Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 61
Filtrar
1.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 34(1): 28-35, 2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34479769

RESUMO

AIMS: Most randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in oncology are now funded by the pharmaceutical industry. We explore the extent to which RCT design, results and interpretation differ between industry-funded and non-industry-funded RCTs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional analysis, a structured literature search was used to identify all oncology RCTs published globally during 2014-2017. Industry funding was identified based on explicit statements in the publication. Descriptive statistics were used to compare elements of trial methodology and output between industry- and non-industry-funded RCTs. RESULTS: The study sample included 694 RCTs; 71% were funded by industry. Industry-funded trials were more likely to test systemic therapy (97% versus 62%; P < 0.001), palliative-intent therapy (71% versus 41%; P < 0.001) and study breast cancer (20% versus 12%; P < 0.001). Industry-funded trials were larger (median sample size 474 versus 375; P < 0.001) and more likely to meet their primary end point (49% versus 41%; P < 0.001). Among positive trials, there were no differences in the magnitude of benefit between industry- and non-industry-funded RCTs. Trials funded by industry were published in journals that had a significantly higher median impact factor (21, interquartile range 7, 28) than non-industry-funded trials (impact factor 12, interquartile range 5, 24; P = 0.005); this persisted when adjusted for whether a trial was positive or negative. CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of oncology RCTs are now funded by industry. Industry-funded trials are larger, more likely to be positive, predominantly test systemic therapies in the palliative setting and are published in higher impact journals than trials without industry support.


Assuntos
Indústria Farmacêutica , Oncologia , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
2.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 28(1): 87-95, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33509058

RESUMO

AIM: To evaluate the impact of discrepancy between prescribed and recommended fixed 200 mg dose (P-F discrepancy) on immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and treatment efficacy in patients with advanced melanoma and NSCLC. METHODS: This retrospective study included 177 patients with advanced melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received at least one cycle of single-agent pembrolizumab. We defined P-F discrepancy as the differences between prescribed pembrolizumab dose and 200 mg recommended dose, expressed in percentages. Our primary outcome was immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and our secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). RESULTS: The median P-F discrepancy was -21.5%, with the 25th and 75th percentile at -32% and -5.0% respectively. ROC curve analyses did not show any optimal cutoffs to prognosticate irAEs (AUC = 0.558 for all patients) or cancer mortality (AUC = 0.583 for melanoma; AUC = 0.539 for NSCLC) in either cancer type. Separate multivariable Cox analyses suggested no statistically significant association between P-F discrepancy and overall survival in patients with melanoma (HR 1.012, 95%CI 0.987-1.038, P = 0.362) or NSCLC (HR 0.998, 95%CI 0.978-1.019, P = 0.876). CONCLUSION: There was no optimal pembrolizumab cut-off point to predict irAEs or treatment efficacy. We supported the use of weight-based pembrolizumab dosing, given the potential cost-saving and no differences in terms of irAEs or treatment efficacy in patients with advanced melanoma or NSCLC. Future studies on province- or national-level would be important to validate our findings.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Melanoma , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 32(1): e19-e26, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31324474

RESUMO

AIMS: The workload pressure on medical oncologists will increase in the near future. There are no comprehensive data available about the current workload of medical oncologists in Europe. Here we report the European results of a global survey of the workload of medical oncologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online survey was distributed through a snowball method via national oncology societies to chemotherapy-prescribing physicians in 21 European countries. We compared the workload of medical oncologists in Eastern European countries (EECs) and Western European countries (WECs). The primary measure of workload was the annual number of new cancer patient consults seen per oncologist. RESULTS: In total, 495 oncologists from 16 European countries completed our survey: 100 from seven EECs and 395 from nine WECs. The median number of annual consults per medical oncologist was 225 in EECs compared with 175 in WECs (P < 0.001). The proportion of medical oncologists seeing more than 300 consults/year was 35% (35/100) in EECs compared with 18% (68/395) in WECs. The median number of patients seen in a full day clinic was 25 in EECs and 15 in WECs (P < 0.001). Eastern European medical oncologists reported spending a median of 25 min per new consultation compared with 45 min in WECs (P < 0.001). The top two reported barriers in both EECs and WECs to patient care were high clinical volumes and insufficient time for reading. CONCLUSION: The clinical workload of medical oncologists in EECs was substantially higher than in WECs. European health policymakers and educators need to address existing disparities in the workload of medical oncologist, undertake plans for future workforce supply and consider alternative models of care.


