Efficacy of immunotherapy in ARID1A-mutant solid tumors: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), especially those targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), have introduced a new treatment landscape for many types of tumors. However, they only achieve a limited therapeutic response. Hence, identifying patients who may benefit from ICIs is currently a challenge. METHODS: 47 tumor patients harboring ARID1A mutations were retrospectively studied. The genomic profiling data through next-generation sequencing (NGS) and relevant clinical information were collected and analyzed. Additionally, bioinformatics analysis of the expression of immune checkpoints and immune cell infiltration levels was conducted in ARID1A-mutant gastric cancer (GC). RESULTS: ARID1A mutations frequently co-occur with mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR)-associated genes. Among the 35 ARID1A-mutant patients who received immunotherapy, 27 were evaluable., with the objective response rate (ORR) was 48.15% (13/27), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 92.59% (25/27). Moreover, survival assays revealed that ARID1A-mutant patients had longer median overall survival (mOS) after immunotherapy. In ARID1A-mutated GC patients, receiving ICIs treatment indicated longer progressive-free survival (PFS). Additionally, the incidence of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), high tumor mutation burden (TMB-H) and Epstein‒Barr virus (EBV) infection was elevated. Bioinformatic analysis showed significant enrichment of immune response and T cell activation pathway within differentially expressed genes in ARID1A-mutant GC group. Finally, ARID1A mutations status was considered to be highly correlated with the level of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and high expression of immune checkpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with tumors harboring ARID1A mutations may achieve better clinical outcomes from immunotherapy, especially in GC. ARID1A mutations can lead to genomic instability and reshape the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), which can be used as a biomarker for immunotherapy.

Case report: A rare immune-related adverse effect: hepatic cavernous hemangioma induced by camrelizumab.

Background: Camrelizumab, a programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibiting antibody, has demonstrated efficacy in various malignancies and received approval in multiple countries. Despite its therapeutic benefits, camrelizumab is associated with a unique spectrum of immune-related adverse effects (irAEs), predominantly reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP). However, visceral manifestations of such endothelial proliferations, particularly hepatic cavernous hemangiomas, have not been extensively documented. Methods: This case series retrospectively reviews six patients who developed hepatic hemangiomas following treatment with camrelizumab in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. The series highlights the clinical course, imaging findings, management strategies, and outcomes associated with this complication. A detailed analysis was conducted to discern the potential causal relationship between camrelizumab therapy and the development of hepatic hemangiomas. Results: All six patients, after varying cycles of camrelizumab-based therapy, presented with hepatic lesions identified as cavernous hemangiomas on imaging. These findings were atypical for metastatic disease and were further complicated by significant clinical events, including massive intra-abdominal bleeding post-biopsy. Discontinuation of camrelizumab led to a reduction in the size of the hemangiomas in two cases, suggesting a potential link between the drug and the development of these vascular lesions. The incidence of RCCEP remained high, and the use of other agents such as bevacizumab did not mitigate the occurrence of hepatic hemangiomas, indicating a possible unique pathogenic mechanism associated with camrelizumab. Conclusion: Hepatic cavernous hemangioma may represent a rare but clinically significant irAE associated with camrelizumab therapy. This series underscores the importance of vigilant monitoring and a high index of suspicion for atypical hepatic lesions in patients undergoing treatment with PD-1 inhibitors. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the pathophysiology of this complication and to establish guidelines for the management and surveillance of patients receiving camrelizumab.

MET fusions are targetable genomic variants in the treatment of advanced malignancies.

Targeted therapy for malignancies has developed rapidly in recent years, benefiting patients harboring genetic mutations sensitive to relevant tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). With the development of targeted sequencing techniques, an increasing number of detectable genomic alterations in malignancies, including MET fusions, have been revealed. MET fusions, although rare among malignancies, might be functional driver genes that participate in activating downstream signaling pathways and promoting cell proliferation. Therefore, it is believed that MET fusions could be targetable genomic variants of MET, and inhibition of MET is considered an optionable therapeutic choice for patients harboring MET fusions. According to the summary presented in this review, we recommend MET-TKIs as suitable treatment agents for patients harboring primary MET fusions. For patients harboring acquired MET fusions after the development of resistance to TKIs targeting primary genomic alterations, such as sensitive EGFR mutations, treatment with a MET-TKI alone or in combination with TKIs targeting primary genomic alterations, such as EGFR-TKIs, is hypothesized to be a reasonable option for salvage treatment. In summary, MET fusions, despite their low incidence, should be taken into consideration when developing treatment strategies for cancer patients.

