Group B (November 2007-October 2008), we calculated the time to progression (TTP) under this TM-PD criteria, which was compared with the TTP under the RECIST criteria. RESULTS: CA19-9 and SPan-1 had the highest pretreatment positive rates: 83% and 90%, respectively. In Group A (CA19-9, n = 38; SPan-1, n = 36), TM-PD criteria were defined as follows: fluctuation rates were ≥25% for a month or ≥10% for 2 consecutive months in CA19-9, and ≥10% for a month in SPan-1. In Group B (CA19-9, n = 18; SPan-1, n = 17), under these criteria, one-month earlier confirmation of treatment failure was feasible in 61% by CA19-9 and 59% by SPan-1. Furthermore, the combination could facilitate this determination in 72% (35/49), significantly better than CA19-9 alone (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Monitoring of serum CA19-9 and SPan-1 is helpful for earlier confirmation of treatment failure during gemcitabine therapy in PC.

[Classification of the bleeding pattern in colonic diverticulum is useful to predict the risk of bleeding or re-bleeding after endoscopic treatment].

We examined the re-bleeding rate after endoscopic hemostasis according to the bleeding pattern in patients with an acute lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage from colonic diverticula in 34 patients with active bleeding (Type 1) and 49 patients with exposed vessels and/or erosions in the base of diverticulum and no active bleeding (Type 2). Endoscopic hemostasis was performed by clipping the exposed vessel or erosions (direct method) or the entire diverticular orifice (reefing method). The incidence of re-bleeding was significantly higher in the Type 1 group than in the Type 2 group (p=0.002). All Type 1 cases were treated by the reefing method. In contrast, 14 of the 49 Type 2 cases were treated by the direct method, and no re-bleeding was observed in these cases. Of the other 35 Type 2 cases treated by reafing, rebleeding was seen in 5 cases. More effective endoscopic treatment is needed to prevent early re-bleeding, especially for Type 1 patients. The direct method may therefore reduce the rate of re-bleeding in Type 2 patients.

A 4-week versus a 3-week schedule of gemcitabine monotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized phase II study to evaluate toxicity and dose intensity.

BACKGROUND: This randomized phase II study compared the efficacy and toxicity between 4-week and 3-week schedules of gemcitabine monotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to either a 4-week schedule (gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m² as a 30-min infusion weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks) or a 3-week schedule (gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m² as a 30-min infusion weekly for 2 consecutive weeks every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was the compliance rate during the first 8 weeks between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were enrolled. The compliance rate during the first 8 weeks was the same (53.3%). For the 4- and 3-week schedules, the tumor response rates were 14.2 and 17.1% (p = 0.92), median progression free survival was 112 and 114 days (p = 0.82), and median overall survival was 206 and 250 days (p = 0.84), respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was the major adverse event in both schedules: 37.7 and 35.5% (p = 0.82). In contrast, thrombocytopenia (platelet count <70000/mm³) was significantly higher for the 4-week schedule: 26.6 and 4.4% (p = 0.008). The mean received dose intensity was equal: 588 and 550 mg/m²/week (p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: The 3-week schedule of gemcitabine did not improve the compliance rate during 8 weeks compared with the 4-week schedule, but it attained a comparable efficacy with lower toxicity. Further investigation will be needed to introduce it into daily practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN ID 974.

Combined duodenal stent placement and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage for malignant duodenal obstruction with biliary stricture.

Patients with malignant pancreatobiliary neoplasm sometimes manifest duodenal obstruction and biliary stricture synchronously or metachronously. In this paper, we reviewed our experience with and technique for combined endoscopic duodenal stent placement and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided biliary drainage. Between May 2007 and September 2009, this combined technique was performed on seven patients with distal biliary strictures and duodenal obstructions. The clinical success rate of the procedure, complications, patency periods of duodenal stents and patency periods of biliary stents were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical success was achieved in all seven cases for both procedures. Complications related to EUS-biliary drainage, namely localized peritonitis due to bile leakage, occurred in two cases. Both patients recovered without additional interventions. Occlusion of a duodenal stent was observed in one patient, but additional intervention could not be performed due to sepsis. Occlusion of both a duodenal stent and a biliary stent was also observed in one patient, and this was resolved with the insertion of an additional duodenal stent and a biliary stent exchange. In conclusion, combined duodenal stent placement and EUS-guided biliary drainage is a therapeutic option in case of failed endoscopic retrograde cannulation of malignant strictures with a malignant duodenal obstruction.

