18F-Fluorocholine PET/CT of Incidental Male Breast Cancer.

Breast cancer is approximately 100 times less common among men. Estrogen-related receptor α was detected in human prostate cancer tissue, and androgen receptors are expressed in both normal and malignant breast tissue. Thus, prostate cancer hormonal therapy may increase breast cancer risk. A 67-year-old man with prostate cancer history presented with rising prostate-specific antigen level. F-Fluorocholine PET/CT showed intense uptake in his right breast and moderate uptake in right axillary lymph node. Complementary F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated more intense tracer uptakes in both the right breast and axillary lymph node. Breast histological findings were invasive ductal cancer, with axillary lymph node invasion.

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy screening in advanced hepatocarcinoma: A multi-center French study.

BACKGROUND: Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) has been reported for receptor (SSTR) screening in advanced hepatocarcinoma (aHC) prior to somatostatin analogue treatment. AIMS: To evaluate SSTR screening with SRS in aHC patients. RESULTS: Seventy aHC patients (63 men) aged 65 +/- 11 y were included, with alcohol, viral or other causes cirrhosis in 35 (50%), 23 (33%), 12 (17%) cases respectively. CLIP score was 2.7 +/- 1.7, with more than three nodules in 37 (53%) cases. Largest nodule measured 7.6 +/- 4.5 cm. Median alpha-fetoprotein was 574 UI/mL. SRS was positive in 25/70 (35.7%) livers and 7/17 (41.2%) metastatic sites. Positive SRS patients differed from others for tumor size (9.2 +/- 4 vs. 6.7 +/- 4.6 cm, p = 0.03), prothrombin time (PT) (75.2 +/- 15.2 vs. 61.9 +/- 19%, p = 0.005), albumin (34.1 +/- 5.9 vs. 30.5 +/- 7.2 g/L, p = 0.04) and Child-Pugh (6.7 +/- 1.8 vs. 7.7 +/- 2.3, p = 0.04). After multivariate analysis, only PT was associated with positive SRS (p = 0.028). Immunohistochemistry was positive for SSTR2s in 6/7 tumors (SRS uptake in 5/6 cases). METHODS: SRS was performed prior treatment, with images at 4, 24 and 48 h. For seven tumors, SSTR2 subtype was detected immunohistochemically. CONCLUSIONS: In advanced hepatocarcinoma, we report SRS uptake in 35.7% of livers and 41.2% of metastatic sites. SRS value in screening patients for somatostatin analogue treatment remains to be assessed.

Impact of FDG-PET to detect recurrence of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Prospectively evaluate the impact of fluorodeoxyglucose-fluorine-18 positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in the management of recurrence of advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma during the first year after treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Seventy patients were followed-up every 6 to 8 weeks during the first year after initial combined curative therapy. FDG-PET, together with conventional imaging and endoscopy were performed systematically at 1 year (group A) or prompted earlier in case of clinically suspicious recurrence (group B). The referring physician evaluated the impact of FDG-PET on the patient's management. Another clinician checked the pertinence of decisions. RESULTS: FDG-PET had a therapeutic impact in 8 of 43 group A patients and in 16 of 27 group B patients; the overall rate was 34%. This change was pertinent in 5 of 8 and 14 of 16 cases, respectively. Overall pertinence rate of decisions was 90% versus 70% without FDG-PET. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET had a significant overall therapeutic impact; the induced decisions were either pertinent or just led to "futile" noninvasive examinations. Systematic FDG-PET had a significantly lesser impact in comparison with FDG-PET motivated by clinical suspicion.

Efficiency of 18F-FDG and 99mTc-depreotide SPECT in the diagnosis of malignancy of solitary pulmonary nodules.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to compare ( 18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and ( 99m)Tc-depreotide single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in the diagnosis of malignancy of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs). METHODS: Twenty-eight patients without any history of cancer and presenting an SPN (0.8-3 cm in size) underwent FDG PET and depreotide SPECT. Depreotide SPECT and FDG PET were performed on a double-head gamma camera and a dedicated PET scanner respectively. Twenty-five out of 28 lesions were removed by thoracotomy or assessed by biopsy (n=1) and histologically examined. A strategy of serial CT scanning was adopted in the three remaining patients. RESULTS: Histological findings revealed 18 malignant nodules and seven benign lesions. Stability over a 2-year period indicated a benign process in the remaining three cases. Both techniques yielded true positive results in 15 of the 18 cancers. FDG PET identified two additional adenocarcinomas not detected by depreotide SPECT. A carcinoid tumour not visualised on FDG PET was identified by depreotide SPECT. Seven of the ten benign lesions did not reveal tracer uptake on either depreotide SPECT or FDG PET. Both techniques showed false positive results for the same two lesions. One more false positive was seen on FDG PET. FDG PET and depreotide SPECT had a sensitivity of 94.4% and 88.9% respectively; this difference was not significant. In our experience, depreotide SPECT and FDG PET are equally sensitive (92.3%) for large (>1.5 cm) and equally specific (85.7%) for small (up to 1.5 cm) SPNs suspicious for malignancy. CONCLUSION: This study showed( 18)F-FDG PET to be more sensitive than ( 99m)Tc-depreotide SPECT in the diagnosis of malignancy of SPNs. However, the combination of both techniques may provide additional accuracy.