Role of YES1 signaling in tumor therapy resistance.

YES proto-oncogene 1 (YES1) is an SRC family kinase (SFK) that plays a key role in cancer cell proliferation, adhesion, invasion, survival, and angiogenesis during tumorigenesis and tumor development. Reports suggest that YES1 amplification is associated with resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in human malignancies. However, the mechanisms of drug resistance have not been fully elucidated. In this article, we review the literature on YES1 and discuss the implications of YES1 signaling for targeted therapy and chemotherapy resistance in malignancies. Moreover, recent advances in targeted therapy for YES1-amplified malignancies are summarized. Finally, we conclude that targeting YES1 may reverse drug resistance and serve as a valuable tumor treatment strategy.

The stage-dependent prognostic role of ARID1A in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death. Although novel treatment currently achieves a better response, the majority of HCC patients develop resistance and cannot benefit. Hence, novel biomarkers for guiding therapy and predicting the prognosis are needed. Methods: Tissue microarrays of 206 HCC patients were used, and ARID1A expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. Databases were used for the verification and expansion of our results. The "rms" package of R software was used for the construction of the nomogram. Results: ARID family alterations were associated with disease-free survival (P=0.0325) and overall survival (OS) (P=0.0076). Subgroup analysis confirmed the prognostic effect of ARID1A, ARID1B, and ARID2 alterations. In addition, ARID family genomic alterations, especially ARID1A, were closely related to poor progression-free survival (ARID: P=0.0011; ARID1A: P=0.0082) and OS (ARID: P=0.0161; ARID1A: P=0.0220) after sorafenib treatment. ARID1A expression was found to display a stage-dependent effect on the prognosis, serving as a risk factor in stage I-II patients (P<0.0001) and a protective factor in stage III-IV patients (P=0.0180). Conclusions: ARID1A has dual roles in HCC in a tumor stage-dependent manner, and further study is required to uncover the complex function of ARID1A in HCC development, disease progression, and therapy.

RIT1 regulates mitosis and promotes proliferation by interacting with SMC3 and PDS5 in hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: As a small G protein of Ras family, Ras-like-without-CAAX-1 (RIT1) plays a critical role in various tumors. Our previous study has demonstrated the involvement of RIT1 in promoting malignant progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its underlying mechanism remains unclear. METHODS: Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was conducted in the TCGA LIHC cohort to investigate the underlying biological mechanism of RIT1. Live cell imaging, immunofluorescence (IF) and flow cytometry assays were used to verify biological function of RIT1 in HCC mitosis. Subcutaneous xenografting of human HCC cells in BALB/c nude mice was utilized to assess tumor proliferation in vivo. RNA-seq, co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP), mass spectrometry analyses, western blot and IF assays were employed to elucidate the mechanisms by which RIT1 regulates mitosis and promotes proliferation in HCC. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrate that RIT1 plays a crucial role in regulating mitosis in HCC. Knockdown of RIT1 disrupts cell division, leading to G2/M phase arrest, mitotic catastrophe, and apoptosis in HCC cells. SMC3 is found to interact with RIT1 and knockdown of SMC3 attenuates the proliferative effects mediated by RIT1 both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, RIT1 protects and maintains SMC3 acetylation by binding to SMC3 and PDS5 during mitosis, thereby promoting rapid cell division and proliferation in HCC. Notably, we have observed an upregulation of SMC3 expression in HCC tissues, which is associated with poor patient survival and promotion of HCC cell proliferation. Furthermore, there is a significant positive correlation between the expression levels of RIT1, SMC3, and PDS5. Importantly, HCC patients with high expression of both RIT1 and SMC3 exhibit worse prognosis compared to those with high RIT1 but low SMC3 expression. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore the crucial role of RIT1 in regulating mitosis in HCC and further demonstrate its potential as a promising therapeutic target for HCC treatment.

