Management of refined and personalized newborn blood specimen collection.

Background: Iatrogenic blood loss is an important cause of neonatal anemia. In this study, a spreadsheet tool was developed to reduce blood collection, providing a new idea for the prevention of iatrogenic blood loss in newborns. Methods: Based on hematocrit, minimum test volume and dead volume, a new tool was to calculate the minimum blood collection volume and the number of containers required for the test portfolio. We collected data from October 2022 to October 2023 from Xiamen Maternal and Child Health Hospital for analysis and validation. Results: During this year, there were 16,434 patients and 13,696 plasma/serological samples in the neonatology department. Among them, there were 8 test combinations of greater than 1%, and 9490 samples in total. According to the hospital manual, the recommended amount of blood collection is 27,534 ml and 9490 containers. Through the analysis of this tool, total blood collection was 8864.77 ml, marked qnantity of upward containers (closest level to the calculated blood collection volume) was 10301 ml, and the amount of containers was 8835, which decreased by 67.8%, 62.58% and 6.9% respectively. Besides, if the hematocrit information cannot be obtained in advance and the high hematocrit is calculated as 0.8, the recommended amount of blood collection is 14334.3 ml, and the marked amount of the upward container markering is 17340 ml, decreasing by 47.9% and 37.02% respectively. Conclusion: We have developed an auxiliary tool that can manage neonatal blood specimen collection in a fine and personalized way and can be applied among different laboratory instruments by parameters modification.

Serum creatinine/cystatin C ratio as a muscle mass evaluating tool and prognostic indicator for hospitalized patients: A meta-analysis.

Objective: Sarcopenia is a syndrome of decreased muscle mass and deficits in muscle strength and physical function. We aimed to investigate the relationship between creatinine/cystatin C ratio (CCR) and sarcopenia and the prognostic value of CCR in hospitalized patients. Materials and methods: We searched for relevant studies in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database up to August 25, 2022. Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between CCR and skeletal muscle [computed tomography-assessed skeletal muscle (CTASM), muscle strength, and physical performance], prognosis and important clinical outcomes in hospitalized adults. The pooled correlation coefficient, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and hazard ratio (HR) together with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. We also conducted subgroup analyses to explore the sources of heterogeneity. Results: A total of 38 studies with 20,362 patients were eligible. These studies were of moderate to high quality. Our results showed that CCR was significant correlations with all CTASM types (Fisher's Z ranged from 0.35 to 0.5; P values ranged from < 0.01 to 0.01), handgrip strength (Fisher's Z = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.32-0.45; P < 0.001) and gait speed (Fisher's Z = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.21-0.30; P < 0.001). The ROC curves suggested that CCR had good diagnostic efficacy (0.689; 95% CI, 0.632-0.746; P < 0.01) for sarcopenia. CCR can reliably predict mortality in hospitalized patients, which was confirmed by regression analysis of CCR as both continuous (HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.84; P < 0.01) and categorical variables (HR 2.05; 95% CI, 1.58-2.66; P < 0.0001). In addition, less evidence showed that higher CCR was independently associated with a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, reduced length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital, less nutritional risk, and decreased complications in hospitalized patients. Conclusion: CCR could be a simple, economical, and effective screening tool for sarcopenia in hospitalized patients, and it is a helpful prognostic factor for mortality and other important clinical outcomes. Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-9-0097/, identifier INPLASY202290097.

Levosimendan to Facilitate Weaning From Cardiorespiratory Support in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

Background: Cardiopulmonary support, as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or mechanical ventilation (MV), is crucial for ICU patients. However, some of these patients are difficult to wean. Therefore, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of levosimendan in facilitating weaning from cardiorespiratory support in this patient population. Methods: We searched for potentially relevant articles in PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and the Cochrane database from inception up to Feb 30, 2021. Studies focusing on weaning data in MV/ECMO adult patients who received levosimendan compared to controls were included. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool or the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale to evaluate the study quality. The primary outcome was the weaning rate from MV/ECMO. Secondary outcomes were mortality, duration of MV, and ICU stay. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were also conducted. Results: Eighteen studies with 2,274 patients were included. The quality of the included studies was low to moderate. Overall, levosimendan effectively improved weaning rates from MV/ECMO [odds ratio (OR) = 2.32; 95%CI, 1.60-3.36; P < 0.00001, I 2 = 68%]. Subgroup analyses confirmed the higher successful weaning rates in ventilated patients with low left ventricular ejection fractions (OR = 4.06; 95%CI, 2.16-7.62), patients with ECMO after cardiac surgery (OR = 2.04; 95%CI, 1.25-3.34), and patients with ECMO and cardiogenic shock (OR = 1.98; 95%CI, 1.34-2.91). However, levosimendan showed no beneficial effect on patients with MV weaning difficulty (OR = 2.28; 95%CI, 0.72-7.25). Additionally, no differences were found concerning the secondary outcomes between the groups. Conclusions: Levosimendan therapy significantly increased successful weaning rates in patients with cardiopulmonary support, especially patients with combined cardiac insufficiency. Large-scale, well-designed RCTs will be needed to define the subgroup of patients most likely to benefit from this strategy.

Intraoperative Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy During Liver Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis.

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is frequently used to treat recipients with renal failure before or after liver transplantation (LT), though evidence supporting its use during surgery remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a quantitative meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of intraoperative continuous renal replacement therapy (IORRT) in recipients with pretransplant severe renal dysfunction. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database for trials focusing on LT recipients supported with or without IORRT. Outcomes assessed were mortality, preoperative characteristics, intraoperative data, and predefined postoperative outcomes. Seven trials with 1051 recipients were eligible. Preoperatively, the IORRT group recipients had higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores (weighted mean difference [WMD], 6.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.51-9.87), Charlson scores (WMD, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.09-0.80), acute liver failure (odds ratio [OR], 1.82; 95% CI, 1.27-2.61), serum creatinine (WMD, 71.33 µmol/L; 95% CI, 1.98-140.69 µmol/L), total bilirubin level (WMD, 5.05 µmol/L; 95% CI, 1.75-8.35 µmol/L), intensive care unit admission (OR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.23-10.13), vasoactive therapy (OR, 3.80; 95% CI, 2.64-5.46), ventilator care (OR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.18-5.35), and renal replacement therapy (RRT) (OR, 29.37; 95% CI, 7.66-112.54) compared with control patients. IORRT patients also required more intraoperative blood product transfusion and had more post-LT RRT (OR, 25.67; 95% CI, 4.92-133.85). However, there were no significant differences in short-term mortality (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 0.82-5.44) between the groups. In addition, worse longterm mortality was seen in the IORRT group. In conclusion, IORRT is feasible and safe and may help sicker recipients tolerate the LT procedure to achieve short-term clinical outcomes comparable with less ill patients without IORRT. More high-quality evidence is needed to verify our conclusion in the future.

Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation (EI) in ICU patients is associated with an increased risk of life-threatening adverse events due to unstable conditions, rapid deterioration, limited preparation time, and variability in the expertise of operators. The goal of this study was to compare the effect of video laryngoscopy (VL) and direct laryngoscopy (DL) in ICU patients requiring EI. METHODS: We searched for relevant studies in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database from inception through January 30, 2017. Randomized controlled trials were included if they reported data on any of the predefined outcomes in ICU patients requiring EI and managed with VL or DL. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with accompanying 95% CIs. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials with 1,301 patients were included. Despite better glottic visualization with VL (RR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.43; P = .003), use of VL did not result in a significant increase in the first-attempt success rate (RR = 1.08; 95% CI, 0.92-1.26; P = .35) compared with DL. In addition, time to intubation (MD = 4.12 s; 95% CI, -15.86-24.09; P = .69), difficult intubation (RR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.30-1.70; P = .45), mortality (RR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.84-1.25; P = .83), and most other complications were similar between the VL and DL groups. CONCLUSIONS: The VL technique did not increase the first-attempt success rate during EI in ICU patients compared with DL. These findings do not support routine use of VL in ICU patients.