Surgical Management of Achilles Tendon Ruptures in the United States 2006-2020, an ABOS Part II Oral Examination Case List Database Study.

Background: In correlation with a growing body of evidence regarding nonoperative management for Achilles tendon rupture (ATR), studies from Europe and Canada have displayed a decreasing incidence in surgical management, which has not been noted in the United States. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the US trend in ATR repair volume. Methods: The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II Oral Examination Case List Database was used. All cases using Current Procedural Terminology codes for primary ATR repair were requested from the years 2006-2020. Total submitted Achilles repair volume, the number of candidates submitting an Achilles repair case, and the overall submitted case volume per examination year was analyzed. Poisson and linear regressions were used to determine statistically significant trends. Results: The total number of Achilles repair cases submitted for the ABOS Part II Oral Examination significantly increased from 2006 to 2011 and then decreased until 2020. Taking Achilles repair cases as a proportion of total orthopaedic cases submitted, the same trend was seen. The number of candidates submitting an Achilles repair case increased from 2006 to 2009 and then decreased until 2020. Foot and Ankle fellowship-trained candidates submitted an increasing number of ATR repair cases per candidate during the time period studied. Conclusion: This is the first study to demonstrate a decline in the volume of ATR repair in the United States. The decline in ATR repair volume seen in the ABOS Part II Case Lists does not match previously published US surgeon practice patterns but is not necessarily generalizable to beyond this period. Although the overall ATR repair volume in the ABOS Part II Case Lists is decreasing, we found Foot and Ankle fellowship-trained surgeons are operating on an increasing number of ATRs during their board collection period. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Orthopaedic Surgery: Local and National Efforts.

Orthopaedic surgery has not experienced the same increase in diversity as other surgical subspecialties over time. Professional orthopaedic societies across the nation, including the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, are now making sincere efforts to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) within the field. Several national groups provide funding to support DEI -related research as well as scholarships to national meetings. Others are more focused on mentorship and mitigation of residency attrition amongst underrepresented minorities (URMs). Individual residency programs, including the Department of Orthopaedics at Brown University, are engaging in community outreach to attract more diverse candidates to orthopaedics and providing away rotation scholarship support for medical students that identify as female or URMs. These local and national efforts will hopefully lead to a more inclusive environment for all trainees and practitioners within orthopaedics and ultimately improved orthopaedic care for all patients.

High-Volume and Privately Owned Ambulatory Surgical Centers Reduce Costs in Achilles Tendon Repair.

BACKGROUND: While Achilles tendon repairs are common, little data exist characterizing the cost drivers of this surgery. PURPOSE: To examine cases of primary Achilles tendon repair, primary repair with graft, and secondary repair to find patient characteristics and surgical variables that significantly drive costs. STUDY DESIGN: Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A total of 5955 repairs from 6 states were pulled from the 2014 State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database under the Current Procedural Terminology codes 27650, 27652, and 27654. Cases were analyzed under univariate analysis to select the key variables driving cost. Variables deemed close to significance (P < .10) were then examined under generalized linear models (GLMs) and evaluated for statistical significance (P < .05). RESULTS: The average cost was $14,951 for primary repair, $23,861 for primary repair with graft, and $20,115 for secondary repair (P < .001). In the GLMs, high-volume ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) showed a cost savings of $16,987 and $2854 in both the primary with graft and secondary repair groups, respectively (both P < .001). However, for primary repairs, high-volume ASCs had $2264 more in costs than low-volume ASCs (P < .001). In addition, privately owned ASCs showed cost savings compared with hospital-owned ASCs for both primary Achilles repair ($2450; P < .001) and primary repair with graft ($11,072; P = .019). Time in the operating room was also a significant cost, with each minute adding $36 of cost in primary repair and $31 in secondary repair (both P < .001). CONCLUSION: Private ASCs are associated with lower costs for patients undergoing primary Achilles repair, both with and without a graft. Patients undergoing the more complex secondary and primary with graft Achilles repairs had lower costs in facilities with greater caseload.

Radiation Exposure and Health Risks for Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Orthopaedic surgeons are routinely exposed to intraoperative radiation and, therefore, follow the principle of "as low as reasonably achievable" with regard to occupational safety. However, standardized education on the long-term health effects of radiation and the basis for current radiation exposure limits is limited in the field of orthopaedics. Much of orthopaedic surgeons' understanding of radiation exposure limits is extrapolated from studies of survivors of the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. Epidemiologic studies on cancer risk in surgeons and interventional proceduralists and dosimetry studies on true radiation exposure during trauma and spine surgery recently have been conducted. Orthopaedic surgeons should understand the basics and basis of radiation exposure limits, be familiar with the current literature on the incidence of solid tumors and cataracts in orthopaedic surgeons, and understand the evidence behind current intraoperative fluoroscopy safety recommendations.

Lesser Metatarsophalangeal Joint Instability: Advancements in Plantar Plate Reconstruction.

The plantar plate and associated collateral ligaments are the main stabilizers of each of the lesser metatarsophalangeal joints. Although clinical examination and plain radiographs are usually sufficient to establish the diagnosis of a plantar plate tear, MRI or fluoroscopic arthrograms may help in specific cases. Recent results with a dorsal approach to plantar plate repair are promising with respect to pain relief and patient satisfaction.

How To Diagnose and Treat Infection in Total Ankle Arthroplasty.

Periprosthetic infection after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is a serious complication, often requiring revision surgery, including revision arthroplasty, conversion to ankle arthrodesis, or even amputation. Risk factors for periprosthetic ankle infection include prior surgery at the site of infection, low functional preoperative score, diabetes, and wound healing problems. The clinical presentation of patients with periprosthetic ankle joint infection can be variable and dependent on infection manifestation: acute versus chronic. The initial evaluation in patients with suspected periprosthetic joint infections should include blood tests: C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Joint aspiration and synovial fluid analysis can help confirm suspected periprosthetic ankle infection.

Morbidity and Mortality Associated with Geriatric Ankle Fractures: A Medicare Part A Claims Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of adverse events in elderly patients who required inpatient admission after sustaining an ankle fracture and to consider these data in relation to geriatric hip fracture and other geriatric patient admissions. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients admitted with an ankle fracture, a hip fracture, or any other diagnosis was performed with the Medicare Part A database for 2008. The primary outcome measure was the one-year mortality rate, examined with multivariate analysis factoring for both patient age and preexisting comorbidity. Secondary outcome measures analyzed additional morbidity as reflected by length of stay, discharge disposition, readmissions, and medical complications. RESULTS: There were 19,648 patients with ankle fractures, 193,980 patients with hip fractures, and 5,801,831 patients with other admitting diagnoses. Significant differences (p < 0.001) were noted in both age and comorbidity status between the group with ankle fractures and the group with hip fractures. The one-year mortality after admission was 11.9% for patients with ankle fracture, 28.2% for patients with hip fracture, and 21.5% for patients with any other admission. Upon using multivariate analysis to account for both age and comorbidity, the hazard ratio for one-year mortality associated with fracture was 1.088 for patients with hip fracture and 0.557 for patients with ankle fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Even after selecting for admitted patients and accounting for both age and comorbidity, geriatric patients with ankle fractures were found to have a lower one-year morbidity compared with geriatric patients who had sustained a hip fracture or alternative admitting diagnoses. Geriatric patients with ankle fractures are likely healthier and more active in ways that are not captured by simply accounting for age and comorbidity. These findings may support more aggressive definitive management of such injuries in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Evaluation of one-year mortality after geriatric ankle fractures in patients admitted to nursing homes.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of geriatric ankle fractures will undoubtedly increase as the population continues to grow. Many geriatric patients struggle to function independently after such injury and often require placement into nursing homes. The morbidity and mortality associated with nursing homes is well documented within the field of orthopaedic surgery. However, there is currently no study examining the mortality associated with nursing home placement following hospitalization for an ankle fracture. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if geriatric patients admitted to nursing homes following an ankle fracture experience elevated mortality rates. METHODS: Patients were identified using diagnosis codes for ankle fractures from all 2008 part A Medicare claims, and those admitted to nursing homes were identified using a Minimum Data Set (MDS). The Medicare database was also analyzed for specific variables including over-all one year mortality, length of stay, age distribution, certain demographical characteristics, incidence of medical and surgical complications within 90 days, and the presence of comorbidities. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine if patients admitted to nursing homes had elevated mortality rates. RESULTS: 19,648 patients with ankle fractures were identified, and 11,625 (59.0%) of these patients went to a nursing home after hospitalization. Patients who went to a nursing home had higher Elixhauser and Deyo-Charlson comorbidity scores (p<0.0001). Nursing home patients also had significantly increased rates of postoperative medical and surgical complications. One year mortality was 6.9% for patients who did not go to a nursing home and 15.4% for patients who were admitted to a nursing home (p<0.0001). However, multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated no significant difference in one year mortality between patients admitted to nursing homes and those who were not (OR=1.1; 95% CI 0.99-1.24, p>0.05). DISCUSSION: Although admission to nursing home was significantly associated with increased mortality in a bivariate statistical model, this significance was lost during multivariate analysis. This suggests that other patient characteristics may play a more prominent role in determining one year mortality following geriatric ankle fractures.