ARID1A deficiency associated with MMR deficiency and a high abundance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predicts a good prognosis of endometrial carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: ARID1A alterations have been detected in 40% of endometrial carcinomas (ECs) and are associated with loss of its expression. The role of ARID1A in tumorigenesis and development is complex, and the prognostic role in EC remains controversial. Hence, it is of great significance to confirm the role of ARID1A in EC. METHODS: A total of 549 EC patients (cohort A) from TCGA were evaluated to explore the prognostic role of ARID1A. NGS was performed for 13 EC patients (cohort B), and expression of ARID1A, CD3, CD8 and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins in 52 patients (cohort C) from our center was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to perform survival analyses. RESULTS: ARID1A alterations were detected in 32% of EC patients and correlated with good disease-free survival (DFS, P = 0.004) and overall survival (OS, P = 0.0353). ARID1A alterations were found to co-occur with MMR-related gene mutations and correlated with higher PD-L1 expression. Patients concomitantly harboring ARID1A alterations and MMR-related gene mutations had the best prognosis (DFS: P = 0.0488; OS: P = 0.0024). A cohort from our center showed that ARID1A deficiency was an independent prognostic factor and predicted longer recurrence-free survival (P = 0.0476). ARID1A loss was associated with a tendency toward MSI-H (P = 0.0060). ARID1A alterations and expression loss were associated with a higher abundance of CD3+ (P = 0.0406) and CD8+ (P = 0.0387) T cells. CONCLUSION: ARID1A alterations and expression loss are tightly associated with MMR deficiency and a high abundance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, which might contribute to the good prognosis of EC.

Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in locally advanced stage II-III gastric cancer: A single-centre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: PD-1 blockade has been shown to have promising efficacy and acceptable safety profiles in advanced and metastatic gastric cancer; however, the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade-based immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) remain uncertain. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients with LAGC who received neoadjuvant treatment followed by D2 radical resection at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from 2019 to 2021. The primary aim was to investigate the difference in pathological response rates between neoadjuvant PD-1 immunotherapy plus chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. Multivariable models for pathological complete response (pCR) were constructed to investigate the factors that facilitate pCR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: QYFYWZLL27406. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients were included in the analysis, among whom 34 (44.2%) received neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade immunotherapy plus chemotherapy. A higher pCR rate was observed in the neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade immunotherapy plus chemotherapy group (8 of 34, 23.5% vs. 2 of 43, 4.7%, P=0.019). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of pCR revealed neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy regimen promoted pCR (OR 12.95, P=0.016). Regarding safety, 76.5% (26 of 34) of patients in the PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy group and 76.7% (33 of 43) of patients in the chemotherapy group experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and grade 3 or worse adverse events were 29.4% (10 of 34) and 34.9% (15 of 43), respectively. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy induced a higher pCR rate than neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the combined therapy was tolerable in LAGC patients.

Identification of MET fusions as novel therapeutic targets sensitive to MET inhibitors in lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Alterations in the MET gene, including amplifications and exon 14 skipping mutations, have been identified as actionable oncogenic alterations. However, MET fusions are rarely detected in lung cancer, and their sensitivity to therapeutics has not been systematically analyzed. METHODS: The data from 30876 lung cancer patients from the LAVA database and 7966 patients from cBioPortal database were screened. Basic demographic and clinical information for the patients harboring MET fusions were collected. A lung squamous cell cancer patient harboring a novel EML4-MET fusion was treated with crizotinib. Additionally, a literature review was performed to summarize the cases of patients harboring MET fusions and their treatment information. RESULTS: MET fusions were found in only 0.2% to 0.3% of lung cancer patients and appeared in almost all exons of the MET gene. Intragenic MET fusions were found in 52.6% (41/78) of the included patients. Crizotinib was effective for MET fusions, including a novel identified EML4-MET fusion, even after the failure of multiple lines of treatment. This result suggested that acquired MET fusions become more regionally selective, as they usually occurred in exons encoding the extracellular region. Interestingly, the MET-fused genes in primary MET fusions or acquired MET fusions were very different, which indicated the different functions and influences of the disease. CONCLUSION: MET fusions are rare, and half of the fusion types were intragenic fusions. Lung cancer patients harboring primary or acquired MET fusions could benefit from crizotinib. In addition, EML4-MET was first reported in this study as a novel MET fusion type.

Aberrant circulating tumor DNA methylation and exosomal microRNA biomarkers for early detection of colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) became the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer death in 2020. However, the rates of early screening and early diagnosis for CRC remain unsatisfactory. Thus, it is essential to explore the initiating factors of CRC and strategies for its early diagnosis. Research progress in liquid biopsy has led to the finding that circulating tumor-derived DNA (ctDNA) and exosomes play vital roles in early detection of CRC. THE APPLICATIONS OF LIQUID BIOPSY FOR EARLY DETECTION OF COLORECTAL CANCER: Moreover, the increased understanding of epigenetics has highlighted the role of ctDNA methylation in CRC carcinogenesis, and the detection of aberrant ctDNA methylation markers is a feasible strategy for diagnosis of early-stage CRC. Among exosomal markers, microRNAs (miRNAs) are abundant and are the most researched. Upregulated or downregulated expression of exosome-derived miRNAs can indicate the occurrence of early-stage CRC. FUTURE PERSPECTIVE: The current research progress on aberrant ctDNA methylation and tumor exosomal miRNA biomarkers in early detection of CRC is summarized in this review, and the advantages and shortcomings of the methods are discussed.

Neoadjuvant toripalimab plus platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy in stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer: a single-center, single-arm, phase I study in China.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with resectable disease have presented promising results. This is a phase I study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy for NSCLC. METHODS: Treatment-naive patients with resectable NSCLC (stage II-IIIB) received two to four cycles of toripalimab (240 mg, intravenously, q3w) combined with platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy. Surgical operation was performed approximately 4 weeks after the last cycle. The primary end point was safety. The efficacy endpoints included radiographic and pathological response rates, expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and molecular targets. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients were enrolled, consisting of 2 patients (18%) with adenocarcinoma and 9 patients (82%) with squamous cell carcinoma. All patients received two to four cycles of toripalimab plus chemotherapy and underwent radical resection. Regarding safety, 5 of 11 patients (45%) had neoadjuvant treatment-related adverse events, and 1 patient (9%) experienced grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events. Radiographic partial response was achieved in 10 patients, with an objective response rate of 91%. Among 11 patients, 6 (55%) achieved pathological complete response, including 1 PD-L1-negative patient. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant toripalimab plus platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy was tolerable and induced a pathological complete response in 55% of resectable NSCLC patients.

Optimal Treatments for NSCLC Patients Harboring Primary or Acquired MET Amplification.

Background: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring MET mutations, MET-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been proven to achieve a good response. However, the relative efficacy of different therapeutics in primary NSCLC patients with MET amplification and the treatment options for patients harboring acquired MET amplification after the failure of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKIs remain unclear. Methods: In total, 33 patients harboring primary MET amplification and 9 patients harboring acquired MET alterations identified by next-generation sequencing were enrolled. A retrospective analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of different therapeutics. In addition, studies reporting various treatments for patients harboring MET alterations were included in the meta-analysis. Results: In our cohort of patients harboring primary MET amplification, crizotinib displayed better efficacy than immunotherapy and chemotherapy, as demonstrated both in first-line (P = .0378) and second-line treatment regimens (P = .0181). The disease control rates for crizotinib, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy were 81.8%, 72.7%, and 63.6%, respectively. In particular, the median progression-free survival (PFS) time after immunotherapy in patients harboring MET amplification and high programed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (>50%) was only 77.5 days. The meta-analysis revealed that the median PFS times after crizotinib and immunotherapy were 4.57 and 2.94 months, respectively. In patients harboring acquired MET amplification, chemotherapy plus bevacizumab had superior efficacy (310.0 days vs 73.5 days, P = .0360) compared with MET-TKIs ± EGFR-TKIs. Conclusions: Immunotherapy showed a low response in patients harboring MET alterations, even those with concurrent high PD-L1 expression. MET-TKIs might be an optional treatment with worth-expecting efficacy. However, chemotherapy plus bevacizumab could benefit the subpopulation of patients harboring acquired MET amplification after the failure of EGFR-TKIs.

Next-generation sequencing identifies potential novel therapeutic targets in Chinese HGSOC patients.

BACKGROUND: Targeted therapy, especially the use of poly (adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis), has improved the outcome of patients with ovarian cancer. However, most high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patients have wild-type BRCA1/2, and it is necessary to disclose more potential novel targets for other available targeted drugs. So, detection of genetic alterations beyond BRCA1/2 is critical to screen HGSOC patients for personalized therapy. In this study, a broad, hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay was used to identify actionable genetic alterations from HGSOC cancer tissues. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with HGSOC were enrolled, including 6 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I, 15 stage II, 37 stage III and 10 stage IV patients. All patients signed informed consent forms. Potentially actionable genetic alterations, including base substitutions, indels, copy number alterations, and gene fusions, were identified using targeted NGS. RESULTS: In our study, 14.7% (10/68) of the tumors harbored actionable genetic alterations in patients with BRCA1. A total of 25.0% (17/68) of patients without BRCA1 mutations harbored other actionable genetic alterations, such as homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway-related genes (ATM, CDK12, FANCA, and FANCD2), PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway genes (NF1, FBXW7, PIK3CA, PTEN, TSC1, and TSC2), and some other genes (ARID1A, FGFR1, KRAS, and NRAS). Furthermore, some patients harboring ARID1A or NF1 actionable genetic alterations showed good clinical efficacy to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and everolimus, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our research indicates that 39.7% (27/68) of patients with HGSOC harbored at least one actionable genetic alteration. 25.0% (17/68) of patients had somatic mutations or copy number variations beyond BRCA1 mutations and might be treated with off-label therapy or to be allocated into clinical trial. NGS assays of HGSOC patients are necessary to screen actionable genetic alterations to guide personalized and precise treatment.

Anlotinib Combined with Toripalimab as Second-Line Therapy for Advanced, Relapsed Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Carcinoma.

Our study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib-toripalimab combination therapy as a second-line treatment for advanced relapsed gastric or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma (GC/GEJC). In this single arm, single-center extension clinical trial, patients with advanced relapsed GC/GEJC received toripalimab (240 mg, intravenously over 60 minutes, once every 2 weeks) plus anlotinib (12 mg/day, orally, 2 weeks on and 1 week off, every 3 weeks) as second-line therapy. There were 29 patients who achieved partial response, and the ORR was 32.3% (95% CI, 26.6%-38.5%). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were recorded in 7 participants (11.3%), all of which were manageable. The PFS and OS were 4.0 and 11.1 months, respectively. Patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive expression showed numerically longer OS than the negative ones although the difference was not significantly. The tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-H) group showed a significantly better OS (P = .05) than the TMB-Low (TMB-L) group. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) revealed that fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) mutations positively correlated with target lesion reduction (odds ratio [OR] = 0.14; P = .02). The new regimen increased tumor-infiltration of CD8+ T and CD3+ T cells. Furthermore, a patient-derived organoid (PDO) study indicated that anlotinib could promote an immune-supportive tumor microenvironment. As conclusion, the anlotinib-toripalimab combination showed promising efficacy and favorable safety as a second-line treatment for advanced, relapsed GC/GEJC. The PD-L1 expression, TMB, and FGFR2 mutation are potential biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of this regimen (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT04713059).

Anlotinib combined with anti-PD-1 antibody, camrelizumab for advanced NSCLCs after multiple lines treatment: An open-label, dose escalation and expansion study.

OBJECTIVES: Combined therapy should be invested for those patients who are refractory to first-line therapy. Anti-angiogenic agents could enhance tumor immunity response. We designed a phase IB clinical trial and analyzed the effectiveness and safety of anlotinib combined with PD-1inhibitors Camrelizumab for multi-line pretreated and failed advanced NSCLC to explore the synergistic effect of anti-angiogenic agents and immunotherapy. METHODS: All enrolled patients should receive camrelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. Eligible patients were randomized successively to three dose cohorts of Anlotinib in a dose escalation clinical setting. Once maximal tolerable dose was established, the primary end point of this study was progression-free survival, overall survival and safety. Risk factor was an exploratory end point. RESULTS: The identified expansion dose for anlotinib was 12 mg. The median PFS of ITT patients was 8.2 months (95% CI, 4.3-12.1 months). And the mOS was 12.7 months (95% CI, 10.2-15.1 months). There was significant difference of mPFS between the 8 mg cohort and the 12 mg cohort (5.6 m vs.11.0 m, p = 0.04). Patients with brain metastasis had a significantly higher risk of death (HR 5.90; 95% CI 2.01-17.30; P = 0.001). Patients whose ECOG was 0 and 1 had a significantly lower risk of death (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.14-0.91; P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Anlotinib plus camrelizumab had shown promising efficacy and manageable toxicity as a second-line or later-line treatment for NSCLCs, especially in the 12 mg cohorts. Large-scale phase III clinical trials are needed to further explore the rational combination models and biomarkers.

B-Cell Receptor-Associated Protein 31 Promotes Metastasis via AKT/ß-Catenin/Snail Pathway in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most lethal cancer worldwide, characterized with high heterogeneity and inclination to metastasize. Emerging evidence suggests that BAP31 gets involved in cancer progression with different kinds. It still remains unknown whether and how BAP31 plays a role in HCC metastasis. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been a common feature in tumor micro-environment, whose inducer TGF-ß increased BAP31 expression in this research. Elevated expression of BAP31 was positively correlated with tumor size, vascular invasion and poor prognosis in human HCC. Ectopic expression of BAP31 promoted cell migration and invasion while BAP31 knockdown markedly attenuated metastatic potential in HCC cells and mice orthotopic xenografts. BAP31 induced EMT process, and enhanced the expression level of EMT-related factor Snail and decreased contents and membrane distribution of E-cadherin. BAP31 also activated AKT/ß-catenin pathway, which mediated its promotional effects on HCC metastasis. AKT inhibitor further counteracted the activated AKT/ß-catenin/Snail upon BAP31 over-expression. Moreover, silencing Snail in BAP31-overexpressed cells impaired enhanced migratory and invasive abilities of HCC cells. In HCC tissues, BAP31 expression was positively associated with Snail. In conclusion, BAP31 promotes HCC metastasis by activating AKT/ß-catenin/Snail pathway. Thus, our study implicates BAP31 as potential prognostic biomarker, and provides valuable information for HCC prognosis and treatment.

Loss of ARID1A expression promotes lung adenocarcinoma metastasis and predicts a poor prognosis.

BACKGROUND: ARID1A is an essential subunit of SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes. ARID1A gene mutations and loss of ARID1A expression have been observed in a variety of cancers, and to be correlated with invasion, immune escape and synthetic lethality. As yet, however, the biological effect of ARID1A expression and its role in the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients have remained unclear. In this study we aimed to further elucidate the role of ARID1A expression in LUAD in vitro and in vivo and to assess its effect on the clinical prognosis of LUAD patients. METHODS: ARID1A expression was detected by IHC in tissue samples from LUAD patients. After regular culturing of LUAD cell lines and constructing stable ARID1A knockdown lines, wound healing and Transwell assays were used to assess the role of ARID1A in cell migration and invasion. The effect of ARID1A knockdown on metastasis was verified in vivo. Western blotting was used to examine the expression of target proteins. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess survival and to provide variables for nomogram construction. In addition, we used the "rms" package to construct a prognostic nomogram based on a Cox regression model. RESULTS: We found that ARID1A expression serves as an effective prognostic marker for LUAD patients. Loss of ARID1A expression correlated with a poor prognosis, as verified with a nomogram based on a Cox regression model. In addition, we found that ARID1A knockdown promoted LUAD cell proliferation, migration and invasion in vitro and enhanced LUAD metastasis in vivo by activating the Akt signaling pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that loss of ARID1A expression promotes LUAD metastasis and predicts a poor prognosis in LUAD patients.

