Fragment excision and triceps V-Y advanced reattachment using suture anchor for olecranon nonunion: A case report.

RATIONALE: The nonunion of olecranon fractures is uncommon in simple fractures, and it is challenging to treat surgically due to the disruption of the anatomy of the elbow joint. There is limited literature on surgical options, and several factors to determine the treatment, including the amount and quality of bone stock, age, and degree of articular damage. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 58-year-old man presented at the clinic with neglected olecranon fracture for 1 year (case 1). A 74-year-old man (case 2) presented with consistent pain and limited of motion after surgery for olecranon fracture. DIAGNOSIS: Both patients were diagnosed with olecranon nonunion. INTERVENTION: Both patients received the excision of nonunited fragment and reattaching with V-Y advancement of triceps. OUTCOMES: Range of motion and Mayo elbow performance score were improved after surgery. LESSONS: This technique is useful in patients who cannot undergo other surgical options due to insufficient bone quality and elbow function, and it can lead to satisfactory outcomes with an acceptable range of motion and pain relief.

Regional nerve blocks for relieving postoperative pain in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Rotator cuff tear is the most common cause of shoulder pain in middle-age and older people. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is the most common treatment method for rotator cuff tear. Early postoperative pain after ARCR is the primary concern for surgeons and patients and can affect postoperative rehabilitation, satisfaction, recovery, and hospital day. There are numerous methods for controlling postoperative pain including patient-controlled analgesia, opioid, interscalene block, and local anesthesia. Regional blocks including interscalene nerve block, suprascapular nerve block, and axillary nerve block have been successfully and commonly used. There is no difference between interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) and suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) in pain control and opioid consumption. However, SSNB has fewer complications and can be more easily applied than ISB. Combination of axillary nerve block with SSNB has a stronger analgesic effect than SSNB alone. These regional blocks can be helpful for postoperative pain control within 48 hours after ARCR surgery.

Comparison of the conventional Henry approach and trans-flexor carpi radialis approach for the treatment of distal radius fracture: A retrospective cohort study.

Few studies have compared the clinical outcomes of the conventional Henry approach and trans-flexor carpi radialis (FCR) approach. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of the conventional Henry approach and trans-FCR approach for the treatment of distal radius fractures. We compared 20 wrists that underwent the conventional Henry approach with 20 wrists that underwent the trans-FCR approach for open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fracture. The clinical and radiological parameters were checked at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. A visual analogue scale score, the modified Mayo wrist score, range of motion, and grip strength were collected. In addition, tenderness in the area of the FCR tendon were assessed. Regarding radiologic evaluations, the radial inclination, radial height, volar tilt, and ulna variance were measured. In the trans-FCR approach group, 15 patients complained of tenderness in the area of the FCR tendon at 3 months after surgery, which was significantly higher than those of conventional Henry approach group (P < .05). In the conventional Henry approach group, the tenderness had resolved spontaneously by 1 year after surgery in 19 patients. The trans-FCR approach can cause discomfort such as tenderness to the area of the FCR tendon compared to the conventional Henry approach, but there is no significant difference in the final clinical and radiologic outcomes.