Procedural sedation in the emergency department.

Procedural sedation options in the emergency department now allow for more effective and safer care and facilitate the delivery of orthopaedic care that would otherwise require operating room anesthesia. Traditional sedation agents, such as nitrous oxide, midazolam, fentanyl, and ketamine, have a persistent role. Etomidate and propofol are relatively recent additions that are highly effective. Combination regimens, such as ketamine-midazolam and ketamine-propofol, may be superior because they benefit from synergistic traits. Despite these sedation regimens, use of local blocks in adults continues to be effective, and intranasal delivery in children has emerged as a viable option. Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of the appropriateness of different sedation regimens and other options for specific clinical scenarios.

The Effect of C-Arm Position on Radiation Exposure During Fixation of Pediatric Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus.

BACKGROUND: Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of a pediatric supracondylar fracture of the humerus requires operating directly next to the C-arm to hold reduction and perform fixation under direct imaging. This study was designed to compare radiation exposure from two C-arm configurations: with the image intensifier serving as the operating surface, and with a radiolucent hand table serving as the operating surface and the image intensifier positioned above the table. METHODS: We used a cadaveric specimen in this study to determine radiation exposure to the operative elbow and to the surgeon at the waist and neck levels during simulated closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of a pediatric supracondylar fracture of the humerus. Radiation exposure measurements were made (1) with the C-arm image intensifier serving as the operating surface, with the emitter positioned above the operative elbow; and (2) with the image intensifier positioned above a hand table, with the emitter below the table. RESULTS: When the image intensifier was used as the operating surface, we noted 16% less scatter radiation at the waist level of the surgeon but 53% more neck-level scatter radiation compared with when the hand table was used as the operating surface and the image intensifier was positioned above the table. In terms of direct radiation exposure to the operative elbow, use of the image intensifier as the operating surface resulted in 21% more radiation exposure than from use of the other configuration. The direct radiation exposure was also more than two orders of magnitude greater than the neck and waist-level scatter radiation exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Traditionally, there has been concern over increased radiation exposure when the C-arm image intensifier is used as an operating surface, with the emitter above, compared with when the image intensifier is positioned above the operating surface, with the emitter below. We determined that, although there was a statistically significant difference in radiation exposure between the two configurations, neither was safer than the other at all tested levels. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In contrast to traditional teaching regarding radiation exposure, neither C-arm configuration-with the image intensifier serving as the operating surface or with the image intensifier positioned above a radiolucent hand table-was shown to be clearly safer for pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture fixation.

Rapid-Onset Diffuse Skeletal Fluorosis from Inhalant Abuse: A Case Report.

CASE: A thirty-year-old man presented with severely debilitating left hip pain and stiffness. Radiographs demonstrated diffuse osteosclerosis and heterotopic bone formation with near ankylosis of the left hip. The patient underwent successful joint-preserving surgery to restore hip range of motion. After disclosing a history of inhalant abuse, which was confirmed by elevated serum fluoride levels, he was diagnosed with diffuse skeletal fluorosis. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, we present the first reported case of diffuse skeletal fluorosis caused by inhalant abuse of 1,1-difluoroethane. Skeletal fluorosis is uncommon in the United States but is important to consider in the differential diagnosis when a patient presents with otherwise unexplained joint pain and osteosclerosis.