Assuntos
Oncologia/métodos , Oncologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
Curr Oncol ; 25(3): 206-212, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29962838

RESUMO

Background: In 2000, a Canadian task force recommended that medical oncologists (mos) meet a target of 160-175 new patient consultations per year. Here, we report the Canadian results of a global survey of mo workload compared with mo workload in other high-income countries (hics). Methods: Using a snowball method, an online survey was distributed by national oncology societies to chemotherapy-prescribing physicians in 22 hics (World Bank criteria). The survey was distributed within Canada to all members of the Canadian Association of Medical Oncologists. Workload was measured as the annual number of new cancer patient consults per oncologist. Results: The survey was completed by 782 oncologists from hics, including 58 from Canada. Median annual consults per mo were 175 in Canada compared with 125 in other hics. The proportions of mos having 100 or fewer consults or more than 300 consults per year were 3% (2/58) and 5% (3/58) in Canada compared with 31% (222/724) and 16% (116/724) in other hics (p < 0.001 and p = 0.023 respectively). The median number of patients seen in a full-day clinic was 15 in Canada and 25 in other hics (p = 0.220). Canadian mos reported spending a median of 55 minutes per new consultation; new consultations of 35 minutes were reported in other hics (p < 0.001). Median hours worked per week was 55 in Canada and 45 in other hics (p = 0.200). Conclusions: Although the median annual clinical volume for Canadian mos aligns with recommended targets, half the respondents exceeded that level of activity. Health policymakers and educators have to consider mo workforce supply and alternative models of care in preparation for the anticipated surge in cancer incidence in the coming decade.


Assuntos
Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Oncologia/normas , Carga de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Canadá , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
Curr Oncol ; 25(6): e499-e506, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30607116

RESUMO

Background: Little is known about the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy (adj) in the older population with locally advanced rectal cancer (larc). We evaluated use of adj, survival outcomes, and adj-related toxicity in older patients with larc. Methods: Our retrospective review included 286 patients with larc (stages ii and iii) diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2013 in Nova Scotia who underwent curative-intent surgery. Baseline patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics were collected. The survival analysis used the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression statistics. Results: Of 286 identified patients, 152 were 65 years of age or older, and 92 were 70 years of age or older. Median follow-up was 46 months, and 163 patients (57%) received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Although adj was given to 81% of patients (n = 109) less than 65 years of age, only 29% patients (n = 27) 70 years of age and older received adj. Kaplan-Meier analysis suggested a potential survival advantage for adj regardless of age. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, T stage, and adj were significant predictors of overall survival (p < 0.04); age was not. Similarly, N stage, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, and adj were significant predictors of disease-free survival (p < 0.01). Poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was the most common cause of adj omission. In patients 70 years of age and older, grade 1 or greater chemotherapy-related toxicities were experienced significantly more often by those treated with adj (85% vs. 68% for those not treated with adj, p < 0.05). Conclusions: Regardless of age, patients with larc seem to experience a survival benefit with adj. However, older patients are less likely to receive adj, and when they do, they experience more chemotherapy-related toxicities.


Assuntos
Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Neoplasias Retais/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Retais/patologia
7.
Curr Oncol ; 24(6): 383-389, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29270050

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Documentation of advance care planning for patients with terminal cancer is known to be poor. Here, we describe a quality improvement initiative. METHODS: Patients receiving palliative chemotherapy for metastatic lung, pancreatic, colorectal, and breast cancer during 2010-2015 at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario were identified from electronic pharmacy records. Clinical notes were reviewed to identify documentation of care plans in the event of acute deterioration. After establishing baseline practice, we sought to improve documentation of goals of care and referral rates to palliative care. Using quality improvement methodology, we developed a guideline, a standardized documentation system, and a process to facilitate early referral to palliative care. RESULTS: During 2010-2015, 456 patients were included in the baseline cohort: 63% with lung cancer, 16% with colorectal cancer, 13% with pancreatic cancer, and 7% with breast cancer. Care goals in the event of an acute illness were documented by medical oncologists in 6% of cases (26 of 456). Of the 456 patients, 47% (n = 214) were seen by palliative care; care goals were documented by palliative care in 48% of the patients seen (103 of 214). With those baseline data in hand, a local practice guideline and process was developed to facilitate the identification of patients for whom advance care planning and early palliative care referral should be considered. A system was also established so that goals-of-care documentation will be supported with a written framework and broadly accessible in the electronic medical record. CONCLUSIONS: Low rates of documentation of advance care planning and referral to palliative care persist and have stimulated a local quality improvement initiative.

