Optimal drainage time after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (DRAIN TIME 2): a multicentre, randomised, multiarm and multistage non-inferiority trial in Denmark.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative drainage after surgical evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma reduces the risk of recurrence, but the optimum drainage time is uncertain. We aimed to investigate the shortest possible drainage time without increasing the haematoma recurrence rate. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, multi-arm and multistage non-inferiority trial at four neurosurgical centres in Denmark. We enrolled adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with symptomatic chronic subdural haematoma. All patients were treated according to the national standard practice with a burr hole above the maximum width of the haematoma. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio via a centralised web server to receive 6 h, 12 h, or 24 h of postoperative passive subdural drainage. Randomisation was done by an independent on-call neurosurgeon and was masked until 6 h after surgery. The primary outcome was symptomatic haematoma recurrence at 3 months after surgery; the rate of recurrence was assessed in a regression model for non-inferiority testing, with no missing data. Personnel assessing the primary outcome were masked to group allocation. Non-inferiority was assessed with a prespecified margin of 7%, in a modified intention-to-treat population-defined as patients with randomly assigned treatment excluding those withdrawing from study participation after randomisation, or experiencing acute rebleedings or accidental drain removal. This trial is registered with ISRCTN (number 15186366); the trial was stopped after the first interim analysis on the advice of an independent safety advisory committee. FINDINGS: Between March 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022, 347 patients were enrolled and 331 were followed up to 3 months, 105 were assigned to 6 h of drainage, 111 to 12 h of drainage, and 115 to 24 h of drainage. At admission, 83 (25%) participants were women and 248 (75%) were men, mean age was 75·7 years (SD 10·5), median modified Rankin Scale score was 4 (IQR 3-5), and median Glasgow Coma Scale score was 15 (IQR 14-15). At 3 months after surgery, haematoma recurrence was reported in 28 (27%) of 105 patients who were assigned to 6 h drainage (predicted haematoma recurrence rate 27·0%, 95% CI 18·5 to 35·4), 22 (20%) of 111 assigned to 12 h drainage (19·5%, 12·0 to 27·0), and 12 (10%) of 115 assigned to 24 h drainage (10·4%, 4·8 to 16·0). The risk of haematoma recurrence was increased by 16·5 percentage points (95% CI 6·5 to 26·6) in patients drained for 6 h compared with 24 h, and by 9·1 percentage points (-0·4 to 18·5) in patients drained for 12 h compared with 24 h. Therefore, non-inferiority of 6 h and 12 h of drainage to 24 h of drainage was not established. 20 patients had died by 3 months, seven in the 6 h group, eight in the 12 h group, and five in the 24 h group. The most frequent known causes of death were haematoma recurrence (three in 12 h group), comorbidity (three in 12 h group), and pneumonia (one each in 6 h and 12 h groups, two in 24 h group). The most frequent complication was postoperative infection, reported in 20 (20%) patients in the 6 h group, 25 (23%) in the 12 h group, and 19 (17%) in the 24 h group. The most common infection source was the urinary tract. INTERPRETATION: Patients surgically treated for symptomatic chronic subdural haematoma and postoperatively drained for 6 h or 12 h had higher rates of haematoma recurrence than did patients drained for 24 h. The findings from this non-inferiority trial provide evidence to support 24 h of postoperative drainage as the standard drain time when a fixed drain time approach is used. To provide solid evidence of generalisability of the results to countries other than Denmark, a multinational randomised controlled trial will be needed. FUNDING: None.

Lumbar percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: a retrospective survey on the first 172 adult patients treated in Denmark.

PURPOSE: To evaluate patient demographics, surgery characteristics, and patient-reported clinical outcomes related to the implementation of lumbar PTED in Denmark by surgeons novice to the PTED technique. METHODS: All adult patients treated with a lumbar PTED from our first surgery in October 2020 to December 2021 were included. Data was generated by journal audit and telephone interview. RESULTS: A total of 172 adult patients underwent lumbar PTED. Surgery duration was a median of 45.0 (35.0-60.0) minutes and patients were discharged a median of 0 (0-1.0) days after. Per operatively one procedure was converted to open microdiscectomy due to profuse bleeding. Post operatively one patient complained of persistent headache (suggestive of a dural tear), two patients developed new L5 paresthesia, and three patients had a newly developed dorsal flexion paresis (suggestive of a root lesion). Sixteen patients did not complete follow-up and 24 (14.0%) underwent reoperation of which 54.2% were due to residual disk material. Among the remaining 132 patients, lower back and leg pain decreased from 7.0 (5.0-8.5) to 2.5 (1.0-4.5) and from 8.0 (6.0-9.1) to 2.0 (0-3.6) at follow-up, respectively (p < 0.001). Additionally, 93.4% returned to work and 78.8% used less analgesics. Post hoc analysis comparing the early half of cases with the latter half did not find any significant change in surgery time, complication and reoperation rates, nor in pain relief, return to work, or analgesia use. CONCLUSION: Clinical improvements after lumbar PTED performed by surgeons novel to the technique are satisfactory, although the reoperation rate is high, severe complications may occur, and the learning curve can be longer than expected.

