Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 42(2): 421-428, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33279419

RESUMO

RESEARCH QUESTION: Ovarian stimulation during IVF cycles involves close monitoring of oestradiol, progesterone and ultrasound measurements of follicle growth. In contrast to blood draws, sampling saliva is less invasive. Here, a blind validation is presented of a novel saliva-based oestradiol and progesterone assay carried out in samples collected in independent IVF clinics. DESIGN: Concurrent serum and saliva samples were collected from 324 patients at six large independent IVF laboratories. Saliva samples were frozen and run blinded. A further 18 patients had samples collected more frequently around the time of HCG trigger. Saliva samples were analysed using an immunoassay developed with Salimetrics LLC. RESULTS: In total, 652 pairs of saliva and serum oestradiol were evaluated, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.68 to 0.91. In the European clinics, a further 237 of saliva and serum progesterone samples were evaluated; however, the correlations were generally poorer, ranging from -0.02 to 0.22. In the patients collected more frequently, five out of 18 patients (27.8%) showed an immediate decrease in oestradiol after trigger. When progesterone samples were assessed after trigger, eight out of 18 (44.4%) showed a continued rise. CONCLUSIONS: Salivary oestradiol hormone testing correlates well to serum-based assessment, whereas progesterone values, around the time of trigger, are not consistent from patient to patient.


Assuntos
Estradiol/análise , Indução da Ovulação , Progesterona/análise , Saliva/química , Adulto , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Humanos , Leuprolida , Estudos Prospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 21(5): 442-9, 2009 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19606031

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve in-vitro fertilization outcomes is reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS: Many embryos produced in vitro contain chromosomal abnormalities and have little potential for forming a viable pregnancy. The most commonly used method for preimplantation genetic diagnosis involves embryo biopsy on day 3 of development, followed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis of 5-12 chromosomes. However, positive results have been more common with single-cell biopsy and the analysis of nine or more chromosomes, including 15, 16, 21, and 22. Comparative genomic hybridization, array-comparative genomic hybridization, and single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays analyze all chromosomes and, although technically demanding and requiring experience for successful use, improve the selection potential of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and minimize error rates. Recent data suggest that biopsy at the blastocyst stage may allow sampling of representative genetic material without compromising embryo viability. The optimal strategy for aneuploidy screening using preimplantation genetic diagnosis seems to be blastocyst biopsy at 5 days and comprehensive chromosome analysis (comparative genomic hybridization, array-comparative genomic hybridization, single-nucleotide polymorphism array). SUMMARY: The use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis to assist the identification and preferential transfer of healthy euploid embryos should improve implantation rates, reduce miscarriages and trisomic offspring, and ultimately lead to an increase in live birth rates.


Assuntos
Aneuploidia , Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação/métodos , Hibridização Genômica Comparativa , Feminino , Humanos , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente , Gravidez
3.
Int Surg ; 91(5 Suppl): S37-54, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17436604

RESUMO

In a spontaneous menstrual cycle, during the follicular phase, only one follicle out of a cohort of 10-20 usually completes maturation and ovulates to release a mature oocyte. The aim of ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology (ART) protocols is to overcome the selection of a dominant follicle and to allow the growth of a cohort of follicles. This strategy leads to an increase in the number of oocytes and hence embryos available for transfer, thereby increasing the chance of transferring up to three viable embryos. However, the chance of pregnancy and also live birth begins to dramatically decline after the age of 35, and successful treatment for these patients continues to be a major challenge in ART programs. Preimplantation genetic screening studies over the last decade have identified a dramatic increase in the rate of aneuploidy as a major contributor to the reduction in embryo viability in older patients. It has also been demonstrated that women of advanced maternal age may have oocytes that are compromised by a significant reduction in the amount of mitochondrial DNA in their cytoplasm. The strategies outlined in this review may provide a means of augmenting follicular recruitment and cytoplasmic integrity by utilizing pharmacogenomics and manipulating endocrinology to improve the prognosis for these women. Recent studies indicate that androgen supplementation may be one area to explore further. The availability of recombinant human leutinizing hormone (rhLH) has made it possible to investigate the role of LH in the endocrinology of follicular recruitment: it appears that a defect in the balance of LH/ follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) might be involved in the subtle age-related decline in follicular recruitment, and patients of older reproductive age undergoing ART might benefit from the addition of LH and/or hGH. Further studies are required to investigate the physiological mechanisms behind this observation and to assess the possible effect of LH and/or hGH supplementation on the age-related decline in pregnancy rate.


Assuntos
Idade Materna , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida , Androgênios/fisiologia , Inibidores da Aromatase/uso terapêutico , Contagem de Células , Sobrevivência Celular , Regulação para Baixo/fisiologia , Embrião de Mamíferos/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hormônio Luteinizante/fisiologia , Folículo Ovariano/citologia , Indução da Ovulação , Farmacogenética , Diagnóstico Pré-Implantação
4.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 4 Suppl 3: 64-71, 2002.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12470569

RESUMO

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists have recently been introduced into clinical practice. They appear to offer a promising alternative to the long-established GnRH agonist regimens for prevention of a premature LH surge during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive techniques. Clinical outcomes achieved with antagonists are comparable with those of a long GnRH agonist protocol, while treatment times and gonadotrophin requirements are reduced and safety is improved. In particular, the antagonists appear to be associated with a lower risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) than do agonists. Patient surveys suggest a preference for antagonist over agonist treatment cycles. These benefits suggest that GnRH antagonists have the potential to replace agonists as the treatment of choice in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive techniques. Two agents, cetrorelix and ganirelix, are currently in clinical use. Cetrorelix is available in single- and multiple-dose formulations, offering increased flexibility compared with ganirelix.


Assuntos
Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/análogos & derivados , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inibidores , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia , Ovário/patologia , Sequência de Aminoácidos , Feminino , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante/uso terapêutico , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Síndrome de Hiperestimulação Ovariana , Indução da Ovulação , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA