Social determinants of health and depressive symptoms before and after cancer diagnosis.

Despite frequent reports of mental health needs among older women with cancer, depressive symptoms often go unrecognized and untreated, particularly in socially vulnerable survivors. Here, we examined associations of sociodemographic factors and social limitations with depressive symptoms from pre-diagnosis to post-diagnosis in older women diagnosed with breast or gynecological cancer. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (SEER-MHOS) linked dataset, we used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between sociodemographic factors (race, ethnicity, marital status, rurality) and social limitations (i.e., health interfering with social activities) on depressive symptoms in women aged ≥65 years with breast or gynecologic cancer (n = 1,353). Most participants had breast cancer (82.0%), stage I-II cancer (85.8%), received surgery for their cancer (94.8%), and radiation treatment (50.6%). Prior to diagnosis, 11.8% reported depressive symptoms, which nearly doubled to 22.4% at follow-up. Participants were 2.7 times more likely of reporting depressive symptoms after cancer diagnosis compared with pre-cancer diagnosis (95%CI: 2.10-3.48). Race, ethnicity, rurality, marital status, and social interference were significantly associated with an increased risk of depressive symptoms after cancer diagnosis than before their cancer diagnosis (p < 0.05). In summary, depressive symptoms increased following a cancer diagnosis. Our results suggest potential avenues for intervention that could lead to reduced depressive symptoms among older female cancer survivors.

Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Outcomes in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplant recipients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) have an increased risk of poor outcomes. However, a recent study demonstrated that immunosuppression is not an independent risk factor for these poor outcomes after controlling for primary tumor stage. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether transplant status is an independent risk factor for poor outcomes in CSCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A database of CSCCs treated at an academic center over 10 years was used to perform a retrospective cohort study comparing the risk of poor outcomes (local recurrence, regional and distant metastases, and disease-specific death) in solid organ transplant recipients and controls. Subjects were matched on age, tumor stage, sex, tumor site, and time to poor outcome. RESULTS: There were 316 tumors from 78 transplant patients and 316 tumors from 262 controls. On multivariate analysis, tumor stage and location on the head and neck were predictive of poor outcomes. There was no significant difference in the risk of poor outcomes in the transplant group versus the control group. CONCLUSION: Transplant status was not an independent risk factor for poor squamous cell carcinoma outcomes after controlling for stage, age, sex, site, and time to poor outcome.

Performance of Staging Systems for Non-Head and Neck Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The performance of staging systems in non-head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas has not been well established. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition and Brigham and Women's Hospital staging systems in non-head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible tumors were identified and staged from an existing retrospective database. Cumulative incidence function curves of any poor outcome were generated. Distinctiveness, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and concordance index were calculated. RESULTS: 1,042 primary tumors were included, with 38 resulting in any poor outcome and 16 in any major poor outcome. High-stage tumors represented 2.2% and 3.5% of tumors; these accounted for 10/38 of the poor outcomes (26.3%) and 8/16 of the major poor outcomes (50%). High-stage tumors predicted major poor outcomes with a sensitivity of 0.5 and specificity of 0.99 for the Brigham and Women's Hospital system, and a sensitivity of 0.5 and specificity of 0.97 for the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition system. The concordance index for both was 0.74. CONCLUSION: Current staging systems can be used to predict poor outcomes in cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas off the head and neck.

Receipt, uptake, and satisfaction with tailored DVD and patient navigation interventions to promote cancer screening among rural women.

Process evaluation is essential to understanding and interpreting the results of randomized trials testing the effects of behavioral interventions. A process evaluation was conducted as part of a comparative effectiveness trial testing a mailed, tailored interactive digital video disc (DVD) with and without telephone-based patient navigation (PN) to promote breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening among rural women who were not up-to-date (UTD) for at least one screening test. Data on receipt, uptake, and satisfaction with the interventions were collected via telephone interviews from 542 participants who received the tailored interactive DVD (n = 266) or the DVD plus telephone-based PN (n = 276). All participants reported receiving the DVD and 93.0% viewed it. The most viewed sections of the DVD were about colorectal, followed by breast, then cervical cancer screening. Most participants agreed the DVD was easy to understand, helpful, provided trustworthy information, and gave information needed to make a decision about screening. Most women in the DVD+PN group, 98.2% (n = 268), reported talking with the navigator. The most frequently discussed cancer screenings were colorectal (86.8%) and breast (71.3%); 57.5% discussed cervical cancer screening. The average combined length of PN encounters was 22.2 minutes with 21.7 additional minutes spent on coordinating activities. Barriers were similar across screening tests with the common ones related to the provider/health care system, lack of knowledge, forgetfulness/too much bother, and personal issues. This evaluation provided information about the implementation and delivery of behavioral interventions as well as challenges encountered that may impact trial results.

