RESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate preoperative differences in racial and socioeconomic factors in patients undergoing laminoplasty (LP) versus laminectomy and fusion (LF) for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: DCM is prevalent in the United States, requiring surgical intervention to prevent neurological degeneration. While LF is utilized more frequently, LP is an emerging alternative. Previous studies have demonstrated similar neurological outcomes for both procedures. However, treatment selection is primarily at the discretion of the surgeon and may be influenced by social determinants of health that impact surgical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Quality Outcome Database (QOD), a national spine registry, was queried for adult patients who underwent either LP or LF for the management of DCM. Covariates associated with socioeconomic status, pain and disability, and demographic and medical history were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess patient factors associated with undergoing LP versus LF. RESULTS: Of 1673 DCM patients, 157 (9.4%) underwent LP and 1516 (90.6%) underwent LF. A significantly greater proportion of LP patients had private insurance (P<0.001), a greater than high school level education (P<0.001), were employed (P<0.001), and underwent primary surgery (P<0.001). LP patients reported significantly lower baseline neck/arm pain and Neck Disability Index (P<0.001). In the multivariate regression model, lower baseline neck pain [odds ratio (OR)=0.915, P=0.001], identifying as non-Caucasian (OR=2.082, P<0.032), being employed (OR=1.592, P=0.023), and having a greater than high school level education (OR=1.845, P<0.001) were associated with undergoing LP rather than LF. CONCLUSIONS: In DCM patients undergoing surgery, factors associated with patients undergoing LP versus LF included lower baseline neck pain, non-Caucasian race, higher education, and employment. While symptomatology may influence the decision to choose LP over LF, there may also be socioeconomic factors at play. The trend of more educated and employed patients undergoing LP warrants further investigation.
Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais , Laminectomia , Laminoplastia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fusão Vertebral , Espondilose , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Laminoplastia/métodos , Laminectomia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Espondilose/cirurgia , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades Socioeconômicas em SaúdeRESUMO
The musculoskeletal system plays vital roles in the body, facilitating movement, protecting vital structures, and regulating hematopoiesis and mineral metabolism. Injuries to this system are common and can cause chronic pain, loss of range of motion, and disability. The acute phase response (APR) is a complex process necessary for surviving and repairing injured musculoskeletal tissue. To conceptualize the APR, it is useful to divide it into 2 distinct phases, survival and repair. During the survival-APR, a "damage matrix" primarily composed of fibrin, via thrombin activity, is produced to contain the zone of injury. Once containment is achieved, the APR transitions to the repair phase, where reparative inflammatory cells use plasmin to systematically remove the damage matrix and replace it with new permanent matrices produced by differentiated mesenchymal stem cells. The timing of thrombin and plasmin activation during their respective APR phases is crucial for appropriate regulation of the damage matrix. This review focuses on evidence indicating that inappropriate exuberant activation of plasmin during the survival-APR can result in an overactive APR, leading to an "immunocoagulopathy" that may cause "immunothrombosis" and death. Conversely, preclinical data suggest that too little plasmin activity during the repair-APR may contribute to failed tissue repair, such as a fracture nonunion, and chronic inflammatory degenerative diseases like osteoporosis. Future clinical studies are required to affirm these findings. Therefore, the temporal-spatial functions of plasmin in response to musculoskeletal injury and its pharmacologic manipulation are intriguing new targets for improving orthopedic care.