Trained to cut? A literature review of veterinary surgical resident training.

A surgical residency trains veterinary graduates to a higher level of expertise in surgical procedures than is possible during veterinary school and prepares a resident to pursue board certification in surgery. The education of veterinary surgical residents has changed minimally since its inception in the twentieth century, and there are insufficient studies to determine if residency programs are producing surgeons with competence in each of the necessary procedural categories. The aims of this review were to report the current theory and methods used to provide surgical education to residents, to discuss the training most likely to create a competent, board-certified surgeon and to review assessment methods used during training. Several literature searches using broad terms such as "veterinary surgery residency," "veterinary surgery resident," and "veterinary surgical training" were performed using PubMed, CAB abstracts, and Google Scholar. Literature pertinent to theory, methods, training, and assessment of veterinary surgical residents was included. The reviewed literature demonstrated the need for research-based learning curves for specific procedures. Simulation training is known to facilitate deliberate practice and should be leveraged where possible to reach competency. The creation of validated assessment methods should be pursued as it enables assessment of competency instead of inferring its development from case logs. Understanding and supporting learner cognition and providing sufficient feedback remain important issues in the field. Surgical educators are urged to continue to search for innovative and evidence-based ways to train competent surgical residents.

Simulating Ovariohysterectomy: What Type of Practice Promotes Short- and Long-Term Skills Retention?

Simulation-based surgical training allows students to learn skills through deliberate practice without the patient risk and stress of operating on a live animal. This study sought to determine the ideal distribution of training sessions to improve short- and long-term retention of the skills necessary to perform a simulated ovariohysterectomy (OVH). Fourth-semester students (n = 102) were enrolled. Students in the weekly instruction group (n = 57) completed 10 hours of training on the OVH simulator, with sessions held at approximately weekly intervals. Students in the monthly instruction group (n = 45) completed the same training with approximately monthly sessions. All students were assessed 1 week (short-term retention test) and 5 months following the last training session (long-term retention test). Students in the weekly instruction group scored higher on their short-term assessment than students in the monthly instruction group (p < .001). However, students' scores in the weekly instruction group underwent a significant decrease between their short- and long-term assessments (p < .001), while the monthly group did not experience a decrease in scores (p < .001). There was no difference in long-term assessment scores between weekly and monthly instruction groups. These findings suggest that if educators are seeking maximal performance at a single time point, scheduling instructional sessions on a weekly basis prior to that time would be superior to monthly sessions, but if educators are concerned with long-term retention of skills, scheduling sessions either on a weekly or monthly basis would accomplish that purpose.

Teaching veterinary surgical skills: Comparison of massed versus spaced instruction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of massed instruction (MI) versus spaced instruction (SI) of veterinary surgical skills on students' cognitive load and skill retention. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized cohort study STUDY POPULATION: First-year veterinary students from Louisiana State University (LSU; n = 47) and Lincoln Memorial University (LMU; n = 101). METHODS: Students were randomized to MI (two skills in a single session of twice the duration) or SI (one skill per session on two consecutive days). Instructors, instructional ratio, and total educational time was equivalent. Following instruction, students completed a cognitive load questionnaire and underwent a structured assessment immediately after (LMU only), 1 day after, and 3-4 weeks after learning the second skill. Students completed two supervised practice sessions one and 2 weeks after the initial laboratory session(s). RESULTS: Overall cognitive load did not differ between groups (p > .05), although LMUs MI group reported higher physical and time demands, effort, and frustration. At initial assessment, SI students scored higher than MI students for the first skill at both LSU (mean checklist score = 27.7 vs. mean = 24; p = .004) and LMU (mean global rating score = 4.76 vs. mean = 4.55; p = .029). Differences between groups were no longer evident by 3-4 weeks after instruction. CONCLUSION: SI may lead to improved immediate performance; however, supervised practice was sufficient to overcome the initial disparity. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: SI may be beneficial for initial skill performance. However, SI and MI students had similar performance after 3 weeks, suggesting the more convenient curricular design of MI may be sufficient as long as practice sessions are incorporated.

Retention of basic surgical skills in veterinary students.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify veterinary students' retention of surgical skills after a 5-month period without practice. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal descriptive study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Convenience sample of second year veterinary students (n = 57). METHODS: Students practiced ovariohysterectomy (OVH) on a model during 4 clinical skills laboratories during spring 2021. Students were assessed performing OVH on their model using a validated 22-item rubric. Students not meeting expectations repeated their assessment 2 weeks later. All students had a 5-month period, including summer break, without skills practice. Students were again assessed performing OVH on their model in the fall. Students' rubric scores and pass rates were compared before and after summer break. RESULTS: Students scored lower on their retention test in fall (median = 43) than at the spring assessment (median = 56, P < .001). No difference was detected between lower and higher performing students. Five students (9%) did not meet expectations on their first assessment; more students (17/57, 30%) failed to meet expectations on their retention test (P = .004). CONCLUSION: Students experienced a decay in the surgical skills required to perform OVH after a 5-month period without practice, regardless of the quality of their initial performance. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Veterinary educators should emphasize the importance of continual practice to maintain skills and should consider assisting students in regaining skills during review sessions on models to improve surgical skill retention after a prolonged break.

What's the evidence? A review of current instruction and assessment in veterinary surgical education.

Veterinary surgical education is improved by studying the relevant literature. The aim of this literature review was to report the theory and methods used to provide surgical education to veterinary students; to discuss the training most likely to create a competent general practitioner; and to review assessment methods for simulated and live surgeries. The literature reviewed demonstrates that new graduates are expected to perform small animal sterilization, dental extraction, onychectomy, abscess treatment, aural hematoma repair, and mass removal with little or no supervision. Students require repetitive practice to reach competence; some practice can take place in a clinical skills laboratory on models or cadavers. When training novices, distributing practice over a longer time improves retention, but months without practice causes skills to decay. Suturing skills may be taught on models at a ratio of 1 instructor per 10 students. Veterinary students require 6-10 repetitions of each small animal sterilization surgery to reach competence; however, learning curves for other surgeries have not been established. Assessment of surgical skills has been undertaken using objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) and observed model and live surgeries. Additional validated rubrics are needed in the field. Surgical educators are urged to continue to search for innovative ways to foster deliberate practice, assess skill, and provide feedback for students.

Validation of a Rubric Used for Skills-Based Assessment of Veterinary Students Performing Simulated Ovariohysterectomy on a Model.

Surgical skills are an important competency for new graduates. Simulators offer a means to train and assess veterinary students prior to their first surgical performance. A simulated ovariohysterectomy (OVH) rubric's validity was evaluated using a framework of content evidence, internal structure evidence, and evidence of relationship with other variables, specifically subsequent live surgical performance. Clinically experienced veterinarians (n = 13) evaluated the utility of each rubric item to collect evidence; each item's content validity index was calculated to determine its inclusion in the final rubric. After skills training, veterinary students (n = 57) were assessed using the OVH model rubric in March and August. Internal structure evidence was collected by video-recording 14 students' mock surgeries, each assessed by all five raters to calculate inter-rater reliability. Relationship with other variables evidence was collected by assessing 22 students performing their first live canine OVH in November. Experienced veterinarians included 22 items in the final rubric. The rubric generated scores with good to excellent internal consistency; inter-rater reliability was fair. Students' performance on the March model assessment was moderately correlated with their live surgical performance (ρ = 0.43) and moderately negatively correlated with their live surgical time (ρ = -0.42). Students' performance on the August model assessment, after a summer without surgical skills practice, was weakly correlated with their live surgical performance (ρ = 0.17). These data support validation of the simulated OVH rubric. The continued development of validated assessment instruments is critical as veterinary medicine seeks to become competency based.

Evaluating validity evidence for 2 instruments developed to assess students' surgical skills in a simulated environment.

OBJECTIVE: To gather and evaluate validity evidence in the form of content and reliability of scores produced by 2 surgical skills assessment instruments, 1) a checklist, and 2) a modified form of the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) global rating scale (GRS). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized blinded study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Veterinary surgical skills educators (n =10) evaluated content validity. Scores from students in their third preclinical year of veterinary school (n = 16) were used to assess reliability. METHODS: Content validity was assessed using Lawshe's method to calculate the Content Validity Index (CVI) for the checklist and modified OSATS GRS. The importance and relevance of each item was determined in relation to skills needed to successfully perform supervised surgical procedures. The reliability of scores produced by both instruments was determined using generalizability (G) theory. RESULTS: Based on the results of the content validation, 39 of 40 checklist items were included. The 39-item checklist CVI was 0.81. One of the 6 OSATS GRS items was included. The 1-item GRS CVI was 0.80. The G-coefficients for the 40-item checklist and 6-item GRS were 0.85 and 0.79, respectively. CONCLUSION: Content validity was very good for the 39-item checklist and good for the 1-item OSATS GRS. The reliability of scores from both instruments was acceptable for a moderate stakes examination. IMPACT: These results provide evidence to support the use of the checklist described and a modified 1-item OSAT GRS in moderate stakes examinations when evaluating preclinical third-year veterinary students' technical surgical skills on low-fidelity models.

If you build it, they will learn: A review of models in veterinary surgical education.

Surgical skills are learned through deliberate practice, and veterinary educators are increasingly turning to models for teaching and assessing surgical skills. This review article sought to compile and review the literature specific to veterinary surgical skills models, and to discuss the themes of fidelity, educational outcomes, and validity evidence. Several literature searches using broad terms such as "veterinary surgery model," "veterinary surgical model," and "veterinary surgical simulator" were performed using PubMed, CAB abstracts, and Google scholar. All articles describing a model created and utilized for veterinary surgical training were included. Other review articles were used as a source for additional models. Commercially available models were found using review articles, internet browser searches, and communication with veterinary clinical skills educators. There has been an explosion of growth in the variety of small animal surgical task trainers published in the last several decades. These models teach orthopedic surgery, ligation and suturing, open celiotomy and abdominal surgery, sterilization surgeries, and minimally invasive surgeries. Some models were published with accompanying rubrics for learner assessment; these rubrics have been noted where present. Research in veterinary surgical models is expanding and becoming an area of focus for academic institutions. However, there is room for growth in the collection of validity evidence and in development of models for teaching large animal surgery, training surgical residents, and providing continuing education to practitioners. This review can assist with evaluation of current surgical models and trends, and provide a platform for additional studies and development of best practices.

The impact of gel fingernail polish application on the reduction of bacterial viability following a surgical hand scrub.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of gel nail polish application on the reduction of bacterial viability immediately after a surgical hand scrub. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SAMPLE POPULATION: Ten fingernails each from 40 female health care professionals and students. METHODS: Participants' fingernails were randomized to receive no polish or gel nail polish during a manicure from a licensed manicurist. One day and 14 days after manicure, participants' fingernails were sampled before and after a surgical hand scrub with chlorhexidine gluconate. The samples for each fingernail were serially diluted, plated on a Trypsin sheep blood agar and MacConkey's agar plate, and incubated for 36 h. For each plate, bacterial colony forming units (CFU)/ml were determined. Mixed linear models were used to assess factors associated with the logarithmic reduction of viable bacterial counts from pre- to post-surgical scrub. RESULTS: In the final model, no association was detected between gel nail polish and reduction of viable bacterial count (p = .09). On Day 14, among longer nail lengths (2 to <3-mm and ≥3-mm), surgical scrubs resulted in greater reduction in bacterial counts in left-handed than right-handed participants (p < .01). Increasing nail length was correlated with increased CFU/ml post-scrubbing (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Application of gel nail polish did not seem to affect the ability of surgical scrub to reduce bacterial viability 1 and 14 days after a manicure. CLINICAL IMPACT: This study does not provide evidence to prevent application of gel nail polish on short fingernails in surgeons prior to surgical hand scrub with chlorhexidine gluconate.

Influence of instructor-to-student ratio for teaching suturing skills with models.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of instructor to student ratio on the effectiveness and efficiency of teaching suturing skills to veterinary students. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Second-year veterinary students (N = 121). METHODS: Students were randomly divided into three groups to participate in four 2-hour skills laboratory sessions in which suturing of the subcutaneous tissue was taught by using a simple continuous pattern, suturing of the skin was taught by using continuous patterns, suturing of the skin was taught by using interrupted patterns, and suturing of hollow organs was taught by using inverting patterns. For each laboratory, the groups were taught by using instructor-to-student ratios of 1:6, 1:8, and 1:10 on a rotating basis. Students were surveyed at the end of each laboratory, and underwent individual performance assessments at the end of each laboratory session and again at the end of the semester in an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). RESULTS: For each of the four in-laboratory assessments and the OSCE, no difference in performance was detected between groups. When they were surveyed, students in all groups reported that there was an adequate number of instructors in the laboratory and that they received help in a timely fashion when help was requested (median for all groups = agree). CONCLUSION: For students with prior surgical skills education and with the use of prelaboratory instructional videos, teaching at the 1:10 instructor-to-student ratio was efficient and effective. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Good educational outcomes may be reached with a 1:10 instructor-to-student ratio or, potentially, fewer instructors, depending on the educational aids present in the laboratory and students' prior level of experience.

The Impact of Extracurricular Surgical Experience on Veterinary Students' Performance of Canine Ovariohysterectomy and Orchidectomy in a Clinical Skills Curriculum.

Veterinary students may pursue extracurricular surgical experiences before performing ovariohysterectomy or orchidectomy in their veterinary curriculum. We sought to evaluate the impact of these experiences on student confidence and subsequent surgical performance during students' first canine ovariohysterectomy or orchidectomy during their veterinary school curriculum. We enrolled 69 third-year veterinary students to complete pre- and post-operative surveys reporting their confidence to perform surgery and self-assessing their performance. Students had all completed five semesters of surgical skills training on models and cadavers but varied in their participation in extracurricular surgical experiences. A subset of students (n = 27) were digitally recorded while performing ovariohysterectomy (16) or orchidectomy (11). Digital recordings were scored by a blinded rater using task-specific rubrics and a global rating scale, and time to perform the procedure was recorded. The number of extracurricular surgeries students had performed was positively correlated with their confidence to perform orchidectomy (r = .78) but not ovariohysterectomy (r = -.17). There was no correlation between extracurricular surgeries performed and subsequent rubric scores or surgical times for the first ovariohysterectomy (r = -.01 and r = -.14, respectively) or orchidectomy (r = .09 and r = -.18, respectively) performed as part of their veterinary curriculum. Our results suggest that extracurricular surgical experiences may not impart a long-term improvement on performance scores or surgical time during students' first surgery of their veterinary curriculum. Additional research is necessary to clarify how model training and extracurricular surgical experiences on live animals interact to affect students' subsequent surgical performance.

Does virtual reality training improve veterinary students' first canine surgical performance?

BACKGROUND: Virtual reality (VR) applications are effective tools in many educational disciplines. A minimally interactive VR application allowing stereoscopic viewing of surgical videos has been developed to aid veterinary students learning to perform surgery. We sought to describe how students used the VR application while preparing to perform their first canine sterilisation surgery and compare surgical performance of students who prepared using traditional methods with students who also used VR. METHODS: Third-year veterinary students (n=44) were randomised into control and VR groups in a parallel superiority randomised controlled trial. All were given lectures, videos and skills practice on models. VR group students were also given a VR application and headset to view stereoscopic surgical videos. Blinded raters scored a subset of students (n=19) as they performed their first canine ovariohysterectomy. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Groups spent similar time preparing to perform surgery, potentially because of the rigour of students' non-surgical course load. When VR training was added to an already comprehensive surgical skills curriculum, students watched VR videos for a median of 90 min. Groups did not differ in surgical performance scores or time. A larger study of the VR application with prescribed use guidelines would be a helpful subsequent study.