Interphalangeal Resection Arthroplasty for the Prevention and Treatment of Diabetic Deformities and Ulcers of the Toes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are serious complications that induce a high risk of lower extremity amputations and mortality. Compared with the standard of care, few reports analyzed the outcome of surgical treatment mainly for diabetic toe deformities and ulcers. The aim of this study is to collate evidence on the outcomes of interphalangeal resection arthroplasty (IP-RA) in preventing and treating diabetic toe ulcers distal to the metatarsophalangeal joint. Methods: A search strategy has been developed including electronic databases from inception. Only ulcers distal to the metatarsophalangeal joints were included. Noninfected and infected ulcers were also included at any toe location (dorsal/side/plantar). Outcomes were defined as healing rate, time to heal, ulcer recurrence, ulcer transfer, postintervention infection, wound dehiscence, and additional surgeries including amputation. Proportional meta-analysis was conducted for frequency outcomes. Results: Six observational studies comprising 217 patients with 244 IP-RA procedures were included. The mean follow-up period was 23.4 ± 8.2 months. Weighted frequencies were as follows: healing rate (93.6%), ulcer recurrence frequency (4.3%), ulcer transfer frequency (15.4%), postoperative infection (10.5%), wound dehiscence (17.8%), revision surgery (5%), and amputation rate (3.4%). The mean healing time was 4.3 ± 1.8 weeks. Conclusion: This review suggests that IP-RA is effective in preventing and treating diabetic toe deformities and ulcers with a modest rate of complications for this specific and often challenging clinical presentation.

Early Outcomes and Complications of Surgically Treated Diabetic Hallucal Infection.

BACKGROUND: Severely infected diabetic ulcers of the big toe often necessitate surgical treatment. Depending on the wound stage and presence of osteomyelitis, conservative surgery and amputation are the main surgical treatments. Few articles reported the outcomes and complications of such procedures. This study is a preliminary comparative report on the early outcomes and complications of hallucal diabetic foot infection (DFI) treated with either conservative surgery or amputation. METHODS: This is a retrospective comparative study comprising a continuous series of patients admitted at our hospital. Initially, all diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) were infected and at advanced stage (Wagner Grade 3 or 4). All clinically suspected cases of osteomyelitis were confirmed by bone pathology and microbiology culture. The study included 37 patients diagnosed with DFI. Infection profile was as follows: 23 DFU with osteomyelitis (Wagner Grade 3 or 4) and 14 infected DFU (Wagner Grade 2). Twenty-four conservative procedures and 13 amputation surgeries were performed initially. The primary outcome was defined as the frequency of subsequent surgery (deep infection recurrence treated with surgery). Statistical analysis was used to look for significant difference between both groups. RESULTS: Ten patients (27%) required additional surgeries because of deep infection recurrence. Four recurrences (16.7%) were observed in the conservative group and 6 (46%) in the amputation group (P = 0.054). Amputation rate as a subsequent procedure was 8.3% for the conservative group and the reamputation rate for the amputation group was 23.1% (P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: The study findings would indicate that the more severe is the initial hallucal infection severity (higher Wagner grade), the higher is the frequency of early surgical complications mainly after an index amputation procedure. Our assessment tools of initial infection extent seem to be underperforming. A more aggressive treatment in the form of a more proximal cut with regard to magnetic resonance imaging bone infection signal could be considered to minimize the risk of subsequent surgeries and reamputations.

Should we resect more proximally? Outcomes of toe amputation versus ray resection in patients with infected diabetic ulcers and osteomyelitis. A preliminary study and new treatment algorithm.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of severe diabetic toe infection complicated with osteomyelitis is often surgical. The decision on the level of amputation, when required, is difficult. Very few articles reported comparative outcomes between toe amputation and ray resection, and only in relation to the hallux. The aim of this preliminary report is to record the results of these procedures when performed on all toes. METHODS: This is a comparative retrospective study where the charts of a continuous series of 44 patients (48 procedures) with diabetic forefoot infection were analyzed. Only cases of severe infection with confirmed osteomyelitis were included. Two groups were compared based on the level of amputation: the toe amputation group (at and distal to the metatarsophalangeal joint) and the ray resection group (distal to tarsometatarsal joint). The primary outcomes were defined as osteomyelitis recurrence and re-amputation. RESULTS: Outcome comparison between toe amputation and ray resection; 47.3 % vs. 51.7 % had a recurrence of their osteomyelitis (p = 0.8), 36.8 % vs. 34.5 % had a re-amputation (p = 0.02). Re-amputation was needed in 25 % of cases following hallux/first ray index procedure while the same was required in 39 % of cases following lateral toes/rays index procedures (p = 0.4). Both primary outcomes were correlated to CDK, smoking and creatinine level. CONCLUSIONS: Bone infection recurrence and re-amputation are highly prevalent in patients undergoing initial amputation for severe diabetic toe infection. A more aggressive approach in the form of a more proximal level of index amputation might be needed when treating severe toe infections with osteomyelitis in patients with diabetes.