Use tumor suppressor genes as biomarkers for diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of death worldwide. Especially, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has higher mortality rate than the other cancers. The high mortality rate is partially due to lack of efficient biomarkers for detection, diagnosis and prognosis. To find high efficient biomarkers for clinical diagnosis of NSCLC patients, we used gene differential expression and gene ontology (GO) to define a set of 26 tumor suppressor (TS) genes. The 26 TS genes were down-expressed in tumor samples in cohorts GSE18842, GSE40419, and GSE21933 and at stages 2 and 3 in GSE19804, and 15 TS genes were significantly down-expressed in tumor samples of stage 1. We used S-scores and N-scores defined in correlation networks to evaluate positive and negative influences of these 26 TS genes on expression of other functional genes in the four independent cohorts and found that SASH1, STARD13, CBFA2T3 and RECK were strong TS genes that have strong accordant/discordant effects and network effects globally impacting the other genes in expression and hence can be used as specific biomarkers for diagnosis of NSCLC cancer. Weak TS genes EXT1, PTCH1, KLK10 and APC that are associated with a few genes in function or work in a special pathway were not detected to be differentially expressed and had very small S-scores and N-scores in all collected datasets and can be used as sensitive biomarkers for diagnosis of early cancer. Our findings are well consistent with functions of these TS genes. GSEA analysis found that these 26 TS genes as a gene set had high enrichment scores at stages 1, 2, 3 and all stages.

ALK rearrangements as mechanisms of acquired resistance to osimertinib in EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR sensitive mutations may benefit from treatment with EGFR TKIs. Osimertinib, which is an irreversible third-generation EGFR TKI, has demonstrated a convincing efficacy, irrespective of whether it is used in first- or second-line treatment. The acquired resistance mechanisms to osimertinib are highly complicated, and a variety of potential molecular mechanisms have been discovered, including C797S. Here, we determined that ALK rearrangement might be an underlying mechanism contributing to acquired resistance to osimertinib. In our report, a 60-year-old female patient with lung adenocarcinoma with an EGFR mutation was administered multiple treatments, including first-line gefitinib and second-line osimertinib. According to the next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay after osimertinib failure, the emergence of an ALK rearrangement was considered to be a potentially acquired resistance mechanism to osimertinib. The combination of osimertinib and crizotinib then maintained a six-month stable disease. VEGFA amplification was identified after osimertinib plus crizotinib treatment, and chemotherapy plus bevacizumab achieved a continuous stable disease over 21 months. In this study, we also summarized previously reported cases and concluded that ALK rearrangement is a rare but critical resistance mechanism to osimertinib. After failure of combined treatment with osimertinib plus crizotinib, comprehensive molecular profiling should be performed, and chemotherapy plus bevacizumab might be an optimal treatment especially for patients harboring VEGFA amplification.

Case Report: Primary and Acquired Resistance Mechanisms of Nimotuzumab in Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Revealed by Targeted Sequencing.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a deadly disease with a low 5-year survival rate. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy has been widely used in the treatment of malignancies, and chemotherapy regimens that include nimotuzumab have been confirmed to have satisfactory efficacy among esophageal carcinoma (EC) patients. However, a subpopulation of patients may develop resistance to nimotuzumab. Here, we report an advanced ESCC patient who experienced hyperprogressive disease induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors and was then treated with a chemotherapy regimen containing nimotuzumab. NGS examination of this patient demonstrated that PIK3CA mutation and a RICTOR amplification might participate in primary and acquired resistance to nimotuzumab, respectively, via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway.