Immunotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring oncogenic driver alterations other than EGFR: a multicenter real-world analysis.

Background: The administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with oncogenic driver alterations other than epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) aroused a heated discussion. We thus aimed to evaluate ICI treatment in these patients in real-world routine clinical practice. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted for NSCLC patients with at least one gene alteration (KRAS, HER2, BRAF, MET, RET, ALK, ROS1) receiving ICI monotherapy or combination treatment. The data regarding clinicopathologic characteristics, clinical efficacy, and safety were investigated. Results: A total of 216 patients were included, the median age was 60 years, 72.7% of patients were male, and 46.8% had a smoking history. The molecular alterations involved KRAS (n=95), HER2 (n=42), BRAF (n=22), MET (n=21), RET (n=14), ALK (n=14), and ROS1 (n=8); 56.5% of patients received immunotherapy in the first-line, and the rest 43.5% were treated as a second-line and above. For the entire cohort who received immunotherapy-based regimens in the first-line, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 24.8 months. For the entire cohort who received immunotherapy-based regimens in the second-line and above, the median PFS was 4.7 months and median OS was 17.1 months. KRAS mutated NSCLC treated with immunotherapy-based regimens in the first-line setting had a median PFS and OS were 7.8 and 26.1 months, respectively. Moreover, the median PFS and OS of immunotherapy-based regimens for KRAS-mutant NSCLC that progressed after chemotherapy were 5.9 and 17.1 months. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level was not consistently associated with response to immunotherapy across different gene alteration subsets. In the KRAS group, PD-L1 positivity [tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥1%] was associated with better PFS and OS according to the multivariate Cox analysis. No statistically significant association was found for smoking status, age, or gender with clinical efficacy in any gene group analyses. Conclusions: KRAS-mutant NSCLC could obtain clinical benefits from ICIs either for treatment-naive patients or those who have experienced progression after chemotherapy, and PD-L1 positive expression (TPS >1%) may be a potential positive predictor. For NSCLC with ALK, RET and ROS1 rearrangement, MET exon 14 skipping mutation, or BRAF V600E mutation, effectiveness of single or combined ICI therapy remains limited, therefore, targeted therapies should be considered prior to immunotherapy regimens. Future studies should address the investigation of better predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy response in oncogene-driven NSCLC.

Non-viral Gene Therapy for Melanoma Using Lysenin from Eisenia Foetida.

Earthworms, long utilized in traditional medicine, serve as a source of inspiration for modern therapeutics. Lysenin, a defensive factor in the coelom fluid of the earthworm Eisenia fetida, has multiple bioactivities. However, the inherent toxicity of Lysenin as a pore-forming protein (PFP) restricts its application in therapy. Here, a gene therapy strategy based on Lysenin for cancer treatment is presented. The formulation consists of polymeric nanoparticles complexed with the plasmid encoding Lysenin. After transfection in vitro, melanoma cells can express Lysenin, resulting in necrosis, autophagy, and immunogenic cell death. The secretory signal peptide alters the intracellular distribution of the expressed product of Lysenin, thereby potentiating its anticancer efficacy. The intratumor injection of Lysenin gene formulation can efficiently kill the transfected melanoma cells and activate the antitumor immune response. Notably, no obvious systemic toxicity is observed during the treatment. Non-viral gene therapy based on Lysenin derived from Eisenia foetida exhibits potential in cancer therapy, which can inspire future cancer therapeutics.

First-line treatment of driver gene-negative metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with malignant pleural effusion: Should chemotherapy be combined with an immune checkpoint inhibitor or bevacizumab?

Patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (MLA) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE) without driver gene mutations have a poor prognosis. None of the standard treatment strategies is recommended for such patients. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of the first-line treatment for this specific population: standard platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (CT), CT plus an immune checkpoint inhibitor (CT plus ICI), and CT plus bevacizumab (CT plus Bev). A total of 323 eligible patients were enrolled: CT alone (n = 166), CT plus Bev (n = 72), and CT plus ICI (n = 85). Treatment efficacy assessments were performed every two cycles according to the RECIST guidelines. The endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Kaplan-Meier (K‒M) curves and the log-rank test were used to compare OS and PFS. p < 0.05 was the threshold of significance (statistical software: SPSS). The median follow-up was 11.4 months (range, 2.1-49.6 months). PFS and OS in the CT plus ICI/CT plus Bev cohort were significantly longer than those in the CT group (PFS: 7.8/6.4/3.9 months, p < 0.0001; OS: 16.4/15.6/9.6 months, p < 0.0001, respectively). CT plus Bev had better PFS and OS than CT plus ICI/CT in PD-L1 < 1% patients (PFS: 8.4/5.0/3.8 months, p < 0.0001; OS: 15.6/12.9/9.3 months, p < 0.0001). Among patients with PD-L1 1-49%, CT plus ICI led to a longer PFS and OS (PFS: 8.9/5.8/4.2 months, p = 0.009; OS: 24.2/18.8/11.5 months, p = 0.03). In the cohort with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, CT plus ICI was still the best first-line treatment (PFS: 19.7/13.8/9.6 months, p = 0.033; OS: 27.2/19.6/14.9 months, p = 0.047). In driver gene-negative MLA with MPE, CT plus Bev or ICI better controlled MPE and significantly prolonged survival compared to CT alone. PD-L1 expression (negative/positive) may be a key factor influencing the choice of CT plus Bev or ICI.

Epithelial Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Mimics Lymphoma on 18 F-FDG PET/MRI : A Case Report.

ABSTRACT: Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare tumor with a poor prognosis. We describe a case of 55-year-old man without asbestos exposure history presenting with extensive lymph nodes with high 18 F-FDG uptake in PET/MRI but atypical pleural manifestations thereby being misdiagnosed for lymphoma. Pathological examination concludes for an epithelioid mesothelioma-associated lymph node metastasis. This case emphasizes that with the extensive lymph node abnormalities shown in PET imaging, in addition to the general consideration of lymphoma, it is still necessary to be vigilant about the possibility of mesothelioma and emphasizes the necessity of pathological examination.

Rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a promising therapeutic strategy. The situation for ICI rechallenge can be divided into three categories: adverse events (AEs); resistance to ICIs, and rechallenge becomes compulsive because of tumor relapse while the patients had completed a 2 year course of immunotherapy. However, these categories are still controversial and should be explored further. Through voting at the 6th Straits Summit Forum on Lung Cancer, in this study we summarize the consensus of 147 experts in ICI rechallenges. A total of 97.74% experts agreed to rechallenge; 48.87% experts rechallenge with the original drug, and the others rechallenge with a different drug; 40.3% agreed to rechallenge directly after progression; 88.06% experts agreed to ICI rechallenge with a combination regimen; and factors such as previous performance status score, PD-1 expression, and age should also be considered. Understanding the the clinical studies in ICI rechallenge could bring us one step closer to understanding the consensus. In patients with advanced NSCLC who have suffered recurrent or distant metastasis after immunotherapy, the option of rechallenge with ICIs is a promising treatment option.

Baseline C-reactive protein predicts efficacy of the first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy in advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective, multicenter study.

AIMS: To investigate the predictive value of baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on the efficacy of chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study spanning from January 2016 to December 2020, advanced LSCC patients initially treated with chemotherapy or a combination of chemotherapy and ICI were categorized into normal and elevated CRP subgroups. The relationship between CRP levels and treatment outcomes was analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and multivariate logistic regression, focusing primarily on the progression-free survival (PFS) endpoint, and secondarily on overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) endpoints. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with the log-rank test used for comparison between groups. RESULTS: Of the 245 patients evaluated, the 105 who received a combination of chemotherapy and ICI with elevated baseline CRP levels exhibited a significant reduction in PFS (median 6.5 months vs. 11.8 months, HR, 1.78; 95% CI: 1.12-2.81; p = 0.013) compared to those with normal CRP levels. Elevated CRP was identified as an independent risk factor for poor PFS through multivariate-adjusted analysis. However, among the 140 patients receiving chemotherapy alone, baseline CRP levels did not significantly influence PFS. Furthermore, within the combination therapy group, there was a notable decrease in the ORR (51% vs. 71%, p = 0.035), coupled with a significantly shorter OS (median 20.9 months vs. 31.5 months, HR, 2.24; 95% CI: 1.13-4.44; p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced LSCC, elevated baseline CRP levels were identified as an independent predictive factor for the efficacy of combination therapy with chemotherapy and ICI, but not in chemotherapy alone. This suggests that CRP may be a valuable biomarker for guiding treatment strategies.