Greater Tuberosity Bone Mineral Density and Rotator Cuff Tear Size Are Independent Factors Associated With Cutting-Through in Arthroscopic Suture-Bridge Rotator Cuff Repair.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between cutting-through at the greater tuberosity (GT) in arthroscopic suture-bridge rotator cuff repair and the bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine, hip, and ipsilateral GT of the proximal humerus and to evaluate factors and clinical outcomes related to cutting-through. METHODS: This study prospectively enrolled patients who underwent arthroscopic knotted suture-bridge rotator cuff repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears between June 2014 and October 2015 and who had undergone dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry cans within 1 month before surgery with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Cutting-through was defined as the occurrence of cortical breakage of the GT just medial to the lateral knotless anchor hole due to the tension of the sutures from the medial anchor, and it was assessed. Clinical and radiologic data were analyzed. Univariate and regression analyses were performed to evaluate factors related to cutting-through. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients who had cutting-through (46, group I) and patients who did not (32, group II). In an analysis of lumbar spine, hip, and GT BMD, GT BMD was the most effective for predicting cutting-through (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.89-0.99). GT BMD (P < .001) and tear size (P = .004) were independent factors for cutting-through. Although a significant difference was found between the 2 groups in terms of age, sex, lumbar spine and hip BMD, fatty infiltration of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus, and atrophy of the supraspinatus, these variables were not independent factors. Clinical and structural outcomes showed no significant difference between the 2 groups, and anchor failure was not identified intraoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: GT BMD and rotator cuff tear size are independent factors associated with cutting-through at the GT. A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan of the proximal humerus is useful for predicting bone quality before arthroscopic suture-bridge rotator cuff repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Prospective cohort study.

Dexmedetomidine combined with suprascapular nerve block and axillary nerve block has a synergistic effect on relieving postoperative pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

PURPOSE: Suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) is the most commonly used block for the relief of postoperative pain from arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and can be used in combination with axillary nerve block (ANB). Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a type of alpha agonist that can elongate the duration of regional block. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the use of dexmedetomidine combined with SSNB and ANB with those of the use of SSNB and ANB alone on postoperative pain, satisfaction, and pain-related cytokines within the first 48 h after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: Forty patients with rotator cuff tears who had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were enrolled in this single-center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial study. Twenty patients were randomly allocated to group 1 and received ultrasound-guided SSNB and ANB using a mixture of 0.5 ml (50 µg) of DEX and 9.5 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine preemptively. The other 20 patients were allocated to group 2 and underwent ultrasound-guided SSNB and ANB alone using a mixture of 0.5 ml of normal saline and 9.5 ml of ropivacaine. The visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and patient satisfaction (SAT) scores were postoperatively checked within 48 h. The plasma interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-1ß, cortisol, and serotonin levels were also postoperatively measured within 48 h. RESULTS: Group 1 showed a significantly lower mean VAS (visual analog scale of pain) score 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 h after operation, and a significantly higher mean SAT (patient satisfaction) score 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 h after the operation than group 2. Group 1 showed a significantly lower mean plasma IL-8 level 1 and 48 h after the operation, and a significantly lower mean IL-1ß level 48 h after the operation than group 2. Group 1 showed a significantly lower mean plasma serotonin level 12 h after the operation than group 2. The mean timing of rebound pain in group 1 was significantly later than that in group 2 (36 h > 23 h, p = 0.007). Six patients each in groups 1 and 2 showed rebound pain. The others did not show rebound pain. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided SSNA and ANB with DEX during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair resulted in a significantly lower mean VAS score and a significantly higher mean SAT score within 48 h after the operation than SSNB and ANB alone. Additionally, SSNB and ANB with DEX tended to result in a later mean timing of rebound pain accompanied by significant changes in IL-8, IL-1ß, and serotonin levels within 48 h after the operation. The present study could provide the basis for selecting objective parameters of postoperative pain in deciding the optimal use of medication for relieving pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 2015-20, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04398589. IRB NUMBER: 2015-20, Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital.

Dexmedetomidine combined with interscalene brachial plexus block has a synergistic effect on relieving postoperative pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

