Ischaemic manifestations in giant cell arteritis are associated with area level socio-economic deprivation, but not cardiovascular risk factors.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether ischaemic manifestations of GCA are associated with pre-existing hypertension, atherosclerosis or area-level socio-economic deprivation. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of rheumatologist/ophthalmologist-diagnosed GCA in eight UK centres. The main outcome measure was ischaemic manifestations observed during active GCA: visual loss/blurring, aura, diplopia, jaw/tongue/limb claudication, cerebral/myocardial ischaemia or scalp necrosis. RESULTS: Out of 271 patients, 222 had ischaemic manifestations. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for the influence of hypertension and atherosclerosis were 1.6 (95% CI 0.8, 3.1) and 1.5 (0.6, 3.5). The most striking finding was an association of ischaemic manifestations with increasing Index of Deprivation 2007 score: OR 4.2 (95% CI 1.3, 13.6) for the most-deprived quartile compared with the least-deprived quartile. Similar effect sizes were seen within each recruitment centre. Deprivation was associated with smoking and negatively associated with previous polymyalgia. However, neither of these variables, nor hypertension or atherosclerosis, appeared responsible for mediating the effect of deprivation on ischaemic complications. Smoking was not associated with ischaemic manifestations. Median symptom duration before treatment was 30 days; after adjusting for symptom duration, the OR for ischaemic complications was 3.2 (95% CI 1.0, 10.8) for the most-deprived quartile compared with the least-deprived quartile. CONCLUSIONS: In GCA, area-level socio-economic deprivation was associated with ischaemic manifestations: this was not mediated by traditional cardiovascular risk factors. These findings are novel and require replication. Delay between first symptoms and treatment may play a role. Public awareness campaigns about GCA should aim especially to engage individuals living in more deprived areas to encourage early presentation and prompt treatment.

Effect of the early use of the anti-tumor necrosis factor adalimumab on the prevention of job loss in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare work disability and job loss in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving adalimumab plus methotrexate (adalimumab + MTX) versus MTX alone. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, patients with RA for <2 years who had never taken MTX and who self-reported work impairment were randomized to adalimumab + MTX or placebo + MTX for 56 weeks. Primary outcome was job loss of any cause and/or imminent job loss at or after week 16. Secondary outcomes included disease activity, function (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ] score), and RA quality of life (RAQoL) questionnaire score. Work was evaluated with work diaries and the RA Work Instability Scale. RESULTS: Although job loss during the 56-week study was significantly lower with adalimumab + MTX (14 of 75 patients) compared with MTX alone (29 of 73 patients; P=0.005), the primary end point was not met (12 of 75 versus 20 of 73 patients; P=0.092), likely owing to early drop out in the MTX group. There were significant improvements in American College of Rheumatology 20% response criteria, 28-joint Disease Activity Score, DeltaHAQ, DeltaRAQoL, and working time lost in the adalimumab + MTX group. Twenty-four serious adverse events were reported in 17 participants, with no differences between groups. CONCLUSION: Adalimumab + MTX reduced job loss and improved productivity in early RA when compared with MTX alone, which supports the early use of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy and suggests its cost efficacy.