["Good dying"--definition and current state of research]. / Was ist "gutes Sterben"? Begriffsklärung und Stand der Forschung.

The advances of modern medicine did not only result in prolongation of life expectancy, but also led to a shift from dying at home to dying in public institutions. In western countries most people die at advanced age in medical facilities. Hence, the question regarding the conditions, which should be provided by society and especially medicine, to allow terminally ill people to experience "good dying" is substantial. For this purpose, an examination of patients', family members' and health care providers' understanding of the term " good dying" is required. The present paper aims at shedding light on the term "good dying" and to summarize the current state of research. Therefore, the attributes of "good dying" will be described from the perspectives of patients, family members and health care providers, which are discussed and examined in current medical-sociological research. These attributes can be illustrated on three dimensions: Quality of life at the end of life (e. g. pain relief, mental well-being), quality of dying (e. g. avoiding prolonged dying, autonomy, presence of relatives) and quality of health care at the end of life (e. g. patient-oriented health care, positive communication between health care providers and patients, availability of guidelines). Although the attributes of "good dying" are described in detail in the existing literature, further studies have to clarify the relevance and impact of these attributes as predictors of "good dying".

Are depression and anxiety determinants or indicators of quality of life in breast cancer patients?

Depression and anxiety are associated with a decline of health-related quality of life (QoL) in breast cancer patients, and the present study aims to investigate the longitudinal relationship of depression and anxiety with QoL in breast cancer patients. Depression and anxiety (HADS) as well as QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30) were assessed at baseline and six-month follow-up in 118 breast cancer patients and analysed using cross-lagged partial correlation analysis (CLPC). There were significant partial correlations between depression and anxiety at baseline and physical functioning, emotional functioning and "global health and QoL" at six-month follow-up (range of pr = -0.197 and -0.392; p < 0.05). "Global health and QoL" at baseline was significantly correlated with depression and anxiety at follow-up (pr = -0.207 and -0.327; p < 0.05). Cognitive functioning at baseline was significantly associated with anxiety at follow-up (pr = -0.248; p < 0.01). CLPC analysis of two models (depression and anxiety determining QoL vs. QoL determining depression and anxiety) did not show significant results. Hence, in breast cancer patients, depression and anxiety are closely related to QoL and the observed correlations suggest a complex interrelation in which depression and anxiety have to be regarded as indicators of QoL rather than determinants.

Quality of life in medically ill persons with comorbid mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review aims to investigate the association between comorbid mental disorders and quality of life (QoL) in patients with chronic medical diseases. METHODS: Studies investigating adults with diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, asthma, chronic back pain and colorectal cancer were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed methodological criteria. Effect sizes for QoL scores were analyzed in random-effects meta-analyses. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The database search identified 7,291 references and 65 primary studies were included. Medically ill persons with comorbid mental disorders showed a significantly decreased overall (d = -1.10; 95% CI = -1.34 to -0.86), physical (d = -0.64; 95% CI = -0.74 to -0.53) and psychosocial (d = -1.18; 95% CI = -1.42 to -0.95) QoL compared to persons without mental disorders. Subgroup analyses did not reveal significant differences between the examined medical diseases or mental disorders. CONCLUSION: The review provides evidence of a substantially reduced psychosocial and physical QoL in medically ill patients with comorbid mental disorders. This patient-reported outcome highlights the importance of recognizing and treating comorbid mental disorders in the medically ill.