PURPOSE: Interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) is one of the most commonly used regional blocks in relieving postoperative pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is an alpha 2 agonist that can enhance the effect of regional blocks. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of DEX combined with ISB with ISB alone on postoperative pain, satisfaction, and pain-related cytokines within the first 48 h after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: Fifty patients with rotator cuff tears who had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were enrolled in this single center, double-blinded randomized controlled trial study. Twenty-five patients were randomly allocated to group 1 and received ultrasound-guided ISB using a mixture of 1 ml (100 µg) of DEX and 8 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine preemptively. The other 25 patients were allocated to group 2 and underwent ultrasound-guided ISB alone using a mixture of 1 ml of normal saline and 8 ml of ropivacaine. The visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and patient satisfaction (SAT) scores were checked within 48 h postoperatively. The plasma interleukin (IL)-6, -8, -1ß, cortisol, and substance P levels were also measured within 48 h, postoperatively. RESULTS: Group 1 showed a significantly lower mean VAS score and a significantly higher mean SAT score than group 2 at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 h postoperatively. Compared with group 2, group 1 showed a significantly lower mean plasma IL-6 level at 1, 6, 12, and 48 h postoperatively and a significantly lower mean IL-8 level at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. The mean timing of rebound pain in group 1 was significantly later than that in group 2 (12.7 h > 9.4 h, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided ISB with DEX in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair led to a significantly lower mean VAS score and a significantly higher mean SAT score within 48 h postoperatively than ISB alone. In addition, ISB with DEX showed lower mean plasma IL-6 and IL-8 levels than ISB alone within 48 h postoperatively, with delayed rebound pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 2013-112, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02766556.

Effects of axial forearm instability on force transmission across the elbow.

BACKGROUND: The interosseous membrane (IOM) and distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) provide axial stability to the forearm. Our hypothesis was that injury to these structures alters force transmission through the elbow. METHODS: A custom-designed apparatus that applies axial loads from the wrist to the elbow was used to test 10 cadaveric upper limbs under the following simulated conditions (1) intact, (2) DRUJ injury, (3) IOM injury, or (4) IOM + DRUJ injury. IOM injury was simulated by osteotomies of the IOM attachment to the radius, and DRUJ injury was simulated by distal ulnar oblique osteotomy. We applied 160 N of axial force during cyclic and functional range of forearm rotation (40o pronation/40o supination), and force, contact pressure, and contact area through the elbow joint were measured simultaneously. RESULTS: The force across the radiocapitellar joint was significantly higher in the IOM + DRUJ injury and the IOM injury groups than in the intact and DRUJ injury groups. The mean force across the radiocapitellar joint was not significantly different between the intact and DRUJ injury groups or between the IOM + DRUJ injury and the IOM injury groups. Forces across the ulnohumeral joint showed an inverse pattern to those in the radiocapitellar joint. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that injury to the IOM contributes more to the disruption of the normal distribution of axial loads across the elbow than injury to the DRUJ.

Axial load transmission through the elbow during forearm rotation.

BACKGROUND: Forearm rotation is closely associated with the axiorotational force transmission through the elbow joint. A technique has been developed to study the transmission of force across the radiocapitellar and ulnotrochlear joints during forearm rotation. METHODS: Ten human cadaveric upper limbs were prepared on a custom-designed apparatus that permits the application of extrinsic axial loads across an intact cadaveric elbow joint. A force-sensitive transducer was inserted into the elbow joint of each cadaver. A 160 N axial force was applied to the specimen during cyclic forearm rotation while the force, contact pressure, and contact area through the elbow joint were measured. RESULTS: The mean force across the radiocapitellar joint showed no significant difference between pronation and supination (P = .3547). The radiocapitellar joint showed significantly higher contact area (P = .0001) and lower contact pressure (P = .0001) in pronation than in supination. The mean values for contact pressure, area, and force across the ulnotrochlear joint were not significantly different between supination and pronation. CONCLUSION: The contact pressure and contact area of the radiocapitellar joint in the cadaveric model changed according to forearm rotation while the force remained constant. The mean contact pressure of the radiocapitellar joint in pronation was significantly lower than that in supination because the force across it did not change significantly and its contact area decreased significantly. These findings may suggest that the pronated elbow can play an important role in protecting the radiocapitellar joint in high-impact activities like delivering punch in martial arts or falling on an outstretched arm.

Effects of arthroscopy-guided suprascapular nerve block combined with ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the pain relieving effect of ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) combined with arthroscopy-guided suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) with that of ultrasound-guided ISB alone within the first 48 h after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with rotator cuff tears who had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were enrolled. The 24 patients in group 1 received ultrasound-guided ISB and arthroscopy-guided SSNB; the remaining 24 patients in group 2 underwent ultrasound-guided ISB alone. Visual analogue scale pain score and patient satisfaction score were checked at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 h post-operatively. RESULTS: Group 1 had a lower visual analogue scale pain score at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 h post-operatively (1.7 < 2.6, 1.6 < 4.0, 3.5 < 5.8, 3.6 < 5.2, 3.2 < 4.2, 1.3 < 2.0), and a higher patient satisfaction score at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 h post-operatively than group 2 (7.8 > 6.0, 6.2 > 4.3, 6.4 > 5.1, 6.9 > 5.9, 7.9 > 7.1). Six patients in group 1 developed rebound pain twice, and the others in group 1 developed it once. All of the patients in group 2 had one rebound phenomenon each (p = 0.010). The mean timing of rebound pain in group 1 was later than that in group 2 (15.5 > 9.3 h, p < 0.001), and the mean size of rebound pain was smaller in group 1 than that in group 2 (2.5 > 4.0, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopy-guided SSNB combined with ultrasound-guided ISB resulted in lower visual analogue scale pain scores at 3-24 and 48 h post-operatively, and higher patient satisfaction scores at 6-36 h post-operatively with the attenuated rebound pain compared to scores in patients who received ultrasound-guided ISB alone after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The combined blocks may relieve post-operative pain more effectively than the single block within 48 h after arthroscopic cuff repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Randomized controlled trial, Level I. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02424630.

Which Is Better for Arthroscopic Tenodesis of the Long Head of the Biceps: Soft Tissue or Bony Interference Fixation?

PURPOSE: To compare the outcome between arthroscopic soft tissue tenodesis (STT) at the rotator interval and bony interference fixation tenodesis (BIFT) at the distal bicipital groove for the long head of the biceps (LHB). METHODS: Twenty-five shoulders that underwent arthroscopic STT of the LHB were compared with 28 shoulders that underwent arthroscopic BIFT using a 5.5-mm Bio-Tenodesis screw (Arthrex, Naples, FL). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Constant score, and elbow flexion strength index (EFSI) were checked preoperatively, postoperative 1 year and 2 years. Ultrasound imaging evaluation took place at 1 year and 2 years postoperatively as well. RESULTS: The overall functional outcomes improved after surgery in both groups. The BIFT group showed a significant increase in EFSI (preop: 0.54, postoperative 2 years: 0.94) compared with that of the STT group (preop: 0.52, postoperative 2 years: 0.74) at postoperative 2 years (P = .006). However, no significant difference was seen in the increase of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores and Constant scores between the two groups. At postoperative 2 years, ultrasound showed seven empty grooves in the STT group, but only two empty grooves in the BIFT group (P = .046). CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic BIFT for the LHB showed better improvement in EFSI than arthroscopic STT. In addition, the STT group showed a higher failure rate than the BIFT group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Usefulness of Arthroscopic Treatment of Painful Hip after Acetabular Fracture or Hip Dislocation.

