The Perioperative Effects of Preoperative Radiotherapy in Metastatic Spinal Tumor Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Radiotherapy is one of the important treatment options for metastatic spinal tumors but is not the definite intervention in all cases, as there are patients who still require surgical treatment because of severe pain or neurologic events after this treatment. We evaluated the perioperative effects of preoperative radiotherapy in these cases as a future guide for surgeons on critical considerations in this period. METHODS: We included 328 patients in this study who had undergone decompression and fusion surgery for metastatic spinal tumors. Patients who underwent surgery with preoperative radiotherapy were designated as the radiotherapy group (group RT, n = 81), and cases of surgery without preoperative radiotherapy were assigned to the non-radiotherapy group (group nRT, n = 247). We compared the demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative factors between these 2 groups. RESULTS: In terms of intraoperative factors, statistically significant differences were evident in operation time, estimated blood loss, and transfusion (RT vs. nRT: 188.1 ± 80.7 minutes vs. 231.2 ± 106.1 minutes, 607.2 ± 532.7 mL vs. 830.1 ± 1324.7 mL, and 30.9% vs. 43.3%, P < 0.001, P < 0.031, and P < 0.048, respectively). With regard to postoperative factors, the incidence of infection, wound problems, and local recurrence were statistically higher in group RT (RT vs. nRT: 6.2% vs. 0.8%, 12.3% vs. 0.8%, 23.4% vs. 13.7%, P = 0.004, P < 0.001, and P = 0.038, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative radiotherapy has the intraoperative advantages of reducing bleeding and shortening the operating time, but postoperative caution is needed because of the possibility of infection, wound problems, and local recurrence increases.

Does Preoperative Radiation Therapy Performed for Metastatic Spine Cancer at the Cervical Spine Increase Perioperative Complications of Anterior Cervical Surgery?

Background: Radiation therapy (RT) performed before anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) may cause fascial plane fibrosis, decreased soft-tissue vascularity, and vertebral body weakness, which could increase the risk of esophageal and major vessel injuries, wound complications, and construct subsidence. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate whether preoperative RT performed for metastatic spine cancer (MSC) at the cervical spine increases perioperative morbidity for ACSS. Methods: Forty-nine patients who underwent ACSS for treatment of MSC at the cervical spine were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients underwent anterior cervical corpectomy via the anterior approach. Patient demographics, surgical factors, operative factors, and complications were recorded. Results of patients who were initially treated with RT before ACSS (RT group) were compared with those who did not receive RT before ACSS (non-RT group). Results: Eighteen patients (36.7%) were included in the RT group, while the remaining 31 (63.3%) were included in the non-RT group. Surgery-related factors, including operation time (p = 0.109), estimated blood loss (p = 0.246), amount of postoperative drainage (p = 0.604), number of levels operated (p = 0.207), and number of patients who underwent combined posterior fusion (p = 0.768), did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Complication rates, including esophageal injury, dural tear, infection, wound dehiscence, and mechanical failure, did not significantly differ between the RT and non-RT groups. Early subsidence was significantly greater in the non-RT group compared to that in the RT group (p = 0.012). Conclusions: RT performed before surgery for MSC does not increase the risk of wound complication, mechanical failure, or vital structure injury during ACSS. The surgical procedural approach was not complicated by previous RT history. Therefore, surgeons can safely choose the anterior approach when the number of levels or location of MSC favors anterior surgery, and performing a posterior surgery is unnecessary due to a concern that previous RT may increase complication rates of ACSS.

Reoperation Rates According to Surgical Approach After Operation for Degenerative Cervical Pathology in Patients With Athetoid Cerebral Palsy: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

STUDY DESIGN: National population-based cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The overall complication rate for patients with athetoid cerebral palsy (CP) undergoing cervical surgery is significantly higher than that of patients without CP. The study was conducted to compare the reoperation and complication rates of anterior fusion, posterior fusion, combined fusion, and laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy/radiculopathy in patients with athetoid cerebral palsy. METHODS: The Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service national database was used for analysis. Data from patients diagnosed with athetoid CP who underwent cervical spine operations for degenerative causes between 2002 and 2020 were reviewed. Patients were categorized into four groups for comparison: anterior fusion, posterior fusion, combined fusion, and laminoplasty. RESULTS: A total of 672 patients were included in the study. The overall revision rate was 21.0% (141/672). The revision rate was highest in the anterior fusion group (42.7%). The revision rates of combined fusion (11.1%; hazard ratio [HR], .335; P = .002), posterior fusion (13.8%; HR, .533; P = .030) were significantly lower than that of anterior fusion. Revision rate of laminoplasty (13.1%; HR, .541; P = .240) was also lower than anterior fusion although the result did not demonstrate statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Anterior fusion presented the highest reoperation risk after cervical spine surgery reaching 42.7% in patients with athetoid CP. Therefore, anterior-only fusion in patients with athetoid CP should be avoided or reserved for strictly selected patients. Combined fusion, with the lowest revision risk at 11.1%, could be safely applied to patients with athetoid CP.

Risk factors of revision operation and early revision for adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion surgery: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) following lumbar fusion operation is common and can occur at varying timepoints after index surgery. An early revision operation for ASD, however, signifies a short symptom-free period and might increase the risk of successive surgeries. PURPOSE: We aimed to elucidate the overall risk factors associated with revision surgeries for ASD with distinct attention to early revisions. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective, case-control study. PATIENT SAMPLE: The study included 86 patients who underwent revision operations for ASD after lumbar fusion in the revision group and 166 patients who did not for at least 5 years after index surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: Sagittal parameters, Pfirrmann grading, facet degeneration grading, and disc space height (DSH) of adjacent segments were assessed. METHODS: Revision operations within 5 years postsurgery were defined as early revision. We compared the revision and no-revision groups as well as the early- and late-revision groups. RESULTS: The revision group demonstrated a significantly greater preoperative C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (p=.001), postoperative C7-S1 SVA (p<.001), and postoperative pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) (p<.001) than those in the no-revision group. Preoperative DSH of the proximal adjunct segment (p=.001), postoperative PI-LL (p=.014), and postoperative C7-S1 SVA (p=.037) exhibited significant association with ASD in logistic regression analysis. The early-revision group had a significantly higher patient age (p=.001) and a greater number of levels fused (p=.030) than those in the late-revision group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that old age (p=.045), a significant number of levels fused (p=.047), and a narrow preoperative DSH of the proximal adjacent level (p=.011) were risk factors for early revision. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative sagittal imbalance, including significant PI-LL and C7-S1 SVA were risk factors for revision operation for ASD but not for early revision. These factors are likely to affect the long-term risk of revision operation due to ASD and thus are not considered risk factors for early revision. Narrow DSH of the proximal adjacent level increased the risks of both revision and early revision surgeries. Moreover, old age and a significant number of levels fused further increased the risk for early revision for ASD.

Comparison of preemptive and preventive intravenous acetaminophen on opioid consumption in pediatrics undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Posterior spinal fusion (PSF), commonly used for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), causes severe postoperative pain. Intravenous (IV) administration of acetaminophen has shown promise for opioid-sparing analgesia; however, its analgesic effect and optimal timing for its standard use remain unclear. Our study aimed to evaluate the analgesic effect and optimal timing of IV acetaminophen administration in pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing PSF and requiring adequate pain control. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, triple-blind trial was conducted in patients aged 11-20 undergoing PSF. Participants were randomized into three groups: the preemptive group (received IV acetaminophen 15 mg/kg after anesthetic induction/before surgical incision), the preventive group (received IV acetaminophen 15 mg/kg at the end of surgery/before skin closure), and the placebo group. The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption during the first 24 h postoperatively. RESULTS: Among the 99 enrolled patients, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) amount of opioid consumption during the postoperative 24 h was 60.66 ± 23.84, 52.23 ± 22.43, and 66.70 ± 23.01 mg in the preemptive, preventive, and placebo groups, respectively (overall P = 0.043). A post hoc analysis revealed that the preventive group had significantly lower opioid consumption than the placebo group (P = 0.013). However, no significant differences between the groups were observed for the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The preventive administration of scheduled IV acetaminophen reduces cumulative opioid consumption without increasing the incidence of drug-induced adverse events in pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing PSF.

Does Sacral Slanting Affect Postoperative Shoulder Balance in Patients With Lenke Type 2A Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

OBJECTIVE: Even minor sacral slanting can influence T1 tilt and shoulder balance. Yet, the relationship between sacral slanting and postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) has not been previously explored. To determine risk factors for PSI in Lenke 2A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients, with an emphasis on sacral slanting. METHODS: The study encompassed 96 consecutive patients who had undergone posterior correction and fusion surgery for Lenke type 2A AIS. Patients were grouped into PSI(+) and PSI(-) based on postoperative outcomes. Additionally, they were classified into left-sided slanting, no slanting, and right-sided slanting groups according to the degree of sacral slanting. Various radiological measures were compared. RESULTS: Patients in the PSI(+) group exhibited a smaller preoperative proximal thoracic curve and a higher main thoracic curve correction rate than those in the PSI(-) group. The presence or absence of sacral slanting did not exhibit a significant variation in PSI occurrence. However, the right-sided sacral slanting group showed a larger delta radiologic shoulder height compared to the other 2 groups (7.1 mm vs. 1.5 & 3.3 mm). CONCLUSION: Sacral slanting was not directly linked to the development of PSI. Despite the common postoperative elevation of the left shoulder, the shoulder height differences decreased over the follow-up period. Especially in cases with a right-sided tilted sacrum, the PSI demonstrated progressive improvement, with an associated increase in the rightward distal wedging angle, leading to distal adding-on.

Novel Screw Placement Method for Extremely Small Lumbar Pedicles in Scoliosis.

Study Design: Consecutive case series. Objective: To propose a screw placement method in patients with extremely small lumbar pedicles (ESLPs) (<2 mm) to maintain screw density and correction power, without relying on the O-arm navigation system. Summary of Background Data: In scoliosis surgery, ESLPs can hinder probe passage, resulting in exclusion or substitution of the pedicle screws with a hook. Screw density affects correction power, making it necessary to maximize the number of screw placements, especially in the lumbar curve. Limited studies provide technical guidelines for screw placement in patients with ESLPs, independent of the O-arm navigation system. Methods: We enrolled 19 patients who underwent scoliosis correction surgery using our novel screw placement method for ESLPs. Clinical, radiological, and surgical parameters were assessed. After posterior exposure of the spine, the C-arm fluoroscope was rotated to obtain a true posterior-anterior view and both pedicles were symmetrically visualized. An imaginary pedicle outline was presumed based on the elliptical or linear shadow from the pedicle. The screw entry point was established at a 2 (or 10) o'clock position in the presumed pedicle outline. After adjusting the gear-shift convergence, both cortices of the transverse process were penetrated and the tip was advanced towards the lateral vertebral body wall, where an extrapedicular screw was placed with tricortical fixation. Results: Out of 90 lumbar screws in 19 patients, 33 screws were inserted using our novel method, without correction loss or complications during an average follow-up period of 28.44 months, except radiological loosening of one screw. Conclusions: Our new extrapedicular screw placement method into the vertebral body provides an easy, accurate, and safe alternative for scoliosis patients with ESLPs without relying on the O-arm navigation system. Surgeons must consider utilizing this method to enhance correction power in scoliosis surgery, regardless of the small size of the lumbar pedicle.

