A plain language summary describing changes in pain associated with uterine fibroids among women receiving relugolix combination therapy.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of two research studies (known as clinical trials) called LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2. These studies compared how well a medicine called relugolix combination therapy and placebo worked in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding (periods) in women with uterine fibroids (published in a separate article referenced in the section: Where can readers find more information on these studies?). Researchers also looked at whether women with moderate to severe pain from uterine fibroids saw improvement in their worst pain symptoms after 24 weeks of treatment (results described in the present summary). WHAT ARE THE KEY TAKEAWAYS?: Women with moderate to severe pain from uterine fibroids (menstrual or nonmenstrual pain) took either relugolix combination therapy or placebo (once daily by mouth) for 24 weeks. During the last 5 weeks of treatment, 65% of women taking relugolix combination therapy and 19% of women taking placebo reported having minimal or no menstrual pain. Similarly, 45% of women taking relugolix combination therapy and 22% of women taking placebo reported having minimal or no non-menstrual pain. During the same time period, 71% of the women taking relugolix combination therapy and 40% of women taking placebo reported their worst pain was reduced by about one third compared with the start of the study. WHAT WERE THE MAIN CONCLUSIONS REPORTED BY THE RESEARCHERS?: Women with moderate to severe pain from uterine fibroids taking relugolix combination therapy were more likely to have minimal or no pain from uterine fibroids after treatment compared with women taking placebo.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03049735 (LIBERTY 1), NCT03103087 (LIBERTY 2) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Patient Preferences for Attributes of Androgen Deprivation Therapies in Prostate Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment with Latent Class Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Medical androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) options have expanded for patients with advanced prostate cancer (PC). Historically, ADT was primarily available in long-acting injectable formulations. In 2020, the first oral formulation was US Food and Drug Administration-approved for adults with advanced PC. This study's aim was to assess patient preferences for attributes of medical ADT, including mode of administration, side effects, impact on sexual interest, and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs, and to segment respondents into distinct groups based on their treatment choice patterns. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among US residents aged > 40 years with PC, employing a discrete choice experiment to assess preferences for ADT attributes. For each choice task, respondents were asked to select the hypothetical treatment profile that they preferred out of two presented. Latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted to estimate attribute-level preference weights and calculate attribute relative importance for groups of respondents with similar treatment preferences. RESULTS: A total of 304 respondents completed the survey (mean age 64.4 years). LCA identified four preference groups, named according to the attribute each group considered most important: Sexual interest, Cost-sensitive, Favors daily pill, and Favors injection. Most respondents in the Sexual interest group were < 65 years, while the Cost-sensitive group was mostly ≥ 65 years. Favors daily pill had the highest proportion of ADT-naïve individuals. On average, respondents in these groups preferred an oral medication. Favors injection, which had the highest proportion of ADT-experienced individuals, preferred infrequent intramuscular injections, lower chance of post-ADT testosterone recovery, and lower OOP cost. CONCLUSION: Respondents differed in their preferences regarding ADT attributes, highlighting the need for patient involvement in their treatment decisions. Effective communication between healthcare providers and patients about the benefits and risks of available therapies should be encouraged to ensure that patients receive the PC treatment that best meets their needs.

Prostate cancers often depend on the male sex hormone, testosterone, to grow. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is used to lower testosterone levels in patients with advanced prostate cancer. ADT options available to patients have different characteristics, including how they are taken (injection or pill), side effects, impact on sexual interest, and costs. Researchers wanted to understand which ADT characteristics were most important to groups of patients with similar preferences. To do this, they gave 304 patients a series of two hypothetical (meaning not real) examples of ADT options with different characteristics and asked them to choose the option that they preferred most. Researchers found that patients could be separated into four different groups based on their preferences for ADT characteristics. One group preferred an ADT that had the least impact on their interest in sex. These patients were mainly younger than 65 years old. A second group preferred a lower cost ADT. These patients were mainly 65 years or older. A third group preferred a pill that could be taken once a day by mouth. Most of these patients did not take ADT in the past. A fourth group preferred an ADT that was given in a physician's office as an injection every 6 months. These patients mainly had taken ADT in the past. This study shows that patients have different preferences for ADT treatment characteristics. It is important for doctors to discuss the different ADT options with patients to find the treatment that best meets their needs.

Impact of relugolix combination therapy on functioning and quality of life in women with endometriosis-associated pain.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of relugolix combination therapy (relugolix CT; 40 mg relugolix, 1 mg estradiol, and 0.5 mg norethisterone acetate) for up to 2 years in the SPIRIT long-term extension study on functioning and health-related quality of life (QoL), using the Endometriosis Health Profile (EHP)-30 questionnaire, and assess how changes in QoL domains correlated with improvements in dysmenorrhea as well as nonmenstrual pelvic pain (NMPP). DESIGN: Long-term extension study of the SPIRIT phase 3 trials. SETTING: Clinics and University Hospitals. PATIENT(S): Premenopausal women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis pain who previously completed the randomized SPIRIT trials were eligible to enroll in an 80-week long-term extension where all women received relugolix CT. INTERVENTION(S): Relugolix CT (relugolix 40 mg, estradiol 1 mg, and norethindrone acetate 0.5 mg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Least squares (LS) mean changes in the EHP-30 domain and total scores from baseline (pivotal) were analyzed using a mixed-effects model. Results up to 104 weeks are reported by a pivotal trial treatment group with a focus on the relugolix CT group (i.e., relugolix CT or placebo for 24 weeks, or delayed relugolix CT [relugolix 40 mg monotherapy for 12 weeks, followed by relugolix CT for 12 weeks]). In addition, the relationships between changes in dysmenorrhea and NMPP as well as changes in EHP-30 scores were assessed. RESULT(S): In the 277 women treated with relugolix CT, LS mean EHP-30 pain domain scores improved by 57.8% (LS mean change: -32.8; 95% CI: -35.5, -30.1), 66.4% (LS mean change: -37.7; 95% CI: -40.3, -35.0), and 72.2% (LS mean change: -41.3; 95% CI: -43.9, -38.7) at weeks 24, 52, and 104, respectively. The proportions of women with clinically meaningful improvement in the EHP-30 pain domain were 75.9%, 83.6%, and 88.6% at weeks 24, 52, and 104, respectively. Non-pain EHP-30 domain and total scores likewise improved. A positive correlation between changes in dysmenorrhea/NMPP and all EHP-30 domain scores was observed. Results were similar for the delayed relugolix CT and placebo → relugolix CT groups. CONCLUSION(S): Sustained reduction of endometriosis-associated pain with relugolix CT observed up to 104 weeks was accompanied by improvements in functioning and health-related QoL. These findings complement the results of the pivotal SPIRIT trials, which showed that relugolix combination therapy significantly reduced dysmenorrhea, NMPP, and dyspareunia vs. placebo in premenopausal women with endometriosis-associated pain. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Registration/clinicaltrials.gov identifier: SPIRIT Extension Study (NCT03654274).

Changes in symptom burden and quality of life among women with uterine fibroids receiving relugolix combination therapy: a plain language summary.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of findings from two research studies (known as clinical trials). The studies looked at how well a medicine called relugolix combination therapy worked in women with heavy menstrual bleeding (heavy bleeding during a period) with uterine fibroids (noncancerous or benign growths in the uterus). In this analysis of the studies, researchers looked at how patients self-reported their uterine fibroid symptoms before and after taking relugolix combination therapy. Researchers also looked at how patients self-reported the impact of uterine fibroids on their health-related quality of life before and after taking relugolix combination therapy. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Women took either relugolix combination therapy or placebo (a pill that contains no medicine) by mouth once daily for 24 weeks. Women completed the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire (where "quality of life" refers to the women's health-related quality of life related to uterine fibroids) before, during, and after treatment. The questionnaire let researchers see if the women felt that relugolix combination therapy decreased the burden of uterine fibroid symptoms and improved the women's health-related quality of life related to uterine fibroids. More women said that they felt less distress due to their uterine fibroid symptoms and that their health-related quality of life related to uterine fibroids was better after taking relugolix combination therapy compared with women who took placebo. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: Relugolix combination therapy may lessen distress associated with uterine fibroid symptoms and improve health-related quality of life related to uterine fibroids.

Development of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Symptoms and Impacts of Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Advanced Prostate Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: This qualitative research study was conducted to develop a novel, comprehensive, patient-reported outcome measure (PRO), the "Symptoms and Impacts of Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) for Prostate Cancer" (SIADT-PC), assessing hormonal therapy-related symptoms and their impacts on men with advanced prostate cancer. METHODS: Concept elicitation (CE) interviews were conducted among adult men with prostate cancer to evaluate their experiences with ADT. Based on key symptom and impact concepts mentioned, an initial PRO measure was developed. The draft measure was further assessed in cognitive debriefing (CD) interviews with men with prostate cancer, in which participants reviewed items, response options, and recall periods. Initial item-based psychometric analyses were conducted using interview data. The draft questionnaire was revised on the basis of participant feedback, quantitative psychometric results, and consultation with clinical experts. RESULTS: A total of 21 participants were interviewed (CE concept elicitation, n = 12; CD cognitive debriefing, n = 17; n = 8 completed both). Mean participant age (SD) was 59.7 (8.7) years and 76.2% were white. The de novo SIADT-PC measure consists of 27 items: 11 symptoms (e.g., fatigue, hot flashes, and erectile dysfunction), 2 long-term symptoms (e.g., weight gain), 10 impacts (e.g., impacts on physical activities and relationships), and 4 related to mode of administration (i.e., injection-site reactions). Items were assessed with a 5-point verbal rating scale, with answer choices that capture frequency or severity. CONCLUSIONS: Once fully validated, this de novo measure may be used in clinical studies and clinical practice to assess hormone therapy-related symptoms and impacts, enabling physicians to identify timely and appropriate interventions.

A plain language summary of the perspectives of women who were interviewed about their experiences with uterine fibroids.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This summary describes what researchers learned during interviews of women with uterine fibroids and heavy menstrual bleeding (or period bleeding). At this time, little is known about how women perceive the impact of uterine fibroids on their lives and more information is needed. The goal of this study was to provide new information about the symptoms women have and how these symptoms affect their everyday lives. These interviews were done to better understand how uterine fibroid symptoms affect the lives of women in their own words. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Thirty women from the United States, who had completed a clinical trial for a new treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding and uterine fibroids, agreed to be interviewed. The women described what their experiences with uterine fibroids were and the impact these experiences with uterine fibroids had on their lives before participating in the clinical trial. The most common symptoms of uterine fibroids the women described were heavy bleeding with their menstrual periods, pain in the pelvis or groin area, the passing of blood clots, and anemia (or low hemoglobin in red blood cells). Women said their symptoms affected them physically, emotionally, socially, and financially. They also said their symptoms made it hard to do daily activities, sleep, have a sex life, and go to work or school. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: Women who have heavy menstrual bleeding and uterine fibroids experience various uterine fibroid symptoms, and these symptoms affect most parts of the their lives.

Impact of Relugolix Versus Leuprolide on the Quality of Life of Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Results from the Phase 3 HERO Study.

BACKGROUND: Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist, demonstrated testosterone suppression to castrate levels in men with advanced prostate cancer (PCa) in the HERO study. Since advanced PCa and its treatments can impact patients' daily life, it is imperative to understand the impact of systemic therapy on patient health-related quality of life (HRQOL). OBJECTIVE: To report the HRQOL for patients on relugolix compared with those on leuprolide in on-treatment and testosterone recovery periods of the HERO study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A phase 3 randomized controlled study was conducted in 934 patients with advanced PCa. INTERVENTION: Patients underwent 2:1 randomization and received relugolix 120 mg orally once daily or leuprolide 3-mo injections for 48 wk. Testosterone recovery was evaluated in a patient subset. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: HRQOL evaluations were based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Prostate Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-PR25) during treatment and testosterone recovery phases. In a post hoc analysis, predictors of HRQOL deterioration were evaluated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: No statistically significant differences between the two groups were found in changes from baseline to the end of treatment in either the EORTC QLQ-C30 or the EORTC QLQ-PR25 instrument. During the testosterone recovery phase, hormonal treatment-related symptoms scores were lower for relugolix than for leuprolide, suggesting a lower burden of hormone-related symptoms associated with a treatment that has more rapid testosterone recovery after treatment cessation. Limitations include low patient numbers in the testosterone recovery group. CONCLUSIONS: Oral relugolix is a therapeutic option with similar patient-reported HRQOL to leuprolide, providing an oral option for androgen deprivation therapy associated with a more rapid testosterone reduction. PATIENT SUMMARY: In men with advanced prostate cancer, relugolix had similar health-related quality of life to leuprolide.

Quality of life with relugolix combination therapy for uterine fibroids: LIBERTY randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic uterine fibroids are burdensome to live with; they are associated with symptom-related distress, affect daily activities, and reduce health-related quality of life. The LIBERTY randomized clinical trials showed that oral relugolix combination therapy (40 mg relugolix, 1 mg estradiol, and 0.5 mg norethindrone acetate once daily) markedly improved fibroid-associated symptoms and conditions, including heavy menstrual bleeding, pain, and anemia, and was well-tolerated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of relugolix combination therapy on the symptom burden and health-related quality of life among women with uterine fibroids. STUDY DESIGN: Two replicate, multinational, double-blind, 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies, LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2, were conducted in premenopausal women with uterine fibroid-associated heavy menstrual bleeding (≥80 mL per cycle for 2 cycles or ≥160 mL during 1 cycle). The symptom burden and health-related quality of life were secondary endpoints and were assessed using the validated Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire, which the participants completed at baseline and at week 12 and 24 of treatment. For this secondary analysis, the pooled LIBERTY 1 and LIBERTY 2 data set was used. The Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire is made up of a Symptom Severity scale and a Health-Related Quality of Life scale, the latter of which includes 6 subscales focusing on the following aspects of daily life: concern, activities, energy or mood, control, self-consciousness, and sexual function. The Revised Activities subscale of the Health-Related Quality of Life scale addresses the impact of uterine fibroids on physical and social activities. Symptom burden was also assessed via the Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort subscale, a patient-reported outcome measure derived from the Uterine Fibroid Symptom Severity scale that focuses on distress from key uterine fibroid symptoms, which was a key secondary endpoint. Least squares mean changes from baseline to week 24 in the Symptom Severity scale, Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort subscale, overall Health-Related Quality of Life scale, and the respective subscales were compared between the relugolix combination therapy and placebo groups. Responder analyses of the proportion of women who experienced a clinically meaningful change from baseline to week 24 were conducted for the Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort and the activity subscales. A stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, adjusted for stratification factors (region [North America vs rest of world] and baseline menstrual blood loss volume), was used for treatment comparisons. RESULTS: Across both trials, 509 women were randomized to the relugolix combination therapy or placebo groups (April 2017-December 2018). Participants on relugolix combination therapy showed a statistically significant reduction in symptom severity (-33.5 vs -12.1; nominal P<.0001) and the Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort subscale from baseline to week 24 when compared with those on placebo treatment (-48.4 vs -17.4; nominal P<.0001). Overall, the total Health-Related Quality of Life scores improved significantly from baseline to week 24 in the relugolix combination therapy group when compared with the placebo (+37.6 vs +13.1; nominal P<.0001). Responder analyses demonstrated that more women treated with relugolix combination therapy reported a clinically meaningful reduction in the Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort subscale and an improvement in physical and social activities when compared with those treated with the placebo (nominal P<.0001). CONCLUSION: After 24 weeks of treatment with relugolix combination therapy, women with symptomatic uterine fibroids experienced substantial improvements in health-related quality of life with all subscales showing improvement, including emotional well-being, physical and social activities, and sexual function. In addition, women reported substantial reductions in the overall symptom burden and distress caused by key fibroid-associated symptoms.

