Sclerosing Epithelioid Fibrosarcoma (SEF) versus Low Grade Fibromyxoid Sarcoma (LGFMS): Presentation and outcome in the nationwide NETSARC+ series of 330 patients over 13 years.

Sclerosing Epithelioid Fibrosarcoma (SEF) and Low Grade Fibromyxoid Sarcoma (LGFMS) are ultrarare sarcomas sharing common translocations whose natural history are not well known. We report on the nationwide exhaustive series of 330 patients with SEF or LGFMS in NETSARC+ since 2010. PATIENTS AND METHODS: NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTB). Since 2010, (i) pathological review has been mandatory for sarcoma,and (ii) tumour/patients' characteristics have been collected in the NETSARC+ nationwide database. The characteristics of patients with SEF and LGFMS and their outcome are compared. RESULTS: 35/73 (48%) and 125/257(49%) of patients with SEF and LGFMS were female. More visceral, bone and trunk primary sites were observed in SEF (p < 0.001). 30% of SEF vs 4% of LGFMS patients had metastasis at diagnosis (p < 0.0001). Median size of the primary tumor was 51 mm (range 10-90) for LGFMS vs 80 (20-320) for SEF (p < 0.001). Median age for LGFMS patients was 12 years younger than that of SEF patients (43 [range 4-98] vs 55 [range 10-91], p < 0.001). Neoadjuvant treatment was more often given to SEF (16% vs 9%, p = 0.05). More patients with LGFMS were operated first in reference centers (51% vs 26%, p < 0.001). The R0 rate on the operative specimen was 41% in LGFMS vs 16% in SEF (p < 0.001). Median event-free survival (EFS) of patients with SEF and LGFMS were 32 vs 136 months (p < 0.0001). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Fifty-months OS was 93% vs 81% for LGFMS vs SEF (p = 0.05). Median OS was 77 months after first relapse, similar for SEF and LGFMS. In multivariate analysis, age, tumor size, metastasis at diagnosis were independent prognostic factors for OS in LGFMS. CONCLUSIONS: Although sharing close molecular alterations, SEF and LGFMS have a different natural history, clinical presentation and outcome, with a higher risk of metastatic relapse in SEF. Survival after relapse is longer than with other sarcomas, and similar for SEF and LGFMS.

Intraoperative motive for incomplete resection in primary retroperitoneal sarcoma.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical resection is the current standard of care for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Recent data suggests that up to 5% of patient have incomplete (R2) resection. The exact reason why patients scheduled for surgery with a curative intent to treat ended up with an R2 resection is largely unknown. AIM OF THE STUDY: To identify intraoperative findings responsible for incomplete (R2) resection in primary RPS. METHODS: All records of consecutive patients scheduled for a non-metastatic primary RPS surgery between 1995 and 2020 in a tertiary care sarcoma centre were retrospective analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 347 patients scheduled for surgery, 13 (3.7%) had an incomplete (R2) resection. The reasons for incomplete surgery were intraoperative finding of vascular involvement of great vessels in 5 patients, previously undetected peritoneal metastases in 5 patients, invasion of contralateral kidney/ureter in 2 patients and the need to preserve both kidneys in 1 patient because of his past medical history. Among these patients, 3 had a laparotomy without resection and 10 had a partial resection (i.e. debulking surgery). Severe postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients. The median length of stay in hospital was 19days. After a median follow-up of 12months, the median survival of patients after incomplete resection was 18months. The 1-y, 5-y and 8-y overall survival (OS) for these patients were 46%, 14%, and 7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Incomplete (R2) resection for a primary RPS surgery is rare in specialized sarcoma center. The next steps should be to identify the preoperative criteria that lead to this accurate selection and to define the best practice in front of a peroperative discovery of an unresectable RPS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Early phase trials in soft-tissue sarcomas: clinical benefit of inclusion in early lines of treatment, molecular screening, and histology-driven trials.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) remains dismal, and systemic therapeutic options are limited. Early phase trials are becoming increasingly safe and effective. This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included all STS patients participating in early phase trials at Gustave Roussy and Léon Bérard between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2020. RESULTS: Overall, 199 patients accounted for 214 inclusions in advanced STS. The most frequent histotypes were well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcomas (n = 55), leiomyosarcomas (n = 53), synovial sarcomas (n = 22), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (n = 15), angiosarcomas (n = 12), and myxoid liposarcomas (n = 10). The median PFS was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval 2.7-4.1 months). The median PFS in the first, second, and later lines was 8.3, 5.4, and 2.6 months, respectively (P = 0.00015). The median PFS was 2.8 months in case of molecular screening, 4.1 months in case of histology-driven screening, and 1.6 months (P = 0.00014) in the absence of either screening modalities. In univariate analysis, histotype (P = 0.026), complex genomics (P = 0.008), number of prior lines (P < 0.001), prior anthracyclines (P < 0.001), number of metastatic sites (P = 0.003), liver metastasis (P < 0.001), lung metastasis (P < 0.001), absence of molecular or histology-driven screening (P < 0.001), first-in-human trials (P < 0.001), dose-escalation cohorts (P = 0.011), and Royal Marsden Hospital (RMH) score >1 (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with shorter PFS. In multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors for shorter PFS were myxoid liposarcoma (P = 0.031), ≥2 prior lines of treatment (P = 0.033), liver metastasis (P = 0.007), and RMH score >2 (P = 0.006). Factors associated with improved PFS were leiomyosarcomas (P = 0.010), molecular screening (P = 0.025), and histology-driven screening (P = 0.010). The median overall survival rates were 36.3, 12.6, and 9.2 months in the first, second, and later lines, respectively (P = 0.0067). The grade 3-4 toxicity rate was 36%. CONCLUSIONS: Early phase trials provide an active therapeutic option for STS, even in first-line settings. Molecular screening and histology-driven trials further improve the clinical benefit.

Treatment of primary and metastatic peritoneal tumors in the Covid-19 pandemic. Proposals for prioritization from the RENAPE and BIG-RENAPE groups.

The Covid-19 pandemic is profoundly changing the organization of healthcare access. This is particularly so for peritoneal neoplastic diseases, for which curative treatment mobilizes substantial personnel, operating room and intensive care resources. The BIG-RENAPE and RENAPE groups have made tentative proposals for prioritizing care provision. A tightening of the usual selection criteria is needed for curative care: young patients with few or no comorbidities and limited peritoneal extension. It is desirable to prioritize disease conditions for which cytoreduction surgery with or without associated hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the gold-standard treatment, and for which systemic chemotherapy cannot be a temporary or long-term alternative: pseudomyxoma peritonei, resectable malignant peritoneal mesotheliomas, peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin if they are resectable and unresponsive to systemic chemotherapy after up to 12 courses, first-line ovarian carcinomatosis if resectable or in interval surgery after at most six courses of systemic chemotherapy. Addition of HIPEC must be discussed case by case in an expert center. The prioritization of indications must consider local conditions and the phase of the epidemic to allow optimal peri-operative care.

[Treatment of primary and metastatic peritoneal tumors in the Covid-19 pandemic. Proposals for prioritization from the RENAPE and BIG-RENAPE groups]. / Prise en charge des tumeurs primitives et métastatiques du péritoine en période de pandémie CoViD-19. Pistes de réflexion et de priorisation du groupe RENAPE et BIG-RENAPE.

The Covid-19 pandemic is profoundly changing the organization of healthcare access. This is particularly so for peritoneal neoplastic diseases, for which curative treatment mobilizes substantial personnel, operating room and intensive care resources. The BIG-RENAPE and RENAPE groups have made tentative proposals for prioritizing care provision. A tightening of the usual selection criteria is needed for curative care: young patients with few or no comorbidities and limited peritoneal extension. It is desirable to prioritize disease conditions for which cytoreduction surgery with or without associated hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the gold-standard treatment, and for which systemic chemotherapy cannot be a temporary or long-term alternative: pseudomyxoma peritonei, resectable malignant peritoneal mesotheliomas, peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin if they are resectable and unresponsive to systemic chemotherapy after up to 12 courses, first-line ovarian carcinomatosis if resectable or in interval surgery after at most six courses of systemic chemotherapy. Addition of HIPEC must be discussed case by case in an expert center. The prioritization of indications must consider local conditions and the phase of the epidemic to allow optimal peri-operative care.