Exploring the impact of mild-to-moderate foraminal stenosis at L5-S1 on clinical outcomes following L4-5 posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Patients scheduled for L4-5 PLIF often have FS at L5-S1. However, data on the clinical and radiographic outcomes of cases with mild-to-moderate L5-S1 FS are lacking, which may affect clinical outcomes or require additional surgery after L4-5 fusion. PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of L4-5 PLIF in patients with and without mild-to-moderate L5-S1 FS, with a primary focus on the association between L5-S1 FS and postoperative clinical outcomes including back pain, leg pain, and scores on the oswestry disability index (ODI) and EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A retrospective review of patients who underwent L4-5 PLIF from 2014 to 2018. The patients were divided according to the presence of mild-to-moderate FS at L5-S1. OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical assessment included the pain visual analog scale (VAS), ODI, and EQ-5D score. Radiographic assessments included spinopelvic parameters and grades for central and foraminal stenosis. METHODS: Clinical outcomes were assessed using validated outcome measures at preoperative, 6-month, 12-month, and 36-month follow-up visits. Radiographic evaluations were performed using preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Foraminal stenosis was assessed qualitatively using MRI with a grading system from none to severe and quantitatively by measuring changes in the foraminal area on CT. RESULTS: Among 186 patients, 55 were categorized as the FS group and 131 as the non-FS group. The FS group was older (p=0.039) and had more severe central stenosis at L5-S1 (p=0.007) as well as more severe FS at both L4-5 and L5-S1 (both p<0.001). Preoperative disc height (p<0.001), C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis (p=0.003), lumbar lordosis (p=0.005), and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (p=0.026) were more aggravated in the FS group. The FS group showed inferior clinical outcomes at the final follow-up in terms of back pain (p=.010) and ODI score (p=.003). CONCLUSION: The presence of mild-to-moderate FS at L5-S1 was associated with more aggravated sagittal balance in terms of smaller preoperative disc height, larger sagittal vertical axis, smaller lumbar lordosis, and larger pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch. Patients with L5-S1 FS also had poorer clinical outcomes including back pain and ODI score after L4-5 PLIF. Patients with L5-S1 FS need to be carefully examined before L4-5 fusion considering their adverse outcomes due to underlying degenerative changes.

Meta-Analysis on Efficacy and Complications of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Posterior Fusion of Cervical Spine.

OBJECTIVE: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) is effective for promoting robust fusion for long-level cervical deformity and revision surgeries. However, only a few studies have reported its efficacy and complications in posterior cervical fusion (PCF). METHODS: Therefore we evaluated the efficacy and complications of rhBMP-2 application in PCF surgery by searching 3 electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Database, and EMBASE) for studies that evaluated the use of rhBMP-2 in PCF. Five studies (1 prospective and 4 retrospective) were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: The quality of each study was assessed, and data on pseudarthrosis, wound infection, neurologic, and immediate medical complications were extracted and analyzed. We found that the use of rhBMP-2 in PCF showed significant benefits in terms of pseudarthrosis and no significant increases in the risk for neurologic and immediate medical complications regardless of the dose. However, high-dose (>2.1 mg/level) rhBMP-2 was a risk factor for wound infection after PCF. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis of the currently available literature suggests that patients with PCF may benefit from BMP-2 usage without increasing the risk of complications. However, dose control and containment are important to ensure a low risk of complications.

Can We Control Lateral Shoulder Balance Through Proximal Thoracic Curve Correction in Lenke Type 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

