Cutaneous Adverse Events of Anti-PD-1 Therapy and BRAF Inhibitors.

OPINION STATEMENT: The treatment of advanced melanoma has undergone a dramatic transformation over the last decade with the advent of targeted and immunomodulatory therapies. This transition from cytotoxic chemotherapy has yielded improvements in both survival and quality of life; yet despite their therapeutic advantages, these treatments have been associated with a diverse range of cutaneous adverse events (AEs). These range from relatively benign eczematous conditions to more severe inflammatory and bullous disorders, and can include induction of second malignancies. AEs can result in serious morbidity and risk of mortality if not recognised and managed early. As a consequence of their novelty, and rapid uptake, these agents have been subject to intense scrutiny and there is a general understanding that cutaneous AEs should be anticipated in treatment plans. Dermatologists should be integrated into management teams to assist in the development of treatment protocols for anticipated common AEs and to provide expert management of more severe, rare or unusual AEs. Our experience has shown a reduction in treatment interruptions, more rapid recognition of unusual AEs and improved management pathways for patients suffering cutaneous AEs.

Cutaneous adverse events of anti-programmed death 1 antibodies combined with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 therapy use in patients with metastatic melanoma.

To date, cutaneous toxicities of combination therapies of anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD1) and ipilimumab are poorly described. Understanding cutaneous presentations will aid clinicians with early diagnoses and treatments. We aim to describe and compare the cutaneous toxicities between the combination therapies and anti-PD1 monotherapy. This is a cohort study comparing previously published data on 82 patients with metastatic melanoma on anti-PD1 monotherapy, with a new group of 25 patients with metastatic melanoma receiving combined ipilimumab and pembrolizumab between January 2015 to February 2016. A single institution, internal referrals were received from medical oncology teams from May 2012 to February 2015 for the anti-PD1 monotherapy group and from January 2015 to February 2016 for combination group. All patients who were treated with either anti-PD1 therapy or combination therapies during the timeframe within the institution were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to illustrate the time taken to develop cutaneous toxicities in the monotherapy and combination groups. Of the 25 patients, 88% developed new cutaneous lesions since the treatment. Immune-related lesions; lichenoid reaction (64%) and vitiligo (28%) were the most frequent. The incidence of lichenoid reaction increased rapidly in the early phase of treatment. Approximately one-third developed their first lichenoid reaction within 12 days of commencing treatment in combination group compared to 14 months in the anti-PD1 monotherapy. The rate of incidence of vitiligo was comparable in both groups. There was no statistical significance in the development of cutaneous toxicities and the treatment response between the two groups. The time taken to develop immune-related cutaneous toxicities was shorter for those on combination therapy versus anti-PD1 monotherapy.

Anti-programmed cell death-1 therapy-associated bullous disorders: a systematic review of the literature.

Bullous disorders are rare adverse events associated with anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD1) therapy. This paper presents two new cases of bullous disorders under anti-PD1 therapy and systematically reviewed the literature to foster a better understanding of the presentation and pathogenesis of bullous disorders under anti-PD1. A systematic review of the literature was completed using MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed and LILACS databases. We identified 29 cases of bullous disorders under anti-PD1 therapy, including our two new cases. This includes 18 cases of bullous pemphigoid (BP), five cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN)/Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) spectrum, one case of erythema multiforme (EM), four cases of bullous lichenoid reactions and one case of vesiculobullous eczema. In BP, blistering occurred by a median of 23 weeks after anti-PD1 therapy initiation and is often preceded by a prodrome, which lasts for a median of 9.5 weeks. Limbs and trunk were the most frequently involved body sites. Most cases (76%) achieved remission. In TEN/SJS/EM, blistering was usually preceded by a prodrome of interface dermatitis that lasted for a median of 1.5 weeks. Most cases (80%) died from either TEN/SJS or disease progression. Bullous disorders under anti-PD1 may be classified clinically as BP, SJS/TEN/EM, bullous lichenoid reactions and vesiculobullous eczema and histologically by intraepidermal splitting and subepidermal splitting. BP is usually preceded by a pruritic eruption and has a relatively good prognosis. SJS/TEN is usually preceded by a maculopapular eruption and has a very poor prognosis.

