The Craniofacial Collaboration UK: Developmental Outcomes in 7- and 10-Year-Old Children With Sagittal Synostosis.

The Craniofacial Collaboration UK (CC-UK) protocol is a shared agreement across the 4 UK Highly Specialist Craniofacial Centres (HSCCs) to conduct robust neurodevelopmental and psychosocial clinical screening for children with craniosynostosis. This agreement allows for the analysis of outcomes of a homogenous sample of children with single suture craniosynostosis (SSC), a frequent limitation of the existing research. The current study is the latest analysis of CC-UK data on behavioral, cognitive, and psychosocial outcomes. The focus of this analysis is 7- and 10-year-olds with nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis (SS) who have undergone primary corrective surgery and completed routine clinical screening at 1 of the 4 HSCCs since the introduction of the CC-UK protocol. Due to changes in clinical pathways, only data from 3 HSCCs is included to preserve homogeneity. Results show that the majority of children with SS fall within the average range across behavioral and neurodevelopmental domains. A notable exception was a task involving perceptual reasoning and visuomotor skills (Block Design). Although this difference was small and the mean score remained within the average range, it suggests some increased risk of subtle difficulty with such skills for children with SS. Across other measures, there was no consistent evidence of any significantly increased risk of poorer outcomes, in line with findings of previous CC-UK papers. Understanding the psychological phenotype of SS is a key research priority for parents and clinicians, and the current study is another step toward achieving this goal.

Early Experiences of Parents of Children With Craniofacial Microsomia.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the early health care experiences of parents of children with craniofacial microsomia (CFM), a congenital diagnosis often identified at birth. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive. SETTING: Homes of participants. PARTICIPANTS: Parents of 28 children with CFM from across the United States. METHODS: We interviewed participants (27 mothers individually and one mother and father together) via telephone or teleconference and used reflexive thematic analysis to derive themes that represented early health care experiences of parents of children with CFM. RESULTS: Participants' narratives included detailed recounting of their birth and early care experiences. We identified two overarching themes. The first overarching theme, Stressors, included four subthemes that represented difficulties related to emotional reactions and negative experiences with health care providers. The second overarching theme, Finding Strength, included four subthemes that represented participants' positive adjustment to stressors through independent information seeking about CFM, adaptive coping, positive experiences with health care providers, and drawing on external supports. CONCLUSION: Participants often described early experiences as challenging. Findings have implications for improving early care, including increasing open and supportive communication by health care professionals, expanding access to CFM information, screening for mental health concerns among parents, strengthening coping among parents, and linking families to resources such as reliable online CFM information and early intervention programs.

Social Media and Website Use: The Experiences of Parents and Carers Accessing Care at the Oxford Craniofacial Unit.

INTRODUCTION: Historically, medical professionals have been the providers of specialist information about rare medical conditions. Now, increasingly, patients and the public are using the internet to access and generate information about medical diagnoses. The global nature of the internet allows patients to connect across geographical borders, and to obtain and share information that would have been previously inaccessible to them. This research investigated the use of website and social media by parents of children with craniosynostosis. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey-based design was employed. Participants were parents of children with craniosynostosis attending multidisciplinary craniofacial clinics within the Oxford Craniofacial Unit. A questionnaire was administered which assessed social media and website use adapted from the questionnaire created by Khouri and colleagues (2016) and Huggons and colleagues (2019). The surveys were administered over an 18-month period (November 2020 to May 2022). RESULTS: The final sample comprised 82 parents [70 mothers; 10 fathers; 1 sister/carer and 1 parent (mother/father unspecified)]. The children were aged 11 months-16 years of age (average age 6 y and 3 mo). Children had a variety of diagnoses: 31 sagittal, 19 metopic, 14 syndromic craniosynostosis, 8 unicoronal, 6 multisuture, 3 bicoronal, and 1 unilambdoid.Results showed that 93% (n=76/82) of parents used the internet to find out more about craniosynostosis, with 72% (n=59/82) of parents specifically using social media to find out more about craniosynostosis. The social media platforms used included: Facebook 64% (n=53/82), Instagram 24% (n=20/82), Blogs 12% (n=10/82), Twitter 4% (n= 4/82), Tik Tok 2% (n=2/82), and Snapchat 0.01% (n=1/82).Parents reported that Facebook was the most helpful source of information about craniosynostosis (52%; n=43/82). Parents indicated the key timepoints they used social media included: when their child received a diagnosis (70%; n=58/82), before their child's surgery (34%; n=28/82), before their first craniofacial clinic appointment (83%; n=25/30), and when child was older (17%; n=14/84). Forty percent (n=33/82) of parents said that a diagnosis of craniosynostosis made no difference to their social media use, whereas 34% (n=28/82) of parents used social media more, and 20% (n=16/82) used it less. CONCLUSION: Results highlight that parents use social media and other websites to access information relating to craniosynostosis. Future research should examine whether parental use of social media changes across their child's lifespan and evaluate the quality of this information.