BACKGROUND: Proximal thoracic curve (PTC) correction has been considered to prevent lateral shoulder imbalance in Lenke Type 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients; however, postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) commonly occurs despite these strategies with PTC correction. We investigated the hypothesis that PTC correction would not directly affect PSI in the majority of Lenke type 2 AIS cases. Furthermore, we investigated the risk factors for lateral PSI after corrective surgery. METHODS: This study examined the records for AIS patients with Lenke type 2 who underwent corrective surgery and followed up for >2 years. Patients were categorized into PSI (-); radiologic shoulder height (RSH)<15 mm, and PSI (+); RSH≥15 mm. Repeated measures analysis of variance was performed at preoperatively, postoperatively, 1 month, and final follow-up. Postoperative lateral shoulder imbalance was predicted by the identification of univariate analysis and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Among the 151 patients reviewed, 29 (19.2%) showed PSI at final follow-up. Lateral shoulder balance parameters showed different directionalities between PSI (-) and (+) groups at postoperatively, 1 month, and final follow-up ( P <0.01 each). Preoperative PTC, middle thoracic curve (MTC) curve and MTC correction showed strong correlations with the RSH ( P =0.01, 0.03, and 0.04, respectively). However, PTC correction did not show a significant correlation with the RSH. Moreover, only a smaller MTC curve and larger MTC correction rate were related to lateral PSI in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In Lenke type 2 AIS curves, the MTC curve and its correction predominantly influence lateral shoulder imbalance after corrective surgery, irrespective of the PTC correction extent. Consequently, overemphasizing the correction of the PTC curve may not necessarily lead to an improved lateral shoulder balance. When MTC curve is smaller, surgeons should be more careful for MCT overcorrection leading to a lateral shoulder imbalance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Atrophy of the Posterior Cricoarytenoid Muscle as an Indicator of a Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injury History Before Revision Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: In our recent study, we observed some cases of symptomatic normal vocal cord motility instead of asymptomatic vocal cord palsy (VCP) in preoperative laryngoscopy of a revision anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) cohort. We assumed the intrinsic muscle atrophy caused by recurrent laryngeal nerve injury could cause vocal cord-related symptoms. Thus, radiological examinations were reviewed in relation to the posterior cricoarytenoid (PCA) muscle, one of the intrinsic muscles. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 64 patients who underwent a revision ACSS. Patients with vocal cord-related symptoms were classified as symptomatic group (group S, n = 11), and those without symptoms as asymptomatic group (group AS, n = 53). The bilateral size and signal intensity of the PCA muscles in these patients were measured in the axial view with preoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations. Since the size and signal intensity values were different on each image, the ratios of the contralateral and ipsilateral muscle values were analyzed for each modality. RESULTS: There was no VCP on laryngoscopy study. However, the mean ratio of the PCA muscle size on CT was 1.40 ± .37 in group S and 1.02 ± .12 in group AS (P = .007). These values on the MRI were 1.49 ± .45 in group S and 1.02 ± .14 in group AS, which was also a significant difference (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating the size of the PCA muscle before revision ACSS may predict a previous recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Careful planning for the appropriate approach should be undertaken if vocal cord-related symptoms and atrophy of PCA muscle are evident.

Does Posterior Cord Compression From the Ligamentum Flavum Influence Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To clarify whether outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) differ according to the presence of posterior cord compression from the ligamentum flavum (CCLF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although ACDF effectively addresses anterior cord compression from disc material and bone spurs, it cannot address posterior compression. Whether ACDF could result in favorable outcomes when CCLF is present remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 195 consecutive patients who underwent ACDF and were followed up for >2 years were included. CCLF was graded based on magnetic resonance imaging findings. Patients with CCLF grade 2 were classified as such, whereas patients with CCLF grades 0 to 1 were classified as the no-CCLF group. Patient characteristics, cervical sagittal parameters, neck pain visual analog scale, arm pain visual analog scale, and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score were assessed. Categorical variables were analyzed using a χ 2 test, whereas continuous variables were analyzed using the Student t test. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to elucidate factors associated with JOA recovery rates of >50%. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-seven patients (85.6%) were included in the no-CCLF group, whereas the remaining 28 patients (14.4%) were included in the CCLF group. Among patients in the CCLF group, 14 patients (50.0%) achieved clinical improvement. JOA score significantly improved in the no-CCLF group after the operation ( P < 0.001), whereas improvement was not appreciated in the CCLF group ( P = 0.642). JOA scores at 3 months ( P = 0.037) and 2 years ( P = 0.001) postoperatively were significantly higher in the no-CCLF group. Furthermore, the JOA recovery rate at 2 years after surgery was significantly higher in the no-CCLF group ( P = 0.042). Logistic regression demonstrated that CCLF was significantly associated with a JOA recovery rate of >50% at 2 years after surgery (odds ratio: 2.719; 95% CI: 1.12, 6.60). CONCLUSION: ACDF performed for patients with CCLF grade 2 showed inferior JOA score improvement compared with those with CCLF grade 0 or 1. ACDF cannot remove posterior compressive structures, which limits its utility when ligamentum flavum significantly contributes to cord compression.