Development of the Bleeding and Pelvic Discomfort Scale for Use in Women With Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated With Uterine Fibroids.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to define a cardinal symptom burden measure based on items from the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire for use as a clinical trial endpoint. METHODS: Exploratory factor analysis was computed to assess the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life symptom severity scale factor structure, using phase 2 data. Pooled blinded data from phase 3 studies were used for the confirmatory factor analysis and the psychometric evaluation of the new measure. Exit interviews in 30 patients from phase 3 studies provided additional qualitative evidence. A meaningful change threshold was determined using anchor-based analyses supported by patient feedback in the exit interviews. RESULTS: Three factors emerged from the exploratory factor analysis. Factor 1, called the bleeding and pelvic discomfort (BPD) scale, consists of cardinal symptoms, measuring menstrual distress owing to heavy bleeding, passing blood clots, and feeling tightness or pressure in pelvic area. Patients generally understood the items in the scale and the recall period as intended. The BPD scale had good item performance and internal consistency reliability, strong item-to-total correlations, good item discrimination, known-groups validity, and ability to detect change. A 20-point change on the BPD scale was determined as the clinically meaningful change threshold. CONCLUSIONS: The BPD scale assesses symptom burden owing to bleeding, passing blood clots, and pelvic pressure. The subscale is based on a subset of items selected to measure the cardinal symptoms of uterine fibroids in a clinical trial setting. The responder threshold evaluates whether patients experience a meaningful treatment benefit over the on-treatment period.

Relugolix Combination Therapy for Uterine Leiomyoma-Associated Pain in the LIBERTY Randomized Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of once-daily relugolix combination therapy (relugolix-CT: relugolix 40 mg, estradiol 1 mg, and norethindrone acetate 0.5 mg) compared with placebo on moderate-to-severe pain in women with uterine leiomyomas and heavy menstrual bleeding. METHODS: Two replicate, multinational, double-blind, 24-week, randomized, phase 3 studies (LIBERTY 1 and 2) were conducted in premenopausal women with uterine leiomyoma-associated heavy menstrual bleeding (80 mL or greater per cycle for two cycles or 160 mL or greater during one cycle). A predefined secondary objective was to determine the effect of relugolix-CT on moderate-to-severe uterine leiomyoma-associated pain in the pain subpopulation (women with maximum pain scores of 4 or higher on the 0-10 numerical rating scale at baseline, with pain score reporting compliance of 80% (ie, 28 days or more over the last 35 days of treatment). This key secondary endpoint was defined as the proportion of women achieving minimal-to-no uterine leiomyoma-associated pain (maximum numerical rating scale score 1 or lower) at week 24; menstrual and nonmenstrual pain were evaluated in prespecified secondary analyses. Treatment comparisons were performed in the pooled LIBERTY 1 and 2 pain subpopulation using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by baseline menstrual blood loss volume. RESULTS: Across both trials, 509 women were randomized to relugolix-CT or placebo (April 2017-December 2018). Of these, 277 (54.4%) met pain subpopulation requirements. With relugolix-CT, 45.2% (95% CI 36.4-54.3) of women achieved minimal-to-no pain compared with 13.9% (95% CI 8.8-20.5) with placebo (nominal P<.001). The proportions of women with minimal-to-no pain during menstrual days and during nonmenstrual days were significantly higher with relugolix-CT (65.0% [95% CI 55.6-73.5] and 44.6% [95% CI 32.3-57.5], respectively) compared with placebo (19.3% [95% CI 13.2-26.7], nominal P<.001, and 21.6% [95% CI 12.9-32.7], nominal P=.004, respectively). CONCLUSION: Over 24 weeks, relugolix-CT significantly reduced moderate-to-severe uterine leiomyoma-associated pain with a more pronounced effect on menstrual pain. These data support that relugolix-CT had clinically meaningful effects on women's experience of uterine leiomyoma-associated pain. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: LIBERTY 1, NCT03049735; LIBERTY 2, NCT03103087. FUNDING SOURCE: Myovant Sciences GmbH.

The Burden of Uterine Fibroids from the Perspective of US Women Participating in Open-Ended Interviews.

Background: Research on women's perspective of uterine fibroids (UF) experiences using their own words is limited. This study aimed to provide new insights on the symptoms experienced and their impacts on daily life. Methods: Interview substudy in 30 US women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) associated with UF who completed one of two phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (LIBERTY 1 and 2; ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03049735, NCT03103087). Women who consented to participate in this substudy were interviewed after their last clinical trial study visit. Concepts (i.e., symptoms and impacts) of importance to women were determined via open-ended questions, and the frequency of symptoms and their impacts, including the relationship between pain and menstruation, were assessed. Data were analyzed using established qualitative research methods, including grounded theory and constant comparative methods, and concept saturation was assessed. Results: Fifteen unique symptoms of UF emerged: the most commonly reported were HMB (n = 30, 100.0%), pelvic pain (n = 28, 93.3%), and passing of blood clots (n = 24, 80.0%). In total, 25 unique impacts were identified across eight concepts: physical impacts, activities of daily living, sleep, emotional impacts, sex life, social impacts, work and school, and financial impacts. Concept saturation was achieved for both symptoms and impacts. Conclusion: This study provides data on the symptoms experienced by women with HMB associated with UF, as well as the negative impacts of these symptoms as reported using their own words. The study findings confirm the significant burden associated with symptomatic UF.

Burden of illness in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a life-threatening condition, and few data concerning the impact on healthcare utilization and associated costs are available. The objective of this study was to describe the burden of illness (comorbidity, healthcare resource utilization, and associated costs) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. METHODS: Two cohorts (patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and matched controls) were retrospectively identified from US claims databases between January 1, 2001 and September 30, 2008. Cases with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis were defined by age of 55 years or older and either two or more claims with a code for idiopathic fibrosing alveolitis (ICD-9 516.3), or one claim with ICD 516.3 and a subsequent claim with a code for post-inflammatory pulmonary fibrosis (ICD-9 515). The prevalence and incidence of pre-selected comorbidities, healthcare resource utilization (hospital, outpatient, drugs), and direct medical costs were assessed in each cohort. RESULTS: A total of 9286 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis were identified. When compared with age- and gender-matched controls, these patients were at significantly increased risk for comorbidities including pulmonary hypertension and emphysema. The all-cause hospital admission rate (0.5 per person-year) and the all-cause outpatient visit rate (28.0 per person-year) were both ∼2-fold higher than in controls. Total direct costs for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis were $26,378 per person-year; the incremental costs over controls were $12,124 (2008 value). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis experience increased comorbidity, healthcare resource utilization, and direct medical costs compared to controls.

The cost-effectiveness of bosentan in the United Kingdom for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension of WHO functional class III.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether bosentan or no active intervention, in addition to palliative care, is the more cost-effective first-line treatment option for patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (iPAH) or PAH associated with connective tissue disease (PAH-CTD) of WHO functional classification (FC) III in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A cost-utility model simulated the treatment of patients with PAH of FC III. Patients remained on the selected intervention until death or clinical deterioration to FC IV, which would trigger initiation of epoprostenol treatment. The initial first-line treatment choice was assumed to not affect survival, but to affect the time until clinical deterioration, with this assumption being relaxed in sensitivity analyses. The distribution of time to clinical deterioration was estimated from long-term clinical trial databases of bosentan and from published literature. Utility associated with FC was taken from published literature. Costs were sourced from published literature and from specialist PAH centers. The time horizon was that of patients' lifetimes, with costs and benefits discounted at 3.5% per annum. RESULTS: In the base case, bosentan dominated no active intervention because of the longer time to clinical deterioration and therefore the reduced time, per patient, spent in FC IV, which was associated with high costs of epoprostenol and reduced utility. In sensitivity analyses, bosentan was estimated to be more cost-effective than no active intervention, provided that any survival benefit was not greater than 2 years for patients with iPAH and 1 year for those with PAH-CTD. CONCLUSIONS: Bosentan is likely to be a more cost-effective first-line therapy for patients with PAH FC III in the UK than no active intervention.

