Low-molecular-weight heparin is associated with lower venous thromboembolism events than factor Xa inhibitors in patients with severe blunt trauma: a cohort study from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a common complication of major trauma. Pharmacological VTE prophylactics are widely used, and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended. Factor Xa inhibitors are increasingly being used for VTE prophylaxis in both medical and surgical patients. Evidence comparing LMWH and factor Xa inhibitors as VTE prophylactics for severe blunt trauma is lacking. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of factor Xa inhibitors and LMHW in VTE prophylaxis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with severe blunt trauma who received LMWH or a factor Xa inhibitor for VTE prophylaxis in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program between 2017 and 2019 were included. The comparison was performed after using propensity score matching. The outcomes included mortality and incidence of DVT, PE, post-prophylactics haemorrhage control procedures and length of stay. RESULTS: After 2:1 propensity score matching, 1128 patients ( n =752, LMHW group; n =376, factor Xa inhibitor group) were included in the analysis. Patients in the LMWH group had fewer VTE events than those in the factor Xa inhibitor group (DVT, 3.7% vs. 7.2%, P =0.013; PE, 0.4% vs. 3.2%, P <0.001). VTE risk was higher in the factor Xa group (DVT: odds ratio, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.12-3.44; P =0.018 and PE: odds ratio, 9.65; 95% CI, 2.91-44.12; P =0.001). The mortality rate was higher in the LMWH group; however, there was no significant difference (4.0% vs. 1.9%; P =0.075). The difference in the risk of undergoing haemorrhage control surgery after VTE prophylaxis between both groups was insignificant (0.3% vs. 0.0%; P =0.333). CONCLUSIONS: LMWH was associated with a lower risk of VTE than factor Xa inhibitors in patients with severe blunt trauma. The mortality rate was higher in the LMWH group; however, there was no statistically significant difference observed.

Feasibility of non-operative management for patients sustained blunt splenic traumas with concomitant aortic injuries.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to elucidate the treatment approach for blunt splenic injuries concurrently involving the aorta. We hypothesized that non-operative management failure rates would be higher in such cases, necessitating increased hemorrhage control surgeries. METHODS: Data from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program spanning 2017 to 2019 were utilized. All patients with blunt splenic trauma were considered for inclusion. We conducted comparisons between blunt splenic trauma patients with and without thoracic or abdominal aortic injuries to identify any potential disparities in treatment. RESULTS: Among the 32,051 patients with blunt splenic injuries during the study period, 752 (2.3%) sustained concurrent aortic injuries. Following 2:1 propensity score matching, it was determined that the presence of aortic injuries did not significantly affect the utilization of splenic transarterial angioembolization (TAE) (7.2% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.243) or the necessity for splenectomy or splenorrhaphy (15.3% vs. 15.7%, p = 0.853). Moreover, aortic injuries were not a significant factor contributing to TAE failure, regardless of the location or severity of the injury. Patients with simultaneous splenic and aortic injuries required more red blood cell transfusion within first 4 hours (0 ml [0, 900] vs. 0 ml [0, 650], p = 0.001) and exhibited a higher mortality rate (10.6% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that patients with concurrent aortic and splenic injuries presented with more severe conditions, higher mortality rates, and extended hospital stays. The presence of aortic injuries did not substantially influence the utilization of TAE or the necessity for splenectomy or splenorrhaphy. Patients of this type can be managed in accordance with current treatment guidelines. Nonetheless, given their less favorable prognosis, they necessitate prompt and proactive intervention.

Speeding pelvic fracture fixation: CT scan with simultaneous 3-D pelvic reconstruction in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans are usually needed in the emergency department (ED) to evaluate intra-abdominal injuries associated with pelvic fractures. Three-dimensional (3-D) images for pelvis reconstruction are also needed for planning surgical fixation after admission. This study investigates the advantages integrating a one-stage computed tomography (CT) scan with these two diagnostic modalities simultaneously to reduce the time to surgery and improve the outcomes of pelvic fracture fixation. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study (2018-2021) of patients with pelvic fractures was performed. Patients were categorized into the one-stage CT group or the two-stage CT group, and propensity score matching was used to address biases. The outcome measures included time to surgical fixation, time to CT scan for 3-D pelvis reconstruction, and overall length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-four pelvic fracture patients who underwent definite surgical fixation were identified. Of those, 320 underwent a one-stage CT scan, while the remaining 124 underwent a two-stage CT scan. After well-balanced matching, those in the one-stage CT group had a significantly shorter time to surgical fixation than those in the two-stage CT group (4.6 vs. 6.8 days, p < 0.001). Even among critically ill patients necessitating intensive care unit (ICU) admission, the one-stage CT scan group had a shorter time to definitive surgical fixation (5.5 vs. 7.2 days, p = 0.002) and a shorter hospital stay (19.0 vs. 32.7 days, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: A one-stage contrast-enhanced CT scan combined with simultaneous 3-D pelvis reconstruction is promising for expediting surgical fixation in pelvic fracture patients. This innovative strategy may improve patient outcomes by facilitating timely surgical interventions and minimizing delays associated with additional CT scans.

Timely surgical fixation confers beneficial outcomes in patients' concomitant flail chest with mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury: a trauma quality improvement project analysis - a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic flail chest results in respiratory distress and prolonged hospital stay. Timely surgical fixation of the flail chest reduces respiratory complications, decreases ventilator dependence, and shortens hospital stays. Concomitant head injury is not unusual in these patients and can postpone surgical timing due to the need to monitor the status of intracranial injuries. Reducing pulmonary sequelae also assists in the recovery from traumatic brain injury and improves outcomes. No previous evidence supports that early rib fixation can improve the outcome of patients with concomitant flail chest and traumatic brain injury. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can early rib fixation improve the outcome of patients with concomitant flail chest and traumatic brain injury? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Adult patients with blunt injuries from the Trauma Quality Improvement Project between 2017 and 2019 were eligible for inclusion. Patients were divided into two treatment groups: operative and nonoperative. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to identify the predictors of mortality and adverse hospital events. RESULTS: Patients in the operative group had a higher intubation rate [odds ratio (OR), 2.336; 95% CI, 1.644-3.318; p <0.001), a longer length of stay (coefficient ß , 4.664; SE, 0.789; p <0.001), longer ventilator days (coefficient ß , 2.020; SE, 0.528; p <0.001), and lower mortality rate (OR], 0.247; 95% CI, 0.135-0.454; p <0.001). INTERPRETATION: Timely rib fixation can improve the mortality rate of patients with flail chest and a concomitant mild-to-moderate head injury.

The three-dimensional weakly supervised deep learning algorithm for traumatic splenic injury detection and sequential localization: an experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Splenic injury is the most common solid visceral injury in blunt abdominal trauma, and high-resolution abdominal computed tomography (CT) can adequately detect the injury. However, these lethal injuries sometimes have been overlooked in current practice. Deep learning (DL) algorithms have proven their capabilities in detecting abnormal findings in medical images. The aim of this study is to develop a three-dimensional, weakly supervised DL algorithm for detecting splenic injury on abdominal CT using a sequential localization and classification approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The dataset was collected in a tertiary trauma center on 600 patients who underwent abdominal CT between 2008 and 2018, half of whom had splenic injuries. The images were split into development and test datasets at a 4 : 1 ratio. A two-step DL algorithm, including localization and classification models, was constructed to identify the splenic injury. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Grad-CAM (Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping) heatmaps from the test set were visually assessed. To validate the algorithm, we also collected images from another hospital to serve as external validation data. RESULTS: A total of 480 patients, 50% of whom had spleen injuries, were included in the development dataset, and the rest were included in the test dataset. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT in the emergency room. The automatic two-step EfficientNet model detected splenic injury with an AUROC of 0.901 (95% CI: 0.836-0.953). At the maximum Youden index, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 0.88, 0.81, 0.92, 0.91, and 0.83, respectively. The heatmap identified 96.3% of splenic injury sites in true positive cases. The algorithm achieved a sensitivity of 0.92 for detecting trauma in the external validation cohort, with an acceptable accuracy of 0.80. CONCLUSIONS: The DL model can identify splenic injury on CT, and further application in trauma scenarios is possible.

Spleen size greater than 9.76 cm may impact the treatment strategy for blunt splenic injury in adults - A retrospective analysis of experience at a tertiary trauma center in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The present study investigated the impact of splenomegaly on the treatment outcomes of blunt splenic injury patients. METHODS: All blunt splenic injury patients were enrolled between 2010 and 2018. The exclusion criteria were age less than 18 years, missing data, and splenectomy performed at another hospital. The patients were divided into two groups based on the presence of splenomegaly, defined as a spleen length over 9.76 cm on axial computed tomography. The primary outcome was the need for hemostatic interventions. RESULTS: A total of 535 patients were included. Patients with splenomegaly had more high-grade splenic injuries (p = 0.007). Hemostatic treatments (p < 0.001) and transarterial embolization (p = 0.003) were more frequently required for patients with splenomegaly. Multivariate analysis showed that male sex (p = 0.023), more packed red blood cell transfusions (p = 0.001), splenomegaly (p = 0.019) and grade 3-5 splenic injury (p < 0.001) were predictors of hemostatic treatment. The failure rate of transarterial embolization was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.180). The sensitivity and specificity for splenomegaly in predicting hemostatic procedures were 48.8% and 66.5%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 62.8% and 52.9%, respectively. The overall mortality rate was 3.7%. CONCLUSION: Splenomegaly is an independent predictor for the requirement of hemostatic treatments in blunt splenic injury patients, especially transarterial embolization. Transarterial embolization is as effective for blunt splenic injury patients with splenomegaly as it is for those with a normal spleen.

Could video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery be feasible for blunt trauma patients with massive haemothorax?

INTRODUCTION: The study reviewed the experience of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of massive haemothorax (MHT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All adult patients who sustained blunt trauma with a diagnosis of traumatic haemothorax or pneumothorax (ICD9 860; ICD10 S27.0-2), injury to the heart and lungs (ICD9 861; ICD10 S26, S27.3-9), and injury to the blood vessels of the thorax (ICD9 901; ICD10 S25) were queried from the trauma registry between 2014 and 2018. Patients who had chest tube drainage amounts meeting the criteria for MHT and who underwent subsequent operations were eligible for analyses. The patients were divided into VATS or thoracotomy groups based on the surgical modalities. Descriptions and analyses of the two groups were made. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were enroled in the study, including 8 females (21%) and 30 males. The median age was 47.0 (first quartile (Q1) 25.5 and third quartile (Q3) 59.3) years. Twenty-three patients were in the VATS group, six (26%) of whom were converted to thoracotomy. There were no obvious differences in age, sex, pulse rate, or systolic pressure on arrival to the ED or after resuscitation between the two groups. The laboratory data were worse amongst the thoracotomy group, especially the arterial blood gas analysis (ABG) results: pH 7.2 (7.1, 7.3) vs. 7.4 (7.2, 7.4); HCO3 14.6 (12.4, 18.7) vs. 19.7 (16.1, 23.9) mEq/L; base excess (BE) -12.6 (-15.8, -7.8) vs. -5.2 (-11.1, -0.9) mEq/L. The PaO2/FiO2 ratio was lower in the thoracotomy group (91.4 (68.5, 193.3) vs. 245.3 (95.7, 398.0) mmHg). The thoracotomy group had coagulopathy (INR 1.6 (1.2, 1.9) vs. 1.3 (1.1, 1.4)) and required more blood transfusions (WB and PRBC 36.0 (16.0, 48.0) vs. 12.0 (4.0, 24.0) units; FFP 20.0 (6.0, 50.0) vs. 6.0 (2.0, 20.0) unit). No factors associated with VATS conversion to thoracotomy could be identified. CONCLUSIONS: VATS could be applied to selected blunt trauma patients with MHT. The major differences between the VATS and thoracotomy groups were coagulopathy, acidosis, PaO2/FiO2 ratio < 200 mmHg, or a persistent need for blood transfusion.