Isolation, Uncertainty and Treatment Delays: Parents' Experiences of Having a Baby with Cleft Lip/Palate During the Covid-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: Previous literature finds that having a child with a cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) may pose social and emotional challenges for parents. For parents of children born during the Covid-19 pandemic, such challenges may be heightened. Further, novel demands brought about by the pandemic could have caused additional hardships. The aim of this study was to describe the impact of the pandemic on new parents through qualitative exploration of their experiences. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 parents of children born in the United Kingdom with CL/P between January and June 2020, around the start of the pandemic. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three themes, with sub-themes, were identified. The first theme, "Changes to Healthcare: The Impact of Restrictions and Reduced Contact", discussed the impact of the pandemic on perinatal care, the care received from the specialist CL/P teams, and parents' experiences of virtual consultations. The second theme, "Family Functioning During the Pandemic", covered parental anxiety, fathers' experiences, and social support. The third theme, "Surgical Prioritisation: Delays and Uncertainty", addressed changes to surgical protocols, coping with uncertainty, complications associated with delayed surgery, and how parents created positive meaning from this period. CONCLUSIONS: A range of increased and additional psychosocial impacts for parents were identified, along with several coping strategies, utilization of social support, and the positive aspects of their experiences. As the pandemic continues, close monitoring of families affected by CL/P remains imperative, particularly for those at risk of emotional distress.

Surgical Performance Anxiety and Wellbeing Among Surgeons: A Cross-sectional Study in the United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE: This national cross-sectional study aims to establish the prevalence and potential impact of performance anxiety among surgeons and investigate its association with psychological traits and wellbeing. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA: Despite a growing awareness that human factors, non-technical skills and wellbeing in healthcare affect patient outcomes, an area that has remained unexplored is surgical performance anxiety (SPA). METHODS: A prospectively registered, cross-sectional study using mixed methods was conducted across the United Kingdom. Data captured included demographics, surgical specialty, trait anxiety, trait perfectionism, SPA, and surgical perfectionism scores. Wellbeing was assessed using The Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale, whereas qualitative data were collected regarding surgeons' experiences of SPA. RESULTS: A total of 631 responses were collected. Mean age was 41·2 years and mean surgical experience 15·3 years. A total of 62% were male and 52% of consultant/attending grade. A total of 100% felt that SPA affected surgeons, with 87% having experienced it themselves. A total of 65% reported SPA negatively impacted surgical performance and 96% felt SPA negatively impacted surgeons' wellbeing. Male surgeons reported significantly better wellbeing than female surgeons. Surgeons with SPA reported significantly worse wellbeing compared with surgeons who did not experience SPA. Surgeons in general experienced significantly lower mental wellbeing compared with population norms. Thematic analysis highlighted a reticence to share SPA openly and need for cultural change. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical performance anxiety is a very common and significant challenge among surgeons across all specialties at all levels of experience in the United Kingdom. It is perceived by surgeons to affect surgical performance adversely and is associated with worse psychological wellbeing. A more open culture of sharing and acknowledgment has been identified to be beneficial.

Neurodevelopmental, Cognitive, and Psychosocial Outcomes for Individuals With Pathogenic Variants in the TCF12 Gene and Associated Craniosynostosis.

ABSTRACT: Heterozygous mutations in the TCF12 gene were discovered in 2013 as a cause of craniosynostosis (CS). However, limited information regarding the behavioral phenotypic profile is available. Here the authors provide the first detailed study of the neurodevelopmental, cognitive, and psychosocial outcomes for patients with a pathogenic TCF12 variant and associated CS.A clinical casenote audit was conducted at the 4 UK highly specialized craniofacial centers. A total of 35 patients aged 18 months to 10 years with an identified TCF12 pathogenic variant and CS (bicoronal CS = 45.7%, unicoronal CS = 40.0%, multisuture = 14.3%) were included. Standardized screening and/or assessment of full-scale intelligence quotient, social communication, development, behavior, and self-concept were conducted.In the majority of cases, outcomes were consistent with age-related expectations. About 75% of patients demonstrated no delay across any early developmental domain, while 84.6% demonstrated full-scale intelligence quotient scores within 1 standard deviation of the population mean. Significant behavioral difficulties were demonstrated by parent reporters in 26.3% to 42.1% of cases (dependent upon domain). Clinically elevated social communication profiles were present in (41.7%) of parent-reported cases. Levels of self-concept (at age 10) were consistent with age-related normative data.Most patients with a TCF12 pathogenic variant had a mild behavioral and cognitive phenotype, although they may be at a slightly increased risk of social communication difficulties and psychosocial issues. Although not measured statistically, there were no clear associations between surgical history and cognitive, behavioral, or psychosocial outcomes. This paper highlights the need for robust integrated developmental assessment of all CS patients, particularly those with an identified syndrome.

A systematic review of the use of psychological assessment tools in congenital upper limb anomaly management.

STUDY DESIGN: This study is a systematic review. INTRODUCTION: Congenital upper limb anomalies (CULAs) are often associated with psychosocial difficulties including negative body image, low self-esteem, and withdrawal from social activities. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of the study was to identify, describe, and evaluate all published psychosocial assessment tools used in the assessment and management of CULAs, to direct the use of these tools in clinical practice, and to identify areas requiring development. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, EMBASE, Pubmed, and PsychInfo databases was performed. In total, 23 studies were included for analysis. Data extracted included study and population characteristics, psychosocial measures utilized, psychosocial outcomes reported, and the reliability and validity of measures. RESULTS: Seventeen patient-reported measures were identified. The most commonly used tool was a Likert scale (n =7) with satisfaction with appearance and function, the most commonly evaluated outcome (n = 18). Other evaluated domains included quality of life or psychosocial functioning (n = 9), self-image (n = 2), and psychological well-being (n = 5). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: There is no well-established, validated assessment tool in regular use to effectively address psychosocial outcomes for children with CULAs. Although the majority of children born with a CULA appear to adjust well, this is by no means the case for all children. There is a need for routine psychosocial evaluation preoperatively and postoperatively with long-term follow-up data to help direct patient-orientated management. A clear understanding of these, and how to measure them, is needed to help for a patient-centred, multidisciplinary, evidence-driven approach to CULA management.