Single-pattern convergence of K-ras mutation correlates with surgical indication of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

OBJECTIVES: One or more patterns of 6 K-ras mutations are detected in cells from the pancreatic juice of patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). We investigated whether these mutations are associated with malignant progression. METHODS: Between January 2002 and December 2007, 53 patients with IPMN were subjected to collection of pure pancreatic juice to evaluate K-ras mutation. According to the histological and radiological findings, the IPMNs were classified into 4 groups: carcinoma group, adenoma group, high-risk group, and low-risk group. We retrospectively investigated the mutation with these groups. RESULTS: In patients with a positive K-ras mutation, a single pattern of K-ras mutation was observed in 80% (8/10) of the carcinoma group, in 71% (5/7) of the adenoma group, in 40% (2/5) of the high-risk group, and in 38% (8/21) of the low-risk group. The rate of a single pattern of K-ras mutation decreased in a stepwise order (P = 0.017). The incidence of a single pattern of K-ras mutation was significantly higher in the patients who received surgical therapy (75%, 12/16) than in those who did not (38%, 10/26; P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that the single-clonal convergence of K-ras mutation is associated with the malignant progression of IPMNs.

Nonprevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic pancreatitis by pancreatic stent after aspiration of pure pancreatic juice in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a pancreatic stent regarding the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis after aspiration of pure pancreatic juice in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. METHODS: A retrospective study was made to assess the outcome in 121 consecutive patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms who underwent endoscopic aspiration of pure pancreatic juice for cytologic examination between July 2001 and October 2007. From July 2001 to March 2004, 58 patients did not undergo pancreatic stent insertion (the no-stent [nS] group). The remaining 63 patients did undergo stent insertion (stent [S] group). RESULTS: The overall incidences of post-ERCP pancreatitis was 11 (9.1%). The incidences of post-ERCP pancreatitis in the S and nS groups were 8 (12.7%) and 3 (5.2%; P = 0.21), respectively. In the male patients and the patients with a smaller diameter of the main pancreatic ducts, post-ERCP pancreatitis was seen more frequently in those in the S group (13% and 21%, respectively) than in those in the nS group (0% and 0%, respectively; P = 0.04, 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The pancreatic stent did not seem to decrease the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Furthermore, the pancreatic stent seems to be potentially detrimental in male patients and in patients with small-diameter main pancreatic ducts.

Prevention of biliary complication in radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma-Cooling effect by endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Biliary stricture after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for nodules of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) close to major bile ducts sometimes causes septic complications and liver failure. Therefore, it may require interventional drainage for decompression during the follow-up period. The purpose of this study is to clarify the feasibility and safety of bile duct cooling using an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) tube in RFA for HCC close to major bile ducts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 2003 and July 2007, 14 consecutive patients (14 nodules) undergoing RFA with cooling by an ENBD tube for HCCs close to major bile ducts were enrolled in this study. We infused chilled saline solution via the ENBD tube at 1ml/s to prevent heat damage during RFA. As controls, 11 patients (13 nodules) undergoing RFA without cooling close to major bile ducts between April 2001 and August 2003 were reviewed. The major outcomes for evaluation were biliary complications and the secondary outcome was local tumor recurrence. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in tumor recurrence between the two groups. However, the rate of biliary complications was significantly lower in the cooling group than in the non-cooling group (0% vs. 39%, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Cooling of bile ducts via an ENBD tube can prevent biliary complications induced by RFA of HCC close to major bile ducts without increasing local recurrence. This technique increases indication of RFA in difficult cases.

[ case of autoimmune pancreatitis with various extrapancreatic fibrosclerosis followed by malignant diseases].

We experienced a rare case of autoimmune pancreatitis with sclerosing cholangitis, retroperitoneal fibrosis and interstitial pneumonia. The patient was a 68-year old man and had abnormal liver function with jaundice. We performed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and needle biopsy of the liver and pancreas. We obtained histological findings such as dense infiltration of plasma cells and lymphocytes and remarkable fibrosis and diagnosed AIP. The patient received treatment by prednisolone and thereafter developed bladder cancer and gastric cancer. He has been followed up for 4.5 years with no recurrence.