Two interventions to promote cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening among rural women who were not up-to-date (UTD) for at least one screening test were evaluated by rural women who received them as part of the randomized trial. Participants who received the tailored interactive digital video disc (DVD; n = 266) or the DVD plus telephone-based patient navigation (PN; n = 276) were interviewed by phone about their engagement and satisfaction with the interventions. All participants reported receiving the DVD and 93.0% viewed it. Most agreed the DVD was easy to understand, helpful, provided trustworthy information, and gave information needed to get screened. Almost all women in the DVD+PN group, 98.2% (n = 268) talked with the navigator. The most common cancer screenings discussed with navigators were colorectal (86.8%), followed by breast (71.3%) and cervical (57.5%). The average length of encounters with the navigators was 22.2 minutes; navigators spent 21.7 additional minutes on coordinating activities. Barriers discussed were similar across screening tests. The most common were related to the healthcare provider/system, lack of knowledge, forgetfulness/too much bother, and personal issues. This study provided important information about receipt, uptake, and satisfaction with two behavioral interventions, along with challenges encountered that may impact results.

The association of upward economic mobility with textbook outcomes among patients undergoing general and cardiovascular surgery.

BACKGROUND: While disadvantaged neighborhoods may be associated with worse outcomes and earlier death, the relationship between economic opportunity and surgical outcomes remains unexplored. METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries who underwent AAA, CABG, colectomy or cholecystectomy were identified and stratified into quintiles based on upward economic mobility. Risk-adjusted probability of adverse postoperative outcomes were examined relative to economic mobility. RESULTS: Among 1,081,745 Medicare beneficiaries (age: 75.5 years, female: 43.0%, White: 91.3%), risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality decreased in a stepwise fashion from 6.0%(5.9-6.1) in the lowest quintile of upward economic mobility to 5.3%(5.2-5.4) in highest upward economic mobility (lowest vs. highest economic mobilityobility OR:1.14 (95%CI:1.11-1.17)). Similar associations were noted for postoperative complications (OR:1.04, 95%CI:1.02-1.06), extended length-of-stay (OR:1.07, 95%CI:1.06-1.09), and 30-day readmission (OR:1.04, 95%CI:1.02-1.05). Black beneficiaries had a higher risk of post-operative mortality across upward economic mobility quintiles except within the highest upward mobility group (referent, White patients, OR:0.93, 95%CI:0.79-1.09, p=0.355). CONCLUSION: Economic upward mobility was associated with post-operative outcomes. Race-based differences were mitigated at the highest levels of upward economic mobility, highlighting the importance of socioeconomics as a health equity lever.

Machine Learning Approach to Stratifying Prognosis Relative to Tumor Burden after Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: An International Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Assessing overall tumor burden on the basis of tumor number and size may assist in prognostic stratification of patients after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). We sought to define the prognostic accuracy of tumor burden by using machine learning (ML) algorithms compared with other commonly used prognostic scoring systems. STUDY DESIGN: Patients who underwent hepatectomy for CRLM between 2001 and 2018 were identified from a multi-institutional database and split into training and validation cohorts. ML was used to define tumor burden (ML-TB) based on CRLM tumor number and size thresholds associated with 5-year overall survival. Prognostic ability of ML-TB was compared with the Fong and Genetic and Morphological Evaluation scores using Cohen's d. RESULTS: Among 1,344 patients who underwent resection of CRLM, median tumor number (2, interquartile range 1 to 3) and size (3 cm, interquartile range 2.0 to 5.0) were comparable in the training (n = 672) vs validation (n = 672) cohorts; patient age (training 60.8 vs validation 61.0) and preoperative CEA (training 10.2 ng/mL vs validation 8.3 ng/mL) was also similar (p > 0.05). ML empirically derived optimal cutoff thresholds for number of lesions (3) and size of the largest lesion (1.3 cm) in the training cohort, which were then used to categorize patients in the validation cohort into 3 prognostic groups. Patients with low, average, or high ML-TB had markedly different 5-year overall survival (51.6%, 40.9%, and 23.1%, respectively; p < 0.001). ML-TB was more effective at stratifying patients relative to 5-year overall survival (low vs high ML-TB, d = 2.73) vs the Fong clinical (d = 1.61) or Genetic and Morphological Evaluation (d = 0.84) scores. CONCLUSIONS: Using a large international cohort, ML was able to stratify patients into 3 distinct prognostic categories based on overall tumor burden. ML-TB was noted to be superior to other CRLM prognostic scoring systems.