8.
Curr Oncol ; 24(5): e379-e387, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29089808

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of carboplatin-paclitaxel in the trimodality setting was demonstrated in the cross trial. Because of better tolerance, that regimen has been adopted as an alternative for patients receiving definitive chemoradiation (dcrt). The purpose of our study was to compare outcomes in patients with localized esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (gej) cancer who received dcrt using either platinum-5-fluorouracil (5fu) or carboplatin-paclitaxel. METHODS: Medical records and outcomes for all patients diagnosed with localized carcinoma of the esophagus and gej at our centre between 2008 and 2015 were reviewed. All patients who underwent dcrt using cisplatin-5fu, carboplatin-5fu, or carboplatin-paclitaxel were included. RESULTS: The 73 identified patients (34 cisplatin-5fu, 13 carboplatin-5fu, 26 carboplatin-paclitaxel) were all prescribed concomitant radiotherapy of 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions. The diagnosis was adenocarcinoma in 64% and squamous cell carcinoma in 36%. Median overall survival (os) duration for the cisplatin-5fu group was 28 months [95% confidence interval (ci): 19 to 41 months], with a 3-year os rate of 44%, in contrast to the 15 months (95% ci: 11 to 17 months) and 15% in the carboplatin-paclitaxel group (log-rank p = 0.0047). Median os duration for the carboplatin-5fu group was 17 months (95% ci: 11 to 68 months) with a 3-year os rate of 31%. Adjusting for patient and disease factors, better os durations and rates were associated with cisplatin-5fu (hazard ratio: 0.34; p = 0.0016) and carboplatin-5fu (hazard ratio: 0.55; p = 0.20) than with carboplatin-paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: In a dcrt regimen, a better os is associated with cisplatin-5fu than with carboplatin-paclitaxel. Clinical trials to determine optimal chemotherapy regimens are warranted for patients who are not suitable for surgery.

9.
Ann Oncol ; 28(1): 157-162, 2017 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27742650

RESUMO

Background: The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) recently released a magnitude of clinical benefit scale (ESMO-MCBS) for systemic therapies for solid cancers. Here, we evaluate contemporary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) against the proposed ESMO thresholds for meaningful clinical benefit. Methods: RCTs evaluating systemic therapy for breast cancer, nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer (CRC), and pancreatic cancer published 2011-2015 were reviewed. Data were abstracted regarding trial characteristics and outcomes, and these were applied to the ESMO-MCBS. We also determined whether RCTs were designed to detect an effect that would meet clinical benefit as defined by the ESMO-MCBS. Results: About 277 eligible RCTs were included (40% breast, 31% NSCLC, 22% CRC, 6% pancreas). Median sample size was 532 and 83% were funded by industry. Among all 277 RCTs, the experimental therapy was statistically superior to the control arm in 138 (50%) trials: results of only 31% (43/138) of these trials met the ESMO-MCBS clinical benefit threshold. RCTs with curative intent were more likely to meet clinically meaningful thresholds than those with palliative intent [61% (19/31) versus 22% (24/107), P < 0.001]. Among the 226 RCTs for which the ESMO-MCBS could be applied, 31% (70/226) were designed to detect an effect size that could meet ESMO-MCBS thresholds. Conclusion: Less than one-third of contemporary RCTs with statistically significant results meet ESMO thresholds for meaningful clinical benefit, and this represents only 15% of all published trials. Investigators, funding agencies, regulatory agencies, and industry should adopt more stringent thresholds for meaningful benefit in the design of future RCTs.


