Tanshinone IIA promotes vascular normalization and boosts Sorafenib's anti-hepatoma activity via modulating the PI3K-AKT pathway.

Introduction: Angiogenesis is an essential feature of liver cancer. Tumor hypoxia results from abnormal vessel architecture. Numerous studies have sufficiently demonstrated that Tanshinone IIA (Tan IIA) can increase blood flow and enhance microcirculation. The objectives of this study are to: 1 assess the impact of Tan IIA on tumor angiogenesis and architecture, 2 determine the impact of Tan IIA on tumor hypoxia and susceptibility to Sorafenib, and 3 clarify the relevant mechanisms. Methods: CCK8 and flow cytometry measured cell proliferation and apoptosis, respectively. Tube creation assay was used to investigate medication effects on angiogenesis and structure. Drug effects on tumor development, metastasis, and hypoxic tumor microenvironment are assessed in an orthotopic xenograft model of liver tumors. Protein expression was measured by Western blotting and immunohistochemistry. Results: Our results demonstrated that Tan IIA could not reduce tumor proliferation or enhance Sorafenib's anti-tumor effect in vitro. Nevertheless, it can prevent Sorafenib from demolishing the typical vascular structure and aid sorafenib in blocking the recruitment of vascular endothelial cells by liver cancer cells. Although Tan IIA cannot inhibit tumor growth in vivo, it can significantly boost Sorafenib's inhibitory effect on liver cancer, alleviate tumor microenvironment hypoxia, and minimize lung metastasis. This effect may be achieved by reducing HIF-1α and HIF-2α expression via the PI3K-AKT signal pathway. Discussion: Our results reveal the mechanism of Tan IIA in normalizing tumor blood vessels, provide innovative concepts and approaches to overcome chemotherapy resistance, and provide a theoretical basis for the clinical transformation and usage of Tan IIA.

The expression profile of Gasdermin C-related genes predicts the prognosis and immunotherapy response of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) has a poor prognosis and is relatively unresponsive to immunotherapy. Gasdermin C (GSDMC) induces pyroptosis in cancer cells and inflammation in the tumor microenvironment. However, whether GSDMC expression in PAAD is associated with survival or response to immunotherapy remains unknown. GSDMC expression and the relationship between GSDMC and patient survival or immune infiltration in PAAD were examined using data in the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Gene Expression Ominbus (GEO), Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) and Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) databases. The TCGA PAAD cohort could be divided into two distinct risk groups based on the expression of GSDMC-related genes (GRGs). The TIDE algorithm predicted that the low-risk group was more responsive to immune checkpoint blockade therapy than the high-risk group. A novel 15-gene signature was constructed and could predict the prognosis of PAAD. In addition, the 15-gene signature model predicted the infiltration of immune cells and Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) treatment response. Immunohistochemical staining assessment of patient-derived human tissue microarray (TMA) from 139 cases of local PAAD patients revealed a positive correlation between GSDMC expression and PD-L1 expression but a negative correlation between GSDMC expression and infiltration of low CD8+ T cells. Moreover, the overexpression of GSDMC was related to poor overall survival (OS). This study suggests that GSDMC is a valuable biomarker for predicting PAAD prognosis and predicts the immunotherapy response of PAAD.

PIK3C2A is a prognostic biomarker that is linked to immune infiltrates in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma.

Background: Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks) are lipid enzymes that regulate a wide range of intracellular functions. In contrast to Class I and Class III PI3K, which have more detailed descriptions, Class II PI3K has only recently become the focus of functional research. PIK3C2A is a classical member of the PI3Ks class II. However, the role of PIK3C2A in cancer prognosis and progression remains unknown. Methods: The expression pattern and prognostic significance of PIK3C2A in human malignancies were investigated using multiple datasets and scRNA-seq data. The PIK3C2A expression in renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) was then validated utilizing Western blot. The functional role of PIK3C2A in KIRC was assessed using combined function loss experiments with in vitro experiments. Furthermore, the correlation of PIK3C2A expression with tumor immunity was investigated in KIRC. The TCGA database was employed to investigate PIK3C2A functional networks. Results: Significant decrease in PIK3C2A expression in KIRC, demonstrated that it potentially influences the prognosis of diverse tumors, particularly KIRC. In addition, PIK3C2A was significantly correlated with the T stage, M stage, pathologic stage, and histologic grade of KIRC. Nomogram models were constructed and used to predict patient survival based on the results of multivariate Cox regression analysis. PIK3C2A knockdown resulted in significantly increased KIRC cell proliferation. Of note, PIK3C2A expression demonstrated a significant correlation with the infiltrating levels of primary immune cells in KIRC. Conclusion: These findings support the hypothesis that PIK3C2A is a novel biomarker for tumor progression and indicates dynamic shifts in immune infiltration in KIRC. Furthermore, aberrant PIK3C2A expression can influence the biological activity of cancer cells.

Effects of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogs on Ovarian Function Against Chemotherapy-Induced Gonadotoxic Effects in Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer in China: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Studies of the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs (GnRHa) to protect ovarian function have shown mixed results. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether administering GnRHa during chemotherapy in premenopausal women with breast cancer can reduce ovarian impairment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial, conducted at the Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital and Zhejiang Cancer Hospital in China, was an open-label trial involving premenopausal women aged 18 to 49 years with operable stage I to III breast cancer for which treatment with adjuvant or neoadjuvant cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy was planned in 2 parallel groups: treatment with chemotherapy with or without GnRHa. Enrollment occurred from September 2015 to August 2017, and follow-up ended December 2020. The data were analyzed in March 2021. A total of 405 patients were enrolled in the study, among whom 27 patients (6.7%) quit participation voluntarily, 33 (8.1%) did not meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded, and 15 (3.7%) were lost to follow-up. Ultimately 330 patients were included in the primary analysis, including 29 patients with baseline anti-Müllerian hormone levels less than 0.5ng/ mL. INTERVENTIONS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive chemotherapy with (n = 165) or without (n = 165) GnRHa. In patients randomized to receive GnRHa, 3.6 mg of goserelin or 3.75 mg of leuprorelin was injected subcutaneously once every 28 days from 1 to 2 weeks before the first cycle of chemotherapy to 4 weeks after the last cycle of chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the rate of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) at 12 months after chemotherapy. Premature ovarian insufficiency was defined as anti-Müllerian hormone levels of less than 0.5 ng/mL in this study. The secondary end point was overall survival (OS) and tumor-free survival (TFS). RESULTS: A total of 330 eligible patients could be evaluated with complete data, among whom 301 patients (91.2%; GnRHA group: mean [SD] age, 40.6 [6.7] years; control group: mean [SD] age, 40.2 [5.9] years) were eligible for primary end point analysis. At 12 months after the completion of chemotherapy, the POI rate was 10.3% (15 of 146) in the GnRHa group and 44.5% (69 of 155) in the control group (odds ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.14-0.39; P < .001). Anti-Müllerian hormone resumption in the GnRHa group was significantly better than that in the control group (15 of 25 vs 6 of 44; odds ratio, 4.40; 95% CI, 1.96-9.89; P < .001). After a median follow-up of 49 months (range, 25-60 months), the differences in 4-year OS and TFS between the 2 groups were not significant. A post hoc analysis showed that in patients younger than 35 years, the TFS was higher in the GnRHa group than in the control group (93% vs 62%; P = .004; hazard ratio, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03-0.82; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This randomized clinical trial found that administering GnRHa in treatment with chemotherapy for premenopausal patients with breast cancer reduces the risk of POI, which promotes the recovery of ovarian function. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02518191.

Analysis on the Clinical Effect of High-Dose Glucocorticoids Combined with Immunosuppressants on Patients with Myasthenia Gravis Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the clinical effect of high-dose glucocorticoids (GCS) combined with immunosuppressants on the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). METHODS: A total of 106 MG patients admitted to the neurology department of our hospital from February 2016 to February 2020 were selected as the study subjects and divided into experimental group (n = 53) and control group (n = 53). The patients in the control group underwent VATS, while the patients in the experimental group were treated with high-dose GCS combined with immunosuppressants on the basis of VATS treatment. The clinical efficacy of different MG treatment methods was analyzed. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in visual analogue score (VAS) at T1 between the two groups (P > 0.05), while VAS scores at T2, T3, and T4 in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.001). In the experimental group, the overall response rate was significantly higher than the control group (P < 0.05). Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) level in regulatory T (Treg) cells in experimental groups after treatment was significantly higher, compared to that in before treatment and the control group (P < 0.05). Similar results of each quantitative MG score were displayed in both groups after treatment, compared to before treatment and the control group (P < 0.05). Clinical performance of patients with lower incidence of adverse reactions in the experimental groups after treatment was significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: GCS combined with immunosuppressants can effectively relieve patients' clinical symptoms and improve their quality of life, with significant clinical efficacy and high safety, which is worthy of application and promotion.

Preoperative Systemic Therapy Versus Upfront Surgery in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in the Real World.

PURPOSE: To compare survival in different strategies, preoperative systemic treatment versus upfront surgery, in HER2-positive early breast cancer patients in the real world. METHODS: According to the actual upfront treatment, eligible patients from 2012 to 2015 were classified as preoperative systemic treatment or upfront surgery group prospectively. The primary endpoint is disease-free survival; the second endpoint is overall survival. All the outcomes were examined in the propensity score matching model and inverse probability of treatment weighting model. RESULTS: Included in the analysis were 1,067 patients (215 in the preoperative systemic treatment group, 852 in the upfront surgery group). In the propensity score matching model (matching at 1:1 ratio), the disease-free survival of the preoperative systemic treatment group was significantly higher than that of the upfront surgery group (hazard ratio, 0.572, 95%CI, 0.371-0.881, P, 0.012). In the inverse probability of treatment weighting model, there was no significant difference in disease-free survival between the two groups (hazard ratio, 0.946, 95%CI, 0.763-1.172, P, 0.609). For overall survival, there was no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The HER2-positive patients who accepted preoperative systemic treatment had better disease-free survival than those who underwent upfront surgery by real-world statistic methods. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04249440.

The Guiding Significance of the Number of Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Frozen Section for Intraoperative Axillary Dissection in Early Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: The results of large randomised trials have changed the treatment strategy of axillary lymph nodes. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be avoided in some patients with one to two sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) metastasis based on final paraffin section (FPS) results which called into question the need for intraoperative frozen section (FS). This study aims to assess the guiding value of the number of positive SLN detected via FS for intraoperative ALND. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed data from 3303 patients with breast cancer who underwent SLN biopsy between 2015 and 2019. Combined with the FPS results, FS sensitivity, specificity, and false negative rate (FNR) were calculated and the difference in the number of positive SLNs between FS and FPS was analyzed. RESULTS: The overall FNR of FS was 23.21%, which was 76.47% in isolated tumor cells, 62.28% in micrometastasis, and 12.09% in macrometastatic disease. The size of SLN metastasis were significantly associated with a higher FNR (p<0.001). The accuracy rate of the number of positive SLNs detected via FS was 92.62%. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (p<0.03) and Ki67 (p<0.02) were significant factors affecting the accuracy rate. CONCLUSION: FS is a effective method for SLN biopsy, ALND can be avoided in patients with one or two positive SLNs detected via FS.

Dissection of Level III Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer.

Axillary lymph node dissection is an indispensable step in modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer. It is the most reliable method and the golden standard to determine the status of axillary lymph nodes. It is also of great importance to evaluate the prognosis and develop treatment plans for breast cancer patients. Axillary lymph node dissection can be anatomically divided into levels I, II, and III. Level I and Level II axillary lymph dissection is the standard clinical treatment of axillary lymph nodes positive breast cancer, whereas level III axillary lymph node dissection has been controversial. Level III axillary lymph node metastasis is one of the important factors that can easily cause distant metastasis and recurrence. It is also an important index to estimate the prognosis of breast cancer patients. To facilitate the decision of whether or not to perform level III lymph node dissection, we reviewed the indications, complications, and surgical procedures of level III lymph node dissection.

Breast carcinoma associated with prolactinoma: A case report.

We report a 28-year-old woman who presented with a 6-year history of milk-like discharge from both of her nipples and was diagnosed with prolactinoma based on computed tomography (CT) findings and serum prolactin level. Further breast examination revealed a mass located in the upper outer region of the left breast. She underwent subtotal pituitary tumor resection. Thereafter, modified radical mastectomy was performed for left breast cancer. Twelve years after treatment, prolactinoma recurrence was detected, and bromocriptine therapy was administered. No recurrence of breast cancer was discovered. Based on this case report, we stress the importance of prolactin levels due to their possible biologic effects on breast cancer induction or growth.

Simultaneous breast reconstruction and treatment of breast cancer-related upper arm lymphedema with lymphatic lower abdominal flap.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to introduce the key points about the transplantation of lower abdominal flap with vascularized lymph node and to evaluate the effect of breast restoration, breast reconstruction, and lymphatic transplantation to treat upper limb lymphedema after breast cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was based on the retrospective study on 10 cases of postmastectomy lymphedema during January 2008 to March 2011. All patients, aged 36 to 50 years, have had one-side upper-limb lymphedema for 3 to 5 years. Six patients had accepted radiotherapy. Four patients had a diagnosis of severe lymphedema, and 2 patients had moderate lymphedema. The isotope radiography before the operation showed obstruction of lymphatic return, and the multidetector computed tomography that followed delivered a clear picture of the abdominal flap blood supply and the blood vessels in the breasts. During the operation, the scar contracture of the axilla was completely relaxed, and all patients accepted abdominal transplantation of lower abdominal flap with vascularized lymph node. After the operation, the elastic bandages were applied for one year as an adjuvant therapy. The follow-up visits were conducted 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgery. The measurement indexes included mid-upper arm circumference, clinical symptoms, and lymphoscintigraphy. RESULTS: All flaps worked well. One patient was found to have delayed wound healing; one patient saw no obvious improvement in lymphedema; 7 patients with lymphedema were relieved with apparent improvement in the affected limbs' mean perimeter and clinical symptoms; one patient recovered; and another patient was lost to follow-up. The mean reduction was 2.122±2.331 cm, and the reduction of the lymphedematous limb was statistically significant between the preoperative and 12-month postoperative groups (P<0.05). The results were good in 4 patients and excellent in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: The transplantation of abdominal flap with vascularized lymph node and breast reconstruction, accompanied by the treatment to upper limb lymphedema and using elastic bandages as an adjuvant therapy, is considered to be an effective method to restore the configuration and function of breasts. Long-term follow-up visits are undergoing, especially the lymphoscintigraphy, 2 years after the operation.