Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 27 Suppl 3: 23-8, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22486867

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Two types of stool antigen tests have been used in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. Testmate Pylori Antigen enzyme immunoassay (TPAg EIA) is a direct sandwich enzyme immunoassay (EIA) while Testmate Rapid Pylori Antigen (Rapid TPAg) is performed using immunochromatography. The aim of this study was to study the characterization and usefulness of these tests. METHODS: Accuracy of both tests was studied using 111 fecal samples obtained from H. pylori-positive or -negative patients. Cross-reactivity was examined with four other Helicobacter spp. and five fecal bacteria in humans. To estimate the sensitivity of both kits, we tested H. pylori clinical strains. We also examined the diagnostic performances of both tests after the storage for 12 months. RESULTS: The accuracy of both Testmate kits was 100% in fecal samples from 111 patients. No cross-reactivity was observed in both Testmate kits in five fecal bacteria and four other Helicobacter spp. TPAg EIA and Rapid TPAg showed positive results in 1342 of 1344, and 483 of 485 clinical strains, respectively. Diagnostic performances was maintained for 12 months when TPAg EIA was stored at 4°C and Rapid TPAg at 30°C. CONCLUSIONS: We examined the details of high accuracy of TPAg EIA and Rapid TPAg. The diagnostic performance of both kits was maintained after storage for up to 1 year. The two types of tests would be useful in the management of H. pylori infection.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais , Antígenos de Bactérias/imunologia , Catalase/imunologia , Cromatografia de Afinidade , Infecções por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Helicobacter pylori/imunologia , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Especificidade de Anticorpos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Reações Cruzadas , Fezes/microbiologia , Infecções por Helicobacter/microbiologia , Helicobacter pylori/enzimologia , Humanos , Japão , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estabilidade Proteica , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Temperatura , Fatores de Tempo
2.
J Clin Periodontol ; 36(6): 506-13, 2009 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19453574

RESUMO

AIM: This study was designed to evaluate whether the oral administration of lactobacilli could change the bacterial population in supra/subgingival plaque. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-six healthy volunteers without severe periodontitis were randomized into two groups to receive lactobacilli or placebo for 8 weeks (8W): the test group (n=34) received 2.01 x 10(9) CFU/day of Lactobacillus salivarius WB21 and xylitol in tablets; the control group (n=32) received placebo with xylitol. Supra/subgingival plaque samples were collected at the baseline and after 4 weeks (4W) and 8W. The bacterial amounts in plaque samples were analysed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: The numerical sum of five selected periodontopathic bacteria in the test group was decreased significantly in subgingival plaque at 4W [odds ratio (OR)=3.13, 95% confidence intervals (CI)=1.28-7.65, p=0.012]. Multivariate analysis showed that significantly higher odds were obtained for the reduction of Tannerella forsythia in subgingival plaque of the test group at both 4W (OR=6.69, 95% CI=2.51-17.9, p<0.001) and 8W (OR=3.67, 95% CI=1.45-9.26, p=0.006). CONCLUSION: Oral administration of probiotic lactobacilli reduced the numerical sum of five selected periodontopathic bacteria and could contribute to the beneficial effects on periodontal conditions.


Assuntos
Lactobacillus , Periodontite/microbiologia , Probióticos/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans/isolamento & purificação , Bacteroides/isolamento & purificação , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Placa Dentária/microbiologia , Índice de Placa Dentária , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hemorragia Gengival/microbiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índice Periodontal , Bolsa Periodontal/microbiologia , Placebos , Porphyromonas gingivalis/isolamento & purificação , Prevotella intermedia/isolamento & purificação , Probióticos/administração & dosagem , Fumar , Comprimidos , Treponema denticola/isolamento & purificação , Xilitol
3.
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol ; 9(1): 75-8, 2002 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11777832

RESUMO

The aim of the present study was to establish monoclonal antibodies that could be used to produce a diagnostic test composed of one kind of monoclonal antibody recognizing a fecal Helicobacter pylori antigen. The need to develop such a test arose from disadvantages of the diagnostic test that uses a polyclonal antibody or plural kinds of monoclonal antibodies, such as the lower specificity for H. pylori antigen and the difficulty of reproduction with consistent quality. Mice were immunized with sonicated cells of the coccoid form of H. pylori, and fecal samples from H. pylori-positive subjects were screened by a direct sandwich enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for antibody production from 32 hybridoma clones. The three stable clones produced antibodies (21G2, 41A5, and 82B9) that reacted with the same soluble antigen. Gel filtration chromatography showed that the molecular masses of the cellular antigen and the fecal antigen were the same, 260 kDa. The antigen was labile in response to sodium dodecyl sulfate and heat treatments. A single-step direct sandwich EIA using a single monoclonal antibody, 21G2, was developed. The EIA could detect the antigen in 41 H. pylori clinical isolates and in fecal samples from seven H. pylori-positive subjects. Several kinds of Helicobacter species (Helicobacter felis, Helicobacter hepaticus, Helicobacter mustelae, and Helicobacter cinaedi) except H. pylori, major bacteria in feces (Campylobacter jejuni, Bacteroides vulgatus, Bifidobacterium breve, Bifidobacterium infantis, and Escherichia coli), and fecal samples from six H. pylori-negative subjects showed negative results. These results indicate that the new monoclonal antibodies and the new specific EIA would be useful as a noninvasive method of diagnosis of H. pylori infection.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/imunologia , Antígenos de Bactérias/análise , Antígenos de Bactérias/imunologia , Fezes/microbiologia , Helicobacter pylori/imunologia , Animais , Humanos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas , Masculino , Camundongos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA