Transfer Validity of Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fracture Pin Placement Practice on In-Theater Performance by Orthopedic Trainees Using an Augmented Reality Simulator: Protocol for a Pilot Interventional Cohort Study With a Retrospective Comparator Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Supracondylar humeral fractures (SCHF) are a common cause of orthopedic morbidity in pediatric populations across the world. The treatment of this fracture is likely one of the first procedures involving x-ray-guided wire insertion that trainee orthopedic surgeons will encounter in their career. Traditional surgical training methods of "see one, do one, teach one" are reliant on the presence of real-world cases and must be conducted within an operative environment. We have developed an augmented reality simulator that allows trainees to practice this procedure in a radiation-free environment at no extra risk to patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine whether training on a simulator in addition to traditional surgical training improves the in-theater performance of trainees. METHODS: This multicenter, interventional cohort study will involve orthopedic trainees from New Zealand in their first year of advanced training between 2019 and 2023. Advanced trainees with no simulator exposure who were in their first year in 2019-2021 will form the comparator cohort, while those in the years 2022-2023 will receive additional regular simulator training as the intervention cohort. The comparator cohort's performance in pediatric SCHF surgery will be retrospectively audited using routinely collected operative outcomes and parameters over a 6-month period. Data on the performance of the intervention cohorts will be collected in the same way over a comparable period. The data collected for both groups will be used to determine whether additional training with an augmented reality training shows improved real-world surgical outcomes compared to traditional surgical training. RESULTS: As of February 2022, a total of 8 retrospective comparator trainees have been recruited by email. The study is financially supported through an external grant from the Wishbone Orthopaedic Research Foundation of New Zealand (September 2021) and an internal research grant from the University of Otago (July 2021). CONCLUSIONS: This protocol has been approved by the University of Otago Health Ethics committee (reference HD21/087), and the study is due for completion in 2024. This protocol may assist other researchers conducting similar studies in the field. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12623000816651; https://tinyurl.com/mtdkecwb. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/38282.

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: An Examination of Care Practices of Orthopaedic Surgeons in India.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated screening, referral and treatment practices for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in India by surveying Orthopaedic surgeons who treat patients with DDH. The survey assessed the timing of DDH presentation, resource availability, and current state of screening and diagnosis, which would help in the development of a DDH care pathway for India. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to Orthopaedic surgeons practicing in India via email and administered onsite to those attending the annual conference of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of India in 2019. RESULTS: 173 completed surveys were received from surgeons practicing in a predominantly urban setting. 68.8% of respondents had performed initial evaluations on children with DDH aged over 1 year in the past 12 months, and 49.1% had assessed children with DDH aged > 2 years on initial presentation. There was no consistent use of established guidelines, with only 30% of respondents stating that a care pathway was in place at their institution. However, 91.9% would support the implementation of a care pathway developed in India, to decrease the incidence of delayed diagnosis and facilitate earlier intervention. 85% of respondents had ready access to ultrasound scans and 95.4% had access to X-rays. CONCLUSIONS: In India, there is still a large number of late-presenting cases of DDH, which could be improved with effective screening. The development of a care pathway for DDH in India is well-supported by Orthopaedic surgeons and may help decrease the incidence of late presenting cases; potentially improving outcomes, decreasing morbidity, and upskilling local practitioners.

Does a titanium-coated polyethylene press-fit cup give reliable midterm results?

BACKGROUND: Uncemented acetabular components have demonstrated low revision rates and high patient satisfaction but with concerns regarding increased costs compared with monoblock cups. Some newer lower-cost uncemented monoblock options have become available in the last decade, but limited data are available on their performance. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does an uncemented, titanium-backed all-polyethylene acetabular cup provide reliable fixation? (2) What is the frequency and what are the causes for revision with this cup? METHODS: Between 2004 and 2008, we elected to use an uncemented, titanium-backed all-polyethylene acetabular cup in older patients with limited physical demands. We performed 615 hip replacements in 550 patients with greater than 5 years of clinical and radiographic followup. When patients who were dead (80 hips in 75 patients), lost to followup (98 hips in 93 patients), or revised (three hips in three patients) were excluded, there were 434 hips in 379 patients for comparison of the postoperative and 5-year radiographs. Two observers not involved in the index surgical procedures (NH, HS) assessed radiographs for signs of migration or loosening. Some degree of early movement sometimes is seen before cup stabilization; however, to be conservative, we defined cups with greater than 3° of change of position (even if they subsequently stabilized) as potentially at risk and report them separately. Revision surgery, time from the index procedure, and the reason for revision were recorded from the New Zealand Joint Registry. RESULTS: By 5 years there was a median change in inclination of 2° (range, 0°-13°; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-2.4; p < 0.001) and 2° of anteversion (range, 0°-11°; 95% CI, 2.0-2.4; p < 0.001). Although at last followup all cups appeared to have stabilized with no radiolucent lines or medial migration, 22% of the cups (94 of 434) had moved more than 3° and so were deemed to be potentially at risk. There were 11 revision procedures (of 429 hips; 2.5%) of which six were for recurrent dislocation, four for femoral fracture, and one for femoral loosening to give an overall all-cause revision rate for all components of 0.25 per 100 component years (95% CI, 0.13-0.43). No revisions were performed for acetabular loosening. CONCLUSIONS: The short- to medium-term results of this all-polyethylene monoblock cup demonstrated a low frequency of revision. However, 94 cups were identified as potentially at risk based on movement of > 3° before apparent stabilization. Although those patients seem to be doing well enough now, the current duration of followup may not be sufficient to know that these cups will be durable, because other ongrowth designs have demonstrated a high frequency of late failure after apparent early success. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

The relationship between the American Society Of Anesthesiologists physical rating and outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty: an analysis of theNew Zealand Joint Registry.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review the results of the first four years of use of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status rating system in the New Zealand Joint Registry. Our hypothesis was that patients with a higher ASA score would have an increased mortality rate, an increased early revision arthroplasty rate, and poorer clinical outcomes at six months after total hip or knee arthroplasty. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the preoperative ASA classes for all patients in the registry who underwent primary total hip or knee arthroplasty from 2005 to 2008 with regard to the six-month mortality rate and the Oxford Hip and Knee Scores at six months. Survival curves were constructed with use of revision joint replacement as the end point. RESULTS: Twenty-two thousand six hundred patients who underwent total hip arthroplasties and 18,434 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasties were recorded in the New Zealand Joint Registry. The six-month mortality rate was 0.77% following hip arthroplasty and 0.40% following knee arthroplasty. Significant differences were observed in the mortality rate between all ASA classes following hip arthroplasty (p < 0.001). Similarly, significant differences were observed in the mortality rate between ASA classes after knee arthroplasty, except between ASA classes 1 and 2 and between ASA classes 3 and 4. The mortality rate was significantly higher (p < 0.001) following hip arthroplasty compared with knee arthroplasty. A significant difference (p < 0.001) in Oxford scores was observed when ASA class 1 and ASA class 2 were compared with ASA class 3 and ASA class 4, independent of age and sex, following both hip or knee arthroplasty. A significant difference was observed in the rate of early revision (revision less than two years after the index procedure) following total hip arthroplasty when ASA class 1 (hazard ratio, 1.39 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04 to 1.95]; p = 0.015) and ASA class 2 (hazard ratio, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.55]; p = 0.030) were compared with ASA class 3, which was independent of age and sex. No significant difference was observed in the rate of early revision after total knee arthroplasty. CONCLUSIONS: The ASA physical status score can be used as a predictor of postoperative mortality and functional status following both hip and knee arthroplasty and may predict early failure of total hip arthroplasty necessitating revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Bilateral total joint arthroplasty: the early results from the New Zealand National Joint Registry.

This study evaluated the mortality rate, major complications, and early outcomes of single anesthetic bilateral total hip and knee arthroplasty compared with unilateral and staged procedures. A total of 37,828 total hip and knee arthroplasties were evaluated with 6-month Oxford 12 scores. Major complications and mortality rates were recorded. Analysis of variance tables were used for statistical analysis. The single anesthetic bilateral group were significantly younger (P < .001), with their age-adjusted postoperative Oxford 12 scores significantly better (P < .001) than the other 2 groups. The surgeons involved, in general, performed more than 25 total knee and hip arthroplasties per year. There was 1 death within the first 6 months occurring in the staged bilateral group and was unrelated to the surgery. The complication rate as reported by patients was low in all groups, and there was no significant difference. The results show that, in selected patients, single anesthetic bilateral total knee or hip arthroplasty is a safe, low-risk procedure with very good patient-generated outcome scores at 6 months when performed by an experienced surgeon.