Intrathecal IGF2 siRNA injection provides long-lasting anti-allodynic effect in a spared nerve injury rat model of neuropathic pain.

Previous studies have shown an increase of insulin-like growth factor-2 (IGF2) in animal models of neuropathic pain. We aimed to examine the hypothesis that reducing the expression of IGF2 using intrathecal IGF2 small-interfering RNA (siRNA) would attenuate the development of neuropathic pain in rats after spared nerve injury (SNI). Male Wistar rats were divided into three groups: sham-operated group, in which surgery was performed to cut the muscles without injuring the nerves; SNI group, in which SNI surgery was performed to sever the nerves; and SNI + siRNA IGF2 group, in which SNI surgery was performed, and IGF2-siRNA was administered intrathecally 1 day after SNI. The rats were assessed for mechanical allodynia and cold allodynia 1 day before surgery (baseline), and at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 days after siRNA treatment. The rat spinal cord was collected for quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blot analysis. Compared with the SNI group, rats that received IGF2 siRNA showed a significantly increased SNI-induced paw-withdrawal threshold to metal filament stimulation from Day 4 to Day 10 after SNI surgery. IGF2 siRNA significantly decreased the response duration from the acetone test from Day 2 to Day 10 following SNI surgery. SNI increased IGF2 mRNA expression on Day 2 and increased IGF2 protein expression on Day 8 and Day 10 in the spinal cord of the SNI rats. However, the above-mentioned effects of IGF2 mRNA and protein expression were significantly inhibited in the SNI + IGF2 siRNA group. We demonstrated that intrathecal administration of IGF2 siRNA provided significant inhibition of SNI-induced neuropathic pain via inhibition of IGF2 expression in the spinal cord. The analgesic effect lasted for 10 days. Further exploration of intrathecal IGF2 siRNA administration as a potential therapeutic strategy for neuropathic pain is warranted.

Detection and Evaluation of Serological Biomarkers to Predict Osteoarthritis in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Transection Combined Medial Meniscectomy Rat Model.

Biomarkers are essential tools in osteoarthritis (OA) research, clinical trials, and drug development. Detecting and evaluating biomarkers in OA research can open new avenues for researching and developing new therapeutics. In the present report, we have explored the serological detection of various osteoarthritis-related biomarkers in the preclinical model of OA. In this surgical OA model, we disrupted the medial tibial cartilage's integrity via anterior cruciate ligament transection combined with medial meniscectomy (ACLT+MMx) of a single joint of Wistar rats. The progression of OA was verified, as shown by the microscopic deterioration of cartilage and the increasing cartilage degeneration scoring from 4 to 12 weeks postsurgery. The concentration of serological biomarkers was measured at two timepoints, along with the complete blood count and bone electrolytes, with biochemical analysis further conducted. The panel evaluated inflammatory biomarkers, bone/cartilage biomarkers, and lipid metabolic pathway biomarkers. In chronic OA rats, we found a significant reduction of total vitamin D3 and C-telopeptide fragments of type II (CTX-II) levels in the serum as compared to sham-operated rats. In contrast, the serological levels of adiponectin, leptin, and matrix metallopeptidase (MMP3) were significantly enhanced in chronic OA rats. The inflammatory markers, blood cell composition, and biochemical profile remained unchanged after surgery. In conclusion, we found that a preclinical model of single-joint OA with significant deterioration of the cartilage can lead to serological changes to the cartilage and metabolic-related biomarkers without alteration of the systemic blood and biochemical profile. Thus, this biomarker profile provides a new tool for diagnostic/therapeutic assessment in OA scientific research.

Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia improves survival compared to desflurane anesthesia in gastric cancer surgery: A retrospective analysis.

Surgical management of cancer may induce stress and increase the likelihood of cancer metastasis and recurrence. Appropriate surgical and anesthetic techniques may affect the patient's outcome. Although numerous studies have been performed, conflicting results have been obtained regarding the effect of anesthetic techniques on the outcome of patients with cancer. We conducted this study to evaluate the association of anesthetic techniques with overall and recurrence-free survival in patients who had undergone gastric cancer surgery.This retrospective study reviewed the electronic medical records of patients, who had visited our hospital and had been diagnosed with gastric cancer between July 1st, 2006 to June 30th, 2016. Univariate analysis of the potential prognostic factors was performed using the log-rank test for categorical factors, and parameters with a P-value < .05 at the univariate step were included in the multivariate regression analysis. Propensity Score Matching was performed to account for differences in baseline characteristics: propofol or desflurane, in a 1:1 ratio.A total of 408 patients anesthetized with desflurane (218) and propofol (190) were eligible for analysis. After propensity matching, 167 patients remained in each group. The overall mortality rate was significantly higher in the desflurane group (56%) than in the propofol group (34%) during follow-up (P < .001). In addition, a greater percentage of patients in the desflurane group (41%) exhibited postoperative metastasis than those in the propofol group (19%, P < .001).The authors found some association between types of anesthesia used and the long-term prognosis of gastric cancer. Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia improved survival and reduced the risk of recurrence and metastasis during the 5-year follow-up period after gastric cancer surgery.