Social Vulnerability Subtheme Analysis Improves Perioperative Risk Stratification in Hepatopancreatic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: There has been increased interest in understanding how social determinants of health (SDH) may affect care both in the medical and surgical setting. We sought to define the impact of various aspects of social vulnerability on the ability of patients to achieve a "textbook outcome" (TO) following hepatopancreatic surgery. METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries who underwent hepatopancreatic resection between 2013 and 2017 were identified using the Medicare database. Social vulnerability was defined using the Centers for Disease Control Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), which is comprised of four subthemes: socioeconomic (SE), household composition and disability (HCD), minority status and language (MSL), and housing type and transportation (HTT). TO was defined as the composite endpoint: absence of 90-day mortality or readmission, absence of an extended length of stay (LOS), and no complications during the index admission. Cluster analysis was used to identify vulnerability cohorts, and multivariable logistic regression was utilized to assess the impact of these SVI subthemes on the likelihood to achieve a textbook outcome. RESULTS: Among 37,707 Medicare beneficiaries, 64.9% (n = 24,462) of patients underwent pancreatic resection while 35.1% (n = 13,245) underwent hepatic resection. Median patient age was 72 years (IQR: 68-77), just over one-half were male (51.9%; n = 19,558), and the median CCI was 3 (IQR: 2-8). Cluster analysis revealed five distinct SVI profiles with wide variability in the distribution of SVI subthemes, ranging from 15 (profile 1 IQR: 7-26) to 83 (profile 5 IQR: 66-93). The five profiles were grouped into 3 categories based on median composite SVI: "low vulnerability" (profile 1), "average vulnerability" (profiles 2 and 3), or "high vulnerability" (profiles 4 and 5). The rate of TO ranged from 44.6% in profile 5 (n = 4022) to 49.2% in profile 1 (n = 4836). Multivariable analyses comparing patients categorized into the two average SVI profiles revealed that despite having similar composite SVI scores, the risk of adverse postoperative outcomes was not similar. Specifically, patients from profile 5 had lower odds of achieving a TO (OR 0.89, 95%CI: 0.83-0.95) and higher odds of 90-day mortality (OR 1.29, 95%CI: 1.15-1.44) versus patients in profile 4. CONCLUSION: Distinct profiles of SVI subtheme characteristics were independently associated with postoperative outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing HP surgery, even among patients with similar overall composite SVI scores.

Rural hospitals are not associated with worse postoperative outcomes for colon cancer surgery.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether colorectal cancer surgery can be done safely at rural hospitals. The current study compared outcomes among rural patients who underwent colon resection at rural and nonrural hospitals. METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries who underwent colon resection for cancer between 2013 and 2017 were identified using the Medicare Inpatient Standard Analytic Files. Patients and hospitals were designated as rural based on rural-urban continuum codes. Risk-adjusted postoperative outcomes and hospitalization spending were compared among patients undergoing resection at rural versus nonrural hospitals. RESULTS: Among 3,937 patients who resided in a rural county and underwent colon resection for cancer, mean age was 76.3 (SD: 7.1) years and 1,432 (36.4%) patients underwent operative procedure at a rural hospital. On multivariable analyses, no differences in postoperative outcomes were noted among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing colon resection for cancer at nonrural versus rural hospitals. Specifically, the risk-adjusted probability of experiencing a postoperative complication at a nonrural hospital was 15.4% (95% CI: 14.1%-16.8%) versus 16.3% (95% CI: 14.2%-18.3%) at a rural hospital (OR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.85-1.38); 30-day mortality (nonrural: 2.9%, 95% CI: 2.2-3.6 vs rural: 3.5%, 95% CI: 2.4-4.5) was also comparable. In addition, price standardized, risk-adjusted expenditures were similar at nonrural ($18,610, 95% CI: $18,037-$19,183) and rural ($19,010, 95% CI: $18,630-$19,390) hospitals. CONCLUSION: Among rural Medicare beneficiaries who underwent a colon resection for cancer, there were no differences in postoperative outcomes among nonrural versus rural hospitals. These findings serve to highlight the importance of policies and practice guidelines that secure safe, local surgical care, allowing rural clinicians to accommodate strong patient preferences while delivering high-quality surgical care.

Surgeon Strategies to Patient-Centered Decision-making in Cancer Care: Validation and Applications of a Conceptual Model.

We sought to construct and validate a model of cancer surgeon approaches to patient-centered decision-making (PCDM) and compare applications of that model relative to surgical specialties. Ten PCDM strategies were assessed using a cross-sectional survey administered online to 295 board-certified cancer surgeons. Structural equation modeling was used to empirically validate and compare approaches to PCDM. Within the full sample, 7 strategies comprised a latent construct labeled, "physical & emotional accessibility," associated with surgeon approaches to PCDM (ß = 0.37, p < .05). Three individual strategies were included: "expectations (Q4)" (ß = 0.52, p < .05), "decision preferences (Q5) (ß = 0.47, p < .05), and "access medical information (Q3)" (ß = 0.75). Surgical specialties for subgroup analysis were classified as general/other (67.6%) or hepato-pancreato-biliary and upper gastrointestinal (HPB/UGI) (34.2%). For general/other surgeons, 7 individual strategies composed the model of surgeon approaches to PCDM, with "time (Q6) (ß = 0.70, p < .001) and "therapeutic relationship building (Q9)" (ß = 0.69, p < .001) being the strongest predictors. The HPB/UGI model included 2 latent constructs labeled "physical accessibility" (ß = 0.72, p < .05) and "creating a decision-making dialogue" (ß = 0.62) as well as the individual strategy, "effective communication (Q8)" (ß = 0.51, p < .05). Although models of surgeon PCDM varied, there were 4 overlapping strategies, including effective communication. Tailoring models of PCDM may improve surgeon uptake and thus, overall patient satisfaction with their cancer care.

Optimal hepatic surgery: Are we making progress in North America?

BACKGROUND: The aim of this analysis was to determine whether optimal outcomes have increased in recent years. Hepatic surgery is high risk, but regionalization and minimally invasive approaches have evolved. Best practices also have been defined with the goal of improving outcomes. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried. Analyses were performed separately for partial (≤2 segments), major (≥3 segments), and all hepatectomies. Optimal hepatic surgery was defined as the absence of mortality, serious morbidity, need for a postoperative invasive procedure or reoperation, prolonged length of stay (<75th percentile) or readmission. Tests of trend, χ2, and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2018, 17,082 hepatectomies, including 11,862 partial hepatectomies and 5,220 major hepatectomies, were analyzed. Minimally invasive approaches increased from 25.6% in 2014 to 29.6% in 2018 (P < .01) and were performed more frequently for partial hepatectomies (34.2%) than major hepatectomies (14.4%) (P < .01). Operative time decreased from 220 minutes in 2014 to 208 minutes in 2018 (P < .05) and was lower in partial hepatectomies (189 vs 258 minutes for major hepatectomies) (P < .01). Mortality (0.7%) and length of stay (4 days) were lower for partial hepatectomies compared with major hepatectomies (1.9%; 6 days), and length of stay decreased for both partial hepatectomies (5 days in 2014 to 4 days in 2018) and major hepatectomies (6 days in 2014 to 6 days in 2018) (all P < .01). Postoperative sepsis (2.9% in 2014 and 2.4% in 2018), bile leaks (6% in 2014 and 4.8% in 2018), and liver failure (3.7% in 2014 and 3.3% in 2018) decreased for all patients (<.05). On multivariable analyses, overall morbidity decreased for major hepatectomies (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99) and all hepatectomies (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, both P < .01), and optimal hepatic surgery increased over time for partial hepatectomies (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.09) and all hepatectomies (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.07, both P < .01). CONCLUSION: Over a 5-year period in North America, minimally invasive hepatectomies have increased, while operative time, postoperative sepsis, bile leaks, liver failure, and prolonged length of stay have decreased. Optimal hepatic surgery has increased for partial and all hepatectomies and is achieved more often in partial than in major resections.

