Identification of differentially expressed mRNAs as novel predictive biomarkers for gastric cancer diagnosis and prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) has a high mortality rate worldwide. Despite significant progress in GC diagnosis and treatment, the prognosis for affected patients still remains unfavorable. AIM: To identify important candidate genes related to the development of GC and identify potential pathogenic mechanisms through comprehensive bioinformatics analysis. METHODS: The Gene Expression Omnibus database was used to obtain the GSE183136 dataset, which includes a total of 135 GC samples. The limma package in R software was employed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Thereafter, enrichment analyses of Gene Ontology (GO) terms and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways were performed for the gene modules using the clusterProfile package in R software. The protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks of target genes were constructed using STRING and visualized by Cytoscape software. The common hub genes that emerged in the cohort of DEGs that was retrieved from the GEPIA database were then screened using a Venn Diagram. The expression levels of these overlapping genes in stomach adenocarcinoma samples and non-tumor samples and their association with prognosis in GC patients were also obtained from the GEPIA database and Kaplan-Meier curves. Moreover, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and western blotting were performed to determine the mRNA and protein levels of glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (GPT) in GC and normal immortalized cell lines. In addition, cell viability, cell cycle distribution, migration and invasion were evaluated by cell counting kit-8, flow cytometry and transwell assays. Furthermore, we also conducted a retrospective analysis on 70 GC patients diagnosed and surgically treated in Wenzhou Central Hospital, Dingli Clinical College of Wenzhou Medical University, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shanghai University between January 2017 to December 2020. The tumor and adjacent normal samples were collected from the patients to determine the potential association between the expression level of GPT and the clinical as well as pathological features of GC patients. RESULTS: We selected 19214 genes from the GSE183136 dataset, among which there were 250 downregulated genes and 401 upregulated genes in the tumor samples of stage III-IV in comparison to those in tumor samples of stage I-II with a P-value < 0.05. In addition, GO and KEGG results revealed that the various upregulated DEGs were mainly enriched in plasma membrane and neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, whereas the downregulated DEGs were primarily enriched in cytosol and pancreatic secretion, vascular smooth muscle contraction and biosynthesis of the different cofactors. Furthermore, PPI networks were constructed based on the various upregulated and downregulated genes, and there were a total 15 upregulated and 10 downregulated hub genes. After a comprehensive analysis, several hub genes, including runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI1), lysyl oxidase (LOX), fibrillin 1 (FBN1) and GPT, displayed prognostic values. Interestingly, it was observed that GPT was downregulated in GC cells and its upregulation could suppress the malignant phenotypes of GC cells. Furthermore, the expression level of GPT was found to be associated with age, lymph node metastasis, pathological staging and distant metastasis (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: RUNX2, SPI1, LOX, FBN1 and GPT were identified key hub genes in GC by bioinformatics analysis. GPT was significantly associated with the prognosis of GC, and its upregulation can effectively inhibit the proliferative, migrative and invasive capabilities of GC cells.

Analysis of surgical treatment of appendix neuroendocrine neoplasms-17 years of single-center experience.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study investigated the clinicopathological characteristics and treatment of appendix neuroendocrine neoplasms in appendectomy specimens of our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinicopathological data, including age, sex, preoperative clinical manifestation, surgical method, and histopathological examination results of 11 patients with appendix neuroendocrine neoplasms confirmed by surgery and pathology between November 2005 and January 2023, were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: In the histopathological examination of 7277 appendectomy specimens, 11 cases (0.2%) had appendix neuroendocrine neoplasms. Among the 11 patients, 8(72.7%) were males, and 3(27.3%) were females, with an average age of 48.1 years. All patients underwent emergency surgery. A total of 9 patients underwent open appendectomy, including 1 patient who underwent second-stage simple right hemicolectomy after an appendectomy, and two who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. All 11 patients were followed up for a period of 1 to 17 years. All patients survived without any indication of tumor recurrence. CONCLUSION: Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms are low-grade malignant tumors originating from neuroendocrine cells. They are rarely seen in clinical practice and are often treated based on acute and chronic appendicitis symptoms. These tumors are challenging to diagnose before surgery due to the lack of specificity in clinical manifestations and auxiliary examinations. The diagnosis generally depends on postoperative pathology and immunohistochemistry. Despite the diagnostic challenges, these tumors have a favorable prognosis.

Perforated appendicitis after colonoscopy: cause or coincidence?: A rare case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Colonoscopy is a relatively safe and common procedure with low risks of complications, and acute appendicitis with perforation is an extremely rare complication of colonoscopy. The current study presents an unusual case of acute gangrenous appendicitis with perforation following a screening colonoscopy. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 73-year-old man presented to our emergency department with lower right abdominal pain 3 days after a routine screening colonoscopy. On physical examination the patient had signs of generalized peritonitis. Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) revealed the presence of multiple free gas in the right subphrenic space and abdominal cavity with exudate effusions in both sides of the paracolic sulci and the pelvic cavity, especially around the ascending colon and caecum. The CT scan also showed a dilated and inflamed appendix with fecaliths. DIAGNOSES: The patient was diagnosed with acute gangrenous appendicitis with perforation after colonoscopy. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent emergency exploratory laparotomy. Intraoperative findings revealed an inflamed gangrenous appendix with focal perforation and impacted fecaliths. The colon showed no evidence of perforation or other areas of concern and thus, a conclusive diagnosis was achieved. An appendectomy was performed and the abdominal cavity was rinsed and drained thoroughly. OUTCOMES: The postoperative course was uneventful. LESSONS: This study may increase clinical awareness with regard to perforated appendicitis after colonoscopy. Acute appendicitis should be included in the differential diagnosis of lower right abdominal pain following a colonoscopy, in addition to possible colonic injury. Furthermore, emergency surgery should be recommended for the typical signs of perforation with peritonitis and free pneumoperitoneum. Early recognition and prompt surgical treatment are critical, which can avoid severe outcomes and improve the prognosis.