BACKGROUND: Painful hip following hip dislocation or acetabular fracture can be an important signal for early degeneration and progression to osteoarthritis due to intraarticular pathology. However, there is limited literature discussing the use of arthroscopy for the treatment of painful hip. The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze the effectiveness and benefit of arthroscopic treatment for patients with a painful hip after major trauma. METHODS: From July 2003 to February 2013, we reviewed 13 patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment after acetabular fracture or hip dislocation and were followed up for a minimum of 2 postoperative years. The degree of osteoarthritis based on the Tonnis classification pre- and postoperatively at final follow-up was determined. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using visual analogue scale for pain (VAS) and modified Harris hip score (MHHS), and range of motion (ROM) of the hip pre- and postoperatively at final follow-up. RESULTS: There were nine male and four female patients with a mean age at surgery of 28 years (range, 20 to 50 years). The mean follow-up period of the patients was 59.8 months (range, 24 to 115 months), and the mean interval between initial trauma and arthroscopic treatment was 40.8 months (range, 1 to 144 months). At the final follow-up, VAS and MHHS improved significantly from 6.3 and 53.4 to 3.0 and 88.3, respectively (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). However, there were no significant differences in hip flexion, abduction, adduction, external rotation, and internal rotation as minor improvements from 113.1°, 38.5°, 28.5°, 36.5°, and 22.7° to 118.5°, 39.0°, 29.2°, 38.9°, and 26.5° were observed, respectively (p = 0.070, p = 0.414, p = 0.317, p = 0.084, and p = 0.136, respectively). None of the patients exhibited progression of osteoarthritis of the hip at the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic treatment after acetabular fracture or hip dislocation is effective and delays the progression of traumatic osteoarthritis.

Efficacy of direct arthroscopy-guided suprascapular nerve block after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of arthroscopy-guided direct suprascapular nerve block performed after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: In the present prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical study, 30 patients were divided into two groups: 15 patients (group I) were treated with arthroscopy-guided suprascapular nerve block using 10 mL 0.5 % ropivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, and 15 patients (group II) were treated with placebo using 10 mL 0.9 % saline after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Patient pain levels were measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h post-operatively. Additionally, the number of boluses and total amount of fentanyl dispensed by patient-controlled analgesia administration during the 24-h post-operative period were evaluated. RESULTS: VAS scores did not differ significantly between groups I and II during the 24-h post-operative period, but mean fentanyl bolus consumption was significantly less in group I compared with group II (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Arthroscopy-guided suprascapular nerve block at the end of a rotator cuff repair was safe and less time-consuming than expected. Although this procedure did not significantly reduce the post-operative pain, the post-operative need for fentanyl boluses as analgesia was reduced significantly, and it would be beneficial if this procedure involved a sensory branch of axillary nerve block or was performed at the beginning of the arthroscopic procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial, Level I.

Effect of ultrasonographically guided axillary nerve block combined with suprascapular nerve block in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the results of ultrasonographically guided axillary nerve block (ANB) combined with suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) with those of SSNB alone on postoperative pain and satisfaction within the first 48 hours after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. METHODS: Forty-two patients with rotator cuff tears who had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were enrolled in this study. Among them, 21 patients were randomly allocated to group 1 and received both SSNB and ANB with 10 mL ropivacaine. The other 21 patients were allocated to group 2 and received SSNB with 10 mL 0.75% ropivacaine and ANB with 10 mL saline. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, patient satisfaction (SAT), and lateral pain index (LPI) was checked at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Group 1 showed a significantly lower mean VAS score at postoperative 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours compared with group 2 (5.1 < 7.6, 4.4 < 6.3, 3.7 < 5.3, 3.2 < 4.5, 2.7 < 4.0, and 2.7 < 3.4, respectively). A significantly high mean SAT and low mean LPI was observed in group 1 at postoperative 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 hours (4.9 > 2.4, 5.9 > 3.7, 6.3 > 5.0, 6.8 > 5.7, 7.3 > 6.2, 7.5 > 6.6, and 7.7 > 7.0, respectively), (1.1 < 3.0, 0.8 < 2.5, 0.7 < 2.0, 0.7 < 1.6, 0.6 < 1.3, 0.6 < 1.0, and 0.4 < 0.7, respectively). The frequency of rebound pain decreased in group 1 compared with group 2 (P = .032). In addition, rebound phenomenon showed a correlation with ANB on univariate logistic regression (P = .034; odds ratio, 0.246). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonographically guided ANB combined with SSNB in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair showed an improved mean VAS in the first 24 hours after surgery compared with SSNB alone. The mean SAT and LPI of the combined blocks were better than those of the single block within the first 36 hours. Ultrasonographically guided ANB combined with SSNB also decreased the rebound phenomenon. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Revisit to scapular dyskinesis: three-dimensional wing computed tomography in prone position.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) wing computed tomography (CT) showed a high inter-rater reliability in assessing scapular dyskinesis. METHODS: The 330 scapular movements of 165 patients were classified into 4 types by 7 blinded observers. Then, 3D wing CT was performed with patients prone, and 4 blinded observers measured 5 angles, consisting of upward rotation (UR) superior translation (ST), anterior tilting (AT), protraction (PRO), and internal rotation (IR). The inter-rater reliability (IRR) of 2 methods was calculated, and cutoff values were determined for the 5 angles on the 3D wing CT images. RESULTS: The IRR was 0.783 for the observational method of scapular dyskinesis and 0.981 for 3D wing CT in the prone position. UR and ST angles were significantly larger in type 3 more than in the other types (P < .001, P < .001), and the AT angle showed a similar pattern in type 1 (P < .001). The PRO angle was significantly larger in types 1, 2, and 3 more than in type 4 (P < .001, P < .001, P = .013), and the IR angle was significantly larger in type 2 more than in the other types (P < .001). The cutoff values of the 5 angles were UR, 117°; ST, 90°; AT, 8°; PRO, 99°; and IR, 51°. The UR angle showed a significant correlation with glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (odds ratio, 0.436; P = .029) and the IR angle with MDI (odds ratio, 8.947; P = .048). CONCLUSION: The patients with a high UR angle showed a low rate of glenohumeral internal rotation deficit and those with a high IR angle had a high rate of the MDI in affected shoulder by the determinant of the cutoff value of the 5 angles. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, development of diagnostic criteria with nonconsecutive patients, diagnostic study.

Clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes of arthroscopic suture bridge repair for massive rotator cuff tear.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of arthroscopic suture bridge repairs of massive rotator cuff tears. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with massive rotator cuff tears that had been repaired by arthroscopic suture bridge repair were enrolled in this study. The mean follow-up period after surgery was 37.6 ± 8.9 months (range, 25 to 56). Arthroscopic en masse suture bridge repair was used in delaminated tears. The integrity of the repaired rotator cuff was examined by ultrasonography 4.5 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score, Constant score, range of motion, and muscle power. RESULTS: Twenty-seven cases (75%) showed complete healing on serial ultrasonography, whereas recurrent tears were detected in the remaining 9 cases (25%). Five retears were smaller than, and the other 4 were the same as or larger than, the initial tear. Overall mean functional scores and values improved after surgery. Although the 4 larger retears had a poorer outcome with respect to ASES score than the healed group (P = .005), the Constant score for these 4 retears did not significantly differ at the last follow-up (P = .175). Mean ASES and Constant scores for the larger tear group were also relatively satisfactory (64.2 and 63.0, respectively). Fatty degeneration of the supraspinatus on preoperative magnetic resonance images was associated with a high retear rate (P = .003, odds ratio = 13.664). CONCLUSIONS: Massive rotator cuff tears can be treated successfully by arthroscopic en masse suture bridge repair with satisfactory results. Larger retears had some adverse effects on functional outcome, whereas patients with smaller retears did not significantly differ in functional outcome from the healed group. Fatty degeneration of the supraspinatus on preoperative magnetic resonance images is a poor prognostic indicator. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

How to assess scapular dyskinesis precisely: 3-dimensional wing computer tomography--a new diagnostic modality.