Healthcare provider self-reported observations and behaviors regarding their role in the spiritual care of cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The provision of spiritual care by an interprofessional healthcare team is an important, yet frequently neglected, component of patient-centered cancer care. The current study aimed to assess the relationship between individual and occupational factors of healthcare providers and their self-reported observations and behaviors regarding spiritual care in the oncologic encounter. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered to healthcare providers employed at a large Comprehensive Cancer Center. Pearson's chi-square test and logistic regression were used to determine potential associations between provider factors and their observations and behaviors regarding spiritual care. RESULTS: Among the participants emailed, 420 followed the survey link, with 340 (80.8%) participants completing the survey. Most participants were female (82.1%) and Caucasian (82.6%) with a median age was 35 years (IQR: 31-48). Providers included nurses (64.7%), physicians (17.9%), and "other" providers (17.4%). There was a difference in provider observations about discussing patient issues around religion and spirituality (R&S). Specifically, nurses more frequently inquired about R&S (60.3%), while physicians were less likely (41.4%) (p = 0.028). Also, nurses more frequently referred to chaplaincy/clergy (71.8%), while physicians and other providers more often consulted psychology/psychiatry (62.7%, p < 0.001). Perceived barriers to not discussing R&S topics included potentially offending patients (56.5%) and time limitations (47.7%). CONCLUSION: Removing extrinsic barriers and understanding intrinsic influences can improve the provision of spiritual care by healthcare providers.

A mixed-methods approach to comparing perceptions of cancer patients' and cancer care providers' religious and spiritual beliefs, behaviours, and attitudes.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the perceptions of cancer patients' and cancer care providers' religious and spiritual (R&S) beliefs, behaviours, and attitudes. METHODS: A concurrent, nested, quantitative dominant, mixed-methods design was utilised. Data were collected from patient and provider groups via online survey. Analyses include chi-square tests of independence and independent t-tests for quantitative data and content analysis for qualitative data. RESULTS: The final analytic cohort for the study included 576 participants (npatients  = 236, nproviders  = 340) with an average age of 47.4 years (SD = 15.0). Over half of participants were partnered (n = 386, 70.1%), female (n = 317, 57.3%) and had an advanced degree (n = 284, 51.2%). The most common diagnosis for patients was breast cancer (n = 103, 43.2%). The most common provider role was nurse (n = 220; 64.7%), while a smaller subset included physicians (n = 61; 17.9%) and "other" providers (n = 59; 17.4%). There was no difference between patients and providers in relation to R&S identity (p = 0.49) or behaviour (p = 0.28). Providers more frequently indicated that patients should receive R&S resources in the hospital (n = 281, 89.7% vs. n = 111, 49.6%, p < 0.001). For resource type, patients most frequently endorsed written resources (n = 93, 83.8%) while providers endorsed relational resources (n = 281, 97.9%). CONCLUSION: Aligning patient and provider expectations of spiritual care will contribute to provision of optimal patient-centred cancer care.

Do Religious/Spiritual Preferences and Needs of Cancer Patients Vary Based on Clinical- and Treatment-Level Factors?

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to characterize the religion and spiritual (R&S) needs of patients who undergo cancer-directed surgery. In addition, we seek to examine how R&S needs vary based on R&S identity and clinical and surgical treatment characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered to potential participants who were recruited through outpatient clinics and online. Respondent desires for R&S resources and engagement with the healthcare team  around R&S topics were assessed. RESULTS: Among 383 potential participants who were identified, 236 respondents were included in the analytic cohort. Mean age was 58.8 (SD 12.10) years, and most participants were female (75.8%) and White/Caucasian (94.1%). The majority (78.4%) identified as currently cancer free. Commonly treated malignancies included breast (43.2%), male reproductive (8.9%), skin (8.5%), and gastrointestinal (GI) (7.2%). Two-thirds of the respondents indicated a desire to have R&S incorporated into their cancer treatment (63.3%). Patients who identified as highly/moderately religious reported wanting R&S more often (highly religious: 95.2% versus moderately religious: 71.4% vs. nonreligious but spiritual: 4.5%). On multivariable analysis, patients who believed their health would improve in the future were more likely to report wanting R&S service (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.7) as well as wanting to engage their healthcare providers on R&S topics (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.7). In contrast, perception of current or future health status was not associated with patient desire for the actual surgeon/doctor him/herself to be involved in R&S activities (OR 1.83, 95% CI 0.97-3.45). CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of patients undergoing cancer-directed surgery expressed a desire to have R&S incorporated into their cancer treatment. Incorporating R&S into cancer treatment can help a subset of patients throughout their cancer experience.

Comparing Surgeon Approaches to Patient-Centered Cancer Care Using Vignette Methodology.

BACKGROUND: We sought to characterize surgeon perceptions of patient attachment-related behaviors relative to patient-centered approaches during treatment decision-making within the clinical encounter. METHODS: An online survey including clinical vignettes was sent to board-certified surgeons to assess their approach to patient-centered treatment decision-making. Within these vignettes, patient behaviors associated with attachment styles (secure vs 3 insecure subtypes: avoidant, anxious, and fearful) were fixed and patient factors (age, race, occupation, and gender) were randomized. Analysis included repeated measures mixed-effects linear regression. RESULTS: Among the 208 respondents, the majority were male (65.4%) and White/Caucasian (84.5%) with an average age of 51.6 years (SD = 9.9). Most surgeons had been in practice for more than 10 years (66.8%) and treated adult patients (77.4%). Surgical specializations included breast (27.2%), HPB (35.0%), and broad-based/general (21.8%). Patient race, age, and gender did not impact surgeons' patient-centered approach to treatment decision-making (all ps > 0.05). However, when the "patient" had a white collar occupation and were securely attached, surgeons reported a greater likeliness to spend equal time presenting all treatment options (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively) and believe the patient wanted an active role in decision-making (p = 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). Surgeons reported being least likely to agree with a patient's treatment decision (p < 0.001) and an increased likelihood of being directive (p = 0.002) when patients exhibited behaviors associated with avoidant attachment. CONCLUSION: Attachment-related behaviors were associated with differences in surgeon approaches to patient-centered decision-making. Attachment styles may offer a framework for providers to understand patient behaviors and needs, thereby providing insight on how to tailor their approach and provide optimal patient-centered care.

The beliefs of cancer care providers regarding the role of religion and spirituality within the clinical encounter.

PURPOSE: To characterize cancer care provider perceptions of the role of religion and spirituality (R&S) within the clinical encounter. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered to healthcare professionals (defined as someone who is authorized to diagnose and/or treat physical or mental health disorders) currently employed at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center. Beliefs around the role of R&S within the clinical encounter were assessed using four adapted subscales/dimensions (D1-D4) from the Religion and Spirituality in Medicine: Physicians' Perspectives measure: God actively intervenes in patient health (D1), R&S is beneficial for patient mental health (D2), provider inquires about (D3) and discusses (D4) R&S in the clinical encounter. Logistic (D1) and linear (D2-D4) regression were performed using SAS v9.4 to determine the relationship between provider type and each subscale while controlling for gender, race, relationship status, education, and R&S identity. RESULTS: Among 340 participants, most participants were female (82.1%) or Caucasian (82.6%) and the median age was 35 years (IQR 31-48). Providers included physicians (17.9%), nurses (64.7%), and "other" (17.4%). Most participants identified as religious (57.5%), followed by spiritual (30.2%) and neither religious nor spiritual (12.3%). Nurses and other providers were more likely than physicians to believe that God intervenes in patient health (physician 41.7% vs. nurse 61.8% vs. other 60.3%; p = 0.02). All providers were equally as likely to believe that R&S is beneficial for patient mental health and to discuss R&S with patients within the clinical encounter (both p > 0.05). In contrast, nurses more frequently reported inquiring about R&S (median 1.7; IQR 0.9-2.0) compared with physicians (median 1.0; IQR 0.9-2.0) or other providers (median 1.4; IQR 1.0-2.1) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There were differences between providers in beliefs regarding the role of R&S in the clinical cancer encounter. Of note, nurses and other provider types were more likely than physicians to inquire about R&S with patients. Understanding variations in these beliefs will help determine how to best incorporate R&S support for patients during their cancer care.

County-Level Variation in Utilization of Surgical Resection for Early-Stage Hepatopancreatic Cancer Among Medicare Beneficiaries in the USA.

INTRODUCTION: Geographic variations in access to care exist in the USA. We sought to characterize county-level disparities relative to access to surgery among patients with early-stage hepatopancreatic (HP) cancer. METHODS: Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare Linked database from 2004 to 2015 to identify patients undergoing surgery for early-stage HP cancer . County-level information was acquired from the Area Health Resources Files (AHRF). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with utilization of HP surgery on the county level. RESULTS: Among 13,639 patients who met inclusion criteria, 66.9% (n = 9125) were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and 33.1% (n = 4514) of patients had liver cancer. Among patients diagnosed with early-stage liver and pancreas malignancy, two-thirds (n = 8878, 65%) underwent surgery. Marked county-level variation in the utilization of surgery was noted among patients with early-stage HP cancer ranging from 57.1% to more than 83.3% depending on which county a patient resided. After controlling for patient and tumor-related characteristics, counties with the highest quartile of patients living below the poverty level had 35% lower odds of receiving surgery for early stage HP cancer compared patients who lived in a county with the lowest proportion of patients below the poverty line (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.55-0.77). In addition, patients residing in counties with the highest surgeon-to-population ratio (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.52-2.65), as well as the highest hospital bed-to-population ratio (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.07-1.54), were more likely to undergo surgical treatment for an early-stage HP malignancy. CONCLUSION: Area-level variations among patients undergoing surgery for early-stage HP cancer were mainly due to differences in structural measures and county-level factors. Policies targeting high-poverty counties and improvement in structural measures may reduce variations in utilization of surgery among patients diagnosed with early-stage HP cancer.

The religious/spiritual beliefs and needs of cancer survivors who underwent cancer-directed surgery.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize patients' preferences for the role of religious and spiritual (R&S) beliefs and practices during cancer treatment and describe the R&S resources desired by patients during the perioperative period. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey was administered to individuals who underwent cancer-directed surgery. Data on demographics and R&S beliefs/preferences were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Among 236 participants, average age was 58.8 (SD = 12.10) years; the majority were female (76.2%), white (94.1%), had a significant other or spouse (60.2%), and were breast cancer survivors (43.6%). Overall, more than one-half (55.9%) of individuals identified themselves as being religious, while others identified as only spiritual (27.9%) or neither (16.2%). Patients who identified as religious wanted R&S integrated into their care more often than patients who were only spiritual or neither (p < 0.001). Nearly half of participants (49.6%) wanted R&S resources when admitted to the hospital including the opportunity to speak with an R&S leader (e.g., rabbi; 72.1%), R&S texts (64.0%), and journaling materials (54.1%). Irrespective of R&S identification, 68.0% of patients did not want their physician to engage with them about R&S topics. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Access to R&S resources is important during cancer treatment, and incorporating R&S into cancer care may be especially important to patients that identify as religious. R&S needs should be addressed as part of the cancer care plan.

Intrapersonal Factors Impact Advance Care Planning Among Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients infrequently engage in advance care planning processes. Establishing preferences for future medical treatment without advance care planning may not be patient-centered, as it fails to consider important factors that influence these important decisions. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of patient intrapersonal factors including race, religion, level of depression, and cancer stage on overall preferences for future medical treatment, including the presence of a (DNR), power of attorney, and advance directive. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review design was used. Patients were included who were diagnosed with cancer at The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center from 01/2015 to 08/2019. RESULTS: A total of 3,463 patients were included. Median age was 59 years (IQR: 49, 67) and the majority of the patients was female (88.7%). Compared with no religious preference, patients who identified as religious had 61% higher odds (95%CI: 1.08-2.40) of having a DNR and approximately 30% higher odds of having a power of attorney (95%CI: 1.08-1.62) or advance directive (95%CI: 1.02-1.64). Patients with clinically relevant depression had more than twice the odds of having a DNR versus patients with no/lower levels of clinical depression (OR: 2.08; 95%CI: 1.40-3.10). White patients had higher odds of having a power of attorney (OR: 1.57; 95%CI: 1.16-2.13) and an advance directive (OR: 3.10; 95% CI: 1.95-4.93) than African-American/Black patients. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding the factors that affect preferences for future medical treatment is necessary for medical professionals to provide proper care and support to patients diagnosed with cancer and their families.