Fate of pseudarthrosis detected 2 years after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a minimum 5-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Prior study has shown that 70% of cervical pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) detected at 1 year will go on to fusion by 2 year. Pseudarthrosis detected 2 years after ACDF may have different bone healing potential compared to nonunion detected 1 year after surgery. Therefore, it might have a different clinical significance. PURPOSE: To examine the radiographic and clinical prognosis of pseudarthrosis detected 2 years after ACDF with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS SAMPLE: A total of 249 patients who completed a 5-year follow-up after ACDF. OUTCOMES MEASURES: Clinical outcomes such as neck pain visual analogue scale (VAS), arm pain VAS, and neck disability index (NDI) and radiographic assessment such as X-ray, computed tomography (CT) scan. METHODS: A total of 249 patients who completed a 5-year follow-up after ACDF were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who were diagnosed with pseudarthrosis at 2 years postoperatively were included. Fusion, neck pain VAS, arm pain VAS, and NDI were assessed. The results were compared between the union group (patients who achieved union), and the nonunion group (patients with pseudarthrosis) at 5 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Among the patients who had pseudarthrosis at 2 years postoperatively, the fusion rate at 5 years was 32.6% (14/43). While the union group showed continued improvements in neck pain VAS, arm pain VAS, and NDI until 5 years, the nonunion group showed significant worsening of arm pain VAS and NDI at 5 years, with the values of neck pain VAS, arm pain VAS, and NDI being significantly worse than those of the union group at 5 years. CONCLUSION: The incidence of pseudarthrosis detected at 2 years postoperatively after ACDF was 67.4%, and it remained unfused at 5 years postoperatively. Nonunion identified 2 years after ACDF may be considered a poor prognostic factor because it has less potential to achieve fusion with further follow-up and a higher chance of worsening clinical symptoms. Therefore, the presence of fusion at the 2-year follow-up can be considered an indicator of the success of the surgery.

Risk Factors for the Aggravation of Sagittal Balance After L5-S1 Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors for the aggravation of sagittal alignment after single-level L5-S1 PLIF. METHODS: Eighty-six patients who underwent L5-S1 PLIF were divided into 2 groups according to the postoperative changes in the segmental angle (SA; group I: increase; group D: decrease). The 2 groups were compared in terms of demographic, clinical, and radiological outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for aggravation of sagittal alignment. RESULTS: Of the study patients, 39 (45%) were categorized as group I and 47 (55%) as group D. The demographic and clinical parameters were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Group D showed postoperative deteriorations in the local sagittal parameters, including lumbar lordosis (LL; P = 0.034), sacral slope (P = 0.012), and pelvic tilt (P = 0.003). In contrast, group I showed improved LL after surgery (P = 0.021). Large preoperative values of lumbosacral angle (LSA; odds ratio [OR], 1.287; P = 0.001), SA (OR, 1.448; P < 0.001), and flexion LSA (OR, 1.173; P = 0.011) were independent risk factors for the aggravation of sagittal balance. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons treating patients with large preoperative SA, LSA, and flexion LSA at L5-S1 level should be cautious of the possible aggravation of sagittal balance after L5-S1 PLIF and may consider different surgical approaches such as anterior or oblique lumbar interbody fusion.