BACKGROUND: Aberrations in scapular motion are believed to be associated with the presence of shoulder or elbow pathologies. There are many methods to evaluate scapular kinematics, but they have certain limitations. Nevertheless, it is believed that appropriate rehabilitation for each type of scapular dyskinesis is important. METHODS: Eighty-nine athletes were videotaped and seven blinded observers categorized scapular dyskinesis into 4 types, which was followed by 3-dimensional (3D) wing computer tomography (CT). Four blinded examiners evaluated 5 angles [upward rotation (UR), internal rotation (IR), anterior tilting (AT), superior translation (ST), and protraction (PRO)] on the 3D wing CT. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) was calculated for both the methods. CT scan measurements were compared with the 4 observational types to establish the validity. RESULTS: The IRR with observational assessment of scapular dyskinesis into 4 types was good, 0.780. The 3D wing CT analysis had a very high IRR, 0.972. There was a statistically significant correlation between observational assessment and 3D wing CT analysis. The UR angle, ST angle in type 3 scapular dyskinesis, and AT angle in type 1 scapular dyskinesis were increased as compared with those in the other types of scapular dyskinesis. All these measurements were made in the resting position of the scapula. CONCLUSION: The 3D wing CT analysis allows precise quantification of a position associated with scapular dyskinesis. Therefore, 3D wing CT can be considered as an alternative method for assessing scapular dyskinesis.

Arthroscopic percutaneous repair of anterosuperior rotator cuff tear including biceps long head: a 2-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: To report the results of an arthroscopic percutaneous repair technique for partial-thickness tears of the anterosuperior cuff combined with a biceps lesion. METHODS: The inclusion criteria were evidence of the upper subscapularis tendon tear and an articular side partial-thickness tear of the supraspinatus tendon, degeneration of the biceps long head or degenerative superior labrum anterior-posterior, above lesions treated by arthroscopic percutaneous repair, and follow-up duration > 24 months after the operation. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, constant score, the pain level on a visual analogue scale, ranges of motion and strength were assessed. RESULTS: The mean (± standard deviation) age of the 20 enrolled patients was 56.0 ± 7.7 years. The forward flexion strength increased from 26.3 ± 6.7 Nm preoperatively to 38.9 ± 5.1 Nm at final follow-up. External and internal rotation strength was also significantly increased (14.2 ± 1.7 to 19.1 ± 3.03 Nm, 12.3 ± 3.2 to 18.1 ± 2.8 Nm, respectively). Significant improvement was observed in ASES and constant scores at 3 months, 1 year and the time of final follow-up when compared with preoperative scores (p < 0.001). The mean subjective shoulder value was 86% (range, 78% to 97%). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of complete rotator cuff repair with concomitant tenodesis of the biceps long head using arthroscopic percutaneous repair achieved full recovery of normal rotator cuff function, maximum therapeutic efficacy, and patient satisfaction.

Is arthroscopic coracoplasty necessary in subcoracoid impingement syndrome?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of arthroscopic coracoplasty in the treatment of subcoracoid impingement syndrome. METHODS: We compared 23 shoulders that underwent arthroscopic coracoplasty for the treatment of subcoracoid impingement syndrome with 28 shoulders that did not undergo arthroscopic coracoplasty for the treatment of subcoracoid impingement syndrome, which comprised the control group. All the shoulders had subcoracoid and subacromial impingement syndrome with or without rotator cuff tear. Subcoracoid impingement was defined as a coracohumeral distance of less than 6 mm on the preoperative magnetic resonance image with anterior shoulder pain or tenderness. The 2 groups were further divided into several subgroups according to the size of concomitant rotator cuff tear, and a comparative analysis of functional outcomes after surgery among the subgroups was performed. RESULTS: In the 2 groups, the overall functional outcomes improved after surgery. The study group showed a significant increase in internal rotation compared with that in the control group (P = .001) at the last follow-up. The large to massive rotator cuff tear subgroup of the study group showed a significant increase in internal rotation (P = .017). On the other hand, no significant difference was seen in the subgroups with small to medium rotator cuff tears including isolated subscapularis tears. The no rotator cuff tear subgroup of the study group showed a significant increase in internal rotation (P = .046). CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic coracoplasty for subcoracoid impingement syndrome can provide a satisfactory outcome. In particular, a significant increase in internal rotation of the treated group was achieved after surgery in comparison with the untreated group, especially in the large to massive rotator cuff tear subgroup and in the no rotator cuff tear subgroup. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.