Can we cure patients with abdominal Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor? Results of a retrospective multicentric study on 100 patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite being associated with a very poor prognosis, long-term survivors across all series of Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor (DSRCT) have been reported. AIM OF THE STUDY: To analyze patients 'characteristics associated with a prolonged survival after DSRCT diagnosis. METHODS: All consecutive patients treated for DSRCT in nine French expert centers between 1991 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with a follow-up of less than 2 years were excluded and cure defined as being disease-free at least 5 years. RESULTS: 100 pts were identified (median age 25 years, 89% male). 27 had distant metastases at diagnosis and 80 pts underwent upfront chemotherapy (CT). 71 pts were operated, 20 pts without prior CT). Surgery was macroscopically complete (CC0/1) in 50 pts. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) was administered during surgery in 15 pts 54 pts had postoperative CT and 26 pts had postoperative whole abdomino-pelvic RT (WAP-RT). After a median follow-up of 103 months (range 23-311), the median overall survival (OS) was 25 months. The 1- year, 3-year and 5-year OS rates were 90%, 35% and 4% respectively. 5 patients were considered cured after a median disease-free interval of 100 months (range 22-139). Predictive factors of cure were female sex (HR = 0.49, p = 0.014), median PCI<12 (HR = 0.32, p = 0.0004), MD Anderson stage I (HR = 0.25, p < 0.0001), CC0/1 (HR = 0.34, p < 0.0001), and WAP-RT (HR = 0.36, p = 0.00013). HIPEC did not statistically improve survival. CONCLUSION: Cure in DSRCT is possible in 5% of patients and is best achieved combining systemic chemotherapy, complete cytoreductive surgery and WAP-RT. Despite aggressive treatment, recurrence is common and targeted therapies are urgently needed.

Survival Benefit of the Surgical Management of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma in a Reference Center: A Nationwide Study of the French Sarcoma Group from the NetSarc Database.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend that retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) be managed in a reference sarcoma center (RSC), but the benefit remains to be demonstrated. This study investigated the impact of initial surgery performed within the NetSarc network on overall survival (OS). METHODS: NetSarc is a network of 26 RSCs with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTs) that is funded by the French NCI. Since 2010, presentation to an MDT and second pathological review are mandatory for sarcoma patients, and data have been collected in a nationwide database. We extracted data for all patients who received surgery in or outside the network and who presented at a NetSarc center (NSC) for primary nonmetastatic RPS between 2010 and 2017. RESULTS: A total of 2945 patients were included: 1078 (36.6%) underwent the first surgery in an NSC, and 1867 (63.4%) in an out-of-network center. The median number of operations at an NSC during the study period was 23 (range: 3-209), and the corresponding median was 1 (range: 1-2) at out-of-network centers. The diagnostic procedures followed significantly more clinical practice guidelines within NetSarc, where there were significantly more first R0 resections [452 (41.9%) vs. 230 (12.3%)]. The OS was significantly superior for patients treated within NetSarc, with a 2-year OS of 87% vs. 70% (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, surgery within an NSC was an independent predictor of OS, with a twofold lower odds ratio of death. CONCLUSIONS: In this national study, surgery for primary RPS within an NSC was associated with a better OS.

Surgery in reference centers improves survival of sarcoma patients: a nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 sarcoma reference centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTB) aiming to improve the outcome of sarcoma patients. Since 2010, presentation to an MDTB and expert pathological review are mandatory for sarcoma patients nationwide. In the present work, the impact of surgery in a reference center on the survival of sarcoma patients investigated using this national NETSARC registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients' characteristics and follow-up are prospectively collected and data monitored. Descriptive, uni- and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors were conducted in the entire series (N = 35 784) and in the subgroup of incident patient population (N = 29 497). RESULTS: Among the 35 784 patients, 155 different histological subtypes were reported. 4310 (11.6%) patients were metastatic at diagnosis. Previous cancer, previous radiotherapy, neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), and Li-Fraumeni syndrome were reported in 12.5%, 3.6%, 0.7%, and 0.1% of patients respectively. Among the 29 497 incident patients, 25 851 (87.6%) patients had surgical removal of the sarcoma, including 9949 (33.7%) operated in a NETSARC center. Location, grade, age, size, depth, histotypes, gender, NF1, and surgery outside a NETSARC center all correlated to overall survival (OS), local relapse free survival (LRFS), and event-free survival (EFS) in the incident patient population. NF1 history was one of the strongest adverse prognostic factors for LRFS, EFS, and OS. Presentation to an MDTB was associated with an improved LRFS and EFS, but was an adverse prognostic factor for OS if surgery was not carried out in a reference center. In multivariate analysis, surgery in a NETSARC center was positively correlated with LRFS, EFS, and OS [P < 0.001 for all, with a hazard ratio of 0.681 (95% CI 0.618-0.749) for OS]. CONCLUSION: This nationwide registry of sarcoma patients shows that surgical treatment in a reference center reduces the risk of relapse and death.

Neoadjuvant isolated limb perfusion in newly diagnosed untreated patients with locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities: the Gustave Roussy experience.

BACKGROUND: Limb-sparing surgery in locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas (LA STS) is challenging. The aim of this study is to evaluate upfront isolated limb perfusion (ILP) in untreated patients with LA STS. METHODS: All consecutive patients with LA STS of the limbs deemed borderline or unresectable and treated with upfront ILP as induction treatment between 2003 and 2016 were included. Demographic, clinical and long-term characteristics were obtained and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: 41 patients (pts), with a median age of 51 years [range 21-76], were identified (lower limb 68%, upper limb 32%). Liposarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma were the most common subtypes (27% and 22%, respectively). Acute toxicities, using Wieberdink classification, were grade II (35 pts, 85%), grade III (2 pts, 5%) and no grade IV-V. Local control rate was 98%. 32 pts had limb-sparing surgery (78%). 1 pt had an early amputation due to progressive disease after ILP. 8 pts were not operated (four had RT alone, one had distant metastases, two had a complete response and one died 3 months after ILP of a pulmonary embolism). 36 pts (84%) received postoperative RT. After a median follow-up of 43 months, 18 pts (47%) relapsed. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 6.7 years. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The 1-year, 5-year and 10-year DFS and OS rates were, respectively, 75%, 50% and 45%, and 90%, 63% and 55%. CONCLUSION: Upfront ILP is an efficient and well-tolerated limb-sparing procedure in borderline or unresectable LA STS without hampering OS.

[What is the best management for a spermatic cord sarcoma in 2018?] / Quelle prise en charge optimale pour un sarcome du cordon spermatique en 2018 ?

Spermatic cord sarcomas are rare tumors for which the most important is the initial diagnostic procedure. They are frequently misdiagnosed after surgery for inguinal hernia, inguinal lymphadenectomy or testicular malignancy. Any clinical suspicion has to lead to perform imaging with MRI and a core needle biopsy in order to obtain an accurate preoperative diagnosis. Liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma are the most common histological subtypes in elderly adults, rhabdomyosarcoma in children or in young adults. A CT scan will precede the treatment in order to look for distant metastasis and abdominal involvement. The therapeutic strategy as well as the surgical planning are then adapted to the histological, morphological and prognostic factors. Surgery is the cornerstone for the treatment of spermatic cord sarcoma. The minimum requirements for the surgical procedure are a wide excision of the tumor en bloc with radical orchidectomy, excision of the ipsilateral scrotum and high spermatic cord ligation. It could be enlarged to the anterior abdominal wall and adjacent organs some required a soft tissue flap. Spermatic cord sarcoma and trunk wall sarcoma have the same prognosis for which local recurrence could significantly decrease survival. Consequently, surgeon in charge with these tumors has to be familiar with soft tissue sarcoma and the management of these patients must be carried out under the supervision of a multidisciplinary team within the Netsarc network.

Long-Term Outcome After Surgery for a Localized Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Elderly Patients: Results from a Retrospective, Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate short- and long-term results after curative surgery for a retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) in elderly patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of all patients operated in our single, tertiary care center for a nonmetastatic RPS and identified patients aged 70 years and older. RESULTS: Among 296 patients with an RPS treated between 1994 and 2015, 60 (20%) were aged 70 years and older (median age 74 years; range 70-85). The median tumor size was 24 cm (range 6-46). Forty-six patients (77%) had mass-related symptoms at the time of diagnosis. The most frequent histological subtypes were de-differentiated liposarcoma (53%, n = 32) and well-differentiated liposarcoma (35%, n = 21). Twenty-two patients (37%) had perioperative radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Fifty-eight patients (97%) had macroscopically complete resection. The postoperative mortality was 8% and severe morbidity (Dindo/Clavien ≥ 3) was 32%. A reoperation was required for ten patients (17%). After a median follow-up of 20 months (range 1-121), the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI] 79-100%), and median OS was not reached. The cancer-specific death rate was 88%. No prognostic factor for disease-specific survival was detected. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 52% (95% CI 33-84%) and 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival rate was 52% (95% CI 33-84%). Median DFS was 94 months (95% CI 35-NA). Reoperation after inappropriate surgery and postoperative morbidity were independent predictive factors of locoregional relapse. No predictive factors of distant metastasis were found. CONCLUSIONS: Curative surgery is feasible in selected elderly patients but with higher mortality and morbidity rates than in younger patients. It enables a prolonged survival. Future studies should focus on selection process to minimize postoperative mortality and morbidity.

Abdominal desmoplastic small round cell tumor without extraperitoneal metastases: Is there a benefit for HIPEC after macroscopically complete cytoreductive surgery?

BACKGROUND: Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor (DSRCT) is a rare disease affecting predominantly children and young adults and for which the benefit of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS) remains unknown. METHODS: To identify patients with DSRCT without extraperitoneal metastases (EPM) who underwent CCRS between 1991 and 2015, a retrospective nation-wide survey was conducted by crossing the prospective and retrospective databases of the French Network for Rare Peritoneal Malignancies, French Reference Network in Sarcoma Pathology, French Sarcoma Clinical Network and French Pediatric Cancer Society. RESULTS: Among the 107 patients with DSRCT, 48 had no EPM and underwent CCRS. The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 9 (range: 2-27). Among these 48 patients, 38 (79%) had pre- and/or postoperative chemotherapy and 23 (48%) postoperative whole abdominopelvic radiotherapy (WAP-RT). Intraperitoneal chemotherapy was administered to 11 patients (23%): two received early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) and nine HIPEC. After a median follow-up of 30 months, the median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 42 months. The 2-y and 5-y OS were 72% and 19%. The 2-y and 5-y disease-free survival (DFS) were 30% and 12%. WAP-RT was the only variable associated with longer peritoneal recurrence-free survival and DFS after CCRS. The influence of HIPEC/EPIC on OS and DFS was not statistically conclusive. CONCLUSION: The benefit of HIPEC is still unknown and should be evaluated in a prospective trial. The value of postoperative WAP-RT seems to be confirmed.

Single-port endoscopic mesocolic and mesorectal excision using an extraperitoneal approach.

BACKGROUND: The extraperitoneal rectal dissection via a transanal approach facilitates the mesorectal dissection. The retroperitoneal approach for mesocolic excision may also offer some similar advantages. To complete the lymphadenectomy of extraperitoneal mesorectal resection, we developed an innovative approach for upper rectal and mesocolic excision via an exclusive retroperitoneal dissection using a single-port access at the site of the future stomy. METHODS: This study was a prospective pilot study and was conducted between 2013 and 2015 at two oncologic centers. Five consecutive patients, with ano-rectal cancer requiring permanent stoma, underwent this procedure. RESULTS: The bowel was never touched or mobilized to perform the lymphadenectomy, and no Trendelenburg was required. The median operative duration was 300 min (range 205-310). The quality of the surgical plane was classified as good (mesorectal) in the five patients. The median circumferential and distal margins were, respectively, 5 mm (range 1-20) and 20 mm (range 5-25). The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 11 (range 5-18). No laparotomy or multiport laparoscopy was required. There was no death. Two patients had perineal wound dehiscence (one minor and one major). CONCLUSIONS: The mesocolic excision via a retroperitoneal approach is feasible, completes naturally the transanal mesorectal excision and may confer several advantages including no morbidity of small bowel manipulation or Trendelenburg position. Further studies are required to analyze this approach.

Long-term survival after aggressive treatment of relapsed serosal or distant pseudomyxoma peritonei.

INTRODUCTION: Complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have dramatically changed the prognosis of patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). However, recurrences can still occur and no consensus has been reached regarding their optimal treatments. This study aimed to analyze the patterns of recurrence after CCRS plus HIPEC for PMP and potential subsequent treatments of these lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1992 and 2014, patients who had relapsed after treatment of PMP were selected from a prospective database of 251 patients who had undergone CCRS plus HIPEC with a curative intent. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 85 months, 66 patients (26%) had relapsed with a median free interval of 25 months. The first recurrence was mostly located in the peritoneum, isolated in 50 patients (76%) and associated with extraperitoneal disease in 6 patients. Curatively intended treatment of the relapse, combining surgery and chemotherapy was achievable in 76% of the patients, leading to a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 83% from the date of treatment of the first recurrence. In contrast, the 5-year OS rate was only 27% (p < 0.001) for patients treated with non-curative therapy. An isolated peritoneal recurrence was predictive of greater amenability to curative therapy and a better prognosis. CONCLUSION: After CCRS plus HIPEC, serosal recurrences were more common than their distant counterparts. Distant relapses' emergence has raised the question of their optimal treatments. Very long-term survival can be obtained after further treatment of recurrent PMP for patients with limited disease and good general status.

[Surgery for soft-tissue sarcomas of the limbs and trunk wall]. / Chirurgie des sarcomes des tissus mous des membres et de la paroi du tronc.

Soft-tissue sarcoma of the limbs or the trunk wall determine a heterogeneous group of tumours that tends to receive a more individualized approach. The surgeon in charge with soft-tissue sarcoma has to be familiar with these tumours in order to deliver an adequate treatment. Most important is the initial diagnostic procedure, comprising imaging with MRI, a core needle biopsy, and in France, referral to a centre of expertise within the clinical network NETSARC. Prior to surgery, a multidisciplinary conference determines its moment and the extent of surgical resection within the frame of a multidisciplinary approach, and also plans reconstructive surgery, when needed. A standardized operative report summarizes items necessary to describe the resection quality (i.e. tumour seen, tumour infiltrated?). In multidisciplinary staff meetings, they are compared to margins measured by the pathologist on the operative specimen. Hence, resection quality is determined collegially and defined by resection type R (R0, R1, R2) as a qualitative result. The quality of resection directly determines the 5-year risk of local recurrence, estimated between 10 and 20% in specialized centres, with the objective to attain 10%. Early rehabilitation favours better functional outcome. The surgeon's experience with soft-tissue sarcoma, as part of a multidisciplinary treatment, is key in achieving the best adequacy between oncological resection and favourable functional outcome. In France, a specific university course for soft-tissue sarcoma will be set-up.

Revisiting the immunocytochemical detection of Neurogenin 3 expression in mouse and man.

During embryonic development, endocrine cells of the pancreas are specified from multipotent progenitors. The transcription factor Neurogenin 3 (NEUROG3) is critical for this development and it has been shown that all endocrine cells of the pancreas arise from endocrine progenitors expressing NEUROG3. A thorough understanding of the role of NEUROG3 during development, directed differentiation of pluripotent stem cells and in models of cellular reprogramming, will guide future efforts directed at finding novel sources of ß-cells for cell replacement therapies. In this article, we review the expression and function of NEUROG3 in both mouse and human and present the further characterization of a monoclonal antibody directed against NEUROG3. This antibody has been previously been used for detection of both mouse and human NEUROG3. However, our results suggest that the epitope recognized by this antibody is specific to mouse NEUROG3. Thus, we have also generated a monoclonal antibody specifically recognizing human NEUROG3 and present the characterization of this antibody here. Together, these antibodies will provide useful tools for future studies of NEUROG3 expression, and the data presented in this article suggest that recently described expression patterns of NEUROG3 in human foetal and adult pancreas should be re-examined.