Recombinant human thrombopoietin therapy for primary immune thrombocytopenia in pregnancy: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for pregnant women with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) who do not respond to first-line treatment are limited. Few studies have reported the use of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) for this subset of patients. AIMS: To investigate the efficacy and safety of rhTPO in ITP during pregnancy and determine obstetric outcomes and predictors of treatment response. METHODS: From July 2013 to October 2022, the data of 81 pregnant women with ITP and a platelet count < 30 × 109/L who did not respond to steroids and/or intravenous immunoglobulin were retrospectively analysed. Of these patients, 33 received rhTPO treatment (rhTPO group) while 48 did not (control group). Baseline characteristics, haematological disease outcomes before delivery, obstetric outcomes, and adverse events were compared between groups. In the rhTPO group, a generalised estimating equation (GEE) was used to investigate the factors influencing the response to rhTPO treatment. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were comparable between both groups (P > 0.05, both). Compared with controls, rhTPO patients had higher platelet counts (median [interquartile range]: 42 [21.5-67.5] vs. 25 [19-29] × 109/L, P = 0.002), lower bleeding rate (6.1% vs. 25%, P = 0.027), and lower platelet transfusion rate before delivery (57.6% vs. 97.9%, P < 0.001). Gestational weeks of delivery (37.6 [37-38.4] vs 37.1 [37-37.2] weeks, P = 0.001) were longer in the rhTPO group than in the control group. The rates of caesarean section, postpartum haemorrhage, foetal or neonatal complications, and complication types in both groups were similar (all P > 0.05). No liver or renal function impairment or thrombosis cases were observed in the rhTPO group. GEE analysis revealed that the baseline mean platelet volume (MPV) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.522, P = 0.002) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (OR: 1.214, P = 0.025) were predictors of response to rhTPO treatment. CONCLUSION: rhTPO may be an effective and safe treatment option for pregnancies with ITP that do not respond to first-line treatment; it may have slightly prolonged the gestational age of delivery. Patients with a low baseline MPV and high baseline PLR may be more responsive to rhTPO treatment. The present study serves as a foundation for future research.

Clinical definition of secondary resistance to immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 blockade) have revolutionized the treatment landscape in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Secondary resistance to immunotherapy (IO), which poses a substantial challenge in clinical settings, occurs in several initial responders. Currently, new treatment approaches have been extensively evaluated in investigational studies for these patients to tackle this difficult problem; however, the lack of consistency in clinical definition, uniform criteria for enrollment in clinical trials, and interpretation of results remain significant hurdles to progress. Thus, our expert panel comprehensively synthesized data from current studies to propose a practical clinical definition of secondary resistance to immunotherapy in NSCLC in metastatic and neoadjuvant settings. In addition to patients who received IO alone (including IO-IO combinations), we also generated a definition for patients treated with chemotherapy plus IO. This consensus aimed to provide guidance for clinical trial design and facilitate future discussions with investigators. It should be noted that additional updates in this consensus are required when new data is available.

Secure reversal of immune evasion from refractory NSCLC and highly contagious CoV-2 mutants by using 3D-engineered multifunctional biologics.

There is an imperative choice to develop a secure feasible strategy to address evasion dynamics of refractory tumors and SARS-CoV-2-variants, while stem cell-based protocol may be more reliable as its unique ability for resetting multifunctional immunity to address progressive tumor and the constantly-evolving virus. In this study, spheroid-embryonoid stem cells from mature somatic cells were engineered as multifunctional biologics (3D-E/BSC) and inoculated in senile rhesus to identify secure potential against immune-evasion from viral-variants. Meanwhile, a cohort of eligible patients with stage IV NSCLC were approved for phase I clinical trials. Subsequently, long-lasting security and efficacy were validated by primate and clinical trials (p < 0.01) in that it could not only stimulate serological immunity, but also reset core immunity for hosts to address variant evasion after 3D-E/BSC withdrawal. Particularly, illustrated by single-cell evolving trajectory, 3D-E/BSC had securely reset senile thymus of aging hosts to remodel core immunity by rearranging naive rhythm to evolve TRGC2+/JCHAIN+NKT clusters to abolish tumoral and viral evasion dynamics with path-feedbacks of NSCLC and COVID-19 simultaneously activated, leading to continuous blockade of breakthrough infection of viral-mutants and long-term survival in one-third of terminal patients without adjuvant required. Our study may pioneer a practical multifunctional strategy to eliminate evasion of SARS-CoV-2 variants and refractory NSCLC so as for victims to restart a new life-equation.

Safety and Tolerability of Low-Dose Radiation and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy + Sintilimab for Treatment-Naïve Stage IV PD-L1+ Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

PURPOSE: Low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT) may enhance the synergistic antitumor effect of combined immunotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The safety and efficacy of this novel triple-combination therapy were evaluated for the first time as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective phase I study enrolled 29 patients and included a dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase. Patients received SBRT [30 Gray (Gy)/3f] to small lesions and LDRT (2 Gy/1f, 4 Gy/2f, or 10 Gy/5f) to a large lesion concurrently, followed by sintilimab (a programmed death-1 inhibitor). The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicities were observed during the dose-escalation phase; 4 Gy/2f was the recommended LDRT dose. Median follow-up was 15.6 months. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 96.6% (28/29) of patients [grade ≥ 3; 20.7% (6/29)]; 2 patients (6.9%) discontinued due to TRAEs. Seven patients experienced pneumonitis (grade 2, n = 6; grade 3, n = 1). Immune-related adverse events were noted in 58.6% (17/29) of patients. In patients with tumor assessment (n = 28), ORR and confirmed ORR were 60.7% and 57.1%, respectively. Median PFS was 8.6 months (95% confidence interval, 3.7-16.5), and median OS was not reached. Exploratory analyses suggested both expanded and newly emerging T-cell receptor clonotypes were associated with better PFS. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that the novel SBRT + LDRT + sintilimab therapy is safe and promising in patients with programmed death ligand-1-positive, driver gene-negative primary metastatic NSCLC.

Central nervous system efficacy of rezivertinib (BPI-7711) in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M mutation: A pooled analysis of two clinical studies.

BACKGROUND: Rezivertinib (BPI-7711) is a novel third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) which revealed the systematic and central nervous system (CNS) antitumor activities for EGFR T790M-mutated advanced NSCLC in previous clinical studies and is further analyzed here. METHODS: Eligible patients from the previous phase I and phase IIb studies of rezivertinib were included for pooled analysis. Post-progressive patients who received a prescribed dosage (≥180 mg) of rezivertinib orally once daily were included in full analysis set (FAS), while those with stable, asymptomatic CNS lesions, including measurable and non-measurable ones at baseline were included in CNS full analysis set (cFAS). Patients with measurable CNS lesions were included in CNS evaluable for response set (cEFR). BICR-assessed CNS objective response rate (CNS-ORR), CNS disease control rate (CNS-DCR), CNS duration of response (CNS-DoR), CNS progression-free survival (CNS-PFS), and CNS depth of response (CNS-DepOR) were evaluated. RESULTS: 355 patients were included in FAS, among whom 150 and 45 patients were included in cFAS and cEFR. This pooled analysis showed the CNS-ORR was 32.0% (48/150; 95% CI: 24.6-40.1%) and the CNS-DCR was 42.0% (63/150; 95% CI: 34.0-50.3%) in cFAS, while that in cEFR were 68.9% (31/45; 95% CI: 53.4-81.8%) and 100% (45/45; 95% CI: 92.1-100.0%). In cEFR, the median CNS-DepOR and the mean of CNS-DepOR were -52.0% (range: -100.0 to 16.1%) and -46.8% (95% CI: -55.5 to -38.1%). In cFAS, the median CNS-DoR and CNS-PFS were 13.8 (95% CI: 9.6-not calculable [NC]) and 16.5 (95% CI: 13.7-NC) months. CONCLUSIONS: Rezivertinib demonstrated encouraging clinical CNS efficacy among advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M mutation and CNS metastases.

A novel prognostic nomogram for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a comprehensive analysis of 321 patients.

The cure rate of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adolescents and adults remains poor. This study aimed to establish a prognostic model for ≥14-year-old patients with ALL to guide treatment decisions. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 321 ALL patients between January 2017 and June 2020. Patients were randomly (2:1 ratio) divided into either the training or validation set. A nomogram was used to construct a prognostic model. Multivariate Cox analysis of the training set showed that age > 50 years, white blood cell count > 28.52×109/L, and MLL rearrangement were independent risk factors for overall survival (OS), while platelet count >37×109/L was an independent protective factor. The nomogram was established according to these independent prognostic factors in the training set, where patients were grouped into two categories: low-risk (≤13.15) and high-risk (>13.15). The survival analysis, for either total patients or sub-group patients, showed that both OS and progression-free survival (PFS) of low-risk patients was significantly better than that of high-risk patients. Moreover, treatment analysis showed that both OS and progression-free survival (PFS) of ALL with stem cell transplantation (SCT) were significantly better than that of ALL without SCT. Further stratified analysis showed that in low-risk patients, the OS and PFS of patients with SCT were significantly better than those of patients without SCT. In contrast, in high-risk patients, compared with non-SCT patients, receiving SCT can only significantly prolong the PFS, but it does not benefit the OS. We established a simple and effective prognostic model for ≥ 14-year-old patients with ALL that can provide accurate risk stratification and determine the clinical strategy.

Immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR or HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations: a real-world analysis.

Background: Due to less sensitivity to classic tyrosine kinase inhibitors, effective first-line treatment is limited in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations. Meanwhile, the impact of driver genes on the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors is discrepant. Our study aimed to assess the clinical response to immunotherapy in NSCLC patients with EGFR or HER2 ex20ins mutations. In parallel, patients treated with chemotherapy but without immunotherapy were included as controls. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients harboring ex20ins mutations treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and/or chemotherapy in the real world. The clinical response was assessed by progression-free survival (PFS) and the objective response rate (ORR). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to control for confounding factors between immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Results: Of 72 patients enrolled, 38 had been treated with one line of single-agent immunotherapy or combined therapy including immunotherapy, and 34 had received conventional chemotherapy without immunotherapy. Among patients treated with immunotherapy, the median PFS was 10.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 8.2-13.2 months] in the first-line setting, with an ORR of 50% (8/16). The median PFS was significantly longer in the first-line immunotherapy group than in the chemotherapy group (10.7 vs. 4.6 months, P<0.001). A trend of an increased ORR in patients who received ICIs was observed compared with chemotherapy, but there was no statistical difference (50% vs. 21.9%, P=0.096). After PSM, the median PFS with first-line immunotherapy was still longer than that with chemotherapy (10.7 vs. 4.6 months, P=0.028). Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were observed in 13.2% (5/38) of patients, with the majority developing granulocytopenia (40%, 2/5). One patient discontinued treatment due to a grade 3 rash after three cycles of ICI plus anlotinib treatment. Conclusions: The results showed that immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy may play a role in the first-line treatment of NSCLC patients with ex20ins mutations. This finding requires further investigation for application.

Immunotherapy or antiangiogenic therapy plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment of patients with PD-L1(-) advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in a Chinese cohort.

PURPOSE: For patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), immunotherapy or antiangiogenic therapy combined with pemetrexed and cisplatin/carboplatin have both shown significant efficacy at programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels of <1%. Our study aimed to compare two first-line regimens for patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC who were negative for PD-L1. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted comparing the outcomes of patients with advanced PD-L1(-) nonsquamous NSCLC who were treated with antiangiogenic therapy plus chemotherapy (A Group) to those who were treated with anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies plus chemotherapy (mAbs) (B Group). Both regimens were evaluated for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and side effects. RESULTS: 114 patients were enrolled in the study, 82 in Group A and 32 in Group B. Those in Group A had a longer median PFS (9.8 vs. 6.7 months, p = 0.025). The OS was also achieved (p = 0.058). No statistically significant difference was seen in ORR (52.4% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.815) or DCR (93.9% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.225) between the two groups. Patients in the A group who did not smoke and did not have specific metastases could benefit from survival. Adverse events (AEs) in both groups were tolerated. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy outperformed immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in terms of PFS.

Optimal timing of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: For epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with limited brain metastases (BMs), who eventually receive both tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment and brain radiotherapy, the optimal timing of radiotherapy is not clear. The present retrospective analysis aimed to partly solve this problem. METHODS: In total 84 EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with limited BMs, who received both TKI treatment and brain hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT), were enrolled. Patients were divided into three groups based on whether the HSRT was administrated 2 weeks before or after the beginning of TKI treatment (upfront HSRT), when intracranial lesions stabilized after TKI treatment (consolidative HSRT), or when the intracranial disease progressed after TKI treatment (salvage HSRT). The clinical efficacy and toxicities were evaluated. RESULTS: The median intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and overall PFS calculated from the initiation of HSRT (iPFS1 and PFS1) of all patients were 17.5 and 13.1 months, respectively. The median iPFS and PFS calculated from the initiation of TKI treatment (iPFS2 and PFS2) of all patients were 24.1 and 18.4 months, respectively. Compared to consolidative and salvage HSRT, upfront HSRT improved iPFS1 (not reached vs. 17.5 months vs. 11.0 months, p < 0.001) and PFS1 (18.4 months vs. 9.1 months vs. 7.9 months, p < 0.001), and reduced the initial intracranial failure rate (12.5% vs. 48.1% vs. 56%, p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between the three groups for iPFS2, PFS2, and overall survival. Hepatic metastases and diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (ds-GPA) at 2-3 were poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: For patients who receive both TKI treatment and brain HSRT, the timing of HSRT does not seem to influence the eventual therapeutic effect. Further validation in prospective clinical studies is needed.