The highest troponin I level during admission is associated with mortality in blunt cardiac injury patients.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels are usually measured in primary evaluations of blunt cardiac injury (BCI) patients. We evaluated the associations of cTnI levels with the outcomes of BCI patients at different times. METHODS: From 2015 to 2019, blunt chest trauma patients with elevated cTnI levels were compared with patients without elevated cTnI levels using propensity score matching (PSM) to minimize selection bias. The cTnI levels at different times in the survivors and nonsurvivors were compared. RESULTS: A total of 2,287 blunt chest trauma patients were included, and 57 (2.5%) of the patients had BCIs. PSM showed that patients with and without elevated cTnI levels had similar mortality rates (13.0% vs. 11.1%, p-value = 0.317], hospital lengths of stay (LOSs) [17.3 (14.4) vs. 15.5 (22.2) days, p-value = 0.699] and intensive care unit (ICU) LOSs [7.7 (12.1) vs. 6.4 (15.4) days, p-value = 0.072]. Among the BCI patients, nonsurvivors had a significantly higher highest cTnI level during the observation period than survivors. Additionally, patients who needed surgical intervention had significantly higher highest cTnI levels than patients who did not. CONCLUSIONS: An elevated cTnI level is insufficient for the evaluation of BCI and the determination of the need for further treatment. The highest cTnI level during the observation period may be related to mortality and the need for surgery in BCI patients.

Preinjury warfarin does not cause failure of nonoperative management in patients with blunt hepatic, splenic or renal injuries.

BACKGROUND: For patients sustaining major trauma, preinjury warfarin use may make adequate haemostasis difficult. This study aimed to determine whether preinjury warfarin would result in more haemostatic interventions (transarterial embolization [TAE] or surgeries) and a higher failure rate of nonoperative management for blunt hepatic, splenic or renal injuries. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) from 2003 to 2015. Patients with hepatic, splenic or renal injuries were identified. The primary outcome measurement was the need for invasive procedures to stop bleeding. One-to-two propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize selection bias. RESULTS: A total of 37,837 patients were enrolled in the study, and 156 (0.41%) had preinjury warfarin use. With proper 1:2 PSM, patients who received warfarin preinjury were found to require more haemostatic interventions (39.9% vs. 29.1%, p=0.016). The differences between the two study groups were that patients with preinjury warfarin required more TAE than the controls (16.3% vs 8.2%, p = 0.009). No significant increases were found in the need for surgeries (exploratory laparotomy (5.2% vs 3.6%, p = 0.380), hepatorrhaphy (9.2% vs 7.2%, p = 0.447), splenectomy (13.1% vs 13.7%, p = 0.846) or nephrectomy (2.0% vs 0.7%, p = 0.229)). Seven out of 25 patients (28.0%) in the warfarin group required further operations after TAE, which was not significantly different from that in the nonwarfarin group (four out of 25 patients, 16.0%, p = 0.306) CONCLUSION: Preinjury warfarin increases the need for TAE but not surgeries. With proper haemostasis with TAE and resuscitation, nonoperative management can still be applied to patients with preinjury warfarin sustaining blunt hepatic, splenic or renal injuries. Patients with preinjury warfarin had a higher risk for surgery after TAE.