Incidence of Basal Cell Carcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Patients on Antiprogrammed Cell Death-1 Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma.

Systemic melanoma therapies have the potential to affect basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cuSCC) development. In this study, we aim to compare the incidence of BCC and cuSCC in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with antiprogrammed cell death-1 (anti-PD1), BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) monotherapy or dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy (CombiDT) with a group of control patients having similar risk factors. We reviewed the records of melanoma patients on anti-PD1, BRAFi, or CombiDT, and patients from the High-Risk Melanoma Clinic, Westmead Hospital. We also performed an immunohistochemical analysis of BCCs under anti-PD1 compared with controls using PD1, PD-L1, CD3, CD8, and CD20 stains. For the results, in all, 340 patients were included; 82 on anti-PD1, 134 on BRAFi, 69 on CombiDT, and 55 controls. BRAFi had the highest incidence of BCC (12.7%), followed by CombiDT (10.1%) and anti-PD1 (2.4%). The incidence of BCC was significantly lower in patients on anti-PD1 (2.4% vs. 19.4%; P<0.001) compared with controls. Patients on anti-PD1 were 8.54 times less likely to develop BCC than the controls [hazard ratio, 0.117 (95% confidence interval, 0.026-0.526), P=0.005]. BRAFi and CombiDT showed no significant differences in BCC incidence compared with controls. BRAFi had the highest cuSCC incidence (23.9%), followed by anti-PD1 (7.3%) and CombiDT (2.9%). The incidence of cuSCC was significantly higher in patients on BRAFi (23.9% vs. 3.5%; P<0.001) compared with controls, but anti-PD1 and CombiDT showed no differences in cuSCC incidence compared with controls. Immunohistochemistry analysis of 10 BCC from under anti-PD1 and 8 BCC from controls patients showed that while all BCC had negative PD-L1 staining, the percentage of PD1 staining in anti-PD1 group is significantly lower than that of the control group (independent t test, 8% vs. 26%; P<0.001). In conclusion, our study suggests that anti-PD1 therapy decreases the incidence of BCC, as a result of the PD1/PD-L1 blockade. Future studies investigating the role of anti-PD1 in suppressing or treating BCC may be warranted.

Adverse Reactions to Biologics: Melanoma (Ipilimumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab).

With increasing use of immunotherapies such as anti-cytotoxic T cell lymphocyte antigen-4 and anti-programmed cell death 1 antibodies, various skin toxicities have emerged. Severity of skin toxicities varies from mild lichenoid reaction to severe toxic epidermal necrolysis. Appropriate diagnosis and management of these skin toxicities are essential for optimal patient care and to avoid unnecessary cessation of anti-cancer therapies. This review summarises a wide range of cutaneous manifestations associated with immunotherapy usage in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Melanocytic lesion evolution patterns with targeted therapies and immunotherapies for advanced metastatic melanoma: An observational study.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Various cutaneous side-effects have been reported with anti-melanoma systemic therapies. This study investigated the changes in melanocytic lesion pigmentation in patients on four different therapies. METHODS: We analysed the serial dermatoscopic photographs of atypical melanocytic lesions taken from patients with advanced metastatic melanoma on four different systemic therapies (selective BRAF-inhibitor monotherapy, dabrafenib combined with trametinib [D&T], anti-programmed cell death protein 1 [anti-PD1] therapies, and anti-PD1 combined with ipilimumab) seen from February 2013 to May 2016. We compared these changes with the melanocytic lesions of 10 control patients. RESULTS: In the control group, 19% of naevi lightened, 64% did not change and 17% darkened. Only the BRAF inhibitor group showed more darkened lesions than controls (37%, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, there were more lightened naevi in the D&T therapy group (86%, P < 0.001) as well as the anti-PD1 and ipilimumab groups (59%, P < 0.001) than controls. Patients on anti-PD1 monotherapy had more lightened (49%) and fewer darkened naevi (9%) than controls, but differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that different anti-melanoma systemic therapies have different effects on the pigmentation of melanocytic lesions. BRAF inhibitor may have the propensity to cause darkening while D&T therapy and anti-PD1 caused lightening compared with controls. The findings emphasise the importance of regular dermatological monitoring in specialised clinics for patients on anti-melanoma systemic therapy. Clinicians should expect changes in the global pigmentation of melanocytic lesions but be suspicious of lesions with structural changes.

PD-1 inhibitor-associated lichenoid inflammation with incidental suprabasilar acantholysis or vesiculation-Report of 4 cases.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint agents targeting programmed cell death-1 protein (PD1) or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) receptors are increasingly utilized in treatment of advanced malignancies. However, these immunotherapies are commonly associated with idiosyncratic cutaneous adverse reactions. Thus, recognition and awareness of these reactions are necessary. METHODS: We reviewed the skin biopsies of all patients on anti-PD1 therapy with or without ipilimumab who developed lichenoid inflammation and included those with microscopic suprabasal or intraepidermal clefts. RESULTS: Four patients presented with interface dermatitis with microscopic intraepidermal clefts. In 2 patients, the clefts were well developed and had some acantholytic cells while the other 2 appeared to be spongiosis or inflammation related. Immunofluorescence was negative in 1 patient. None of them had clinical findings in keeping with paraneoplastic pemphigus (PP) and the symptoms improved with either topical corticosteroid or withdrawal of immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Lichenoid drug reaction occurring in patients receiving anti-PD1 therapy may be associated with microscopic suprabasal or intraepidermal clefting. The clinical course was similar to lichenoid drug reactions without clefting even though some lesions may resemble PP microscopically.

Histologic Assessment of Lichenoid Dermatitis Observed in Patients With Advanced Malignancies on Antiprogramed Cell Death-1 (anti-PD-1) Therapy With or Without Ipilimumab.

Lichenoid drug reaction is a common adverse reaction in patients taking immune-modulatory agents such as antiprogramed cell death (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 agents. The authors describe the clinical and histologic features of lichenoid drug reaction in 20 biopsies from 15 patients on anti-PD-1 agents and 9 biopsies from 7 patients on anti-PD-1 plus ipilimumab therapy. Clinically, all except 2 patients presented with discrete, violaceous exanthematous papules to plaques. The lichenoid inflammation in the majority (18 of 29 biopsies) was florid although histology was quite heterogeneous. Nevertheless, there was frequent involvement of the superficial follicular epithelium and acrosyringium, and also a propensity to blister that occurred in approximately 20% of the biopsies. Occasional patients had disease closely resembling lichen planus, although all of these biopsies had some atypical features for lichen planus such as parakeratosis. Dermal eosinophils were common particularly in those with mild inflammation. The lichenoid reaction was responsive to topical steroid or oral systemic treatment in general, and the anti-PD-1 agent had to be ceased in only one patient.

Cutaneous adverse events (AEs) of anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1 therapy in patients with metastatic melanoma: A single-institution cohort.

BACKGROUND: Anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1 therapy is emerging as the backbone of new standard of care immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma. Immune-related cutaneous events are observed in these patients. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe cutaneous adverse events observed in patients with metastatic melanoma on anti-PD-1 therapy. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical and histologic information of all patients treated with single-agent anti-PD-1 therapy for metastatic melanoma at Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia, from May 2012 to February 2015. RESULTS: Of the 82 patients included in the study, 34 had dermatology assessments. Forty (49%) developed a form of anti-PD-1-associated cutaneous adverse events. In all, 17% developed lichenoid reactions and eczema, and 15% developed vitiligo. An estimated 25% of patients were expected to develop their first lichenoid reactions within 8.3 months, and eczema and vitiligo within 10.3 months of therapy. These adverse events tend to appear together in patients on anti-PD-1 therapy. LIMITATIONS: The study was from a single center and clinical information was reviewed retrospectively in patients not referred to dermatology. CONCLUSION: Anti-PD-1 therapy is associated with the development of immune-related cutaneous events. Lichenoid reactions, eczema, and vitiligo are the 3 most prevalent lesions observed in our population. There is a tendency for lichenoid reactions and eczema to occur with vitiligo.