Computed tomography-measured body composition and survival in rectal cancer patients: a Swedish cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The association between body composition and survival in rectal cancer patients is still unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the impact of computed tomography (CT)-measured body composition on survival in rectal cancer patients, stratifying our analyses by sex, tumour location, tumour stage and radiotherapy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 173 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. CT colonography scans at the time of diagnosis were used to assess the skeletal muscle index (SMI) and the visceral adipose tissue area (VAT). The patients were divided into a low or high SMI group and a low or high VAT group according to previously defined cutoff values. Endpoints included cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In all patients, low SMI was associated with worse CSS (HR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.35-5.12; P = 0.004) and OS (HR, 3.57; 95% CI, 2.01-6.34; P < 0.001) compared to high SMI. The differences remained significant after adjusting for potential confounders (CSS: adjusted HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.13-4.58; P = 0.021; OS: adjusted HR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.73-5.82; P < 0.001). Low SMI was still related to a poor prognosis after stratifying by sex, tumour location, stage and radiotherapy (P < 0.05). High VAT was associated with better CSS (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.11-0.84; P = 0.022) and OS (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.17-0.97; P = 0.044) compared to low VAT among men with rectal cancer ≤ 10 cm from the anal verge. High VAT was associated with worse CSS (HR, 4.15; 95% CI, 1.10-15.66; P = 0.036) in women with rectal cancer ≤ 10 cm from the anal verge. CONCLUSIONS: Low SMI was associated with worse survival. High VAT predicted better survival in men but worse survival in women. The results suggest that CT-measured body composition is a useful tool for evaluating the prognosis of rectal cancer patients and demonstrate the need to include the sex and the tumour location in the analyses.

Age as a potential predictor of acute side effects during chemoradiotherapy in primary cervical cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Toxicity during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in cervical cancer patients might limit the chances of receiving an optimal treatment and to be cured. Few studies have shown relationships between acute side effects and patient's age. Here, the association between age and acute side effects such as nausea/vomiting, diarrhea and weight loss during CRT was analysed in cervical cancer patients. METHODS: This study included 93 patients with primary cervical cancer stage IBI to IVA who received CRT from 2013 to 2019. The frequency of symptoms/toxicity grade was analysed by using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. RESULTS: Patients ≥ 52 years had a significantly higher frequency of nausea/vomiting and increased grade ≥ 3 toxicity during CRT compared to younger patients (p < 0.001, p = 0.001). Toxicity grade ≥ 3 of nausea/vomiting was associated with increased frequency of weight loss (p = 0.001), reduced ADL (p = 0.001) and dose modifications of both radiotherapy (RT) (p = 0.020) and chemotherapy (CT) (p = 0.030) compared to toxicity grade 2. The frequency of diarrhea (p = 0.015) and weight loss (p = 0.020) was higher in older patients compared to younger. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients have an increased risk of acute side effects as nausea/vomiting, diarrhea and weight loss. Age could be useful in predicting acute side effects in primary cervical cancer patients with CRT.

Mucinous and Non-Mucinous Rectal Adenocarcinoma-Differences in Treatment Response to Preoperative Radiotherapy.

There is a need to personalize the treatment for rectal cancer patients. The aim of this study was to analyze therapy response and prognosis after preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma compared to those with non-mucinous adenocarcinoma. The study included retrospectively collected data from 433 patients, diagnosed with rectal cancer in the South East health care region in Sweden between 2004 and 2012. Patients with non-mucinous adenocarcinoma that received short-course radiotherapy before surgery had better overall survival, cancer specific survival, and disease-free survival, as well as distant- and local-recurrence-free survival (p = 0.003, p = 0.001, p = 0.002, p = 0.002, and p = 0.033, respectively) compared to the patients that received long-course radiotherapy with concomitant capecitabine. The results were still significant after adjusting for sex, age, stage, differentiation, and chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting, except for local-recurrence-free survival that was trending towards significance (p = 0.070). In patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma, no difference in survival was seen when comparing patients that had short-course radiotherapy and patients that had long-course radiotherapy. However, none of 18 patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma treated with long-course radiotherapy had local tumor progression, compared to 7% of 67 patients with non-mucinous adenocarcinoma. The results indicate that mucinous adenocarcinoma and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma may respond differently to radiotherapy.

