Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Biol Macromol ; 251: 126409, 2023 Aug 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37598820

RESUMO

This study investigated the ability of natural nanotubular clay mineral (Halloysite) and cellulose ether based biocomposite matrix as a controlled release agent for Verapamil HCl (BCS Class-I). Drug-loaded halloysite was prepared and tablet formulations were designed by varying amount of hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC K4M). Physical characterization was carried out using SEM, FTIR, and DSC. Tabletability profiles were evaluated using USP1062 guidelines. Drug release kinetics were studied, and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling was performed. Compressed tablets possess satisfactory yield pressure of 625 MPa with adequate hardness and disintegration within 30 min. The initial release of the drug was due to surface drug on tablets, while the prolonged release at later time points (around 80 % drug release at 12 h) were due to halloysite loading. The FTIR spectra exhibited electrostatic attraction between the positively charged drug and the negatively charged Si-O-Si functional group of halloysite, while the thermogram showed Verapamil HCl melting point at ~146 °C with enthalpy change of -126.82 J/g. PBPK modeling exhibited PK parameters of optimized matrix formulation (VER-HNT3%) comparable to in vivo data. The study effectively demonstrated the potential of prepared biocomposite matrix as a commercially viable oral release modifying agent for highly soluble drugs.

2.
Pak J Pharm Sci ; 29(3): 853-60, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27166530

RESUMO

The objective of the present work was to develop Immediate Release (IR) tablets of Metoprolol Tartrate (MT) and to compare trial formulations to a reference product. Six formulations (F1-F6) were designed using central composite method and compared to a reference brand (A). Two marketed products (brands B and C) were also evaluated. F1-F6 were prepared with Avicel PH101 (filler), Crospovidone (disintegrant) and Magnesium Stearate (lubricant) by direct compression. Pharmacopoeial and non-pharmacopoeial methods were used to assess their quality. Furthermore, drug profiles were characterized using model dependent and independent (f(2)) approaches. Brands B and C and F5 and F6 did not qualify the tests for content uniformity. Moreover, brand B did not meet weight variation criteria and brand C did not satisfy requirements for single point dissolution test. Of the trial formulations, F2 failed the test for uniformity in thickness while F4 did not disintegrate within time limit. Only F1 and F3 met all quality parameters and were subjected to accelerated stability testing without significant alterations in their physicochemical characteristics. Based on AIC and r(2)(adjusted) values obtained by applying various kinetic models, drug release was determined to most closely follow Hixson-Crowell cube root law. F1 was determined to be the optimized formulation.


Assuntos
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 1/química , Metoprolol/química , Administração Oral , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 1/administração & dosagem , Celulose/química , Química Farmacêutica , Excipientes/química , Cinética , Metoprolol/administração & dosagem , Modelos Químicos , Povidona/química , Pressão , Solubilidade , Ácidos Esteáricos/química , Comprimidos , Tecnologia Farmacêutica/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA