Disease modifying therapy management of multiple sclerosis after stem cell therapies: A retrospective case series.

BACKGROUND: Stem cell therapies (SCT) have not received formal regulatory approval for the treatment of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), but PwMS may seek various options on their own accord. The current literature largely focuses on the efficacy and safety of SCT in PwMS in clinical trials, in particular autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT), in carefully selected participants. There is little reported on the MS disease modifying therapy (DMT) management of PwMS who choose to undergo SCT outside of these trials. METHODS: We identified PwMS from two academic centers who had MS diagnosis fulfilling 2017 McDonald criteria and received SCT (methodologies permitted: aHSCT, umbilical-derived mesenchymal stem cells and/or adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AdMSC)), with the goal to treat MS, between 1/1/2015 and 11/30/2021. RESULTS: Nine PwMS (five females; age range at SCT treatment 25-69 years old; MS disease duration 1-12 years; six relapsing-remitting, three secondary progressive, one primary progressive) underwent a total of eleven SCTs (nine aHSCT, two AdMSC, one umbilical-derived MSC) with the goal to treat MS. Two of six PwMS who underwent SCT <10 years from MS diagnosis, and one of three PwMS who underwent stem cell therapies >10 years from MS diagnosis were clinically stable thereafter. An MS DMT was resumed in five PwMS afterwards, including rituximab, ocrelizumab, siponimod, and glatiramer acetate: one remained clinically stable, whereas four clinically progressed. Four PwMS remained off of a DMT: three were clinically stable, whereas one clinically progressed. All nine patients demonstrated radiographic stability by MRI after SCT. Only one met formal criteria to consider aHSCT for MS. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the heterogeneous real-world experience of treating MS after patient-chosen experimental SCTs, detailing the range of DMT management in various patient circumstances. Limitations of our study include its small sample size and the variety of stem cell therapies received.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: A 25-year retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the risk factors, clinical course, and treatment of patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) diagnosed and followed over a 25-year epoch at 2 academic hospitals. METHODS: Patients with a definite diagnosis of PML were identified by positive CSF PCR for JC virus or histopathology between January 1, 1994, and January 1, 2019. Demographic and PML-specific variables were recorded on symptomatic presentation and at follow-up, including risk factors, clinical outcome, neuroimaging findings, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at last follow-up. RESULTS: There were 91 patients with confirmed PML. HIV infection was the most common risk factor, identified in 49% (n = 45). Other frequent risk factors included lymphoma, leukemia, or myelodysplasia, identified in 31% of patients (n = 28); exposure to chemotherapeutic medications (30%, n = 27); and exposure to monoclonal antibody therapies (19%, n = 17). Thirty percent of the cohort was alive at the time of censoring, with a median mRS of 2 points, indicating slight disability at last follow-up. Median survival following PML diagnosis in HIV-infected patients was longer than in HIV-uninfected patients (1,992 vs 101 days, p = 0.024). Forty patients survived more than 1 year after PML symptom onset, of whom 24 were HIV infected (60%). Thirteen patients survived more than 10 years after PML symptom onset, all HIV infected, of the 59 patients diagnosed before June 1, 2009, and eligible for 10-year survivor status (22%). CONCLUSIONS: We add to the limited literature on PML by reporting its epidemiology in a large observational cohort. These parameters may be useful for future clinical trials that measure survival and clinical outcomes.