The Current Diagnostic Accuracy on Free Peritoneal Fluid in Computed Tomography to Determinate the Necessity of Surgery in Blunt Bowel and Mesenteric Trauma-Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Traumatic bowel mesenteric injury (TBMI) is a challenge in trauma care. The presence of free peritoneal fluid (FF) in computed tomography (CT) was considered the indication for surgical intervention. However, conservative treatment should be applied for minor injuries. We conduct a systematic review to analyze how reliable the FF is to assess the TBMI. Publications were retrieved by structured searching among databases, review articles and major textbooks. For statistical analysis, summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROCs) were computed using hierarchical models. Fourteen studies enrolling 4336 patients were eligible for final qualitative analysis. The SROC line was created by a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model. The summary sensitivity of FF to predict surgical TBMI was 0.793 (95% CI: 0.635-0.894), and the summary specificity of FF to predict surgical TBMI was 0.733 (95% CI: 0.468-0.896). The diagnostic odds ratio was 10.531 (95% CI: 5.556-19.961). This study represents the most robust evidence (level 3a) to date that FF is not the absolute but an acceptable indicator for surgically important TBMI. However, there is still a need for randomized controlled trials to confirm.

Aspirin does not increase the need for haemostatic interventions in blunt liver and spleen injuries.

PURPOSE: The prohemorrhagic effect of aspirin may cause concern about worse prognoses when treating blunt hepatic or splenic injuries. This study investigated whether preinjury aspirin yields an increasing need for haemostatic interventions. METHODS: Admission and outpatient records were extracted from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) from 2003 to 2015. Patients with splenic or hepatic injuries were identified, and those with preinjury nonaspirin APAC or with penetrating injuries were excluded. The primary outcome measurement was the necessity of invasive procedures to stop bleeding, including transarterial embolization (TAE) and surgeries. One-to-two propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize selection bias. Multilogistic regression (MLR) analysis was used to identify factors associated with haemostatic interventions. RESULTS: A total of 20,470 patients had blunt hepatic injuries, and 15,235 had blunt splenic injuries, of whom 691 (3.4%) and 667 (4.4%) used preinjury aspirin, respectively. In the blunt hepatic injury cohort, there was no significant difference in the need for haemostatic procedures (TAE (6.1% vs 6.1%, p = 1.000), exploratory laparotomy (3.3% vs 4.3%, p = 0.312), hepatectomy (3.0% vs 2.7%, p = 0.686) or hepatorrhaphy (14.3% vs 15.0%, p = 0.683)). Regarding the blunt splenic injury cohort, there was no significant difference in the need for haemostatic procedures (TAE (11.5% vs 10.6%, p = 0.553), splenectomy (43.5% vs 41.4%, p = 0.230) or splenorrhaphy (3.0% vs 3.3%, p = 0.117)). An MLR analysis showed that preinjury aspirin did not increase the need for haemostatic interventions in either cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Preinjury aspirin use is not associated with increased haemostatic procedures in blunt hepatic or splenic injuries.

Is massive hemothorax still an absolute indication for operation in blunt trauma?

BACKGROUND: Surgery is usually suggested to treat massive haemothorax (MHT). The MHT criteria are based on penetrating trauma observations in military scenarios; the need for surgery in blunt trauma patients remains questionable. This study aimed to determine the characteristics of blunt trauma patients with MHT who required surgery. METHODS: Patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) with traumatic haemothorax or pneumothorax, heart and lung injuries, and thoracic blood vessel injuries from Jan 1, 2014, to Dec 31, 2018, were reviewed. The inclusion criterion was a chest tube drainage amount that met the MHT criteria. Therapeutic operations were defined as those involving surgical haemostasis; otherwise, operations were considered non-therapeutic. The non-therapeutic operation group included the patients who received nonoperative management. The characteristics of the therapeutic and non-therapeutic operation groups were compared. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enroled in the study. Six patients received conservative treatment and were discharged uneventfully. Eleven patients underwent non-therapeutic operations. The patients with surgical bleeding had a high pulse rate (125.0 (111.0, 135.0) vs. 116.0 (84.0, 121.0) bpm, p = 0.013); low systolic blood pressure (SBP) after resuscitation (106.0 (84.0, 127.0) vs. 121.0 (116.0, 134.0) mmHg, p = 0.040); low pH (7.2 (7.2, 7.3) vs. 7.4 (7.3, 7.4), p = 0.002); and low bicarbonate (17.8 (14.6, 21.5) vs. 21.4 (17.0, 21.5) mEq/L, p = 0.038), low base excess (-9.1 (-13.4, -4.5) vs. -3.8 (-10.1, -0.7), p = 0.028), and high lactate (5.7 (3.3, 7.8) vs. 1.8 (1.7, 2.8) mmol/L, p = 0.002) levels. CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment could be performed selectively in patients with MHT. Lactate could be a predictor of the need for surgical intervention in blunt trauma patients with MHT.

Eighteen years' experience of traumatic subclavian vascular injury in a tertiary referral trauma center.

PURPOSE: Traumatic subclavian vascular injury (TSVI) is rare but often fatal. The precise diagnosis of TSVI remains challenging mainly because of its occult nature, less typical presentations, and being overlooked in the presence of polytrauma. Compared to penetrating injuries, it is even more difficult to identify TSVI in patients who have blunt injuries and no visible bleeding. The risk factors associated with TSVI in patients with thoracic trauma are unclear. The aims of this study were to identify risk factors for TSVI in a cohort of patients with thoracic vascular injuries and to report outcomes after clinical treatment. METHODS: From January 2009 to June 2017, 39586 patients were admitted to our hospital (a level I trauma center) due to trauma, and 136 patients with thoracic vascular injury were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively reviewed data from medical records including demographic characteristics, injury scoring systems (RTS, ISS, NISS, TRISS and AIS), management and outcomes. Patients were further divided into the TSVI group (patients with TSVI) and the non-TSVI group (patients with thoracic vascular injuries other than TSVI). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify independent risk factors. RESULTS: The enrolled 136 patients suffered mostly from blunt trauma (89.0%) and 22 of them had TSVI. When compared to the non-TSVI group, the TSVI group had lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores (p = 0.002; especially GCS ≤ 12), less concurrent abdominal injury (p < 0.001), lower Injury Severity Scales (ISS) (p = 0.007) and New Injury Severity Scales (NISS) (p < 0.002) but had higher Abbreviated Injury Scales (AIS) of the head ≥ 3 (p = 0.009) and rates of clavicular or scapular fractures (p = 0.013). No difference was detected between the two groups with regard to age, gender, trauma mechanism, vital signs on arrival, or rate of facial and extremities injury. In multivariate regression analyses, GCS ≤ 12, AIS of the head ≥ 3 and the presence of clavicular or scapular fractures were independent risk factors for TSVI (p = 0.026, p = 0.043 and p = 0.005, respectively) after adjustment for confounding factors. Open and endovascular repair were two surgical procedures utilized for these TSVI patients with an overall mortality rate of 18.2%. No difference was found between these groups with regard to mortality rate and the length of ICU stay, but the patients in the TSVI group had a shorter length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that GCS ≤ 12, AIS of the head ≥ 3 and the presence of clavicular or scapular fractures were independent risk factors for TSVI in patients with thoracic vascular injuries. For patients with thoracic trauma, TSVI should be considered for prompt management when patients exhibit concurrent injuries to the head, clavicle or scapula.

Deep coma does not always predict poor outcomes among patients with polytrauma.

PURPOSES: This study aimed to clarify the prognosis of polytrauma patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with a Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS) of 3. METHODS: A trauma registry system has been established at our institution since 2009. The current study reviewed patients in the registry who presented to the ED with a GCS of 3 from January 2011 to December 2015. Surviving and non-surviving patients were compared to identify the prognostic factors of patient survival. The study also aimed to determine the factors contributing to patients who survived with a GCS > 13 at discharge. RESULTS: During the study period, 145 patients were enrolled in the study, 119 of whom (82.1%) did not survive the traumatic insult. Of the 26 survivors, 13 (9.0%) had a GCS of 14 or 15 at discharge. The multiple logistic regression revealed that a lack of bilateral dilated and fixed pupils (BFDP) (OR 5.967, 95% CI 1.780-19.997, p = 0.004) and a GCS > 3 after resuscitation (OR 6.875, 95% CI 2.135-22.138, p = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of survival. Based on the multiple logistic regression, an age under 40 years (OR 16.405, 95% CI 1.520-177.066, p = 0.021) and a GCS > 3 after resuscitation (OR 12.100, 95% CI 1.058-138.352, p = 0.045) were independent prognostic factors of a GCS > 13 at discharge. CONCLUSION: Aggressive resuscitation still provided benefit to polytrauma patients presenting with a GCS of 3, especially those with a rapid response to the resuscitation. Young patients with a deep coma on arrival had a higher probability of functional recovery after resuscitation in the ED.

