A Detailed Analysis of Cardiac Rehabilitation on 180-Day All-Cause Hospital Readmission and Mortality.

PURPOSE: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is endorsed for coronary artery disease (CAD), but studies report inconsistent findings regarding efficacy. The objective of this study was to determine whether confounding factors, potentially contributing to these heterogeneous findings, impact the effect of CR on all-cause readmission and mortality. METHODS: Patients (n = 2641) with CAD, CR eligible, and physically able were identified. Electronic medical records were inspected individually for each patient to extract demographic, clinical characteristic, readmission, and mortality information. Patients (n = 214) attended ≥1 CR session (CR group). Survival was considered free from: all-cause readmission; or composite outcome of all-cause readmission or death. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and discharge criteria, were used to determine HR with 95% CI and to compare 180-d survival rates between the CR and no-CR groups. RESULTS: During 180 d of follow-up, 12.1% and 18.7% of the CR and non-CR patients were readmitted to the hospital. There was one death (0.5%) in the CR group, while 98 deaths (4.0%) occurred in the non-CR group. After adjustment for age, sex, race, depression, anxiety, dyslipidemia, hypertension, obesity, smoking, type 2 diabetes, and discharge criteria, the final model revealed a significant 42.7% reduction in readmission or mortality risk for patients who attended CR (HR = 0.57: 95% CI, 0.33-0.98; P = .043). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and cardiovascular discharge criteria, the risk of 180-d all-cause readmission or death was markedly decreased in patients who attended CR compared with those who did not.

GLP-1 Receptor Blockade Reduces Stimulated Insulin Secretion in Fasted Subjects With Low Circulating GLP-1.

CONTEXT: Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), an insulinotropic peptide released into the circulation from intestinal enteroendocrine cells, is considered a hormonal mediator of insulin secretion. However, the physiological actions of circulating GLP-1 have been questioned because of the short half-life of the active peptide. Moreover, there is mounting evidence for localized, intra-islet mediation of GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1r) signaling including a role for islet dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP4). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether GLP-1r signaling contributes to insulin secretion in the absence of enteral stimulation and increased plasma levels, and whether this is affected by DPP4. METHODS: Single-site study conducted at an academic medical center of 20 nondiabetic subjects and 13 subjects with type 2 diabetes. This was a crossover study in which subjects received either a DPP4 inhibitor (DPP4i; sitagliptin) or placebo on 2 separate days. On each day they received a bolus of intravenous (IV) arginine during sequential 60-minute infusions of the GLP-1r blocker exendin[9-39] (Ex-9) and saline. The main outcome measures were arginine-stimulated secretion of C-Peptide (C-PArg) and insulin (InsArg). RESULTS: Plasma GLP-1 remained at fasting levels throughout the experiments and IV arginine stimulated both α- and ß-cell secretion in all subjects. Ex-9 infusion reduced C-PArg in both the diabetic and nondiabetic groups by ~14% (P < .03 for both groups). Sitagliptin lowered baseline glycemia but did not affect the primary measures of insulin secretion. However, a significant interaction between sitagliptin and Ex-9 suggested more GLP-1r activation with DPP4i treatment in subjects with diabetes. CONCLUSION: GLP-1r activation contributes to ß-cell secretion in diabetic and nondiabetic people during α-cell activation, but in the absence of increased circulating GLP-1. These results are compatible with regulation of ß-cells by paracrine signals from α-cells. This process may be affected by DPP4 inhibition.