Predictive Role of Biopsy Based Biomarkers for Radiotherapy Treatment in Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiation therapy has long been contemplated as an important mode in the treatment of rectal cancer. However, there are few ideal tools available for clinicians to make a radiotherapy decision at the time of diagnosis for rectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess whether biomarkers expressed in the biopsy could help to choose the suitable therapy and provide predictive and/or prognostic information. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In total, 30 biomarkers were analyzed in 219 biopsy samples before treatment to discover the possibility of using them as an indicator for radiotherapy selection, diagnosis, survival and recurrence. RESULTS: Twenty-two biomarkers (COX2-RT, COX2-NonRT, etc.; 36.67%) had diagnostic value. For survival, four biomarkers (NFKBP65, p130, PINCH and PPAR) were significant in regulating gene promoter activity and overall survival, while four had a trend (AEG1, LOX, SATB1 and SIRT6). Three biomarkers (COX2, PINCH and WRAP53) correlated with disease-free survival, while eight had a trend (AEG1, COX2, Ki67, LOX, NFKBP65, PPAR and SATB1). Four biomarkers (COX2-RT, NFKBP65cyto-RT, P130cyto-NonRT and PPARcyto-RT) were independent prognostic factors for recurrence. NFKBP65 and SIRT6 were significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis regardless of radiation. Patients with high AEG1, LOX, NFKBP65, PPAR and SATB1 had or showed a positive trend for better survival after radiotherapy, while those with positive PINCH and WRAP53 expression would not benefit from radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: AEG1, LOX, NFKBP65cyto, PPAR and SATB1 could be used as indicators for choosing radiotherapy. COX2-RT, COX2-NonRT and some other biomarkers may provide additional help for diagnosis.

Survival benefit of statins in older patients with rectal cancer: A Swedish population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Increasing evidence suggests that statins may have antitumor effects but their role in rectal cancer appears inconclusive. The aim of this study was to investigate whether statins may have an impact on survival of older and younger patients with rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 238 patients ≥70 years and 227 patients <70 years old, from the Southeast Health Care Region of Sweden, who were diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2013. RESULTS: In the older group (n = 238), statin use at the time of diagnosis was related to better cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS), compared to non-use (CSS: Hazard Ratio (HR), 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.72; P = .003; OS: HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39-0.96; P = .032). In the older group with stages I-III disease (n = 199), statin use was associated with better disease-free survival (DFS) compared to non use (HR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06-0.59; P = .005). The improvement of CSS, OS and DFS remained significant after adjusting for potential confounders. In the older group with stage III disease, statin users had better CSS and DFS compared to non-users (log rank P = .043; log-rank P = .028, respectively). In the older group with short course radiotherapy, statin use was related to better CSS (log-rank P = .032). No such association was present in the younger group. CONCLUSION: Statin use was related to improved survival in older patients with rectal cancer. This observation is important given the low cost and safety of statins as a drug.

Prognostic Significance and Molecular Features of Colorectal Mucinous Adenocarcinomas: A Strobe-Compliant Study.

Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MC) is a special histology subtype of colorectal adenocarcinoma. The survival of MC is controversial and the prognostic biomarkers of MC remain unclear. To analyze prognostic significance and molecular features of colorectal MC. This study included 755,682 and 1001 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (SEER, 1973-2011), and Linköping Cancer (LC, 1972-2009) databases. We investigated independently the clinicopathological characteristics, survival, and variety of molecular features from these 2 databases. MC was found in 9.3% and 9.8% patients in SEER and LC, respectively. MC was more frequently localized in the right colon compared with nonmucinous adenocarcinoma (NMC) in both SEER (57.7% vs 37.2%, P < 0.001) and LC (46.9% vs 27.7%, P < 0.001). Colorectal MC patients had significantly worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) than NMC patients (SEER, P < 0.001; LC, P = 0.026), prominently in stage III (SEER, P < 0.001; LC, P = 0.023). The multivariate survival analysis showed that MC was independently related to poor prognosis in rectal cancer patients (SEER, hazard ratios [HR], 1.076; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.057-1.096; P < 0.001). In LC, the integrated analysis of genetic and epigenetic features showed that that strong expression of PINCH (HR, 3.954; 95% CI, 1.493-10.47; P = 0.013) and weak expression of RAD50 (HR 0.348, 95% CI, 0.106-1.192; P = 0.026) were significantly associated with poor CSS of colorectal MC patients. In conclusion, the colorectal MC patients had significantly worse CSS than NMC patients, prominently in stage III. MC was an independent prognostic factor associated with worse survival in rectal cancer patients. The PINCH and RAD50 were prognostic biomarkers for colorectal MC patients.

SPARCL1 expression increases with preoperative radiation therapy and predicts better survival in rectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine-like 1 (SPARCL1) is expressed in various normal tissues and many types of cancers. The function of SPARCL1 and its relationship to a patient's prognosis have been studied, whereas its relationship to radiation therapy (RT) is not known. Our aim was to investigate the expression of SPARCL1 in rectal cancer patients who participated in a clinical trial of preoperative RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study included 136 rectal cancer patients who were randomized to undergo preoperative RT and surgery (n=63) or surgery alone (n=73). The expression levels of SPARCL1 in normal mucosa (n=29), primary tumor (n=136), and lymph node metastasis (n=35) were determined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Tumors with RT had stronger SPARCL1 expression than tumors without RT (P=.003). In the RT group, strong SPARCL1 expression was related to better survival than weak expression in patients with stage III tumors, independent of sex, age, differentiation, and margin status (P=.022; RR = 18.128; 95% confidence interval, 1.512-217.413). No such relationship was found in the non-RT group (P=.224). Further analysis of interactions among SPARCL1 expression, RT, and survival showed statistical significance (P=.024). In patients with metastases who received RT, strong SPARCL1 expression was related to better survival compared to weak expression (P=.041) but not in the non-RT group (P=.569). CONCLUSIONS: SPARCL1 expression increases with RT and is related to better prognosis in rectal cancer patients with RT but not in patients without RT. This result may help us to select the patients best suited for preoperative RT.

A clinical study of metastasized rectal cancer treatment: assessing a multimodal approach.

Metastasized rectal cancer has long been considered incurable. During recent years, the treatment of rectal cancer patients has been improved, and nowadays, a subgroup of patients might even be cured. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal timing of treatment in a multimodal therapy schedule in order to see whether the addition of bevacizumab (Avastin) to conventional chemotherapy was effective. The study included 39 patients with metastatic rectal cancer between 2009 and 2011, and three were excluded due to the lack of metastases or lack of follow-up information. The remaining 36 patients were divided into groups by treatment intention. The group with curative intention received mainly oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) in combination with capecitabine (Xeloda) with or without bevacizumab (Avastin) for 2 months followed by preoperative radiotherapy (RT) and surgery. Palliative patients had very different treatments depending on their needs of palliation. The median survival time for patients with curative intention was 31 months and for the palliative patients 12 months. Four of the patients (11%) with curative intention were considered cured at the end of follow-up. The response to chemotherapy after 2-month treatment is a good prognostic sign for which patients can be cured. Long-lasting palliation can be obtained with this treatment schedule. The main side effects were gastrointestinal events, including bowel perforation, neuropathy, thrombo-embolic disease and reduced general condition. All side effects are known, and the treatment is considered tolerable. We conclude that a good treatment schedule would be oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) in combination with capecitabine (Xeloda) with or without bevacizumab (Avastin) for 2 months, followed by preoperative RT and surgery.

PINCH expression in relation to radiation response in co-cultured colon cancer cells and in rectal cancer patients.

Particularly interesting new cysteine-histidine rich protein (PINCH), involved in cell spreading, motility and proliferation, has been shown to enhance radioresistance in colon cancer cell lines. The expression of PINCH in relation to radiation was studied in co-cultured colon cancer cells. Furthermore, the clinical significance between PINCH and radiotherapy (RT) was analyzed in rectal cancer patients with or without RT. The relative PINCH expression in colon cancer (KM12C) cells cultured separately and in co-culture was examined by western blotting and real-time PCR, and was analyzed over a period of 8 and 24 h after radiation. PINCH expression was immunohistochemically examined in 137 primary rectal tumors for which 65 cases did not receive RT and 72 cases received RT. PINCH expression tended to decrease from that in the separately cultured KM12C cells without radiation to that in cells with radiation at 8 h (P=0.060); while in the co-cultured cells, no significant difference was found (P=0.446). In patients with RT, strong PINCH expression was related to worse survival, when compared to patients with weak expression, independent of TNM stage, degree of differentiation, age and p53 status (P=0.029, RR 4.03, 95% CI 1.34­12.1). No survival relationship for the patients without RT was observed (P=0.287). A statistical interaction analysis between PINCH, RT and survival showed a trend towards significance (P=0.057). In conclusion, PINCH predicts survival in rectal cancer patients with RT, but not in patients without RT. The expression of PINCH may be regulated by radiation and by environmental factors surrounding the cells.

PINCH is an independent prognostic factor in rectal cancer patients without preoperative radiotherapy--a study in a Swedish rectal cancer trial of preoperative radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance between particularly interesting new cysteine-histidine rich protein (PINCH) expression and radiotherapy (RT) in tumours is not known. In this study, the expression of PINCH and its relationship to RT, clinical, pathological and biological factors were studied in rectal cancer patients. METHODS: PINCH expression determined by immunohistochemistry was analysed at the invasive margin and inner tumour area in 137 primary rectal adenocarcinomas (72 cases without RT and 65 cases with RT). PINCH expression in colon fibroblast cell line (CCD-18 Co) was determined by western blot. RESULTS: In patients without RT, strong PINCH expression at the invasive margin of primary tumours was related to worse survival, compared to patients with weak expression, independent of TNM stage and differentiation (P = 0.03). No survival relationship in patients with RT was observed (P = 0.64). Comparing the non-RT with RT subgroup, there was no difference in PINCH expression in primary tumours (invasive margin (P = 0.68)/inner tumour area (P = 0.49). In patients with RT, strong PINCH expression was related to a higher grade of LVD (lymphatic vessel density) (P = 0.01) CONCLUSIONS: PINCH expression at the invasive margin was an independent prognostic factor in patients without RT. RT does not seem to directly affect the PINCH expression.

Survivin expression quantified by Image Pro-Plus compared with visual assessment.

Over the past decades, immunohistochemistry has gained significance and already taken a crucial position in diagnosis of diseases and prognosis of patients. However, manual interpretation of immunohistochemistry and reproducibility of the scoring systems can be highly subjective. In the article, the immunohistochemical staining of survivin in 98 rectal cancers was analyzed by using Image Pro-Plus (IPP) [3 parameters: density mean, area sum, and integrated optical density (IOD)] and the results were compared with visual assessment (2 parameters: intensity and percentage). The correlations between the 2 methods were examined, significant correlations were observed between density mean and staining intensity (Spearman correlation coefficient, rs=0.806, P<0.001), IOD and staining intensity (rs=0.914, P<0.001), area sum and staining percentage (rs=0.883, P<0.001), IOD and staining percentage (rs=0.884, P<0.001). There was no significant difference between survivin expression and clinicopathologic variables (P>0.05) by visual assessment. However, by IPP analysis, both the density mean and IOD were higher in better-differentiated cancers than in worse differentiated ones (P=0.02 and 0.03). There was a substantial agreement between the 2 methods. Density mean and IOD of IPP were representative parameters to assess the immunostaining quantification, and increased sensitivity in scoring and provided a more reliable and reproducible analysis of protein expression, especially, more information of the protein expression in relation to clinicopathologic variables can be provided by IPP analysis.