Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
World J Gastroenterol ; 25(47): 6835-6846, 2019 Dec 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31885424

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The management of proximal esophageal cancer differs from that of tumors located in the mid and lower part of the esophagus due to the close vicinity of vital structures. Non-surgical treatment options like radiotherapy and definitive chemoradiation (CRT) have been implemented. The trends in (non-)surgical treatment and its impact on overall survival (OS) in patients with proximal esophageal cancer are unclear, related to its rare disease status. To optimize treatment strategies and counseling of patients with proximal esophageal cancer, it is therefore essential to gain more insight through real-life studies. AIM: To establish trends in treatment and OS in patients with proximal esophageal cancer. METHODS: In this population-based study, patients with proximal esophageal cancer diagnosed between 1989 and 2014 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The proximal esophagus consists of the cervical esophagus and the upper thoracic section, extending to 24 cm from the incisors. Trends in radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery, and OS were assessed. Analyses were stratified by presence of distant metastasis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses was performed to assess the effect of period of diagnosis on OS, adjusted for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 2783 patients were included. Over the study period, the use of radiotherapy, resection, and CRT in non-metastatic disease changed from 53%, 23%, and 1% in 1989-1994 to 21%, 9%, and 49% in 2010-2014, respectively. In metastatic disease, the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy increased over time. Median OS of the total population increased from 7.3 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.4-8.1] in 1989-1994 to 9.5 mo (95%CI: 8.1-10.8) in 2010-2014 (logrank P < 0.001). In non-metastatic disease, 5-year OS rates improved from 5% (95%CI: 3%-7%) in 1989-1994 to 13% (95%CI: 9%-17%) in 2010-2014 (logrank P < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated a significant treatment effect over time on survival. In metastatic disease, median OS was 3.8 mo (95%CI: 2.5-5.1) in 1989-1994, and 5.1 mo (95%CI: 4.3-5.9) in 2010-2014 (logrank P = 0.26). CONCLUSION: OS significantly improved in non-metastatic proximal esophageal cancer, likely to be associated with an increased use of CRT. Patterns in metastatic disease did not change significantly over time.


Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia/tendências , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Esofagectomia/tendências , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Idoso , Quimiorradioterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/tendências , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidade , Esofagectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Br J Radiol ; 91(1086): 20170498, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29451412

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Human papillomavirus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal cancer (oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, OPSCC) is biologically and clinically different from HPV negative OPSCC. Here, we evaluate the use of a radiomic approach to identify the HPV status of OPSCC. METHODS: Four independent cohorts, totaling 778 OPSCC patients with HPV determined by p16 were collected. We randomly assigned 80% of all data for model training (N = 628) and 20% for validation (N = 150). On the pre-treatment CT images, 902 radiomic features were calculated from the gross tumor volume. Multivariable modeling was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. To assess the impact of CT artifacts in predicting HPV (p16), a model was developed on all training data (Mall) and on the artifact-free subset of training data (Mno art). Models were validated on all validation data (Vall), and the subgroups with (Vart) and without (Vno art) artifacts. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare HPV status based on p16 and radiomic model predictions. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operator curve for Mall and Mno art ranged between 0.70 and 0.80 and was not significantly different for all validation data sets. There was a consistent and significant split between survival curves with HPV status determined by p16 [p = 0.007; hazard ratio (HR): 0.46], Mall (p = 0.036; HR: 0.55) and Mno art (p = 0.027; HR: 0.49). CONCLUSION: This study provides proof of concept that molecular information can be derived from standard medical images and shows potential for radiomics as imaging biomarker of HPV status. Advances in knowledge: Radiomics has the potential to identify clinically relevant molecular phenotypes.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/virologia , Inibidor p16 de Quinase Dependente de Ciclina/biossíntese , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/virologia , Papillomaviridae/metabolismo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais
3.
Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg ; 22(2): 105-8, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22548268

RESUMO

Chemoradiation is increasingly being used to treat locally advanced head and neck carcinomas. Possible rare complications of this treatment modality have begun to appear, as the number of treated patients increase. In this report, we present a case who underwent chemoradiation due to T3N3M0 tonsil cancer and developed necrotizing fasciitis of the neck at seven months following treatment. The patient recovered fully after treatment with surgical debridement with pectoralis major flap reconstruction and intravenous antibiotherapy.


Assuntos
Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Fasciite Necrosante/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Neoplasias Tonsilares/terapia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Desbridamento , Drenagem , Fasciite Necrosante/diagnóstico , Fasciite Necrosante/cirurgia , Humanos , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esvaziamento Cervical , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Terapia de Salvação , Transplante de Pele , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Neoplasias Tonsilares/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA