Effects of cigarette smoking associated with sarcopenia in persons 60 years and older: a cross-sectional study in Zhejiang province.

PURPOSE: Smoking is a risk factor for sarcopenia. Nevertheless, few studies analyzed the independent effects of various smoking dimensions (duration, intensity, cumulative dose) on sarcopenia risk. This is a cross-sectional study based on an older population in Zhejiang Province to determine which smoking dimensions are mainly important for sarcopenia risk and to explore the dose-response relationship between them. METHODS: Our study included 783 patients with sarcopenia and 4918 non-sarcopenic individuals. Logistic regression and restricted cubic with logistic regression (for nonlinear dose effects) were used to obtain odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals as well as restricted cubic splines (RCS) curves. RESULTS: Compared with never-smokers, current smokers had an increased risk of sarcopenia (OR = 1.786; 95% CI 1.387-2.301) after adjusting for confounders such as age, sex, education, alcohol consumption, disease history, etc. There was no significant association between smoking intensity and sarcopenia after more than 20 cigarettes per day (OR = 1.484; 95% CI 0.886-2.487), whereas the risk of sarcopenia increased significantly with increasing duration of smoking after more than 40 years (OR = 1.733; 95% CI 1.214-2.473). Meanwhile, there was a significant non-linear dose-response relationship between smoking duration or intensity and the risk of sarcopenia. However, the risk of sarcopenia increased linearly with the number of pack-years of smoking, which is not a significant nonlinear dose-response relationship. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated the association between smoking and sarcopenia. Both smoking duration and cumulative dose were significantly and positively associated with sarcopenia. These findings reflect the important role of the number of years of smoking in increasing the risk of sarcopenia and provide scientific evidence that different smoking dimensions may influence the risk of the sarcopenia.

Inhibition of Hmbox1 Promotes Cardiomyocyte Survival and Glucose Metabolism Through Gck Activation in Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury.

BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced physiological cardiac growth regulators may protect the heart from ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Homeobox-containing 1 (Hmbox1), a homeobox family member, has been identified as a putative transcriptional repressor and is downregulated in the exercised heart. However, its roles in exercise-induced physiological cardiac growth and its potential protective effects against cardiac I/R injury remain largely unexplored. METHODS: We studied the function of Hmbox1 in exercise-induced physiological cardiac growth in mice after 4 weeks of swimming exercise. Hmbox1 expression was then evaluated in human heart samples from deceased patients with myocardial infarction and in the animal cardiac I/R injury model. Its role in cardiac I/R injury was examined in mice with adeno-associated virus 9 (AAV9) vector-mediated Hmbox1 knockdown and in those with cardiac myocyte-specific Hmbox1 ablation. We performed RNA sequencing, promoter prediction, and binding assays and identified glucokinase (Gck) as a downstream effector of Hmbox1. The effects of Hmbox1 together with Gck were examined in cardiomyocytes to evaluate their cell size, proliferation, apoptosis, mitochondrial respiration, and glycolysis. The function of upstream regulator of Hmbox1, ETS1, was investigated through ETS1 overexpression in cardiac I/R mice in vivo. RESULTS: We demonstrated that Hmbox1 downregulation was required for exercise-induced physiological cardiac growth. Inhibition of Hmbox1 increased cardiomyocyte size in isolated neonatal rat cardiomyocytes and human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes but did not affect cardiomyocyte proliferation. Under pathological conditions, Hmbox1 was upregulated in both human and animal postinfarct cardiac tissues. Furthermore, both cardiac myocyte-specific Hmbox1 knockout and AAV9-mediated Hmbox1 knockdown protected against cardiac I/R injury and heart failure. Therapeutic effects were observed when sh-Hmbox1 AAV9 was administered after I/R injury. Inhibition of Hmbox1 activated the Akt/mTOR/P70S6K pathway and transcriptionally upregulated Gck, leading to reduced apoptosis and improved mitochondrial respiration and glycolysis in cardiomyocytes. ETS1 functioned as an upstream negative regulator of Hmbox1 transcription, and its overexpression was protective against cardiac I/R injury. CONCLUSIONS: Our studies unravel a new role for the transcriptional repressor Hmbox1 in exercise-induced physiological cardiac growth. They also highlight the therapeutic potential of targeting Hmbox1 to improve myocardial survival and glucose metabolism after I/R injury.