Assuntos
Oncologia/normas , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/normas , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Sociedades Médicas
10.
Haemophilia ; 23(1): 115-121, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27611464

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder known in humans. Currently, studies investigating the health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in VWD using standardized tools are limited, particularly among patients with mild decreases in von Willebrand factor or activity. AIM: To determine HR-QoL and its predictors among patients with mild, moderate and severe forms of VWD. METHODS: Patients with clinical diagnosis of VWD were recruited from a tertiary Inherited Bleeding Disorder Clinic. Upon informed consent, bleeding scores were obtained via a standardized, self-administered tool. Each participant also completed a HR-QoL questionnaire (SF-36). Analyses included paired t-test, independent t-test, one-way anova and multivariate regression. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were recruited (consent rate = 95%). Participants were 38 years on average (SD 14.8), 78% were female and 80% were diagnosed with VWD Type 1. Compared to age- and sex-matched normative data, VWD patients had clinically and statistically significant reductions in seven of eight HR-QoL domains and the physical and mental component summaries. Adjusted for age, sex, socioeconomic status and rurality, there was a trend towards lower physical component summary with increasing bleeding score, and lower mental domains with iron deficiency status (P = 0.07 and P = 0.08 respectively). CONCLUSION: This study is the first to examine the impact of VWD on HR-QoL across disease severity while incorporating socioeconomic status and rurality. Significant reductions in HR-QoL among VWD patients, especially the relationship between iron status and mental HR-QoL, strengthen the rationale for prospective studies to evaluate the efficacy of iron replacement in this setting.


Assuntos
Ferro/metabolismo , Doenças de von Willebrand/diagnóstico , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hemorragia , Humanos , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida
11.
Curr Oncol ; 23(2): e116-22, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27122979

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested an effect of metformin on mortality for patients with both diabetes and colorectal cancer (crc). However, the literature is contradictory, with both positive and negative effects being identified. We set out to determine the effect of metformin with respect to prognosis in crc patients. METHODS: After a retrospective chart review of crc patients treated at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compare overall survival (os) in patients with and without diabetes. RESULTS: We identified 1304 crc patients treated at the centre. No significant differences between the diabetic and nondiabetic groups were observed with respect to tumour pathology, extent of metastatic disease, time or toxicity of chemotherapy, and the os rate (1-year os: 85.6% vs. 86.4%, p = 0.695; 2-year os: 73.6% vs. 77.0%, p = 0.265). In subgroup analysis, diabetic patients taking metformin survived significantly longer than their counterparts taking other diabetes treatments (os for the metformin group: 91% at 1 year; 80.5% at 2 years; os for the group taking other treatments, including diet control: 80.6% at 1 year, 67.4% at 2 years). Multivariate analysis suggests that patients with diabetes taking treatments other than metformin experience worse survival (p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that crc patients with diabetes, excluding those taking metformin, might have a worse crc prognosis. Taking metformin appears to have a positive association with prognosis. The protective nature of metformin needs further evaluation in prospective analyses.

12.
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) ; 28(3): 209-14, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26698027

RESUMO

AIMS: Documentation of advance directives among patients with terminal cancer is known to be poor. Here we describe documentation of prognosis, treatment benefit and goals of care discussions in outpatients with advanced cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients receiving first-line palliative chemotherapy for metastatic pancreas or lung cancers during 2010-2013 at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario were identified from electronic pharmacy records. Clinical notes from medical oncology were reviewed to identify documentation of discussions regarding prognosis, treatment benefit and goals of care. Differences between groups were tested using the chi-squared test. RESULTS: In total, 222 patients were included: 80% (177/222) with lung cancer and 20% (45/222) with pancreas cancer. Medical oncology notes documented discussion of prognosis in 64% (142/222), palliative intent of therapy in 82% (182/222), magnitude of treatment benefit in 29% (64/222) and goals of care in 4% (9/222) of patients. An estimate of survival was documented in 36% (79/222) of cases. Across medical oncology providers there was substantial variation in the frequency of discussing prognosis (range 33-90%, P < 0.001), treatment intent (range 55-100%, P < 0.001) and goals of care (range 0-17%, P = 0.034). In total, 41% (93/222) of patients were seen by palliative care; substantial medical oncology provider variation was observed (range 27-58%, P = 0.020). Referral rates to palliative care did not increase over time (41-44%, P = 0.250). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of ambulatory patients with an estimated life expectancy of 1 year or less, medical oncology documentation of prognosis, treatment benefit and goals of care was poor. Less than half the patients were seen by palliative care. Initiatives to improve documentation and referral to palliative care are needed.