Economic evaluation of etoricoxib versus non-selective NSAIDs in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis in the UK.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of etoricoxib, a cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 selective inhibitor, versus non-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (nsNSAIDs) in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: The cost-effectiveness of etoricoxib versus nsNSAIDs was evaluated from the UK National Health Service (NHS) and society perspective with a decision-analytic model. Patients stayed on initial therapy throughout 52 weeks unless they experienced an adverse event (AE) or lacked efficacy, in which case they switched to another nsNSAID or a tumor necrosis factor alpha antagonist. Efficacy data were obtained from a 1-year etoricoxib clinical trial in AS. Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI) data were translated into Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) weights using a published data on the relation between BASFI and Short-form (SF) 36 Quality of life scores, as well as the relation between SF-36 and utility. Safety data were based on meta-analyses of etoricoxib trials. Information on treatment pathways, resource consumption, and absenteeism from work was obtained from literature and experts. Model outcomes included QALYs, perforations, ulcers, or bleeds, cardiovascular events, and costs. RESULTS: Etoricoxib was cost-effective compared to nsNSAIDs in terms of cost per QALY saved ( pound5611). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis found a 77% probability of the incremental cost per QALY saved being within a threshold for cost-effectiveness of pound20 000. The expected direct costs over the 52-week period were pound1.23 (95% uncertainty distribution pound1.10; pound1.39) and pound1.13 per day ( pound0.78; pound1.55) for patients starting with etoricoxib and nsNSAIDs, respectively. When costs related to absenteeism were taken into account, the cost per QALY saved was pound281. CONCLUSIONS: Given the underlying assumptions and data used, this economic evaluation demonstrated that, compared to nsNSAIDs, etoricoxib is a cost-effective therapy for AS patients in the UK.

Pharmacological treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review.

The purpose of this study was to review the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of pharmacological therapies currently available for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS).A literature search using MEDLINE from 1966 through to April 2005 and a hand search of abstracts from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) meetings for 2001 through to 2004 were performed. References of articles retrieved were also searched. The MEDLINE search yielded 570 citations and 157 abstracts from ACR were identified. Eighty-four studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs); 53 fulfilled the inclusion criteria (pharmacological treatment of AS and RCT) and were included in this review. Statistical pooling of data was not performed because of the disparate outcome measures used. Eight RCTs found nonselective NSAIDs and two RCTs found cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2-selective NSAIDs to be superior to placebo for relief of pain and improvement in physical function. Twenty-nine RCTs showed comparable efficacy and safety between nonselective NSAIDs. One RCT showed no difference between methylprednisolone 1g and 375 mg. Seven RCTs assessing the efficacy of sulfasalazine (sulphasalazine) and two RCTs of methotrexate provided contradictory evidence as to their benefit for treatment of AS. One RCT showed intravenous pamidronate 60 mg to be more effective than 10mg intravenously for the treatment of axial pain. All six RCTs of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha agents demonstrated superiority to placebo for the treatment of axial and peripheral symptoms. Nonselective as well as COX-2-selective NSAIDs can be used for pain control in patients with AS. Other proven treatment options include sulfasalazine for the treatment of peripheral joint symptoms, while limited evidence supports the use of pamidronate or methotrexate, which require further studies. Anti-TNFalpha agents have been found very effective for the treatment of both peripheral and axial symptoms in patients with AS, but their use is limited by cost and uncertainty over long-term efficacy and safety.