Endoscopic removal of lumbar disc herniation.

The technical development has caused a reintroduction of endoscopic techniques directed towards degenerative spine disease. A summary of the endoscopic procedure is given in this review. The spinal canal is reached through an inter-laminar or transforaminal access. In comparison with open surgery the percutaneous transforaminal access seems especially advantageous for the removal of paramedian and/or foraminal herniated disc material. However, careful patient selection is required, as the restricted manoeuverability and working zone of the endoscope and patient specific pathoanatomy in some cases will disfavour endoscopy.

Postoperative drainage for 6, 12, or 24 h after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma in symptomatic patients (DRAIN-TIME 2): study protocol for a nationwide randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common acute or subacute neurosurgical condition, typically treated by burr-hole evacuation and drainage. Recurrent CSDH occurs in 5-20% of cases and requires reoperation in symptomatic patients, sometimes repeatedly. Postoperative subdural drainage of maximal 48 h is effective in reducing recurrent hematomas. However, the shortest possible drainage time without increasing the recurrence rate is unknown. METHODS: DRAIN-TIME 2 is a Danish multi-center, randomized controlled trial of postoperative drainage time including all four neurosurgical departments in Denmark. Both incapacitated and mentally competent patients are enrolled. Patients older than 18 years, free of other intracranial pathologies or history of previous brain surgery, are recruited at the time of admission or no later than 6 h after surgery. Each patient is randomized to either 6, 12, or 24 h of passive subdural drainage following single burr-hole evacuation of a CSDH. Mentally competent patients are asked to complete the SF-36 questionnaire. The primary endpoint is CSDH recurrence rate at 90 days. Secondary outcome measures include SF-36 at 90 days, length of hospital stay, drain-related complications, and complications related to immobilization and mortality. DISCUSSION: This multi-center trial will provide evidence regarding the shortest possible drainage time without increasing the recurrence rate. The potential impact of this study is significant as we believe that a shorter drainage period may be associated with fewer drain-related complications, fewer complications related to immobilization, and shorter hospital stays-thus reducing the overall health service burden from this condition. The expected benefits for patients' lives and health costs will increase as the CSDH patient population grows. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN15186366 . Registered in December 2020 and updated in October 2021. This protocol was developed in accordance with the SPIRIT Checklist and by use of the structured study protocol template provided by BMC Trials.

Bilateral chronic subdural hematoma: unilateral or bilateral drainage?

OBJECTIVE Bilateral chronic subdural hematoma (bCSDH) is a common neurosurgical condition frequently associated with the need for retreatment. The reason for the high rate of retreatment has not been thoroughly investigated. Thus, the authors focused on determining which independent predictors are associated with the retreatment of bCSDH with a focus on surgical laterality. METHODS In a national database of CSDHs (Danish Chronic Subdural Hematoma Study) the authors retrospectively identified all bCSDHs treated in the 4 Danish neurosurgical departments over the 3-year period from 2010 to 2012. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the relationship between retreatment of bCSDH and clinical, radiological, and surgical variables. RESULTS Two hundred ninety-one patients with bCSDH were identified, and 264 of them underwent unilateral (136 patients) or bilateral (128 patients) surgery. The overall retreatment rate was 21.6% (57 of 264 patients). Cases treated with unilateral surgery had twice the risk of retreatment compared with cases undergoing bilateral surgery (28.7% vs 14.1%, respectively, p = 0.002). In accordance with previous studies, the data also showed that a separated hematoma density and the absence of postoperative drainage were independent predictors of retreatment. CONCLUSIONS In bCSDHs bilateral surgical intervention significantly lowers the risk of retreatment compared with unilateral intervention and should be considered when choosing a surgical procedure.