Assuntos
Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Padrões de Prática Médica , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundário , Masculino , Oncologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/secundário , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos
13.
Curr Oncol ; 23(6): e583-e588, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28050148

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (ppis) are a commonly used medication. A limited number of studies have identified a weak-to-moderate association between ppi use and colorectal cancer (crc) risk, but none to date have identified an effect of ppi use on crc survival. We therefore postulated that an association between ppi use and crc survival might potentially exist. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 1304 crc patients diagnosed from January 2005 to December 2011 and treated at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate overall survival (os). RESULTS: We identified 117 patients (9.0%) who were taking ppis at the time of oncology consult. Those taking a ppi were also more often taking asa or statins (or both) and had a statistically significantly increased rate of cardiac disease. No identifiable difference in tumour characteristics was evident in the two groups, including tumour location, differentiation, lymph node status, and stage. Univariate analysis identified a statistically nonsignificant difference in survival, with those taking a ppi experiencing lesser 1-year (82.1% vs. 86.7%, p = 0.161), 2-year (70.1% vs. 76.8%, p = 0.111), and 5-year os (55.2% vs. 62.9%, p = 0.165). When controlling for patient demographics and tumour characteristics, multivariate Cox regression analysis identified a statistically significant effect of ppi in our patient population (hazard ratio: 1.343; 95% confidence interval: 1.011 to 1.785; p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a potential adverse effect of ppi use on os in crc patients. These results need further evaluation in prospective analyses.

14.
Haemophilia ; 21(5): e384-8, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26179127

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION/AIM: Our aim was to generate, optimize and validate a self-administered bleeding assessment tool (self-BAT) for von Willebrand disease (VWD). METHODS: In Phase 1, medical terminology in the expert-administered International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH)-BAT was converted into a Grade 4 reading level to produce the first version of the Self-BAT which was then optimized to ensure agreement with the ISTH-BAT. In Phase 2, the normal range of bleeding scores (BSs) was determined and test-retest reliability analysed. In Phase 3, the optimized Self-BAT was tested as a screening tool for first time referrals to the Haematology clinic. RESULTS: Bleeding score from the final optimized version of the Self-BAT showed an excellent intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.87 with ISTH-BAT BS in Phase 1. In Phase 2, the normal range of BSs for the optimized Self-BAT was determined to be 0 to +5 for females and 0 to +3 for males and excellent test-retest reliability was shown (ICC = 0.95). In Phase 3, we showed that a positive Self-BAT BS (≥6 for females, ≥4 for males) has a sensitivity of 78%, specificity of 23%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.15 and negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.86 for VWD; these figures improved when just the females were analysed; sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 21%, PPV = 0.17 and NPV = 1.0. CONCLUSION: We show an optimized Self-BAT can generate comparable BS to the expert-administered ISTH-BAT and is a reliable, effective screening tool to incorporate into the assessment of individuals, particularly women, referred for a possible bleeding disorder.


Assuntos
Hemorragia/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento , Autoadministração , Doenças de von Willebrand/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Demografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Adulto Jovem
15.
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis ; 18(7): 787-92, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24902553

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) may be useful in diagnosing latent tuberculous infection (LTBI) in inmates; however, published experience in these settings is limited. OBJECTIVE: To identify variables associated with IGRA positivity among Canadian federal inmates with positive tuberculin skin test (TST) results. DESIGN: On intake, TST-positive (≥10 mm) inmates were offered an IGRA (QuantiFERON(®)-TB Gold), and demographic and historical data were collected. IGRA-positive and -negative inmates were compared using the χ(2) test and multivariable logistic regression; the final model's goodness of fit was assessed using Hosmer-Lemeshow test and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Of 96 TST-positive inmates, 31 (32.3%) were IGRA-positive. Variables associated with positive IGRA were age >45 years (11/20 vs. 20/75, P = 0.016) and previous LTBI treatment (9/20 vs. 13/55, P = 0.032) in univariate analysis, and being from a country with a moderate or high estimated tuberculosis (TB) incidence (OR 3.5, 95%CI 1.3-9.4, P = 0.013) and absence of bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination (OR 3.3, 95%CI 1.2-9.0, P = 0.017) in multivariable analysis. The data fit the model well, classifying the group better than chance alone (AUC 0.67, P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: High discordance with TST, particularly among BCG-vaccinated inmates and those from low TB incidence countries, suggest that IGRA may be useful in Canadian federal penitentiary screening programmes.