Risk Factors and Exit Strategy of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Alert During Deformity Correction for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the risk factors of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) alert during deformity correction surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to describe the outcomes of patients who underwent staged correction surgery due to IONM alert during the initial procedure. METHODS: We reviewed 1 024 patients with idiopathic scoliosis who underwent deformity correction and were followed-up for ≥1 year. The pre-and postoperative Cobb angle of the major structural curve, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), number of levels fused, event that caused the IONM alert, and intervention required for the recovery of the signal were recorded. Patients who received IONM alerts (alert group) and those who did not (non-alert group) during the operation were compared. RESULTS: Compared to the non-alert group, the alert group had a significantly greater preoperative Cobb angle of the major structural curve (P < .001), number of levels fused (P = .003), operative time (P < .001), and EBL (P < .001). The percentage of correction did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (P = .348). Eight patients (.8%) underwent a staged operation because the IONM signal alert hindered correction of the deformity. The percentage of correction of patients who underwent staged operation was 64.9 ± 15.1%, and no permanent neurologic deficits occurred. CONCLUSIONS: A greater magnitude of preoperative deformity and surgical extent increases the risk of cord injury identified by IONM alerts during correction of deformities in patients with AIS. However, in patients in whom the IONM alert cannot be recovered or reproduced by proceeding with deformity correction, surgeons can minimize the risk by aborting the initial procedure and completing the correction using staged operations.

Floating Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Compressive Myelopathy Accompanied by C1 Posterior Ring Hypoplasia: A Technical Note and Case Series.

Posterior ring hypoplasia of the atlas (C1) is not common and in most cases is found by chance without symptoms. This disorder is sometimes accompanied by a mild C1-C2 instability or the presence of a space-occupying lesion such as ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament, pannus, or retro-odontoid pseudo-tumor, which are indications for surgery if symptomatic cord compression is present. A C1 posterior arch resection has been the procedure of choice but is associated with several fatal complications. We here present a novel posterior arch decompression technique that is relatively safer and easier and that involves mobilization and posterior translation of the posterior arch as a whole, similar to a vertebral body sliding osteotomy.

Efficacy and safety of oblique posterior endplate resection for wider decompression (trumpet-shaped decompression) during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) provides a limited workspace, and surgeons often need to access the posterior aspect of the vertebral body to achieve sufficient decompression. Oblique resection of the posterior endplate (trumpet-shaped decompression [TSD]) widens the workspace, enabling removal of lesions behind the vertebral body. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oblique posterior endplate resection for wider decompression. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 227 patients who underwent ACDF for the treatment of cervical myelopathy or radiculopathy caused by spondylosis or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and were followed up for ≥ 1 year were included. Patient characteristics, fusion rates, subsidence, and patient-reported outcome measures, including the neck pain visual analog scale (VAS) score, arm pain VAS score, and Neck Disability Index (NDI), were assessed. Patients who underwent TSD during ACDF (TSD group) and those who underwent surgery without TSD (non-TSD group) were compared. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (25.1%) were included in the TSD group and 170 patients (74.9%) in the non-TSD group. In the TSD group, 28.2% ± 5.5% of the endplate was resected, and 26.0% ± 6.1% of the region behind the vertebral body could be visualized via the TSD technique. The resection angle was 26.9° ± 5.9°. The fusion rate assessed on the basis of interspinous motion, intragraft bone bridging, and extragraft bone bridging did not significantly differ between the two groups. Furthermore, there were no significant intergroup differences in subsidence. The patient-reported outcome measures at the 1-year follow-up were also not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: TSD widened the workspace during ACDF, and 26% of the region posterior to the vertebral body could be accessed using this technique. The construct stability was not adversely affected by TSD as demonstrated by the similar fusion and subsidence rates among patients who underwent TSD and those who did not. Therefore, TSD can be safely applied during ACDF when compressive lesions extend behind the vertebral body and are not limited to the disc space, enabling adequate decompression without disrupting the construct stability.

Factors affecting the prognosis of recovery of motor power and ambulatory function after surgery for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression.

OBJECTIVE: Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) causes neurological deficits that may hinder ambulation. Understanding the prognostic factors associated with increased neurological recovery and regaining ambulatory functions is important for surgical planning in MESCC patients with neurological deficits. The present study was conducted to elucidate prognostic factors of neurological recovery in MESCC patients. METHODS: A total of 192 patients who had surgery for MESCC due to preoperative neurological deficits were reviewed. A motor recovery rate ≥ 50% and ambulatory function restoration were defined as the primary favorable endpoints. Factors associated with a motor recovery rate ≥ 50%, regaining ambulatory function, and patient survival were analyzed. RESULTS: About one-half (48.4%) of the patients had a motor recovery rate ≥ 50%, and 24.4% of patients who were not able to walk due to MESCC before the surgery were able to walk after the operation. The factors "involvement of the thoracic spine" (p = 0.015) and "delayed operation" (p = 0.041) were associated with poor neurological recovery. Low preoperative muscle function grade was associated with a low likelihood of regaining ambulatory functions (p = 0.002). Furthermore, performing the operation ≥ 72 hours after the onset of the neurological deficit significantly decreased the likelihood of regaining ambulatory functions (p = 0.020). Postoperative ambulatory function significantly improved patient survival (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Delayed operation and the involvement of the thoracic spine were poor prognostic factors for neurological recovery after MESCC surgery. Furthermore, a more severe preoperative neurological deficit was associated with a lesser likelihood of regaining ambulatory functions postoperatively. Earlier detection of motor weaknesses and expeditious surgical interventions are necessary, not only to improve patient functional status and quality of life but also to enhance survival.

What Type of Incision for Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery Involving Long Segments Can Bring Better Cosmetic and Functional Outcomes?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether double transverse incisions could provide superior cosmetic and functional outcomes, including rates of dysphagia and dysphonia, compared with longitudinal incisions in patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) involving ≥ 3 levels. METHODS: A total of 62 consecutive patients who underwent ACSS involving ≥ 3 levels were included in this study. They consist of 33 with longitudinal incisions (L group) and 29 with double transverse incisions (DT group). We recorded functional outcome measures including the Bazaz score for postoperative dysphagia and the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) for postoperative dysphonia. The Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) were used to evaluate postoperative skin scarring. RESULTS: Cosmetic results, as assessed using the VSS and POSAS, were significantly better in the DT than in the L group at most follow-up time points (p < 0.01 each). Dysphagia rates were significantly lower in the DT group than in the L group during the late postoperative period from 6 months until final 2 years of follow-up (p < 0.01 each). There were no significant different results between the 2 groups in terms of dysphonia. CONCLUSION: A double transverse incision can be a feasible option when performing ACSS involving ≥ 3 levels, providing better cosmesis and lower rates of persistent dysphagia than with a longitudinal incision.

The medial window technique as a salvage method to insert C2 pedicle screw in the case of a high-riding vertebral artery or narrow pedicle: a technical note and case series.

PURPOSE: To describe the safety and feasibility of C2 medial window screw (C2MWS) as an alternative salvage method for C2 pedicle screws in cases of high-riding vertebral artery (HRVA) or narrow pedicle. METHODS: The C2MWS technique involves screw insertion by intentionally breaching the medial cortex of the pedicle to avoid vertebral artery injury. Twelve patients who underwent C2 screw insertion via the C2MWS were retrospectively reviewed. C2MWS was indicated in cases of high-riding vertebral artery (HRVA) or narrow pedicle (pedicle width ≤ 4 mm). The width of the canal breach by screw, vertebral artery groove (VAG) breach, solid fusion, neck pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score were assessed as outcome measurements. RESULTS: C2MWS was indicated due to both HRVA and narrow pedicle for 11 screws, narrow pedicle for one screw, and HRVA for two screws. No screw VAG breach or vertebral artery injury was noted postoperatively. The mean width of canal breach was 2.9 ± 1.3 mm. There were no cases demonstrating neurologic deterioration, and 11 patients (91.7%) demonstrated solid fusion at 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, neck pain VAS and JOA scores significantly improved after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The C2MWS technique can provide 3-column fixation while reliably avoiding VA injury. C2MWS could be considered as a salvage alternative method when the insertion of C2 pedicle screw is complicated by HRVA or a narrow pedicle, while there is a need to provide firmer fixation strength than that provided by pars or translaminar screws.