SFX-01 in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Introduction: Sulforaphane can induce the transcription factor, Nrf2, promoting antioxidant and anti-inflammatory responses. In this study, hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) were treated with stabilised synthetic sulforaphane (SFX-01) to evaluate impact on clinical status and inflammation. Methods: Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of SFX-01 (300 mg oral capsule, once daily for 14 days) conducted in Dundee, UK, between November 2020 and May 2021. Patients had radiologically confirmed CAP and CURB-65 (confusion, urea >7 mmol·L-1, respiratory rate ≥30 breaths·min-1, blood pressure <90 mmHg (systolic) or ≤60 mmHg (diastolic), age ≥65 years) score ≥1. The primary outcome was the seven-point World Health Organization clinical status scale at day 15. Secondary outcomes included time to clinical improvement, length of stay and mortality. Effects on Nrf2 activity and inflammation were evaluated on days 1, 8 and 15 by measurement of 45 serum cytokines and mRNA sequencing of peripheral blood leukocytes. Results: The trial was terminated prematurely due to futility with 133 patients enrolled. 65 patients were randomised to SFX-01 treatment and 68 patients to placebo. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection was the cause of CAP in 103 (77%) cases. SFX-01 treatment did not improve clinical status at day 15 (adjusted OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.41-1.83; p=0.71), time to clinical improvement (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.02, 95% CI 0.70-1.49), length of stay (aHR 0.84, 95% CI 0.56-1.26) or 28-day mortality (aHR 1.45, 95% CI 0.67-3.16). The expression of Nrf2 targets and pro-inflammatory genes, including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1ß and tumour necrosis factor-α, was not significantly changed by SFX-01 treatment. At days 8 and 15, respectively, 310 and 42 significant differentially expressed genes were identified between groups (false discovery rate adjusted p<0.05, log2FC >1). Conclusion: SFX-01 treatment did not improve clinical status or modulate key Nrf2 targets in patients with CAP primarily due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Sputum Proteomics in Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease.

BACKGROUND: Nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infections are difficult to diagnose and treat. Biomarkers to identify patients with active infection or at risk of disease progression would have clinical utility. Sputum is the most frequently used matrix for the diagnosis of NTM lung disease. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can sputum proteomics be used to identify NTM-associated inflammatory profiles in sputum? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with NTM lung disease and a matched cohort of patients with COPD, bronchiectasis (BE), and cystic fibrosis (CF) without NTM lung disease were enrolled from two hospitals in the United Kingdom. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to identify proteomic biomarkers associated with underlying diagnosis (COPD, BE, and CF), the presence of NTM lung disease defined according to American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America criteria, and severity of NTM. A subset of patients receiving guideline-concordant NTM treatment were studied to identify protein changes associated with treatment response. RESULTS: This study analyzed 95 sputum samples from 55 subjects (BE, n = 21; COPD, n = 19; CF, n = 15). Underlying disease and infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the strongest drivers of sputum protein profiles. Comparing protein abundance in COPD, BE, and CF found that 12 proteins were upregulated in CF compared with COPD, including MPO, AZU1, CTSG, CAT, and RNASE3, with 21 proteins downregulated, including SCGB1A1, IGFBP2, SFTPB, GC, and CFD. Across CF, BE, and COPD, NTM infection (n = 15) was not associated with statistically significant differences in sputum protein profiles compared with those without NTM. Two proteins associated with iron chelation were significantly downregulated in severe NTM disease. NTM treatment was associated with heterogeneous changes in the sputum protein profile. Patients with NTM and a decrease in immune response proteins had a subjective symptomatic improvement. INTERPRETATION: Sputum proteomics identified candidate biomarkers of NTM severity and treatment response. However, underlying lung disease and typical bacterial pathogens such as P aeruginosa are also key determinants of the sputum proteomic profile.