Assuntos
Testes de Liberação de Interferon-gama , Tuberculose Latente/diagnóstico , Prisioneiros/estatística & dados numéricos , Prisões , Adulto , Vacina BCG/administração & dosagem , Canadá , Humanos , Tuberculose Latente/epidemiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Projetos Piloto , Teste Tuberculínico
16.
Curr Oncol ; 20(3): e171-9, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23737687

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (pp-g-csf) is recommended in patients undergoing chemotherapy carrying a febrile neutropenia (fn) risk of 20% or more. In the present study, we examined clinical practice patterns and the impact of pp-g-csf on fn incidence in women with early-stage breast cancer (ebc) treated with modern adjuvant chemotherapy (act). METHODS: This single-centre retrospective cohort study of women with ebc, who were identified from the pharmacy database and who received at least 1 cycle of modern act from January 2009 to December 2011, was conducted at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario. Data on patient demographics, pathology, stage distribution, chemotherapy, pp-g-csf use, dose reductions, chemotherapy delays, treatment discontinuation, relative dose intensity, and fn events were collected. Chi-square tests, t-tests, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, and nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-tests were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Of the 239 women eligible for analysis, 145 (61%) received pp-g-csf, and 50 (21%) developed at least 1 episode of fn. Use of pp-g-csf was associated with a significantly lower rate of fn (14% vs. 31%, p = 0.002) and trends to fewer dose delays (17% vs. 27%, p = 0.060) and dose reductions (19% vs. 25%, p = 0.28). Among women receiving pp-g-csf, higher fn rates were associated with an age of 65 years or older, taxane-based chemotherapy, and prophylaxis with filgrastim. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical practice patterns at our institution showed that more than 50% of ebc patients treated with modern act received pp-g-csf, which led to fewer fn episodes and increased delivery of planned act. The observed high fn risk despite pp-g-csf was linked to older age, taxane-based chemotherapy, and filgrastim.

17.
Haemophilia ; 19(5): 758-64, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23711418

RESUMO

von Willebrand's disease (VWD) patients undergoing major surgery are prophylactically treated to promote haemostasis. There is variability in perioperative clinical practice; however, most guidelines suggest replacing the deficient factor to a level of 1.0 IU mL(-1) (or 100%). A review of the literature reveals a paucity of well constructed descriptive data quantifying the changes in coagulation that occur in response to surgical stress. The aim of this study was to quantify the changes in haemostatic variables occurring in response to elective orthopaedic surgery in normal individuals. Eligible subjects >18 years of age undergoing total hip or knee replacement were recruited. Blood samples were drawn at five time points: baseline, preoperatively, 30 min after surgical incision, 30 min postoperatively, postoperative day (POD) 1. Analyses included t-tests and repeated measures anova. Overall 30 patients, 21 women and 9 men, with a mean age of 65 were included in the final analysis. All von Willebrand factor (VWF) variables were seen to significantly decrease intraoperatively and increase postoperatively. VWF multimers showed a statistically significant decrease in high molecular weight multimers intraoperatively and an increase postoperatively. On subgroup analysis, age, gender and anaesthesia type were significantly correlated with changes in VWF parameters. Data presented in the current study establish a physiological baseline for VWF parameters in the normal population and demonstrate mean VWF/factor VIII levels greater than 1.0 IU mL(-1) intraoperatively. As such, current management in VWD patients does not appear to mimic the normal physiological response to surgery.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Fator VIII/metabolismo , Fator de von Willebrand/metabolismo , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
18.
Colorectal Dis ; 15(6): e323-9, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23406347

RESUMO

AIM: Restorative surgery after (procto)colectomy with ileo-neorectal anastomosis (INRA) or restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (RPC) combines cure of ulcerative colitis (UC) with restoration of intestinal continuity. This study aimed to evaluate these two operations. METHOD: Patients having INRA and RPC were matched according to sex, age at onset of UC, age at restorative surgery and duration of follow-up. Patients were included if they were over 18 years of age, had UC confirmed histopathologically and had undergone either operation. Long-term function, anal and neorectal physiology, complications, quality of life (QoL) and health status (HS) were determined. RESULTS: Seventy-one consecutive patients underwent surgery with the intention of having an INRA procedure. This was successfully carried out in 50, and 21 underwent intra-operative conversion to RPC. Median defaecation frequency was 6/24 h. In 11/71 patients reservoir failure occurred and 13/71 developed pouchitis. QoL and HS were comparable to the healthy population. Median follow-up was 6.2 years. These patients were matched with 71 patients who underwent RPC. RPC was successful in all patients. Median defaecation frequency was 8/24 h. Failure occurred in 7/71 patients and 13/71 developed pouchitis. QoL and HS were comparable with the healthy population. Median follow-up was 6.9 years. CONCLUSION: Comparison of INRA and RPC on an intention to treat basis was not considered to be realistic due to the high intra-operative conversion rate and the failures in the INRA group. RPC remains the procedure of choice for restoring intestinal continuity after proctocolectomy for UC.


Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa/cirurgia , Bolsas Cólicas , Proctocolectomia Restauradora , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Pouchite , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
19.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 24(4): 339-e166, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22235913

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Late anorectal toxicity is a frequent adverse event of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer. The pathophysiology of anorectal toxicity remains unknown, but we speculate that rectal distensibility is impaired due to fibrosis. Our goal was to determine whether EBRT induces changes of rectal distensibility as measured by an electronic barostat and to explore whether anorectal complaints are related to specific changes of anorectal function. METHODS: Thirty-two men, irradiated for localized prostate carcinoma, underwent barostat measurements, anorectal manometry, and completed a questionnaire prior to and 1 year after radiotherapy. The primary outcome measure was rectal distensibility in response to stepwise isobaric distensions. In addition, we assessed sensory thresholds, anal pressures, and anorectal complaints. KEY RESULTS: External beam radiotherapy reduced maximal rectal capacity (227 ± 14 mL vs 277 ± 15 mL; P < 0.001), area under the pressure-volume curve (3212 ± 352 mL mmHg vs 3969 ± 413 mL mmHg; P < 0.005), and rectal compliance (15.7 ± 1.2 mL mmHg(-1) vs 17.6 ± 0.9 mL mmHg(-1) ; P = 0.12). Sensory pressure thresholds did not significantly change. Sixteen of the 32 patients (50%) had one or more anorectal complaints. Patients with urgency (n = 10) had a more reduced anal squeeze and maximum pressure (decrease 29 ± 11 mmHg vs 1 ± 7 mmHg; P < 0.05 and 31 ± 12 mmHg vs 2 ± 8 mmHg; P < 0.05 respectively) compared with patients without complaints, indicating a deteriorated external anal sphincter function. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Irradiation for prostate cancer leads to reduced rectal distensibility. In patients with urgency symptoms, anal sphincter function was also impaired.


Assuntos
Defecação/efeitos da radiação , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Reto/efeitos da radiação , Idoso , Canal Anal/efeitos da radiação , Incontinência Fecal/epidemiologia , Incontinência Fecal/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Manometria , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
20.
Curr Oncol ; 18(3): 119-25, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21655158

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with fec-d (5-fluorouracil-epirubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel) is superior to that with fec-100 alone in women with early-stage breast cancer. As the use of fec-d increased in clinical practice, health care providers anecdotally noted higher-than-expected toxicity rates and frequent early treatment discontinuations because of toxicity. In the present study, we compared the rates of serious adverse events in patients who received adjuvant fec-d chemotherapy in routine clinical practice with the rates reported in the pacs-01 trial. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients prescribed adjuvant fec-d for early-stage breast cancer at 4 regional cancer centres in Ontario. Information was collected from electronic and paper charts by a physician investigator from each centre. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests, independent samples t-tests, one-way analysis of variance, and univariate regression. RESULTS: The 671 electronic and paper patient records reviewed showed a median patient age of 52.2 years, 229 patients (34.1%) with N0 disease, 508 patients (75.7%) with estrogen or progesterone receptor-positive disease (or both), and 113 patients (26%) with her2/neu-overexpressing breast cancer. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 152 patients (22.7%), most frequently at cycle 4, coincident with the initiation of docetaxel [78/152 (51.3%)]. Primary prophylaxis with hematopoietic growth factor support was used in 235 patients (35%), and the rate of febrile neutropenia was significantly lower in those who received prophylaxis than in those who did not [15/235 (6.4%) vs. 137/436 (31.4%); p < 0.001; risk ratio: 0.20]. CONCLUSIONS: In routine clinical practice, treatment with fec-d is associated with a higher-than-expected rate of febrile neutropenia, in light of which, primary prophylaxis with growth factor should be considered, per international guidelines. Adoption based on clinical trial reports of new therapies into mainstream practice must be done carefully and with scrutiny.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA