RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection remains an effective method for the treatment of small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) (≤ 10 mm). Moreover, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with double band ligation (EMR-dB), a simplified modification of EMR with band ligation, is an alternative strategy to remove small rectal NETs. AIM: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of EMR-dB for the treatment of small rectal NETs (≤ 10 mm). METHODS: A total of 50 patients with small rectal NETs, without regional lymph node enlargement or distant metastasis confirmed by endoscopic ultrasound, computerized tomography scan, or magnetic resonance imaging, were enrolled in the study from March 2021 to June 2022. These patients were randomly assigned into the EMR-dB (n = 25) group or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) group (n = 25). The characteristics of the patients and tumors, procedure time, devices cost, complete resection rate, complications, and recurrence outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 25 patients (13 males, 12 females; age range 28-68 years old) in the EMR-dB group, and the ESD group contained 25 patients (15 males, 10 females; age range 25-70 years old). Both groups had similar lesion sizes (EMR-dB 4.53 ± 1.02 mm, ESD 5.140 ± 1.74 mm; P = 0.141) and resected lesion sizes(1.32 ± 0.52 cm vs 1.58 ± 0.84 cm; P = 0.269). Furthermore, the histological complete resection and en bloc resection rates were achieved in all patients (100% for each). In addition, there was no significant difference in the complication rate between the two groups. However, the procedure time was significantly shorter and the devices cost was significantly lower in the EMR-dB group. Besides, there was no recurrence in both groups during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The procedure time of EMR-dB was shorter compared with ESD, and both approaches showed a similar curative effect. Taken together, EMR-dB was a feasible and safe option for the treatment of small rectal NETs.
RESUMO
Background: Psychological problems may promote peptic ulcers. Ulcer-like wounds can be formed after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The influence of family support on the healing of gastric ESD-induced ulcers remains largely undetermined. Objective: In the present study, we aimed to assess the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores and the incidence of post-ESD complications in patients with family support in the care process and those in the non-relative group. Materials and methods: A total of 191 patients aged between 30 and 70 years who received gastric ESD were evaluated with the Chinese version of HADS. Differences in depression and anxiety between the two groups were compared using the chi-square test and t-test. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine whether anxiety and depression were the risk factors for post-ESD complications. Results: The mean values of HADS-A (4.61 ± 2.89 vs. 5.56 ± 3.07, p = 0.042) and HADS-D (4.14 ± 3.03 vs. 4.97 ± 2.61, p = 0.048) scores were significantly lower in patients with accompanying relatives compared with those in the non-relative group. Besides, through the pre-ESD and post-ESD self-contrast, the scores of anxiety and depression in the relative-group were 0.57 and 0.56, respectively (p < 0.001), while those in the non-relative group were increased by 1.43 and 1.49, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that HADS-A, HADS-D scores, and age were significantly correlated with post-ESD abdominal pain (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The occurrence and degree of adverse emotions such as psychological anxiety and depression in patients who received gastric ESD with accompanying relatives during hospitalization may were reduced, and the incidence of gastric post-ESD abdominal pain may was also decreased.