Radiological and long-term clinical response to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis with advanced lung disease.

INTRODUCTION: A triple combination of CFTR modulators ELE/TEZ/IVA (elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, Trikafta™) has been evaluated in clinical trials for people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) and was approved to the European and US market. During registration and settling reimbursement in Europe, it could be requested on a compassionate use basis, for patients with advanced lung disease (ppFEV1 < 40). AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate 2 years of experience with the clinical and radiological response of ELE/TEZ/IVA in pwCF in a compassionate use setting. METHODS: pwCF who started ELE/TEZ/IVA in a compassionate use setting were prospectively followed with assessment of spirometry, BMI, chest CT, CFQ-R and sweat chloride concentration (SCC) before start and after 3 months. Furthermore, spirometry, sputum cultures, and BMI were repeated after 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were eligible for this evaluation, nine with F508del/F508del genotype (eight of whom were using dual CFTR modulators) and nine with F508del/minimal function mutation. After 3 months, mean change in SCC was -44.9 (p ≤ 0.001), together with significant improvement in CT (change in Brody score: -28.27 p ≤ 0.001) and CFQ-R results (change in respiratory domain: +18.8, p = 0.002). After 24 months, ppFEV1 change was +8.89 (p = 0.002), BMI had improved by +1.53 kg/m2 (p ≤ 0.001) and exacerbation rate declined from 5.94 in 24 months before start to 1.17 (p ≤ 0.001) in the 24 months after. CONCLUSION: pwCF with advanced lung disease experience relevant clinical benefit after 2 years of treatment with ELE/TEZ/IVA in a compassionate use setting. Structural lung damage, quality of life, exacerbation rate, and BMI improved significantly with treatment. Gain in ppFEV1 is lower compared to the phase III trials that included younger patients with moderately affected lung function.

Serum Biomarker Profile Including CCL1, CXCL10, VEGF, and Adenosine Deaminase Activity Distinguishes Active From Remotely Acquired Latent Tuberculosis.

Introduction: There is an urgent medical need to differentiate active tuberculosis (ATB) from latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and prevent undertreatment and overtreatment. The aim of this study was to identify biomarker profiles that may support the differentiation between ATB and LTBI and to validate these signatures. Materials and Methods: The discovery cohort included adult individuals classified in four groups: ATB (n = 20), LTBI without prophylaxis (untreated LTBI; n = 20), LTBI after completion of prophylaxis (treated LTBI; n = 20), and healthy controls (HC; n = 20). Their sera were analyzed for 40 cytokines/chemokines and activity of adenosine deaminase (ADA) isozymes. A prediction model was designed to differentiate ATB from untreated LTBI using sparse partial least squares (sPLS) and logistic regression analyses. Serum samples of two independent cohorts (national and international) were used for validation. Results: sPLS regression analyses identified C-C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CCL1), C-reactive protein (CRP), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as the most discriminating biomarkers. These markers and ADA(2) activity were significantly increased in ATB compared to untreated LTBI (p ≤ 0.007). Combining CCL1, CXCL10, VEGF, and ADA2 activity yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 90%, respectively, in differentiating ATB from untreated LTBI. These findings were confirmed in the validation cohort including remotely acquired untreated LTBI participants. Conclusion: The biomarker signature of CCL1, CXCL10, VEGF, and ADA2 activity provides a promising tool for differentiating patients with ATB from non-treated LTBI individuals.

Management of Individual Patient Expectations When Starting with Highly Effective CFTR Modulators.

Highly effective CFTR modulators such as elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELE/TEZ/IVA will become available for an increasing number of people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) in the near future. Before the start of this therapy, many questions may arise concerning the expected effects. We assembled the currently available data from the literature about ELE/TEZ/IVA that focused on commonly asked questions from patients. Overall, the literature so far presents a very hopeful prospect of effects, not only on lung function, but also on nutritional status, sinonasal symptoms and quality of life. The effects in patients with pwCF with severe lung damage are also favorable. Treatment is generally well tolerated. In some cases, patient-derived cell models can help in predicting the effects for individual patients.

Tuberculosis during TNF-α inhibitor therapy, despite screening.

As part of a prospective study on the safety of TNF-α inhibitor therapy after screening for and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), we report two patients who developed active tuberculosis (TB) infection during TNF-α inhibitor therapy, despite negative screening for LTBI. The clinical history is suggestive of a primary infection acquired during travelling to TB-endemic countries. In this lesson of the month we would like to highlight the risk of travelling to TB-endemic areas in patients treated with TNF-α inhibitor therapy. Screening for latent tuberculosis infection is not enough to prevent tuberculosis in patients treated with TNF-α inhibitor therapy.