[Marked effect of combination chemotherapy with tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium and gemcitabine on a suspected case of pancreas cancer or gallbladder cancer metastasis to bone: further diagnosis of disseminated carcinomatosa of bone marrow recurrence after the 23 years of gastric cancer operation by autopsy findings].

A 70-year-old woman who underwent proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer (poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma) of Stage IIIB at age 46 visited our hospital April 2004 because of exacerbated pain by movement in the buttocks since November 2003. She showed multiple bone metastasis by CT (computerized tomography). Pancreas cancer or gallbladder cancer was suspected by CT, and a high tumor marker score (CA19-9 18,625 U/mL, DUPAN-II 15,000 U/ mL elevations were acknowledged). Although her symptoms were severe with performance status (PS) 4, she was administered combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. After 2 cycle therapy, her PS was improved to 2, but the tumor markers had elevated. So we changed the chemotherapy menu to S-1 and gemcitabine. Her tumor markers lowered and PS was improved to 1. There was a remarkable response to this chemotherapy, and the result of CT and bone scintigraphy suggested that her bone metastasis was improved. Because of hematologic relapse due to DIC at 1 year after the first treatment, she was readmitted to our hospital and later died. The autopsical result revealed recurrence of gastric cancer 23 years post-operatively.

Endoscopic deployment of multiple JOSTENT SelfX is effective and safe in treatment of malignant hilar biliary strictures.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: For the treatment of unresectable biliary tract carcinoma with hilar biliary stricture, antitumor therapy and biliary stenting should be addressed in terms of prolonged survival with a good quality of life. However, the endoscopic management of malignant hilar biliary strictures is difficult even for an expert endoscopist. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the endoscopic deployment of multiple JOSTENT SelfX units in patients with hilar biliary strictures treated with or without chemotherapy. METHODS: Between November 2003 and December 2006, endoscopic deployment of multiple JOSTENT SelfX units in hilar biliary strictures by using a partial stent-in-stent procedure was performed on 41 consecutive patients with primary cholangiocarcinoma (n = 34) and gallbladder carcinoma (n = 7) at a gastroenterologic center of Okayama University Hospital. Thirty-three patients were treated with gemcitabine (n = 25) or S-1 (n = 8). RESULTS: Metallic stent deployment was successfully accomplished in all cases via only endoscopic procedures. During the follow-up period (mean, 210 days), mean patency time was 150 days, and metallic stent obstruction occurred in 15 cases (37%). Although a repeat intervention was required in all metallic stent obstructed cases, the deployment of the second metallic or plastic stent was completed successfully. The remaining 26 cases (63%) required no interventions. The median overall survival period was only 235 days. However, that of the patients receiving chemotherapy was 392 days. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic partial stent-in-stent deployment with multiple JOSTENT SelfX prostheses is effective and safe for the treatment of malignant hilar biliary stricture even in patients receiving chemotherapy.

Santorinicele in a patient with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

A santorinicele is defined as a focal cystic dilatation of the terminal portion of the dorsal pancreatic duct at the minor papilla; most cases have been reported in patients with pancreas divisum. It has been suggested that a santorinicele results from a combination of a minor papilla obstruction which prevents the flow of pancreatic juice and a weakness of the duodenal wall where the dorsal pancreatic duct terminates. However, these conditions can occur in patients with invasive ductal cancer in the pancreatic head. We encountered a rare case of a santorinicele with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head in an 81-year-old woman.

Perforation of jejunum induced by the deployment of a temporary prophylactic pancreatic stent in the patient with peritonitis carcinomatosa.

A great deal of medical literature describes the efficacy and safety of the prophylactic pancreatic stent in reducing the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (post-ERCP) pancreatitis. At the moment, no serious complication due to the migration of this stent has been reported. We describe a case with perforation of jejunum induced by the migration of a temporary prophylactic pancreatic stent. This report indicates that we should pay attention to this severe complication when we place a temporary prophylactic pancreatic stent in patients who have peritonitis carcinomatosa or adherence of the intestine irrespective of oral intake.