Concomitant external and internal hemorrhage: Challenges to managing patients with open pelvic fracture.

INTRODUCTION: Managing patients with open pelvic fractures continues to be challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach. In this study, we examined the characteristics of patients with open pelvic fractures and strategies for managing such patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of patients with open pelvic fractures from January 2010 to August 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Emergency surgery was performed to control hemorrhaging in patients with an active external hemorrhage. Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) was used for definitive hemostasis. The relation between cause of death and timing of death was examined. We also compared the characteristics of surviving and non-surviving patients. Furthermore, patients who received both surgery and post-operative TAE were analyzed in detail. RESULTS: In total, 42 patients with open pelvic fractures were enrolled in the study. The overall mortality rate among patients with open pelvic fractures was 26.2%. Patients whose deaths were related to hemorrhaging and associated injuries died significantly earlier than patients whose deaths were related to sepsis and multiple organ failure (1.3days vs. 12.3days, p<0.001). Sixteen patients (38.1%) received TAE for hemostasis, and their systolic blood pressure (SBP) improved significantly following TAE (from 88.4mmHg to 111.6mmHg, p<0.05). In the patients who received both surgery and post-operative TAE (n=8), the SBP increased significantly after surgery (from 58.8mmHg to 81.1mmHg, p<0.05). Similarly, the patients' SBP after TAE was significantly higher than their post-operative SBP (110.5mmHg vs. 81.1mmHg, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Active external hemorrhaging was initially controlled when managing patients with open pelvic fractures; however, most patients also required TAE for definitive hemorrhage control. Early TAE should be considered due to the high probability of concomitant internal and external hemorrhage. Close observation and further infection control are important following the hemostatic procedure.

Non-operative management is feasible for selected blunt trauma patients with pericardial effusion.

BACKGROUND: Blunt pericardial effusion (BPE) in trauma patients can be suggestive of injuries to the heart or great vessels. Surgical exploration is the mainstay of management; however, the effectiveness of non-operative management in this patient group remains unclear. METHODS: Patients presenting with BPE in the trauma registry system at our level I trauma center were reviewed. Patients with and without cardiovascular (CVS) injury were compared to identify predictors for CVS injury and to understand the factors related to the requirement for surgery. Patients with and without CVS injury who presented with stable hemodynamics and initially received conservative management were also compared. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled in the study with a mean age of 53.2 (standard deviation (SD) 18.0) years and a mean injury severity score (ISS) of 26.7 (SD 9.0). Eleven patients presented with systolic blood pressure (SBP)<100mmHg, and immediate surgical intervention was performed. Eight patients had evidence of CVS injury (73%). Nineteen patients had stable hemodynamics and initially received conservative treatment. Of these, twelve patients received further surgical interventions, and only three had evidence of CVS injury (16%, 3/19). Comparisons of individuals with and without CVS injury revealed that the SBP on presentation was higher in patients without CVS injury than in those with CVS injury (132.7 (SD 41.3) mmHg vs. 95.6 (SD 21.1) mmHg). Clinically irrelevant differences between the two groups were observed for the creatine kinase (CK)-MB level, the troponin I level, the presence of an echocardiography tamponade sign, associated chest trauma and ISS. No remarkable predictors for CVS injury were found in hemodynamically stable patients. CONCLUSION: Non-operative management can be considered for patents with traumatic BPE and stable hemodynamics; however, this approach must be performed at an institution with adequate facilities and well-trained staff.

Impact of deferred surgical intervention on the outcome of external laryngeal trauma.

BACKGROUND: External laryngeal trauma (ELT) can be a fatal injury. Proper management of ELT significantly affects patient survival and quality of life. The optimal timing of surgical intervention is controversial. In this study, we review the incidence, management, and outcome of ELT and attempt to analyze the risk factors and prognosis of this injury. METHODS: We conducted retrospective review using prospective data collection from patients with ELT in a level I trauma center from May 2008 to May 2013. We retrieved data regarding the severity of ELT, Injury Severity Score (ISS), New Injury Severity Score (NISS), Reverse Trauma Score (RTS), surgical timing, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), hospital length of stay (HLOS), long-term outcome, and mortality. We analyzed the risk of prolonged hospitalization, adverse outcome, and mortality. RESULTS: The 48 patients in this cohort had a mean age of 40.8±19.6 years. Twenty-four patients underwent operation within 48 hours, 10 patients underwent operation after 48 hours, and the other 14 patients did not require surgical intervention. A high NISS and the necessity for operation prolonged the ICU LOS and the HLOS. A high ISS and a low RTS predicted mortality. Initial phonatory impairment and the necessity of surgical intervention increased adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, ELT leads to high mortality and morbidity. The mortality in our series was related to severe associated injuries and to initial physical decompensation. Proper resuscitation and aggressively physiologic compensation were more important in the initial phase. Deferred treatment was acceptable until the patients were ready for operation.

Factors affecting outcomes in penetrating diaphragmatic trauma.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUDS: Diagnosing penetrating diaphragmatic rupture (PDR) is a challenging aspect of managing thoracoabdominal injuries due to the lack of a typical clinical presentation. The mortality from PDR is variable and center-specific. In this study, we identified the incidence and clinical presentation of PDR at our institution and analyzed the factors that affected the length of hospital stay and mortality. METHODS: We collected all patients who were diagnosed with PDR from January 2001 through December 2010 at a Level I trauma center. We recorded demographic characteristics, clinical parameters, diagnostic images, trauma mechanism, location and severity of injuries, injury severity score (ISS), time to diagnosis, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), hospital length of stay (HLOS), and mortality. We analyzed the risk for mortality and prolonged hospitalization. RESULTS: Forty-one patients with a median age of 37 years were included. Thirty-six patients (87.8%) had an early diagnosis, and 5 patients (12.2%) had a delayed diagnosis requiring longer than 24 h. The median ICU LOS and HLOS were 2 and 11 days, respectively. High-grade PDR and lung injury increased the ICU LOS and HLOS. The total mortality rate was 7.3%. Multivariate analysis showed that hypothermia and hypotension were independent risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSION: Overlooking diaphragmatic rupture in patients with thoracoabdominal penetrating injury is not infrequent. A high index of suspicion is important for making the diagnosis. A high-grade PDR and associated lung injury prolonged the length of hospital stay. Profound hemorrhagic shock and associated physical decompensation have an impact on mortality.

Liver resection for complicated hepatocellular carcinoma: challenges but opportunity for long-term survivals.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often diagnosed late because of the lack of pathognomonic symptoms. This study evaluated outcomes following liver resection (LR) for patients with HCC presenting with large tumor size (over 10 cm), adjacent organ invasion, or ruptured tumor, which we termed as complicated HCC (cHCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 660 HCC patients who underwent LR between January 2001 and July 2005. The patients were grouped into cHCC and non-cHCC according to the defined criteria. The clinicopathological features were analyzed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Patients in the cHCC group required longer operative times and resulted in greater intraoperative blood loss and more severe surgical complications. The cHCC group had a higher incidence of HCC recurrence after LR, and the HCC recurrence had a tendency to be associated with extrahepatic metastasis. The 5-year RFS (P < 0.0001) and OS (P < 0.0001) of cHCC and non-cHCC patients were 18.5% and 28.9% versus 37.5% and 57.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LR for cHCC can be a great challenge for liver surgeons. However, with comparable operative mortality rates and acceptable survival times, surgical resection should always be considered performing in patients with cHCC, if clinically feasible.