Real-world clinical analysis in 190 advanced NSCLC patients with uncommon EGFR mutations: A multi-center study.

Differently from epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) 19Del and L858R mutations, the panoramic description of uncommon EGFR mutations is far from mature. Our understanding of its population characteristics, treatment response, and drug resistance mechanisms needs urgent expansion and deepening. Our study enrolled 437 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer from four clinical centers and who had uncommon EGFR mutations. The clinical characteristics of all patients and the treatment outcomes of 190 advanced patients who received pharmacotherapy were analyzed. Moreover, the acquired resistance mechanisms were explored based on 53 tissue or liquid re-biopsy data in 45 patients. Patients with EGFR 20ins had a shorter survival time compared with patients with non-20ins mutations. In total, 149 cases had received EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI); afatinib was significantly superior to other EGFR-TKIs both in ORR and mPFS in all uncommon mutations and especially in the L861Q group. The most common acquired drug resistance mechanism was MET amplification, followed by EGFR T790M, which was significantly different from common EGFR mutations.

Extracellular Vesicles Expressing CD19 Antigen Improve Expansion and Efficacy of CD19-Targeted CAR-T Cells.

Background: CAR-T cell therapy is effective in the treatment of certain hematological malignancies, and the expansion and functional persistence of CAR-T cells in vivo are crucial to clinical efficacy. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of extracellular vesicles (EVs) modified with the CAR antigen to promote the efficacy of CAR-T cells in vivo. Methods: We generated HEK293T-derived EVs to present the CD19 antigen as the CAR target. In vitro, EVs expressing CD19 antigen (CD19 EVs) were co-incubated with anti-CD19 CAR-T cells. Then, proliferation, cytokine secretion, CD107a expression, tumor killing, subsets, and immune checkpoint expression were measured to assess CAR-T cell function. After infusion of CD19 EVs pretreated CAR-T cells into a lymphoma xenograft mouse model, flow cytometry and digital PCR were used to measure the expansion of CAR-T cells, and tumor volumes were continuously monitored to assess the anti-tumor efficacy of CAR-T cells in vivo. Another mouse model was created to investigate the effect of in vivo injection of CD19 EVs on the functional persistence of CAR-T cells, and safety was determined by histopathology of the main organs. Results: CD19 EVs activated CAR-T cells in an antigen-specific and dose-dependent manner and promoted the selective expansion and cytokine secretion of co-cultured CAR-T cells. Specifically, CD19 EVs preferably increased the expansion of the CAR-T subpopulation with a high surface CD19-CAR density and consequently enhanced the anti-tumor activity of CAR-T cells. Futhermore, CD19-EVs-primed CAR-T cells achieved superior proliferation and anti-tumor effects in a mouse model with lymphoma xenograft. In vivo administration of CD19 EVs promoted the functional persistence of CAR-T cells in the xenograft mouse model. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that antigen-expressing EVs can be utilized as a boost to improve CAR-T cell efficacy in vitro and in vivo.

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) characterized by refractory lower gastrointestinal postoperative bleeding with coagulopathy.

Bleeding is a common complication after lower gastrointestinal surgery, and cases due to coagulation dysfunction are rare. The current authors encountered a 54-year-old Chinese man with refractory bleeding after endoscopic rectal polypectomy, and multiple endoscopic and surgical interventions failed to control that bleeding. An APTT mixing test could not be corrected and there was no evidence of autoimmune-related disease, so the presence of nonspecific antibodies was considered. After empiric therapy with a cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoid, APTT was corrected and gastrointestinal bleeding stopped. Based on laboratory results and therapeutic results, the patient was ultimately diagnosed with prolonged APTT induced by monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). MGUS and coagulopathy characterized by a prolonged APTT has rarely been reported. Here, studies noting elevated monoclonal immunoglobulins and coagulopathy have been reviewed. If a prolonged APTT of undetermined significance cannot be corrected with an APTT mixing test and if autoimmune-related factors are excluded, then plasma cell-related diseases such as MGUS need to be considered.