A comparative study of the efficacy of tamoxifen and Chinese patented medicine (Pingxiao capsules) in gynecomastia: A retrospective cohort study.

To compare the clinical efficacy of tamoxifen and Chinese patented medicine (Pingxiao capsules) in patients with gynecomastia and discuss the safety of the two treatments. We retrospectively analysed the clinical data of 388 male patients with gynecomastia who were treated in the Outpatient Clinic of our hospital between January 2010 and December 2020. There were 103 patients in the tamoxifen (TAM) group and 103 patients in the Chinese patented medicine group. There were 182 patients in the observation group (non-medication group; age range, 11-75 years; average age, 33.1 years). The natural outcomes were compared between the observation and two medication groups under the same conditions. Disease progression was compared between the observation and two medication groups over the same treatment duration to confirm the efficacy of the medication treatments. Patients with clinical grade 2 gynecomastia accounted for the highest proportion of patients in the TAM group. The percentage of patients with clinical grade 2 gynecomastia was comparable in the Chinese patented medicine and observation groups. The percentage of patients with clinical grades 1 and 3 gynecomastia was the lowest in the TAM group and comparable among the three groups (p = 0.014). The TAM group had the largest number of patients achieving breast shrinkage, and therefore had the best efficacy (p = 0.000). Among the three groups, the surgery rate was the highest in the observation group (p = 0.000). Patients with the greatest glandular tissue thickness achieved better outcomes after medication treatment (p = 0.000). Patients with a higher clinical grade also had a higher surgery rate (p = 0.000). Some patients from the TAM and Chinese patented medicine groups had side effects. TAM results in better outcomes than Chinese patented medicine in gynecomastia patients. The surgery rate is the highest in the observation group. In addition, among some patients with a greater glandular tissue thickness, the higher the clinical grade is, the higher the surgery rate is. Both TAM and Chinese patented medicine cause some side effects and should be used with caution along with continuous follow-up evaluation of patients receiving either treatment.

Inherited determinants of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis phenotypes: a genetic association study.

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are the two major forms of inflammatory bowel disease; treatment strategies have historically been determined by this binary categorisation. Genetic studies have identified 163 susceptibility loci for inflammatory bowel disease, mostly shared between Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. We undertook the largest genotype association study, to date, in widely used clinical subphenotypes of inflammatory bowel disease with the goal of further understanding the biological relations between diseases. METHODS: This study included patients from 49 centres in 16 countries in Europe, North America, and Australasia. We applied the Montreal classification system of inflammatory bowel disease subphenotypes to 34,819 patients (19,713 with Crohn's disease, 14,683 with ulcerative colitis) genotyped on the Immunochip array. We tested for genotype-phenotype associations across 156,154 genetic variants. We generated genetic risk scores by combining information from all known inflammatory bowel disease associations to summarise the total load of genetic risk for a particular phenotype. We used these risk scores to test the hypothesis that colonic Crohn's disease, ileal Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis are all genetically distinct from each other, and to attempt to identify patients with a mismatch between clinical diagnosis and genetic risk profile. FINDINGS: After quality control, the primary analysis included 29,838 patients (16,902 with Crohn's disease, 12,597 with ulcerative colitis). Three loci (NOD2, MHC, and MST1 3p21) were associated with subphenotypes of inflammatory bowel disease, mainly disease location (essentially fixed over time; median follow-up of 10·5 years). Little or no genetic association with disease behaviour (which changed dramatically over time) remained after conditioning on disease location and age at onset. The genetic risk score representing all known risk alleles for inflammatory bowel disease showed strong association with disease subphenotype (p=1·65 × 10(-78)), even after exclusion of NOD2, MHC, and 3p21 (p=9·23 × 10(-18)). Predictive models based on the genetic risk score strongly distinguished colonic from ileal Crohn's disease. Our genetic risk score could also identify a small number of patients with discrepant genetic risk profiles who were significantly more likely to have a revised diagnosis after follow-up (p=6·8 × 10(-4)). INTERPRETATION: Our data support a continuum of disorders within inflammatory bowel disease, much better explained by three groups (ileal Crohn's disease, colonic Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis) than by Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis as currently defined. Disease location is an intrinsic aspect of a patient's disease, in part genetically determined, and the major driver to changes in disease behaviour over time. FUNDING: International Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetics Consortium members funding sources (see Acknowledgments for full list).